Platinum-based Chemotherapy In Patients Research Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Cetuximab Versus Innovator Cetuximab in Indian Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is the sixth most common cancer, with approximately 225,419 new cases with over 125,000 deaths annually in India. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of biosimilar cetuximab versus innovator cetuximab (IC) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent locoregional or metastatic SCCHN. This phase III trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind and parallel group study performed in Indian patients with recurrent locoregional or metastatic SCCHN. Patients were randomly assigned in 2:1 ratio to receive biosimilar cetuximab and IC in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil via intravenous infusions. The primary end points were disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate (ORR) as per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1. The secondary end points included pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability. Of 180 patients enrolled, 120 patients received biosimilar cetuximab and 60 patients received IC treatment. No significant statistical difference was observed in the primary outcomes between two groups. Treatment difference in DCR and ORR response was found to be -5.21 (90% CI, -8.94 to -1.48) and -4.79 (90% CI, -19.42 to 9.84), respectively, indicating noninferiority to reference product. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs; biosimilar cetuximab: 89.2% v IC: 91.7%; P = .8364) and serious AEs (biosimilar cetuximab: 23.3% v IC: 13.3%; P = .0603) and PK parameters were comparable between treatment groups. The immunogenicity findings showed higher incidence of anticetuximab antibodies in the biosimilar cetuximab group compared with the IC group at the end of Study. The findings of this study demonstrated noninferiority along with comparable PK, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilar cetuximab and IC in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN.

TROPION-Lung07: Phase III study of Dato-DXd+pembrolizumab±platinum-based chemotherapy as 1L therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

For patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations and low (<50%) PD-L1 expression, pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy is a preferred first-line treatment. These patients have comparatively worse outcomes than those with higher PD-L1 expression, underscoring the need for new combination strategies. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), a TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity and safety in this patient population. We describe the rationale and design of TROPION-Lung07, a randomized, open-label Phase III study assessing Dato-DXd in combination with pembrolizumab with/without platinum-based chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations and <50% PD-L1 expression. Primary study objectives are progression-free survival and overall survival.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05555732 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Improved Event-Free Survival After Complete or Major Pathologic Response in Patients With Resectable NSCLC Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Regardless of Adjuvant Treatment: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

IntroductionNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has reshaped the treatment landscape for resectable NSCLC, yet the prognostic significance of pathologic response remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR) on event-free survival (EFS) and assessed the influence of adjuvant immunotherapy. MethodsWe performed an IPD meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials on neoadjuvant or perioperative anti–programmed death-ligand 1 in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. The IPD was extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves for pCR and/or MPR from the included studies. Survival outcomes were compared between patients achieving pCR or MPR and those who did not, considering both intention-to-treat and resected populations. ResultsAchieving pCR or MPR was associated with improved EFS in the intention-to-treat population (pCR, hazard ratio = 0.13; MPR, hazard ratio = 0.18, respectively) with a 24 months EFS rate of 94% and 88% for patients who achieved pCR and MPR, respectively. Independently from pCR status, patients who were treated in an experimental arm that included adjuvant immunotherapy had similar EFS. ConclusionsOur study reported a strong EFS improvement in patients who achieved either pCR or MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The use of adjuvant immunotherapy after tumor resection was not associated with improved EFS.

Olaparib as maintenance therapy in non resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma associated with homologous recombination deficiency profile: A French retrospective multicentric AGEO real-world study

BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis. The POLO trial showed that olaparib (PARP inhibitor) improved progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS), when used as maintenance therapy after ≥ 16 weeks of disease control with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with germline (g) BRCA 1 or 2 pathogenic variants (PV) metastatic PDAC. However, real-world data on the effectiveness of olaparib are missing. MethodsPatients with unresectable PDAC associated with somatic (s) or (g)BRCA1/2 and (g)non-BRCA-HRD PV (i.e. other homologous recombination deficiency/HRD genes) who were treated with olaparib between 2020–2023 were included. The primary objective was to describe treatment patterns. Secondary exploratory objectives included OS and PFS in patients treated with olaparib according to the POLO trial or not, OS and PFS in patients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC versus (s)PVs, olaparib safety profile and factors associated with olaparib poor outcomes. ResultsAmong 85 patients, 45.9 % received olaparib as defined by the POLO trial. No difference in OS and PFS was observed between patients who received olaparib according to the POLO trial versus not. Patients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC had better OS compared to others (22.3 versus 10.5 months, p = 0.038). Factors associated with olaparib poor outcomes included a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the use of olaparib outside the recommendations of the POLO trial. Few grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported (9.4 %). ConclusionPatients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC had longer OS than those with (s)HRD PV. Olaparib use beyond the scope of the POLO trial was associated with poor outcomes.

