Pooled Risk Of Malignancy Research Articles

The Use of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.

To perform the first meta-analysis regarding the pooled risk of malignancy (ROM) of each category of the Yokohama system for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration, as well as assess the latter's diagnostic accuracy using this new system. Two databases were searched, followed by data extraction, study quality assessment, and statistical analysis. The "Insufficient," "Benign," "Atypical," "Suspicious," and "Malignant" Yokohama system categories were associated with a pooled ROM of 17% (95% CI, 10%-28%), 1% (95% CI, 1%-3%), 20% (95% CI, 17%-23%), 86% (95% CI, 79%-92%), and 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%), respectively. When both "Suspicious" and "Malignant" interpretations were regarded as cytologically positive, sensitivity (SN) was 91% (95% CI, 87.6%-93.5%) and false-positive rate (FPR) was 2.33% (95% CI, 1.30-4.14%). A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed and the pooled area under the curve was 97.3%, while the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 564 (95% CI, 264-1,206), indicating a high level of diagnostic accuracy. When only "Malignant" interpretations were regarded as cytologically positive, the pooled FPR was lower (0.75%; 95% CI, .39%-1.42%) but at the expense of SN (76.61%; 95% CI, 70.05%-82.10%). Despite Yokohama's system early success, more data would be needed to unravel the system's value in clinical practice.

Diagnostic performance of adult-based ATA and ACR-TIRADS ultrasound risk stratification systems in pediatric thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of adult-based "American College of Radiology- Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System" (ACR-TIRADS) and "American Thyroid Association" (ATA) in the pediatric population. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles investigating the diagnostic performance of each stratification system (ACR-TIRADS or ATA) and evaluated them according to three aspects: (a) the risk of malignancy in each category; (b) diagnostic performance using the classic indicators (sensitivity, specificity); and (c) diagnostic performance regarding fine needle aspiration/biopsy recommendation. In addition to pathologic diagnosis, we allowed imaging follow-up as the reference standard for benign nodules. Eight articles (1036 thyroid nodules) were included. For ACR-TIRADS, the pooled risk of malignancy in category was as follows: category 5 (59.3%); 4 (20.7%); 3 (11.0%); 2 (6.0%), and 1 (5.5%). For nodules of high suspicion of malignancy (category 4 or 5), the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 and 0.64. For ATA, the pooled risk of malignancy was as follows: category 5 (55.4%); 4 (34.2%); 3 (12.2%); and 2 (7.5%). For nodules of high suspicion of malignancy (category 4 or 5), the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 and 0.50. For category 5 nodules, the pooled specificity was significantly higher in ACR-TIRADS (p = 0.02). For ACR-TIRADS, the missed malignancy rate was 21.7% and the unnecessary biopsy rate was 62.7%. Information was not sufficient for this calculation with ATA. The diagnostic performance of ACR-TIRADS and ATA in the pediatric population was somewhat modest. Large studies are mandatory for further validation and future amendments. • The pooled sensitivity and specificity for highly suspicious nodules (category 4 or 5) for ACR-TIRADS were 0.84 and 0.64, and for ATA were 0.90 and 0.50, respectively. • When applying ACR-TIRADS for children, the pooled missed malignancy rate (21.7%) and unnecessary biopsy rates (62.7%) are still reasonably high. Insufficient information was available to perform these calculations for the ATA system. • Current risk stratification systems, especially ACR-TIRADS, require modification by focusing more on increasing the sensitivity and decreasing the missed malignancy rate. Lowering size cut-off for biopsy would be a reasonable option.

Incidental uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the prostate gland. Systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and risk of malignancy.

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data on the prevalence and risk of malignancy of prostatic incidental uptake (PIU) detected by fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT). A comprehensive literature search of studies published up to February 2014 was performed. Pooled prevalence and malignancy risk of PIU were calculated on a per patient-based analysis including 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Furthermore, we assessed some parameters as potential predictors of malignant PIU. Six studies including 47925 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT were selected. Pooled prevalence of PIU was 1.8% (95%CI: 1.3-2.3%). Overall, 444 patients with PIU were further evaluated and 121 underwent biopsy. The pooled risk of malignancy in patients with PIU further evaluated or verified by biopsy were 17% (95%CI: 12-23%) and 62% (95%CI: 54-71%), respectively. A higher mean age was observed in the group of malignant PIUs compared to benign PIUs. There was a trend towards a higher mean SUV(max) in the group of malignant PIUs but without a statistically significant difference compared to benign PIUs. Peripheric site of PIU but not presence or absence of calcification was a predictor of malignancy. PIU is observed in about 1.8% of 18F-FDG PET/CT scans performed in male patients carrying a significant risk of malignancy. Therefore, whenever a PIU is detected further investigation is warranted to exclude malignancy, in particular when PIU is located in the peripheric site of prostate gland.