Physical Counterpressure Maneuvers Research Articles

Vasovagal Syncope: A Review of Current and Emerging Therapies for a Common Cardiology Condition

Vasovagal syncope (VVS), characterized by transient loss of consciousness, is among the most prevalent reasons for emergency visits worldwide. Although benign in nature, VVS can be accompanied by traumatic injury, leading to morbidity and decreased quality of life, especially in those with VVS recurrence. The management includes non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies (if resistant), patient education and reassurance, salt and fluid intake increase, and physical counter-pressure maneuvers. Among medications, midodrine has shown promising results in reducing VVS recurrence and positive head-up tilt tests. Fluoxetine and atomoxetine also might be suitable candidates for VVS therapy. Permanent pacemakers, such as closed-loop stimulation, are under research and can be effective in cases unresponsive to medical treatment. In summary, while data are scarce regarding the definite treatment of VVS, there is a need for further research with novel, easy-to-use and cost-effective therapeutic methods to enhance quality of life and prevent traumatic injury.

The efficacy of non-pharmacological and non-pacing therapies in preventing vasovagal syncope: Tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundVasovagal syncope (VVS) is a prevalent condition characterized by a sudden drop in blood pressure and heart rate, leading to a brief loss of consciousness and postural control. Recurrent episodes of VVS significantly impact the quality of life and are a common reason for emergency department visits. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga, have been proposed as potential treatments for VVS. However, their efficacy in preventing VVS remains uncertain. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing non-pharmacological interventions with control in preventing VVS recurrence. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate of VVS episodes. ResultsA total of 1130 participants from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mean effect size for non-pharmacological interventions versus control was 0.245 (95 % CI: 0.128–0.471, p-value <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that yoga had the largest effect size (odds ratio 0.068, 95 % CI: 0.018–0.250), while tilt training had the lowest effect size (odds ratio 0.402, 95 % CI: 0.171–0.946) compared to control. Physical counter pressure maneuvers demonstrated an odds ratio of 0.294 (95 % CI: 0.165–0.524) compared to control. ConclusionNon-pharmacological interventions show promise in preventing recurrent VVS episodes. Yoga, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and tilt training can be considered as viable treatment options. Further research, including randomized studies comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these interventions for VVS treatment.

Effectiveness of Leg Raise and Leg Fold Maneuver to Prevent Syncope During Extraction of Teeth: A Pilot Study.

Objectives The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of leg raise and leg fold maneuvers to prevent syncope during extraction procedures. Methods This study included 30 patients with a previous history of syncope and dental anxiety. Patients were randomly divided into two groups consisting of 15 patients each. Group I (test group) patients were educated about a few physical maneuvers, and instructions were given preoperatively about when to perform them. Group II (control group) underwent extraction conventionally. The blood pressure, saturation, pulse rate, and clinical signs and symptoms of the patients were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients. Results There is a significant difference between the control and study groups in terms of the occurrence of syncope and patient comfort. This indicates that the leg raise and leg fold maneuvers reducethe occurrence of syncope during extraction. No participant in the test group experienced syncope post-treatment, while five subjects (33.3%)experienced syncope in the control group. Conclusion Physical counterpressure maneuvers are a risk-free, effective, and low-cost treatment method in patients with vasovagal syncope.Leg raise and leg fold maneuversimproved the hemodynamics of the patients.

Counter pressure maneuvers for syncope prevention: A semi-systematic review and meta-analysis.