Polymorphic Variants of the UGT1A1, MTHFR, GSTP, and ITPA Genes and Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Bladder Cancer

Polymorphic Variants of the UGT1A1, MTHFR, GSTP, and ITPA Genes and Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Bladder Cancer

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Resistance to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Ovarian Cancer through Proteomic Analysis.

Platinum resistance in ovarian cancer poses a significant challenge, substantially impacting patient outcomes. Developing an accurate predictive model is crucial for improving clinical decision-making and guiding treatment strategies. Proteomic data from 217 high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) biospecimens obtained from JHU, PNNL, and PTRC were used to construct a prediction model for identifying individuals who are resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. A total of 6437 common proteins were detected across all data sets, with 26 proteins overlapping between the development cohorts JHU and PNNL. Using LASSO and logistic regression analysis, a six-protein model (P31323_PRKAR2B, Q13309_SKP2, Q14997_PSME4, Q6ZRP7_QSOX2, Q7LGA3_HS2ST1, and Q7Z2Z2_EFL1) was developed, which accurately predicted platinum resistance, with an AUC of 0.964 (95% CI, 0.929-0.999). Internal validation by resampling resulted in a C-index of 0.972 (95% CI 0.894-0.988). External validation performed on the PTRC cohort achieved an AUC of 0.855 (95% CI 0.748-0.963). Calibration curves showed good consistency, and DCA indicated superior clinical utility. The model also performed well in predicting PFS and OS at various time points. Based on these proteins, our predictive model can precisely predict platinum response and survival outcomes in HGSOC patients, which can assist clinicians in promptly identifying potentially platinum-resistant individuals.

1789P Second OS interim analysis from BEAT-SC: A randomized phase III study of bevacizumab (bev) or placebo in combination with atezolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

1789P Second OS interim analysis from BEAT-SC: A randomized phase III study of bevacizumab (bev) or placebo in combination with atezolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a randomized, phase 3 trial of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P) versus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC).

108 Background: EV+P nearly doubled median progression-free survival and overall survival vs PBC in patients (pts) with previously untreated la/mUC in the phase 3 EV-302 trial. PROs are reported here. Methods: In EV-302 (NCT04223856) pts were randomized 1:1 to EV+P or PBC (gemcitabine with cisplatin or carboplatin). PRO assessments included the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) completed at baseline, weekly for 12 weeks (wks), then every 3 wks through survival follow-up, inclusive of the time post-progression. Time to pain progression (TTPP) and mean change from baseline in worst pain at wk 26 using the BPI-SF were prespecified analyses statistically tested using a gatekeeping strategy. Mean change from baseline through wk 26 and time to confirmed deterioration (TTCD) of EORTC-QLQ-C30 and BPI-SF domains were prespecified descriptive analyses. TTPP and TTCD were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Of 886 pts randomized, 731 (376 received EV+P; 355 PBC) completed baseline PRO questionnaires. Compliance rates differed between arms and remained &gt;70% through wk 29 for EV+P and through only wk 17 for PBC. Median TTPP was 14.2 months (mos) with EV+P and 10.0 mos with PBC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.92; 95% CI=0.72, 1.17; 2-sided p-value=0.48). The least squares (LS) mean reduction in worst pain at wk 26 was numerically greater with EV+P vs PBC (-0.61 vs -0.03, LS mean difference [95% CI]: -0.58 [-1.05, -0.11] [nominal 2-sided P = 0.015]). Pts with moderate to severe pain at baseline who were treated with EV+P (n=128, 34%) had a meaningful (&gt;2 pt) improvement from baseline in BPI worst pain from wk 3 through 26. In EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life [GHS/QoL], EV+P demonstrated a transient worsening at week 3 (-6.3) that returned to baseline from weeks 4 through 26, while patients treated with PBC demonstrated deterioration from week 1 through week 17 (range -1.2 to -7.1) where scores returned to baseline. TTCD for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL was 5.9 mos with EV+P vs 3.2 mos with PBC (HR = 0.98 [95% CI]: 0.79 – 1.2). Conclusions: Pts treated with EV+P have improved survival compared with PBC without detriment to quality of life and functioning, further supporting the value of EV+P for pts with la/mUC. Compliance, especially after progression, was lower than expected (particularly in the PBC arm) and may have impacted the results. Clinical trial information: NCT04223856 .

