Philosophy Compass Research Articles

A Defense of International Criminal Law

Previous articleNext article No AccessA Defense of International Criminal Law*Andrew Altman and Christopher Heath WellmanAndrew Altman Search for more articles by this author and Christopher Heath Wellman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 115, Number 1October 2004 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/422895 Views: 171Total views on this site Citations: 21Citations are reported from Crossref © 2004 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Andrew Jason Cohen What liberals should tolerate internationally, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24, no.11 (May 2019): 64–86.https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1616880Steven Ratner International law and political philosophy: Uncovering new linkages, Philosophy Compass 14, no.22 (Dec 2018): e12564.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12564Christopher Soler What Is Required to Intrude into the Sovereignty of a Defaulting State in Order to Investigate and Prosecute Core Crimes?, (Sep 2019): 59–87.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-335-1_5Zachary Hoskins May, Larry, (Jul 2017): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_242-1Catriona McKinnon Endangering humanity: an international crime?, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2020): 395–415.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2017.1280381Zachary Hoskins Punishment, Analysis (Mar 2016): anw022.https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anw022Lars Waldorf Inhumanity’s law: Crimes against humanity, RtoP and South Sudan, International Politics 53, no.11 (Dec 2015): 49–66.https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2015.37Shlomit Wallerstein Delegation of Powers and Authority in International Criminal Law, Criminal Law and Philosophy 9, no.11 (Feb 2013): 123–140.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-013-9203-3J. B. Delston The criminalization of money laundering and terrorism in global contexts: a hybrid solution, Journal of Global Ethics 10, no.33 (Nov 2014): 326–338.https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2014.971854Harmen van der Wilt Crimes against humanity: a category hors concours in (international) criminal law?, (Feb 2014): 25–41.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107257139.003EAMON ALOYO Improving global accountability: The ICC and nonviolent crimes against humanity, Global Constitutionalism 2, no.33 (Sep 2013): 498–530.https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000178Kai Ambos Punishment Without a Sovereign? The Ius Puniendi Issue of International Criminal Law: A First Contribution Towards a Consistent Theory of International Criminal Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2274868Christopher Heath Wellman The Rights Forfeiture Theory of Punishment, Ethics 122, no.22 (Jul 2015): 371–393.https://doi.org/10.1086/663791MARKUS D. DUBBER Common Civility: The Culture of Alegality in International Criminal Law, Leiden Journal of International Law 24, no.44 (Nov 2011): 923–936.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156511000434Soraya Nour, Klaus Schlichte, Benjamin Herborth, Andreas Niederberger, Peter Niesen, Anna Goppel, Thomas Seibert Politische Gestalt und politische Konsequenzen, (Jan 2011): 256–303.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05327-5_6Massimo Renzo A Criticism of the International Harm Principle, Criminal Law and Philosophy 4, no.33 (Aug 2010): 267–282.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-010-9098-1Kirsten J Fisher The Distinct Character of International Crime: Theorizing the Domain, Contemporary Political Theory 8, no.11 (Feb 2009): 44–67.https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2008.21Christopher Heath Wellman A Theory of Secession, 18 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499265Aaron Fichtelberg Crimes beyond justice? Retributivism and war crimes, Criminal Justice Ethics 24, no.11 (Jan 2005): 31–46.https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2005.9992178Jovana Davidovic, Larry May, Elizabeth Edenberg International Criminal Court, the Trust Fund for Victims, and Victim Participation, (): 217–243.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139628594.008Kristen Hessler, Larry May, Zach Hoskins State Sovereignty as an Obstacle to International Criminal Law, (): 39–57.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642265.003