Physical counter pressure maneuvers (CPM) are movements that are recommended to delay or prevent syncope (fainting) by recruiting the skeletal muscle pump to augment cardiovascular control. However, these recommendations are largely based on theoretical benefit, with limited data evaluating the efficacy of CPM to prevent syncope in the real-world setting. We conducted a semi-systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess CPM efficacy, identify literature gaps, and highlight future research needs. Articles were identified through a literature search (PubMed, April 2022) of peer-reviewed publications evaluating the use of counter pressure or other lower body maneuvers to prevent syncope. Two team members independently screened records for inclusion and extracted data. From 476 unique records identified by the search, 45 met inclusion criteria. Articles considered various syncopal conditions (vasovagal = 12, orthostatic hypotension = 8, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome = 1, familial dysautonomia = 2, spinal cord injury = 1, blood donation = 10, healthy controls = 11). Maneuvers assessed included hand gripping, leg fidgeting, stepping, tiptoeing, marching, calf raises, postural sway, tensing (upper, lower, whole body), leg crossing, squatting, “crash” position, and bending foreword. CPM were assessed in laboratory-based studies (N = 28), the community setting (N = 4), both laboratory and community settings (N = 3), and during blood donation (N = 10). CPM improved standing systolic blood pressure (+ 14.8 ± 0.6 mmHg, p < 0.001) and heart rate (+ 1.4 ± 0.5 bpm, p = 0.006), however, responses of total peripheral resistance, stroke volume, or cerebral blood flow were not widely documented. Most patients experienced symptom improvement following CPM use (laboratory: 60 ± 4%, community: 72 ± 9%). The most prominent barrier to employing CPM in daily living was the inability to recognize an impending faint. Patterns of postural sway may also recruit the skeletal muscle pump to enhance cardiovascular control, and its potential as a discrete, proactive CPM needs further evaluation. Physical CPM were successful in improving syncopal symptoms and producing cardiovascular responses that may bolster against syncope; however, practical limitations may restrict applicability for use in daily living.

Current approach to the treatment of vasovagal syncope in adults.

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common cause of transient loss of consciousness. Although not associated with mortality, it causes injuries, reduces quality of life, and is associated with anxiety and depression. The European and North American cardiac societies recently published syncope clinical practice guidelines. Most patients with VVS do well after specialist evaluation, reassurance and education. Adequate hydration, increased salt intake when not contraindicated, and careful withdrawal of diuretics and specific hypotension-inducing drugs are a reasonable initial strategy. Physical counterpressure maneuvers might be helpful but can be of limited efficacy in older patients and those with short or no prodromes. Orthostatic training lacks long term efficacy and is troubled by non-compliance. Yoga might be helpful, although the biomedical mechanism is unknown. Almost a third of VVS patients continue to faint despite these conservative measures. Metoprolol was not helpful in a pivotal randomized clinical trial. Fludrocortisone and midodrine significantly reduce syncope recurrences with tolerable side effects, when titrated to target doses. Pacing therapy with specialized sensors appears promising in carefully selected population who have not responded conservative measures. Cardioneuroablation may be helpful but has not been studied in a formal clinical trial.

2019 American Heart Association and American Red Cross Focused Update for First Aid: Presyncope: An Update to the American Heart Association and American Red Cross Guidelines for First Aid.

This 2019 focused update to the American Heart Association and American Red Cross first aid guidelines follows the completion of a systematic review of treatments for presyncope of vasovagal or orthostatic origin. This review was commissioned by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and resulted in the development of an international summary statement of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation First Aid Task Force Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations. This focused update highlights the evidence supporting specific interventions for presyncope of orthostatic or vasovagal origin and recommends the use of physical counterpressure maneuvers. These maneuvers include the contraction of muscles of the body such as the legs, arms, abdomen, or neck, with the goal of elevating blood pressure and alleviating symptoms. Although lower-body counterpressure maneuvers are favored over upper-body counterpressure maneuvers, multiple methods can be beneficial, depending on the situation.

