Photic Phase Response Curve Research Articles

The Drosophila circadian phase response curve to light: Conservation across seasonally relevant photoperiods and anchorage to sunset

Photic history, including the relative duration of day versus night in a 24-hour cycle, is known to influence subsequent circadian responses to light in mammals. Whether such modulation is present in Drosophila is currently unknown. To date, all photic phase-response curves (PRCs) generated from Drosophila have done so with animals housed under seasonally agnostic equatorial photoperiods with alternating 12-hour segments of light and darkness. However, the genus contains thousands of species, some of which populate high and low-latitude habitats (20–50° north or south of the Equator) where seasonal variations in the light-dark schedule are pronounced. Here, we address this disconnect by constructing the first high-resolution Drosophila seasonal atlas for light-induced circadian phase-resetting. Testing the light responses of over 4,000 Drosophila at 120 timepoints across 5 seasonally-relevant rectangular photoperiods (i.e., LD 8:16, 10:14, 12:12, 14:10, and 16:8; 24 hourly intervals surveyed in each), we determined that many aspects of the fly circadian PRC waveform are conserved with increasing daylength. Surprisingly though, irrespective of LD schedule, the start of the PRCs always remained anchored to the timing of subjective sunset, creating a differential overlap of the advance zone with the morning hours after subjective sunrise that was maximized under summer photoperiods and minimized under winter photoperiods. These data suggest that there may be differences in flies versus mammals as to how the photoperiod modulates the waveform and amplitude of the circadian PRC to light. On the other hand, they support the possibility that the lights-off transition determines the phase-positioning of photic PRCs across seasons and across species. More work is necessary to test this claim and whether it might factor into the timing of seasonal light responses in humans.

Inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (Id2) Regulates Photic Entrainment Responses in Mice: Differential Responses of the Id2-/- Mouse Circadian System Are Dependent on Circadian Phase and on Duration and Intensity of Light.

ID2 is a rhythmically expressed helix-loop-helix transcriptional repressor, and its deletion results in abnormal properties of photoentrainment. By examining parametric and nonparametric models of entrainment, we have started to explore the mechanism underlying this circadian phenotype. Id2-/- mice were exposed to differing photoperiods, and the phase angle of entrainment under short days was delayed 2 h as compared with controls. When exposed to long durations of continuous light, enhanced entrainment responses were observed after a delay of the clock but not with phase advances. However, the magnitude of phase shifts was not different in Id2-/- mice tested in constant darkness using a discrete pulse of saturating light. No differences were observed in the speed of clock resetting when challenged by a series of discrete pulses interspaced by varying time intervals. A photic phase-response curve was constructed, although no genotypic differences were observed. Although phase shifts produced by discrete saturating light pulses at CT16 were similar, treatment with a subsaturating pulse revealed a ~2-fold increase in the magnitude of the Id2-/- shift. A corresponding elevation of light-induced per1 expression was observed in the Id2-/- suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). To test whether the phenotype is based on a sensitivity change at the level of the retina, pupil constriction responses were measured. No differences were observed in responses or in retinal histology, suggesting that the phenotype occurs downstream of the retina and retinal hypothalamic tract. To test whether the phenotype is due to a reduced amplitude of state variables of the clock, the expression of clock genes per1 and per2 was assessed in vivo and in SCN tissue explants. Amplitude, phase, and period length were normal in Id2-/- mice. These findings suggest that ID2 contributes to a photoregulatory mechanism at the level of the SCN central pacemaker through control of the photic induction of negative elements of the clock.

Photic phase-response curves for cycling female mice

The photic entrainment system is critical for the internal circadian clock to be synchronized by external time cues. In nocturnal rodents, exposure to light during the early subjective night causes a phase delay, whereas it causes a phase advance during the late subjective night. This is represented by a phase-response curve (PRC). The PRC of females has not been well studied due to their estrous cycles. Our aim in this study was to understand the characteristics of photic entrainment in female cycling rodents and identify differences in photic entrainment among the stages of the estrous cycle. To establish two types of PRC, immediate PRC (iPRC) and steady state PRC (ssPRC), in each stage of the estrous cycle, we recorded circadian rhythms of wheel running activity, applying a 15-min light pulse to cycling female mice in constant darkness. In the iPRC, which was evaluated on the next day of the light pulse, the amount of phase shift in the diestrus was larger than that in the metestrus stage at circadian time (CT) 2. Similarly, the amount of phase shift in metestrus was larger than that in proestrus at CT 10. In the ssPRC, which was evaluated after completion of a new steady state, no significant estrous variations in the amount of photic phase shifts were detected for any CTs. Although these results indicate that the intrinsic photic entrainment system is not influenced by the estrous cycle, it may affect photoreception and cause sudden behavioral changes.

