e14574 Background: The aims of screening for anal cancer are to prevent invasive anal cancer and/or to detect it at an early and hence more curable stage. We sought to evaluate differences in clinicopathological features and outcomes of HIV associated anal cancer between patients who were enrolled on a programme of high resolution anoscopy (HRA) surveillance and those who were not. Methods: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with anal cancer was undertaken based on our HIV cancer registry. Results: Since 1989, 74 patients (73 male) have been diagnosed and treated for HIV-associated invasive anal cancer, including 7 patients who had been enrolled onto an HRA screening programme. The surveillance patients had undergone a total of 26 examinations starting a median of 3.8 years (range: 0.3-8.7) prior to cancer diagnosis. At anal cancer diagnosis, the screened patients were older (median age: 50 years, range: 45-61 vs 44, range: 28-75, p=0.04), had higher CD4 cell counts (median CD4: 575 /mm3, range: 390-842 vs 321, range: 16-1250, p=0.02), more had undetectable plasma HIV viral loads (100% vs 56%, p=0.04) and more were on HAART (100% vs 70% p=0.09). However, there were no differences in cancer stage (p=0.64), local tumour (T) stage (p=0.4), lymph node status (N) stage (p=0.47) or metastatic (M) disease (p=0.51). Similarly, there was no difference in tumour grade between screen and unscreened patients (p=0.19). Finally, there is no difference in the actuarial overall survival between the two groups (Log rank p=0.63). Conclusions: Despite enrolment onto an HRA screening programme and better immunological status at diagnosis, tumours detected in screened patients were neither earlier stage nor better differentiated and there was no improvement in survival. These findings in a relatively small number of patients may cast doubt on the validity of screening by HRA for anal cancer.
Read full abstract