Obstetrical trauma is one of the most common causes of traction injuries of the brachial plexus, with incidence varying between one and two per 1000 live births. This incidence remains stable despite improvement in obstetrical care because of increasing mean birth weight. The majority of the patients with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy recover spontaneously after conservative treatment, without any or with minor functional deficit. The rest of the children require microsurgical treatment, which recently, with the introduction of interposition nerve grafting and neurotization techniques, has significantly improved the prognosis of these patients. Outcomes of surgical treatment depend on the severity and localization of the brachial plexus lesion and also on the timing of surgery. The results of early microsurgical brachial plexus interventions are superior to late brachial plexus reconstructions or following secondary procedures dealing with established joint contractures and bone deformities. Root avulsion is the most severe type of obstetrical brachial plexus lesion, usually found following use of extreme force during a complicated delivery. Presence of an avulsion lesion implies devastating paralysis without possibility for spontaneous recovery, as well as associated spread of the traction force to neighboring spinal nerves or trunks. Therefore, clinical signs of root avulsion such as Horner sign and phrenic nerve palsy are considered strong indicators for brachial plexus exploration and reconstruction. However, the absence of these signs does not rule out root avulsion. Thus, poor spontaneous recovery necessitates accurate diagnostic between preganglionic and postganglionic lesions of the brachial plexus. Postganglionic lesions occur distally to the dorsal root ganglion at the level of the spinal nerve, trunks, or cords. Continuity usually can be restored with nerve repair or interposition nerve grafting. Preganglionic lesions occur proximal to the dorsal root ganglion, with irreversible loss of the original source of nerve fibers. Preganglionic lesions were once considered inoperable, but the use of neurotization procedures from other plexus donors or the use of extraplexus donor nerves has allowed the return of rewarding degree of function.1,2,3,4 Radiological studies such as cervical myelography, computed tomography myelography (CTM) and preoperative electrophysiological testing are commonly used in an effort to correctly pinpoint the brachial plexus lesion. However, there are some controversies regarding the place of all these methods in diagnostic of obstetrical brachial plexus lesions. Cervical myelography can indicate a sign that has a strong association with root avulsions; however, the signs can exist without root avulsion. Furthermore, large, contrast-enhancing pseudomeningoceles expanding along the cervical spine can overlap adjacent normal roots. The CTM allows more accurate assessment of the root and rootlets, but delineation of a level of avulsion on axial slides can be difficult because of discrepancy between the location of root exit zones from spinal cord segments and that of respective intervertebral foramina. The electrophysiology in obstetric brachial plexus lesions differs essentially from one in older patients. The electromyelography (EMG) in obstetric palsy is far too optimistic compared with the clinical picture.5 Others consider EMG unreliable and excluded it from their protocol for examination of the children with obstetrical brachial plexus paralysis, but some still use it with the condition that studies must be done by experienced electromyographer, and results must be interpreted expertly.6 This study was undertaken to determine the diagnostic value of plain myelography, CTM, and preoperative electrophysiology in patients with obstetrical brachial plexus paralysis. Data obtained from these studies will be correlated with intraoperative diagnosis on the basis of operative findings following exploration of these lesions, intraoperative electrostimulation, and histological studies of nerve biopsies.
Read full abstract