Parameters of photic resetting of the circadian system of a durnal rodent, the nile grass rat

Research on circadian rhythms has been hampered by the lack of a suitable rodent model with diurnal habits. The goal of this study was to characterize the parameters of photic entrainment of the circadian system of the Nile grass rat, a small rodent that can potentially serve as a model for the study of circadian rhythms in diurnal animals. The state of the circadian system was accessed through the rhythm of running-wheel activity and manipulated by photic stimulation (white light). The results indicated that the grass rat exhibits a robust rhythm of running-wheel activity with a mean free-running period of 23.9 hours (range: 23.6 to 24.3 hours). The animal is clearly diurnal and starts activity daily approximately 50 minutes before lights-on under an L12:D12 light-dark cycle. Its photic phase-response curve shows a dead zone during most of subjective day, a phase delay region during early subjective night (maximal delay: 1.5 hours), and a phase advance region during late subjective night (maximal advance: 2.2 hours). When exposed to constant illumination, the grass rat exhibits longer circadian periods as the intensity of illumination increases, with a ceiling between 100 and 1,000 lux. Finally, its range of entrainment extends from at least 23.0 to 25.0 hours (from 22.0 to 25.5 in some animals).

Strong (Type 0) Phase Resetting of Activity-Rest Rhythm in Fruit Flies, Drosophila Melanogaster, at Low Temperature

Amplitude modulation in limit cycle models of circadian clocks has been previously formulated to explain the phenomenon of temperature compensation. These models propose that invariance of clock period (τ) with changing temperature is a result of the system traversing small or large limit cycles such that despite a decrease or an increase in the linear velocity of the clock owing to slowing down or speeding up of the underlying biochemical reactions, respectively, the angular velocity and, thus, the clock period remain constant. In addition, these models predict that phase resetting behavior of circadian clocks described by limit cycles of different amplitudes at low or high temperatures will be drastically different. More specifically, this class of models predicts that at low temperatures, circadian clocks will respond to perturbations by eliciting larger phase shifts by virtue of their smaller amplitude and vice versa. Here, we present the results of our tests of this prediction: We examined the nature of photic phase response curves (PRCs) and phase transition curves (PTCs) for the circadian clocks of 4 wild-type fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster populations at 3 different ambient temperatures (18, 25, and 29 °C). Interestingly, we observed that at the low temperature of 18 °C, fly clocks respond to light perturbations more strongly, eliciting strong (type 0) PRCs and PTCs, while at moderate (25 °C) and high (29 °C) temperatures the same stimuli evoke weak (type 1) responses. This pattern of strong and weak phase resetting at low and high temperatures, respectively, renders support for the limit cycle amplitude modulation model for temperature compensation of circadian clocks.

Phase and period responses to short light pulses in a wild diurnal rodent, Funambulus pennanti

Photic phase response curves (PRCs) have been extensively studied in many laboratory-bred diurnal and nocturnal rodents. However, comparatively fewer studies have addressed the effects of photic cues on wild diurnal mammals. Hence, we studied the effects of short durations of light pulses on the circadian systems of the diurnal Indian Palm squirrel, Funambulus pennanti. Adult males entrained to a light–dark cycle (12 h–12 h) were transferred to constant darkness (DD). Free-running animals were exposed to brief light pulses (250 lux) of 15 min, 3 circadian hours (CT) apart (CT 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21). Phase shifts evoked at different phases were plotted against CT and a PRC was constructed. F. pennanti exhibited phase-dependent phase shifts at all the CTs studied, and the PRC obtained was of type 1 at the intensity of light used. Phase advances were evoked during the early subjective day and late subjective night, while phase delays occurred during the late subjective day and early subjective night, with maximum phase delay at CT 15 (−2.04 ± 0.23 h), and maximum phase advance at CT 21 (1.88 ± 0.31 h). No dead zone was seen at this resolution. The free-running period of the rhythm was concurrently lengthened (deceleration) during the late subjective day and early subjective night, while period shortening (acceleration) occurred during the late subjective night. The maximum deceleration was noticed at CT 15 (−0.40 ± 0.09 h) and the maximum acceleration at CT 21 (0.39 ± 0.07 h). A significant positive correlation exists between the phase shifts and the period changes (r = 0.684, p = 0.001). The shapes of both the PRC and period response curve (τRC) qualitatively resemble each other. This suggests that the palm squirrel’s circadian system is entrained both by phase and period responses to light. Thus, F. pennanti exhibits robust clock-resetting in response to light pulses.