A Predictive Model for Initial Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Efficacy in Patients with Postoperative Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using Tissue-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is an often-fatal malignancy marked by the development of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Thus, accurate prediction of platinum drug efficacy is crucial for strategically selecting postoperative interventions to mitigate the risks associated with suboptimal therapeutic outcomes and adverse effects. Tissue-derived extracellular vesicles (tsEVs), in contrast to their plasma counterparts, have emerged as a powerful tool for examining distinctive attributes of EOC tissues. In this study, 4D data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomic sequencing was performed on tsEVs obtained from 58 platinum-sensitive and 30 platinum-resistant patients with EOC. The analysis revealed a notable enrichment of differentially expressed proteins that were predominantly associated with immune-related pathways. Moreover, pivotal immune-related proteins (IRPs) were identified by LASSO regression. These factors, combined with clinical parameters selected through univariate logistic regression, were used for the construction of a model employing multivariate logistic regression. This model integrated three tsEV IRPs, CCR1, IGHV_35 and CD72, with one clinical parameter, the presence of postoperative residual lesions. Thus, this model could predict the efficacy of initial platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with EOC post-surgery, providing prognostic insights even before the initiation of chemotherapy.

Molecularly guided therapy versus chemotherapy after disease control in unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUPISCO): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study

Patients with unfavourable subset cancer of unknown primary (CUP) have a poor prognosis when treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy. Whether first-line treatment guided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can improve outcomes is unknown. The CUPISCO trial was designed to inform a molecularly guided treatment strategy to improve outcomes over standard platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, unfavourable, non-squamous CUP. The aim of the trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of molecularly guided therapy (MGT) versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy in these patients. This was to determine whether the inclusion of CGP in the initial diagnostic work-up leads to improved outcomes over the current standard of care. We herein report the primary analysis. CUPISCO was a phase 2, prospective, randomised, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre trial done at 159 sites in 34 countries outside the USA. Patients with central eligibility review-confirmed disease (acceptable histologies included adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, evaluated by CGP, who reached disease control after three cycles of standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 3:1 via a block-stratified randomisation procedure to MGT versus chemotherapy continuation for at least three further cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03498521, and follow-up is ongoing. From July 10, 2018, to Dec 9, 2022, 636 (42%) of 1505 screened patients were enrolled. Median follow-up in the treatment period was 24·1 months (IQR 11·6-35·6). Of 438 patients who reached disease control after induction chemotherapy, 436 were randomly assigned: 326 (75%) to the MGT group and 110 (25%) to the chemotherapy group. Median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 6·1 months (95% CI 4·7-6·5) in the MGT group versus 4·4 months (4·1-5·6) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·56-0·92]; p=0·0079). Related adverse event rates per 100-patient-years at risk were generally similar or lower with MGT versus chemotherapy. In patients with previously untreated, unfavourable, non-squamous CUP who reached disease control after induction chemotherapy, CGP with subsequent MGTs resulted in longer progression-free survival than standard platinum-based chemotherapy. On the basis of these results, we recommend that CGP is performed at initial diagnosis in patients with unfavourable CUP. F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Effects of PARP Inhibitors on Subsequent Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

The clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer have been significantly improved by Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP-is). However, the best therapeutic strategy for recurrence during PARP-i maintenance therapy remains unknown. Herein, we elucidated the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy after PARP-i treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer. Eligible patients had experienced relapses during PARP-i maintenance therapy lasting at least 6 months and had received subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy at our institution between January 2019 and March 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and risk factors for PFS were evaluated. Sixty-six patients were assessed for eligibility and eighteen were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 14.5 months. The PFS and OS of all patients were 6.5 and 17.6 months, respectively. The evaluation of the risk factors for PFS revealed that age, pathological type, duration of PARP-i maintenance therapy, prior lines of chemotherapy, and PARP-i dose reduction were not significant prognostic markers. However, bevacizumab use in subsequent therapies significantly extended the PFS. The median PFS was 3.1 months in the chemotherapy-alone group and 8.9 months in the chemotherapy with bevacizumab group (log-rank p = 0.022). Platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab in subsequent therapies would provide substantial benefits in the PFS of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Difference of oncological efficacy between two immune checkpoint inhibitors following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with unresectable, metastatic, advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter real-world Japanese cohort.

