Pituitary Cyclic AMP Response Research Articles

ACTH, prolactin, corticosterone and pituitary cyclic AMP responses to repeated stress

The present experiment was conducted to determine whether the plasma hormonal and pituitary cyclic AMP responses observed following a single exposure to an acute stressor would diminish following reexposures to the same stressor. Fifteen-min stress exposures (forced running) were separated by 45-min recovery periods. Separate groups of control and stressed animals were sacrificed before and after each of four 15-min stress periods and after each recovery period. The first exposure to 15 min of forced running raised plasma ACTH, corticosterone and pituitary cyclic AMP levels approximately 6-fold and more than tripled levels of plasma prolactin. Plasma ACTH and pituitary cyclic AMP responses to the second, third and fourth stress exposures were very similar to the responses to the first stress exposure, and levels of these substances returned to prestress levels during each 45-min recovery period. Plasma prolactin responses to the four stress sessions were somewhat variable but no significant trend among the responses was seen. Plasma prolactin levels also returned to prestress levels between stress exposures. Corticosterone levels were similar following each of the four stress sessions but levels remained elevated compared to prestress levels between stress exposures. These data suggest that pituitary responses to acute stress are rapid, that return to prestress levels is also rapid, with the exception of corticosterone, and that repeated responses of the same magnitude may be evoked when stressors are separated by short recovery periods.

Dexamethasone suppresses ACTH release without attenuating pituitary cyclic AMP response to stress in vivo

Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid, has been shown to decrease basal and stress-elevated levels of the pituitary hormone ACTH. Glucocorticoids are known to bind to multiple sites within the brain and pituitary and it is not known which site(s) is most important in mediating the observed inhibition of ACTH release. At the level of the corticotroph, there is contradictory data from in vitro studies regarding whether dexamethasone acts proximal or distal to the formation of the cyclic AMP second messenger that has been shown to be involved in CRF-stimulated ACTH release. In the present report, we have examined the effects of dexamethasone pretreatment on stress-induced elevations in pituitary cyclic AMP and the release of ACTH in vivo . Acute stress (15 min of intermittent footshock) elevated levels of pituitary cyclic AMP and plasma ACTH consistent with previous studies. Dexamethasone administration (0.4mg/kg 24 hr prior to sacrifice plus 0.2mg/kg 2 hr prior to sacrifice) inhibited stress-induced elevations in plasma ACTH but did not affect pituitary cyclic AMP response to acute stress. These findings suggest that dexamethasone inhibits the release of ACTH via an action distal to the generation of cyclic AMP.

Atropine sulfate increases pituitary responses to stress

The effects of atropine sulfate pretreatment on pituitary indices of stress response were examined. Pituitary cyclic AMP and plasma prolactin increases following 15 min of acute stress were used as measures of stress response. Over a range of doses (0, 5, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg), pretreatment with atropine sulfate increased the measured stress responses to footshock but had little or no effect on resting or non-stressed levels of the substances measured. The effects of atropine on response to immobilization were tested only at 5 mg/kg. At this dose, atropine sulfate, but not methylatropine nitrate, increased pituitary cyclic AMP response to immobilization stress demonstrating that the potentiation of the pituitary cyclic AMP stress response was not limited to footshock stress and suggesting that this effect of atropine was central rather than peripheral. Neither atropine nor methylatropine pretreatment at this dose potentiated prolactic response to immobilization stress.

Comparison of the effects of CRF and stress on levels of pituitary cyclic AMP and plasma ACTH in vivo

We have previously reported that acute stress increases levels of rat pituitary cyclic AMP in vivo. The present study was conducted to test the hypothesis that stress-induced increases in pituitary cyclic AMP in vivo were mediated via CRF. We compared the effects of various stressors with the effects of CRF or epinephrine administration on pituitary cyclic AMP and plasma ACTH responses in vivo. Stressors, epinephrine or CRF increased levels of pituitary cyclic AMP. Pituitary cyclic AMP response to either immobilization or CRF was much greater at light onset than at lights off in rats maintained on at 12 hr light: 12 hr dark lighting regimen. In rats with pituitary stalk transections, footshock did not increase levels of pituitary cyclic AMP, suggesting that some factor of central origin was required for this stress response. Exogenous CRF administration did increase levels of pituitary cyclic AMP in stalk-transected rats, while epinephrine increased levels in sham-operated but not in stalk-transected rats. Antisera to CRF markedly decreased pituitary cyclic AMP response to exogenous CRF administered 6 min following antisera and partially attenuated pituitary cyclic AMP response to forced running. Taken as a whole these data support a major role for CRF in the pituitary cyclic AMP response to stress.

Diurnal variation in neuroendocrine response to stress in rats: plasma ACTH, beta-endorphin, beta-LPH, corticosterone, prolactin and pituitary cyclic AMP responses.