Photic Phase-Response Curve in 2 Strains of Mice with Impaired Responsiveness to Estrogens

Steroid hormones including estrogens modulate the expression of daily activity and circadian rhythms, including free-running period, phase angle of activity onset, and response to light. The mechanisms underlying these effects, however, are not fully understood. We tested the hypothesis that estrogen signaling is required for photic responsiveness of the circadian timing system. We used estrogen receptor subtype 1 (ESR1) knock-out mice (ERKO) and nonclassic estrogen receptor knock-in mice (NERKI). ERKO animals are unable to respond to estrogen at ESR1, and NERKI animals lack the ability to respond to estrogens via estrogen response element-mediated transcription but still respond via nonclassical mechanisms. We analyzed behavioral shifts in activity onset in response to 1-h light pulses given across the subjective 24-h day in gonadally intact male and female NERKI, ERKO, and wild-type (WT) littermates. We also examined Fos protein expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the site of the master circadian pacemaker, at 2 times of day. We found a significant effect of genotype on phase shifts in response to light pulses given in the subjective night. Female WT mice had a significantly larger phase response than ERKO females during the early subjective night (phase shift of 98 min and 58 min, respectively; p < 0.05). NERKI females were intermediate to WT and ERKO females, suggesting a contribution of nonclassical estrogen signaling on circadian timekeeping functions. This genotype effect is not observed in males; they did not have a difference in phase shifts following a light pulse at any time point. WT males, however, shifted an average of 47 min less than did females at zeitgeber time (ZT) 16 (ZT 0 lights-on and ZT 12 lights-off). These data indicate that estrogens modify the response of the circadian timekeeping system to light via classical and nonclassical signaling pathways.

Chronotype differences in Drosophila are enhanced by semi-natural conditions

Morning and evening chronotypes of sleep/wake cycles in humans are often metaphorically termed as 'larks' and 'owls'. We derived Drosophila populations early and late, displaying lark- and owl-like emergence chronotypes by imposing selection for adult emergence during morning and evening hours. Preference for morning and evening emergence in these populations was accompanied by divergence in their circadian period (τ) and photic phase response curve. To test if lark- and owl-like emergence chronotypes displayed by these flies under weak environmental cycles of the laboratory would also persist in nature where several zeitgebers are present in the strongest form, we examined the emergence rhythm of early and late flies under semi-natural conditions. The early and late flies not only continued to exhibit divergent emergence waveforms under semi-natural conditions, the differences became even more prominent. However, phases of early and late emergence waveforms did not match natural morning and evening transitions, unlike that observed under laboratory conditions. These results thus provide evidence consistent with the notion that chronotypes are the result of interactions between circadian clocks and natural environmental cycles.

Distinct Phase Relationships between Suprachiasmatic Molecular Rhythms, Cerebral Cortex Molecular Rhythms, and Behavioral Rhythms in Early Runner (CAST/EiJ) and Nocturnal (C57BL/6J) Mice