Maintenance avelumab is currently recommended for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic (mUC) achieving at least stable disease (SD) on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1L-CT). Pembrolizumab is an alternative therapeutic avenue for this patient cohort in clinical practice. We investigated real-world data, focusing on the correlation between response to 1L-CT and oncological efficacy of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with avelumab or pembrolizumab. A multicenter database registered 626 patients with mUC diagnosed from 2008-2023; among these, 175 receiving 2-6 cycles of 1L-CT followed by ICI therapy. Patients were categorized based on response to 1L-CT using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1). Objective response rateonICI, progression to ICI-free survival (ICI-PFS), and overall survival from start of 1L-CT were compared between avelumab-treated and pembrolizumab-treated patients in each response subgroup. ICI-PFS was significantly longer in patients achieving partial response on 1L-CT and subsequently receiving pembrolizumab compared to those receiving avelumab. Notably, patients achieving SD on 1L-CT and subsequently receiving pembrolizumab manifested significantly higher objective response rate (14% and 41%, respectively) and prolonged ICI-PFS relative to those receiving avelumab. In contrast, overall survival did not delineate difference between patients treated with avelumab versus pembrolizumab. Similar findings were discerned in the subanalysis of patients having favorable SD (tumor shrinkage, from -29 to 0%) and unfavorable SD (tumor enlargement, from + 1 to + 19%) on 1L-CT. Our study provides real-world evidence regarding difference of oncological efficacy between maintenanceavelumab and subsequentpembrolizumab in patients with mUC who achieved partial response or SD on 1L-CT.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and platinum‑based chemotherapy as neoadjuvant regimen for stage‑IIIA non‑squamous non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

Bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy provides modest benefits in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while its application as a neoadjuvant regimen has yet to be validated. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC. Data from 110 patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC with negative driver genes, who received neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (n=50) or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy alone (n=60), and tumor resection, were retrospectively reviewed in the current study. In addition, the data on pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were obtained. The results demonstrated that neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy did not significantly increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (18.0 vs. 8.3%; P=0.130). However, neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly increased the rates of DFS (P=0.007) and OS (P=0.049) compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Adjustments were then performed using multivariate logistic or Cox regression analyses, which demonstrated that neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone only significantly independently prolonged DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.251; P=0.042], but did not significantly affect pCR (odds ratio=2.897; P=0.117) or OS (HR=0.297; P=0.158). Furthermore, no significant differences were demonstrated between the number of adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in comparison with those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (all P>0.05). In conclusion, neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was only associated with a significant improvement in the rate of DFS, but showed limited efficacy in improving pCR and OS rates in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC. Therefore, a larger sample size and randomized controlled studies are needed for further validation of the findings of the present study.

Multimodal fully automated predictive model for therapeutic efficacy of first-line cancer immunotherapy based on clinical information and imaging modalities including brain MRI and chest CT images in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