5967A randomized trial of yoga therapy for reflex syncope

Abstract Background Reflex syncope (RS), the most common cause of syncope is usually recurrent, associated with decreased quality of life, and frustrates both the clinicians and the patients with a paucity of effective treatment options. Purpose To assess the effectiveness of yoga therapy on the recurrence of reflex syncope. Methods Subjects with recurrent RS (&gt;3 episodes) and positive head-up tilt test were enrolled prospectively, and randomized to conventional therapy with physical maneuvres (Group 1) and yoga therapy (Group 2). Group 1 patients were taught physical counter-pressure maneuvers as per guidelines. Group 2 patients were taught yoga for 7 sessions by a certified Yoga instructor/therapist, and then advised to perform yoga for 60 minutes at least five days/week for six months. The Yoga module consisted of Pranayama (breathing techniques), Asanas (Postures) and Dhyana (Meditation) for 60 minutes/session. Both groups were followed up monthly for 6 months in the syncope clinic noting down the recurrences and the quality of life using the syncope functional status questionnaire score. Result The study group consisted of 97 patients (group 1: 46 patients and group 2: 51 patients) enrolled prospectively between June 2015 to February 2017. The mean age was 33.1±16.6 years, with male: female ratio 1.1:1, and a mean of 6.4±6.06 syncope episodes (group 1: 6.8±8.0 vs. group 2: 6.0±4.0; p=0.551). The mean duration of symptoms was 17.1±20.71 months (group 1: 16.1±22.8 months vs. group 2: 17.8±19.1 months; p=0.694). There was a significant decrease in the recurrences of syncope in the yoga group compared to the conventional group at three months (group 1: 1.8±1.4 vs group 2: 0.8±0.9, P&lt;0.001) as well as six months follow-up (group 1: 3.38±3.0 vs group 2: 0.98±1.23, P&lt;0.001). The quality of life score at 6 months improved in 20 patients in group 1 and in 45 patients in group 2 (&lt;0.001). Conclusion Guided yoga therapy is superior to conventional measures in reducing the number of syncopal episodes and improves the quality of life in patients with reflex syncope. Yoga therapy should be considered as treatment strategy for patients with reflex syncope.

Immediate Interventions for Presyncope of Vasovagal or Orthostatic Origin: A Systematic Review

Background: Syncope is a common condition that may be prevented. There are non-pharmacological interventions that may be of benefit during the acute episode preceding syncope (presyncope), including physical counter-pressure maneuvers (PCM) or change of body position. We performed a systematic review of interventions that may be applied during presyncope as an immediate, first aid tactic. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and CINAHL and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methods, and risk of bias assessments to determine the certainty of the evidence. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized studies, and case series investigating adults and children with signs and symptoms of presyncope of suspected vasovagal or orthostatic origin who applied any intervention that could be used as an immediate, first aid intervention. We examined the following outcomes: prevention of syncope, adverse events, symptom improvement, and vital signs. We conducted a sub-group analysis based on the etiology of vasovagal or orthostatic presyncope. Results: We screened 5,160 titles and abstracts followed by 81 full text articles. We identified 8 studies meeting inclusion criteria, including 2 RCTs and 6 observational studies. All studies used PCM in adults and all were judged to be of low and very low certainty of evidence. For prevention of syncope, one RCT demonstrated benefit with the use of PCM (RR = 1.80 [1.26–1.89]), while observational studies failed to show benefit (RR = 1.31 [0.98 – 1.75]). Two RCTs showed benefit in symptom improvement (RR = 6.00 [2.21 – 8.61] and (RR = 1.57 [1.06 – 1.93]). Blood pressure (BP) improved with the use of PCM: systolic BP mean difference (MD) 21 mmHg higher (95% CI: 18.25 to 23.41 BPM) and diastolic BP MD 11 mmHg higher (95% CI: 9.39 to 13.10 mmHg higher). No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: While there is a minimal amount of evidence available and the findings were mixed, PCM may provide benefit for prevention of syncope during acute episodes of presyncope and may be tried in the first aid setting. No evidence was found for other non-pharmacologic interventions or for the use of PCM in children.

Treatment of Neurocardiogenic Syncope: From Conservative to Cutting-edge.