We have previously established that CAST/EiJ (CAST) mice differ from normal mice, such as C57BL/6J (B6), in the timing of wheel-running onset relative to light/dark cycles. These mice provide an animal model for studies of the genetic and neurobiological basis for circadian phase misalignment in humans. Neither differences in endogenous circadian period nor the shape of the photic phase response curve explain the difference in the timing of activity onset between CAST and B6 mice, suggesting a mechanism downstream of the circadian clock. Here, we further test the hypothesis that the two strains differ with respect to circadian oscillations at the molecular level. Sleep/wake cycles were examined and rhythms of Period1 (Per1) and Period2 (Per2) expression were measured in the cerebral cortex, suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), and other hypothalamic regions. Basic sleep and molecular research laboratory. Male mice of the B6 and CAST inbred strains. None. Sleep/wake cycles were advanced by approximately 4 h in CAST mice relative to B6 mice. This was paralleled by phase-advanced rhythms of Per1 and Per2 expression, as measured byin situ hybridization, in the cerebral cortex of CAST relative to B6. By contrast, the timing of circadian oscillations and the photic induction ofPer1 and Per2 expression in the SCN were unaffected by strain. The advanced phase of wheel running and sleep/wake cycles in CAST mice relative to B6 mice is apparently not associated with differences in molecular oscillations in the SCN clock itself, but most likely in mechanisms downstream of the SCN clock. CAST mice may therefore provide a model system to investigate circadian downstream mechanisms underlying unusual patterns of entrainment to the ambient photoperiod. Jiang P; Franklin KM; Duncan MJ; O'Hara BF; Wisor JP. Distinct phase relationships between suprachiasmatic molecular rhythms, cerebral cortex molecular rhythms, and behavioral rhythms in early runner (CAST/EiJ) and nocturnal (C57BL/6J) mice. SLEEP 2012;35(10):1385-1394.

Early- and Late-Emerging Drosophila melanogaster Fruit Flies Differ in Their Sensitivity to Light During Morning and Evening

The authors derived early and late populations of fruit flies showing increased incidence of emergence during morning or evening hours by imposing selection for timing of emergence under 12:12 h light/dark (LD) cycles. From previous studies, it was clear that the increased incidence of adult emergence during morning and evening hours in early and late populations was a result of evolution of divergent and characteristic emergence waveforms in these populations. Such characteristic waveforms are henceforth referred to as “evolved emergence waveforms” (EEWs). The early and late populations also evolved different circadian clocks, which is evident from the divergence in their clock period (τ) and photic phase response curve (PRC). Although correlation between emergence waveforms and clock properties suggests functional significance of circadian clocks, τ and PRCs do not satisfactorily explain the early and late emergence phenotypes. In order to understand the functional significance of the PRC for early and late emergence phenotypes, the authors investigated whether circadian clocks of these flies exhibit any difference in photosensitivity under entrained conditions. Such differences would suggest that the light requirement for circadian entrainment of the emergence rhythm in early and late populations is different. To test this, they examined if early and late flies differ in their light utilization behavior, first by assaying their emergence rhythm under complete photoperiod and then in three different skeleton photoperiods. The results showed that early and late populations require different durations of light during the morning and evening to achieve their EEWs, suggesting that for the circadian entrainment of the emergence rhythm, early and late flies utilize light from different parts of the day. (Author correspondence: vsharma@jncasr.ac.in or vksharmas@gmail.com)

Simulation of Drosophila Circadian Oscillations, Mutations, and Light Responses by a Model with VRI, PDP-1, and CLK

A model of Drosophila circadian rhythm generation was developed to represent feedback loops based on transcriptional regulation of per, Clk (dclock), Pdp-1, and vri (vrille). The model postulates that histone acetylation kinetics make transcriptional activation a nonlinear function of [CLK]. Such a nonlinearity is essential to simulate robust circadian oscillations of transcription in our model and in previous models. Simulations suggest that two positive feedback loops involving Clk are not essential for oscillations, because oscillations of [PER] were preserved when Clk, vri, or Pdp-1 expression was fixed. However, eliminating positive feedback by fixing vri expression altered the oscillation period. Eliminating the negative feedback loop in which PER represses per expression abolished oscillations. Simulations of per or Clk null mutations, of per overexpression, and of vri, Clk, or Pdp-1 heterozygous null mutations altered model behavior in ways similar to experimental data. The model simulated a photic phase-response curve resembling experimental curves, and oscillations entrained to simulated light-dark cycles. Temperature compensation of oscillation period could be simulated if temperature elevation slowed PER nuclear entry or PER phosphorylation. The model makes experimental predictions, some of which could be tested in transgenic Drosophila.

Photic phase response curve in Octodon degus: assessment as a function of activity phase preference.