1555 Background: The integration of imaging and clinical data through artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise for more accurately predicting the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± platinum-based chemotherapy in individual patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, tumor segmentation still relies entirely on radiologist evaluation and has not yet achieved fully automated tumor evaluation for image analysis. Furthermore, while central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is a critical prognostic factor in patients with advanced NSCLC, radiomics has primarily focused on chest imaging, with few studies incorporating brain MRI analysis. Methods: This study included patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI ± platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy from March 2017 to August 2023. We developed an ensemble model combining a logistic regression model that analyzes clinical information with a deep learning model that extracts image features. Each sub-model was independent, allowing for individual adjustments and the ability to be attached or detached. Both models were trained to predict response, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS), and 12-month overall survival (OS) using cross-entropy loss. The dataset was randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets in a 5:3:2 ratio. This random assignment was repeated four times, and the average area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The test sets were further classified into high- and low-risk groups based on the predicted results, and log-rank tests were performed on their survival curves. Results: The study included 232 patients, with 89 (38%) receiving ICI alone and 143 (62%) receiving ICI + platinum-based chemotherapy. In the entire population, the overall response rate (ORR) for ICI ± platinum-based chemotherapy was 49.5%, with a median PFS of 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8-9.1) and a median OS of 24.5 months (95% CI: 21.2-30.3). The model achieved an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65- 0.76) for predicting response, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.59-0.71) for 12-month PFS, and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.48-0.90) for 12-month OS. Test sets were classified into high-risk (N = 55) and low-risk (N = 60) groups. The median PFS was 6.8 months in the high-risk group and 14.7 months in the low-risk group (p &lt; 0.05). The median OS was 21.5 months in the high-risk group and 34.3 months in the low-risk group (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: We have demonstrated that a multimodal, fully automated ensemble model has significant predictive accuracy for the efficacy and survival outcomes of ICI ± platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

BEAT-SC: A randomized phase III study of bevacizumab or placebo in combination with atezolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

8001 Background: Atezolizumab combined with carboplatin and etoposide is approved as first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC, based on results from the Phase I/III IMpower133 trial (NCT02763579). The VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab (bev) is approved for the treatment of many tumor types and has synergistic effects when combined with atezolizumab, as demonstrated by the Phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) in non-small cell lung cancer. BEAT-SC (jRCT2080224946) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of bev combined with atezolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC from Japan and China. Here, we report the primary analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) and the first interim analysis for overall survival (OS) from BEAT-SC. Methods: Eligible patients had measurable ES-SCLC, were aged ≥20 y (≥18 y for patients from China), had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and had no prior systemic treatment for ES-SCLC. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 cycles (21 days/cycle) of induction therapy with bev combined with atezolizumab + cisplatin or carboplatin + etoposide (ACE) or placebo combined with ACE, followed by maintenance therapy with bev + atezolizumab or placebo + atezolizumab, respectively. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS (INV-PFS). Key secondary endpoints included OS and safety. Results: The ITT population comprised 333 patients with a median age of 65.0 y; 82.6% of the patients were male, 57.7% were from China, 91.8% received carboplatin and 87.6% were current or former smokers. At data cutoff (June 30, 2023; median follow-up, 10.2 mo), median INV-PFS was 5.7 mo for bev + ACE vs 4.4 mo for placebo + ACE (HR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.90; P=0.0060; 2-sided α boundary=0.05). Median OS was 13.0 mo for bev + ACE vs 16.6 mo for placebo + ACE (HR, 1.22; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.67; P=0.2212; 2-sided α boundary=0.0079). Among the safety analysis population (n=330), bev + ACE was well-tolerated and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were generally similar between treatment arms (Table). Conclusions: BEAT-SC met its primary endpoint, demonstrating that the addition of bev to ACE significantly increased PFS vs placebo + ACE. OS data were immature at the first interim OS analysis, and the numerical OS improvement of bev + ACE was not shown vs placebo + ACE; OS follow-up will continue. No new safety signals were observed. Clinical trial information: jRCT2080224946 . [Table: see text]

ICARUS-LUNG01: A phase 2 study of datopotomab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with sequential tissue biopsies and biomarkers analysis to predict treatment outcome.

8501 Background: Few treatments with limited benefit are currently available after failure of targeted therapies, immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Dato-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a TROP-2-directed monoclonal antibody linked to a topoisomerase I inhibitor via a peptide cleavable linker. In the phase 3 TROPION-Lung01 study, Dato-DXd demonstrated a statistically significant improvement of PFS over docetaxel in previously treated pts with advanced NSCLC. Here we report the results of ICARUS-Lung01 (NCT04940325), a multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 study evaluating activity, safety, and biomarkers of response/resistance to Dato-DXd in pretreated pts with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Intravenous Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg was given every 21 days to pts with advanced NSCLC, ECOG 0/1, who progressed on 1-3 lines of therapy (including actionable genomic alteration (AGA)-specific therapy if indicated). All pts underwent fresh tumor tissue biopsies at baseline, on-treatment (week 3 or 6) and end of treatment. Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). A set of translational analyses was performed to determine biomarkers associated with response/resistance, including TROP2 tumor membrane expression, TROP2-dynamics and spatial distribution (by AI-digital pathology), genomics, transcriptomic, spatial proteomics (by imaging mass cytometry) and CTCs. Results: A total of 100 pts received ≥1 dose: median age 60 years (26-83); 62% males, 89% smokers, 82% non-squamous (NSQ) histology, 23% AGA, median number of prior therapy lines 2 (1-5). At data cut-off (Dec 04, 2023), 92% discontinued therapy, 92 % had disease event, 67% died. Median treatment duration was 2.8 months (mos) (95%CI, 2.1-4.8), median follow-up 19.4 mos (95%CI, 18.2-20.4). Efficacy and safety results are shown in the table. Conclusions: In this heavily pretreated population, Dato-DXd showed similar efficacy and safety results to those reported in TROPION-Lung01. Patients with NSQ appeared to derive the greatest benefit. Translational analyses to determine biomarkers associated with response and/or resistance will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04940325 . [Table: see text]