The effects of restraint stress applied at different times of the day on levels of five stress-responsive plasma hormones (ACTH, beta-endorphin, beta-LPH, corticosterone and prolactin) and pituitary cyclic AMP levels were assessed. Different groups of rats were subjected to 15 min of restraint stress at 2-hour intervals over a 24-hour period. Rats were sacrificed immediately upon removal from their home cage (controls) or immediately following restraint (stressed). The time of day of stress exposure markedly affected the stress responses measured. Generally, responses to stress applied at the beginning of the dark cycle (18:00) were less than those seen following stress applied at the beginning of the light cycle (06:00). Stress at 06:00 increased levels of pituitary cyclic AMP 10-fold, while stress applied at 18:00 did not significantly increase pituitary cyclic AMP levels. In stressed rats, high correlations were seen among levels of hormones derived from the common precursor, proopiomelanocortin (ACTH, beta-endorphin, beta-LPH) and between these hormones and levels of pituitary cyclic AMP. These findings support the hypothesis that pituitary cyclic AMP is involved in the stress-induced release or synthesis of the pituitary hormones ACTH, beta-endorphin, and beta-LPH.

Subsensitive pituitary cyclic AMP response to stress following adrenalectomy is not caused by loss of adrenal epinephrine

We have previously reported that various stressors acutely elevated levels of pituitary cyclic AMP in vivo and that this stress response is not seen in animals tested 7 or 30 days post-adrenalectomy. In this report we present data that demonstrate that the loss of the pituitary cyclic AMP stress response following adrenalectomy is not the result of the loss of stress-induced adrenal epinephrine release. These data show that (1) although administration of epinephrine to intact rats does elevate levels of pituitary cyclic AMP, administration of epinephrine to adrenalectomized animals does not elevate pituitary cyclic AMP levels in vivo ; (2) splanchnic denervation prevents stress-induced adrenal epinephrine release but does not abolish stress-induced increases in pituitary cyclic AMP ; and (3) the time course of the developing subsensitive pituitary cyclic AMP response to stress following adrenalectomy is much slower (2 to 3 days) than the loss of circulating epinephrine.

Habituation to repeated stress is stressor specific

Rats were exposed to 15 min of restraint or footshock or forced running in an activity wheel once a day for 10 days. Control groups were handled only. On the 11th day, rats from each stressor group and controls were exposed to 15 min of one stressor in a crossed design such that all combinations of one chronic stressor and one acute stressor exposure on the 11th day and plasma corticosterone and prolactin and pituitary cyclic AMP levels were determined. There were no measured differences in these stress indices among groups of rats sacrificed immediately upon removal from their home cage on day 11 regardless of previous history on days 1 through 10. Plasma corticosterone and plasma prolactin and pituitary cyclic AMP levels were elevated in all rats exposed to any of the three stressors immediately prior to sacrifice as compared to all rats not exposed to stress immediately before sacrifice. However, plasma prolactin and pituitary cyclic AMP responses to each of the 3 stressors were attenuated in rats which had previous exposure to that specific stressor as compared to rats which had previous experience with a different or no stressor. We conclude that habituation results from behavioral experience with a particular stressor rather than biochemical adaptation resulting from repeated challenge to hormonal and neurochemical systems responsive to stress.

Comparison of stress response in male and female rats: Pituitary cyclic AMP and plasma prolactin, growth hormone and corticosterone

Three potent stressors (forced running, immobilization, and footshock) were found to increase levels of cyclic AMP in the pituitaries of both female and male rats. The pituitary cyclic AMP response in females was generally similar to that observed in males. The tested stressors elevated both plasma corticosterone and prolactin and decreased plasma growth hormone. Plasma corticosterone rose more rapidly in females than in males following stress. Control growth hormone levels were higher in male rats. There was no clear cause and effect relationship between elevations of pituitary cyclic AMP and changes in plasma levels of prolactin, corticosterone, and growth hormone.

Cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP response to stress in brain and pituitary: Stress elevates pituitary cyclic AMP

Male rats were exposed to six stressors (saline injection, cold, forced running, Formalin injection, immobilization, electric footshock) for 15, 30, or 60 min. Following sacrifice by microwave irradiation, cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP levels were measured in pituitary, pineal and 8 regions of rat brain. All stressors except saline increased plasma corticosterone, plasma prolactin and pituitary cyclic AMP levels compared to control animals. The magnitude of the pituitary cyclic AMP response was highly correlated with the intensity of the stress as determined by the levels of plasma prolactin. Electric footshock increased pituitary cyclic AMP levels over 10 fold and plasma prolactin over 60 fold. Cyclic AMP levels in other brain regions were not altered. Cerebellar cyclic GMP was increased only by stressors that involved increased motor activity.

Sex difference in pituitary cyclic AMP response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone.

In VitroSex difference in pituitary cyclic AMP response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone.Z Naor, U Zor, R Meidan, and Y KochZ Naor, U Zor, R Meidan, and Y KochPublished Online:01 Jul 1978https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1978.235.1.E37MoreSectionsPDF (1 MB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInWeChat Previous Back to Top Next Download PDF FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation More from this issue > Volume 235Issue 1July 1978Pages E37-41 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1978 by American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1978.235.1.E37PubMed209694History Published online 1 July 1978 Published in print 1 July 1978 Metrics