ABSTRACT Care practices are imbued with affect. Predominantly, affect is understood as something intrinsic—such as psychological dispositions, and subjective feelings, among others—that are personally experienced by the individuals involved in a caring circle. While this interpretation is true, affect also functions as an influential driving factor that shapes the social, political, and cultural realities of care experiences. The present article examines affective economies of fear, hate, and gendered care labour within the long-term care system. Using theoretical insights from Sara Ahmed, Amelia DeFalco, and Andrea Kantrowitz, among others, the article explains how these affective economies shape the experiential realities of the stakeholders. Through a close reading of Susan MacLeod’s Dying for Attention, the article highlights systemic flaws that foster fear, societal disdain for ageing, and exploitative labour. It calls for a revaluation of existing long-term care practices by examining the gendered dimensions of caregiving and challenging the perception of care as women’s moral duty. Further, the article also investigates how care is commodified within the institutional setting, thus underscoring the (neoliberal) complexities involved in the provision of care.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
6956 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Political Realities
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
7065 Search results
Sort by Recency