First-line sintilimab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A phase II study and post-hoc biomarker analysis.

e20127 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy improves prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, nearly 40% of patients do not benefit from Immunochemotherapy. Herein, this phase II study of first-line immunochemotherapy was conducted aiming to investigate potential biomarkers associated with therapeutic efficacy. Methods: A multi-center, single-arm, prospective phase II trial (ChiCTR2000038354) was designed and conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC who had not previously received treatment. The primary endpoint of this study is progression-free survival (PFS), with patients being defined as disease progression according to RECIST 1.1. Pre-treatment FFPE samples were analyzed using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) to investigate biomarkers. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in the study, with a median follow-up of 10 months and a median PFS of 7.57 months. 8 patients with a PFS greater than 6 months were defined as the responder group (R group) and 5 patients with a PFS less than 6 months belonged to the non-responder group (NR group). WES and WTS were performed on the pre-treatment samples of these 13 patients. WES results revealed mutation frequencies of TP53 (69%), RB1 (31%) and FAT1 (31%) aligning with prior research. Significantly, ZFHX4 mutations correlated with R group (p = 0.05). Genomic instability, as defined by Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) scores, displayed higher scores in NR group than in R group (p = 0.023), which suggests potential benefits of PARP inhibition in the NR group. WTS data revealed that higher M2/M1 macrophage ratio (p = 0.028) in NR group. Additionally, the NR group demonstrated significant VEGFA overexpression. Besides, NOTCH-signaling (p = 0.034), KRAS-signaling-DN (p&lt;0.001), Angiogenesis (p&lt;0.001) and EMT (p&lt;0.001) pathway were also enriched in NR group. Conversely, M1 macrophages (p = 0.079), CD4+T cells (p = 0.093), Mast cells (p = 0.045), NK cells (p = 0.045) and neutrophils (p = 0.06) was higher in R group. Conclusions: This study highlights genomic instability as well as activation of cancer hallmarks such as angiogenesis, EMT may result the resistance to immunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients. These findings may shed light on combinational strategy overcoming therapeutic resistance. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000038354.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a randomized, phase 3 trial of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P) versus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC).

4502 Background: EV+P nearly doubled median progression-free survival and overall survival vs PBC in patients (pts) with previously untreated la/mUC in the phase 3 EV-302 trial. PROs are reported here. Methods: In EV-302 (NCT04223856) pts were randomized 1:1 to EV+P or PBC (gemcitabine with cisplatin or carboplatin). PRO assessments included the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) completed at baseline, weekly for 12 weeks (wks), then every 3 wks through survival follow-up, inclusive of the time post-progression. Time to pain progression (TTPP) and mean change from baseline in worst pain at wk 26 using the BPI-SF were prespecified analyses statistically tested using a gatekeeping strategy. Mean change from baseline through wk 26 and time to confirmed deterioration (TTCD) of EORTC-QLQ-C30 and BPI-SF domains were prespecified descriptive analyses. TTPP and TTCD were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Of 886 pts randomized, 731 (376 received EV+P; 355 PBC) completed baseline PRO questionnaires. Compliance rates differed between arms and remained &gt;70% through wk 29 for EV+P and through only wk 17 for PBC. Median TTPP was 14.2 months (mos) with EV+P and 10.0 mos with PBC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.92; 95% CI=0.72, 1.17; 2-sided p-value=0.48). The least squares (LS) mean reduction in worst pain at wk 26 was numerically greater with EV+P vs PBC (-0.61 vs -0.03, LS mean difference [95% CI]: -0.58 [-1.05, -0.11] [nominal 2-sided p-value=0.015]). Pts with moderate to severe pain at baseline who were treated with EV+P (n=128, 34%) had a meaningful (&gt;2 pt) improvement from baseline in BPI worst pain from wk 3 through 26. In EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life [GHS/QoL], EV+P demonstrated a transient worsening at wk 3 (-6.3) that returned to baseline from wks 4 through 26, while patients treated with PBC demonstrated deterioration from wk 1 through wk 17 (range -1.2 to -7.1) when scores returned to baseline. TTCD for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL was 5.9 mos with EV+P vs 3.2 mos with PBC (HR = 0.98 [95% CI]: 0.79 – 1.2). Conclusions: Pts treated with EV+P have improved survival compared with PBC without detriment to quality of life and functioning, further supporting the value of EV+P for pts with la/mUC. Compliance, especially after progression, was lower than expected (particularly in the PBC arm) and may have impacted the results. Clinical trial information: NCT04223856 .