Neurocardiogenic syncope is the most frequent cause of syncope in the general population. Many years have been spent on determining an effective treatment for this condition. Conventional treatment usually follows a tiered approach for neurocardiogenic syncope, as follows: first, lifestyle modification, including increased fluid intake and the introduction of physical counterpressure maneuvers, is tried; then the use of targeted pharmacologic therapy, particularly agents that support blood pressure or that drive blood pressure is attempted; and, finally, pacemaker implantation in patients with a predominant cardioinhibitory component to their syncopal episodes is performed. More recently, autonomic modulation with cardiac ganglion ablation has emerged as a promising treatment modality for patients refractory to traditional approaches. In this review, we sought to summarize the existing therapies for neurocardiogenic syncope and explore the latest research on new modalities of treatment.

Therapist Perceptions of Physical Counterpressure Maneuvers for the Management of Pre-Syncope

Purpose:To evaluate for change in therapists' perceptions of managing a patient with a near syncopal occurrence in the acute care setting after an educational in-service regarding physical counterpressure maneuvers (PCMs).Methods:This study is a single-group pretest/posttest design. Fifteen employed

Prognostic Value of a Very Prolonged Asystole during Head-Up Tilt Test.

Clinical significance and prognosis of a cardioinhibitory response to head-up tilt (HUT) test with a very prolonged asystole (≥30 seconds) is poorly studied. Our aim was to evaluate the treatment (including pacemaker implantation) and prognosis (syncope recurrence, syncope-related trauma, and overall mortality) of patients with a very prolonged asystole on a HUT test. A retrospective study was conducted in two centers between January 2003 and December 2013 and included a total of 2,263 consecutive HUT tests (sensitized with isosorbide dinitrate) performed in 2,247 patients with syncope of unknown etiology. Cardioinhibitory response with asystole was observed in 149 (6.6%) of these tests (44.3% women, mean age 37 ± 18 years old, 16.1% in the nonpharmacological phase), with a median duration of asystole of 10 (6-19) seconds. Very prolonged asystole (≥30 seconds) was documented in 11 (0.5%) patients (45% women; mean age 40 ± 19 years; only one in the nonpharmacological phase, 9 minutes after HUT). The longest pause lasted 63 seconds. In all patients, avoidance of triggering factors and physical counterpressure maneuvers were recommended. Telephone follow-up was performed: in one patient, fludrocortisone was started; tilt training was conducted in one patient and none received a pacemaker. After a median follow-up of 42 (30-76) months, four patients (36%) had syncopal recurrences, one patient had a syncope-related injury (scalp laceration), and no patient died.

Current concepts in the evaluation and management of syncope

Syncope is a very common presentation with a wide differential diagnosis and equally wide prognostic implications. Recent work has highlighted the importance of an accurate history and physical examination as the basis of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Several centers have evaluated the role of structured histories and comprehensive syncope evaluation guidelines and units in managing syncope. Although these do provide comprehensive care, whether they improve overall outcome and reduce costs is far from clear. This is partly because there are few effective treatments for the major cause of fainting, vasovagal syncope. Recent randomized trials have highlighted the roles of physical counterpressure maneuvers and midodrine and the limitations of treatment with beta blockers and permanent cardiac pacing.

Evidence-based treatment for vasovagal syncope

Only a minority of patients with vasovagal syncope require treatment, and most can be managed conservatively. Patients should be encouraged to liberalize their fluid and salt intake, unless they have contraindications such as hypertension. All patients should be taught physical counterpressure maneuvers. Midodrine is the first-line therapy for patients having frequent presyncope or syncope or for those with brief or no prodromes. The routine use of beta-blockers, serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, fludrocortisone, and pacemakers is discouraged. Whether loop recorders can be used to target treatment is under investigation, as is fludrocortisone.

Is fatigue in Marfan syndrome related to orthostatic intolerance?