Light exposure during the early and late subjective night generally phase delays and advances circadian rhythms, respectively. However, this generality was recently questioned in a photic entrainment study in Octodon degus. Because degus can invert their activity phase preference from diurnal to nocturnal as a function of activity level, assessment of phase preference is critical for computations of phase reference [circadian time (CT) 0] toward the development of a photic phase response curve. After determining activity phase preference in a 24-h light-dark cycle (LD 12:12), degus were released in constant darkness. In this study, diurnal (n = 5) and nocturnal (n = 7) degus were randomly subjected to 1-h light pulses (30-35 lx) at many circadian phases (CT 1-6: n = 7; CT 7-12: n = 8; CT 13-18: n = 8; and CT 19-24: n = 7). The circadian phase of body temperature (Tb) onset was defined as CT 12 in nocturnal animals. In diurnal animals, CT 0 was determined as Tb onset + 1 h. Light phase delayed and advanced circadian rhythms when delivered during the early (CT 13-16) and late (CT 20-23) subjective night, respectively. No significant phase shifts were observed during the middle of the subjective day (CT 3-10). Thus, regardless of activity phase preference, photic entrainment of the circadian pacemaker in Octodon degus is similar to most other diurnal and nocturnal species, suggesting that entrainment mechanisms do not determine overt diurnal and nocturnal behavior.

Neuropeptide Y and glutamate block each other's phase shifts in the suprachiasmatic nucleus in vitro

The suprachiasmatic nuclei contain a circadian clock whose activity can be recorded in vitro for several days. Photic information is conveyed to the nuclei primarily via a direct projection from the retina, the retinohypothalamic tract, utilizing an excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter. Photic phase shifts may be mimicked by application of glutamate in vitro. A second, indirect pathway to the suprachiasmatic nuclei via the geniculohypothalamic tract utilizes neuropeptide Y as a transmitter. Phase shifts to neuropeptide Y in vitro are similar to those seen to non-photic stimuli in vivo. We have used the hypothalamic slice preparation to examine the interactions of photic and non-photic stimuli in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Coronal hypothalamic slices containing the suprachiasmatic nuclei were prepared from Syrian hamsters and 3 min recordings of the firing rate of individual cells were performed throughout a 12 h period. Control slices receiving either no application or application of artificial cerebrospinal fluid to the suprachiasmatic nucleus showed a consistent daily peak in their rhythms. Glutamate produces phase shifts of the circadian clock in the hamster hypothalamic slice preparation during the subjective night but not during the subjective day. These phase shifts were similar in timing and direction to the photic phase response curve in vivo confirming previous work with the rat slice preparation. Neuropeptide Y produces phase shifts of the circadian clock during the subjective day but not during the subjective night. The phase shifts are similar in timing and direction to the non-photic phase response curve in vivo, confirming previous in vitro work. We then examined the interaction of these neurochemicals with each other at various times during the circadian cycle. We found that both advances and delays to glutamate in the slice are blocked by application of neuropeptide Y. We also found that phase shifts to neuropeptide Y in the slice are blocked by application of glutamate. These results indicate that photic and non-photic associated neurochemicals can block each others phase shifting effects within the suprachiasmatic nucleus in vitro. These experiments demonstrate the ability of photic and non-photic associated neurochemicals to interact at the level of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. It is clear that neuropeptide Y antagonizes the effect of glutamate during the subjective night, and that glutamate antagonizes the effect of neuropeptide Y during the subjective day. Great care must be taken when devising treatments where photic and non-photic signals may interact.

Circadian phase shifting induced by clonidine injections in Syrian hamsters

Abstract The mammalian circadian pacemaker can be phase shifted by photic, pharmacological, and behaviorally‐derived stimuli. The phase‐response curves (PRCs) characterizing these diverse stimuli may comprise two distinct families; a photic PRC typified by the response to brief light pulses, and a non‐photic PRC, typified by the response to dark pulses and to behavioral activation. The present study examined the phase shifting effects of acute systemic treatment with the alpha2‐adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine, in Syrian hamsters. Clonidine injections (0.25 mg/kg, ip) delivered during subjective night mimicked the phase shifting effects of light pulses in animals housed in both constant darkness (DD) and constant red light (RR), but similar effects were not seen in saline‐treated controls. Both clonidine and saline injections resulted in phase advances during subjective day, but only in RR‐housed animals. Clonidine‐induced phase shifting was dose‐dependent, but rather high doses were required to induce pha...