Non-metastatic primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a reference cancer center's experience of a heterogenous entity.

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast (Br-NENs) are rare. The classification has been updated in recent years making interpretation of the data published challenging. It is unclear whether neuroendocrine differentiation is associated with poorer prognosis and what treatment approaches should be applied. The database for breast cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2022 at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Branch Krakow was explored to search for Br-NENs. Patients' medical and pathological data were collected and analyzed. We included 22 females with Br-NEN without metastases at the time of diagnosis. The median age was 64 years (range: 28-88), Of the cases, 18 were hormone receptor positive, all were HER-2 negative, the median Ki67 was 27% (10-100%). The median tumor size at the time of diagnosis was 29.5mm (7-75mm), 9 patients were N-positive. DCIS was present in 5 cases. Only one case was negative for chromogranin and synaptophysin staining, but data were missing for 4 cases. Nine patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly based on anthracyclines and taxanes, while 16 received adjuvant hormonal therapy and 15 received postoperative radiotherapy. Radical surgery was performed in all patients, but two underwent suboptimal tumorectomy. One patient had local recurrence, three experienced metastatic disease, all involving the lungs, but these patients are still alive. The median follow-up was 96 months (8-153). Two patients died, with a follow up time of no recurrence >4 years. Our results were compared to twelve case series collecting clinical data on Br-NENs, with median patient number of 10.5 (range: 3-142). Br-NENs represent a heterogenous group of diseases, lacking data from prospective studies or clinical trials. There are no established treatment standards tailored for Br-NENs. Our patients' cohort exhibited a favorable prognosis, potentially attributed to lower tumor stage and Ki67 index compared to other reported case series. We suggest that radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy be administered akin to standard treatment for breast cancer of no special type. ESMO also advocates for this approach in systemic treatment, although we recommend considering platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with poorly differentiated Br-NENs exhibiting high Ki67.

Comparison of SP263 and 22C3 pharmDx assays to test programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Atezolizumab, one of the immune checkpoint inhibitors, has been approved as an adjuvant treatment following resection and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with 1% or more programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved SP263 as a companion diagnostic assay for adjuvant treatment with atezolizumab; however, in clinical practice, the 22C3 assay is most commonly used for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, our study aimed to compare two PD-L1 assays, SP263 and 22C3, to evaluate whether 22C3 could replace SP263 when deciding whether to administer adjuvant atezolizumab. We retrospectively and prospectively analyzed 98 patients who underwent surgical resection at Kanagawa Cancer Center (Japan). An immunohistochemistry assay was performed for all the cases with both SP263 and 22C3. We statistically analyzed the concordance of PD-L1 expression between SP263 and 22C3 assays. The concordance between the two assays using Cohen's kappa was κ = 0.670 (95% CI: 0.522-0.818) at the 1% cutoff and κ = 0.796 (95% CI: 0.639-0.954) at the 50% cutoff. The Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.874 (p < 0.01) indicated high concordance. PD-L1 expression with 22C3 resulted slightly higher than that with SP263. This study showed a high concordance of PD-L1 expression with the SP263 and 22C3 assays. Further studies examining the therapeutic effects of adjuvant atezolizumab are required.