Patients with Marfan syndrome have a tall stature, which could be associated with low orthostatic tolerance. Fatigue, a common complaint of these patients, is also related to orthostatic intolerance. Treatment with beta-blockers, to prevent aortic complications, could be a reinforcing factor of both. This study aimed to investigate (1) the relationship between symptoms of orthostatic tolerance and in patients with Marfan syndrome, and (2) whether termination of beta-blocker therapy improves orthostatic tolerance. Symptoms of fatigue and orthostatic complaints were assessed in 49 subjects using questionnaires (MFI-20 and Autonomic Symptoms Profile). Marfan patients have a high level of fatigue and orthostatic complaints when compared to the general population. Fatigue and orthostatic tolerance are significantly correlated. Orthostatic tolerance was assessed in 9 additional subjects by an active-standing test and head-up tilt for 5 minutes, and 24 hours blood pressure monitoring, once during beta-blocker therapy and once after ceasing beta-blockers for 2 weeks. During hemodynamic testing Marfan patients frequently showed Initial Orthostatic Hypotension and an abnormally high initial heart rate response. Ceasing beta-blockers did not affect the initial blood pressure response. Patients with Marfan syndrome are fatigued and have low orthostatic tolerance, which are significantly correlated. Patients could be educated in physical counterpressure maneuvers to increase orthostatic tolerance.

Physical counterpressure maneuvers reduced vasovagal syncope

Physical counterpressure maneuvers reduced vasovagal syncope

Prevention of vasovagal syncope with physical counterpressure maneuvers

Prevention of vasovagal syncope with physical counterpressure maneuvers

Full Length Article

In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of physical counterpressure maneuvers (PCM) in daily life. There is presently no evidence-based therapy for vasovagal syncope. Current treatment consists of explanation and life-style advice. Physical counterpressure maneuvers have been shown to raise blood pressure and to control or abort vasovagal episodes in laboratory conditions. We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial, which included 223 patients age 38.6 (±15.4) years with recurrent vasovagal syncope and recognizable prodromal symptoms. One hundred and seventeen patients were randomized to standardized conventional therapy alone, and 106 patients received conventional therapy plus training in PCM. The median yearly syncope burden during follow-up was significantly lower in the group trained in PCM than in the control group (p = 0.004). During a mean follow-up period of 14 months, overall 50.9% of the patients with conventional treatment and 31.6% of the patients trained in PCM experienced a syncopal recurrence (p = 0.005). Actuarial recurrence-free survival was better in the treatment group (log-rank p = 0.018), resulting in a relative risk reduction of 39% (95% confidence interval, 11% to 53%). No adverse events were reported. Physical counterpressure maneuvers are a risk-free, effective, and low-cost treatment method in patients with vasovagal syncope and recognizable prodromal symptoms, and should be advised as first-line treatment in patients presenting with vasovagal syncope with prodromal symptoms. (The PC-Trial; http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/45146526/0/45146526.html; ISRCTN45146526)

Effectiveness of Physical Counterpressure Maneuvers in Preventing Vasovagal Syncope: The Physical Counterpressure Manoeuvres Trial (PC-Trial)

In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of physical counterpressure maneuvers (PCM) in daily life. There is presently no evidence-based therapy for vasovagal syncope. Current treatment consists of explanation and life-style advice. Physical counterpressure maneuvers have been shown to raise blood pressure and to control or abort vasovagal episodes in laboratory conditions. We performed a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial, which included 223 patients age 38.6 (+/-15.4) years with recurrent vasovagal syncope and recognizable prodromal symptoms. One hundred and seventeen patients were randomized to standardized conventional therapy alone, and 106 patients received conventional therapy plus training in PCM. The median yearly syncope burden during follow-up was significantly lower in the group trained in PCM than in the control group (p = 0.004). During a mean follow-up period of 14 months, overall 50.9% of the patients with conventional treatment and 31.6% of the patients trained in PCM experienced a syncopal recurrence (p = 0.005). Actuarial recurrence-free survival was better in the treatment group (log-rank p = 0.018), resulting in a relative risk reduction of 39% (95% confidence interval, 11% to 53%). No adverse events were reported. Physical counterpressure maneuvers are a risk-free, effective, and low-cost treatment method in patients with vasovagal syncope and recognizable prodromal symptoms, and should be advised as first-line treatment in patients presenting with vasovagal syncope with prodromal symptoms. (The PC-Trial; http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/45146526/0/45146526.html; ISRCTN45146526).