Doing and Allowing

Next article No AccessArticlesDoing and Allowing*Samuel SchefflerSamuel Scheffler Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 114, Number 2January 2004 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/379355 Views: 244Total views on this site Citations: 27Citations are reported from Crossref © 2004 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Bastian Steuwer Constraints, You, and Your Victims, Noûs 37 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12436María-Elena Gómez-Parra, Bashar Daiss The Concept of Change and the Teachers’ Role on the Implementing Technological Transformation at School, (May 2022): 79–97.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9640-4_4Mellisa Holtzman Bystander Intervention Training: Does it Increase Perceptions of Blame for Non‐Intervention?, Sociological Inquiry 91, no.44 (Sep 2020): 914–939.https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12391Jessica Flanigan Philosophical methodology and leadership ethics, Leadership 14, no.66 (Jun 2017): 707–730.https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715017711823Eugenio Cusumano, James Pattison The non-governmental provision of search and rescue in the Mediterranean and the abdication of state responsibility, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 31, no.11 (Jun 2018): 53–75.https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1477118Jessica Flanigan Obstetric Autonomy and Informed Consent, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19, no.11 (Jun 2015): 225–244.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9610-8Javier S. Hidalgo The Duty to Disobey Immigration Law, Moral Philosophy and Politics 3, no.22 (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2015-0031J. Pattison The ethics of diplomatic criticism: The Responsibility to Protect, Just War Theory and Presumptive Last Resort, European Journal of International Relations 21, no.44 (Mar 2015): 935–957.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115572491Inna Levy, Sarah Ben-David Mechanism of Bystander-Blaming, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 59, no.11 (Sep 2013): 96–113.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13503297Robert S. Taylor Religious Conservatives and Safe Sex: Reconciliation by Nonpublic Reason, American Political Thought 3, no.22 (Jun 2015): 322–340.https://doi.org/10.1086/677736Toby Svoboda, Peter Irvine Ethical and Technical Challenges in Compensating for Harm Due to Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering, Ethics, Policy & Environment 17, no.22 (Aug 2014): 157–174.https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2014.927962Paul Hurley Deontology, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee681James Pattison When Is It Right to Fight? Just War Theory and the Individual-Centric Approach, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, no.11 (Nov 2011): 35–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9323-6Fiona Woollard The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing I: Analysis of the Doing/Allowing Distinction, Philosophy Compass 7, no.77 (Jun 2012): 448–458.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00491.xFiona Woollard The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing II: The Moral Relevance of the Doing/Allowing Distinction, Philosophy Compass 7, no.77 (Jun 2012): 459–469.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00492.xLorraine Besser-Jones The Role of Practical Reason in an Empirically Informed Moral Theory, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15, no.22 (Apr 2011): 203–220.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9284-9XIAOFEI LIU A Robust Defence of the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing, Utilitas 24, no.11 (Feb 2012): 63–81.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820811000380 Svoboda Is Aerosol Geoengineering Ethically Preferable to Other Climate Change Strategies?, Ethics and the Environment 17, no.22 (Jan 2012): 111.https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.17.2.111Jim Staihar, Stephen Macedo Defending a Role for Mercy in a Criminal Justice System, (Oct 2011): 138–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030656.006RIVKA WEINBERG It Ain't My World, Utilitas 21, no.22 (Jun 2009): 144–162.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820809003446by Robert S. Taylor Rawlsian Affirmative Action Taylor, Ethics 119, no.33 (Jul 2015): 476–506.https://doi.org/10.1086/598170FIONA WOOLLARD DOING AND ALLOWING, THREATS AND SEQUENCES, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89, no.22 (Jun 2008): 261–277.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00320.xRobert Huseby Duties and Responsibilities Towards the Poor, Res Publica 14, no.11 (Apr 2008): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-008-9047-1Michael Gunder, Jean Hillier Problematising responsibility in planning theory and practice: On seeing the middle of the string?, Progress in Planning 68, no.22 (Aug 2007): 57–96.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2007.07.002Allen Thompson Environmentalism, Moral Responsibility, and the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing, Ethics, Place & Environment 9, no.33 (Oct 2006): 269–278.https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790600893343Vidar Halvorsen Is it better that ten guilty persons go free than that one innocent person be convicted?, Criminal Justice Ethics 23, no.22 (Jun 2004): 3–13.https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2004.9992168Friderik Klampfer Moral responsibility for unprevented harm, Acta Analytica 19, no.3333 (Mar 2004): 119–161.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-004-1016-5

Caring, Identification, and Agency

Caring, Identification, and Agency

Reasonable Reasons in Contractualist Moral Argument

Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesReasonable Reasons in Contractualist Moral Argument*Rahul KumarRahul Kumar Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 114, Number 1October 2003 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/378034 Views: 179Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref © 2003 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Stephen David John, Emma J Curran Costa, cancer and coronavirus: contractualism as a guide to the ethics of lockdown, Journal of Medical Ethics 48, no.99 (Mar 2021): 643–650.https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107103Ken Oshitani Contractualism and the Moral Point of View, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25, no.44 (Aug 2022): 667–684.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10310-yRyan W. Davis Self‐Authorship and the Claim Against Interference, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102, no.22 (Feb 2021): 220–242.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12336Bharat Ranganathan Paul Ramsey’s Christian Deontology, (Sep 2019): 163–185.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25193-2_8Corey Katz Contractualism, Person-Affecting Wrongness and the Non-identity Problem, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21, no.11 (Nov 2017): 103–119.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9857-3Janis David Schaab Why it is Disrespectful to Violate Rights: Contractualism and the Kind-Desire Theory, Philosophical Studies 175, no.11 (Jan 2017): 97–116.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0857-xMoisés Vaca El dilema contractualista, Ideas y Valores 66, no.165165 (Sep 2017).https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v66n165.59241Julio Montero Human Rights, Personal Responsibility, and Human Dignity: What Are Our Moral Duties to Promote the Universal Realization of Human Rights?, Human Rights Review 18, no.11 (Oct 2016): 67–85.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-016-0430-6Elizabeth Finneron-Burns What’s wrong with human extinction?, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2020): 327–343.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1278150Alan Hamlin Contractarianism, (Jan 2015): 803–808.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.63013-1Stephen John Why the prevention paradox is a paradox, and why we should solve it: A philosophical view, Preventive Medicine 53, no.4-54-5 (Oct 2011): 250–252.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.006Nicholas Southwood Moral Contractualism, Philosophy Compass 4, no.66 (Dec 2009): 926–937.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00256.xScott M. James The Caveman's Conscience: Evolution and Moral Realism, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87, no.22 (Jun 2009): 215–233.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802358016Ludvig Beckman Do global climate change and the interest of future generations have implications for democracy?, Environmental Politics 17, no.44 (Aug 2008): 610–624.https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802193500Pablo Gilabert A Substantivist Construal of Discourse Ethics, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13, no.33 (Sep 2005): 405–437.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550500169232Paul Litton, Franklin G. Miller A Normative Justification for Distinguishing the Ethics of Clinical Research from the Ethics of Medical Care, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33, no.33 (Jun 2016): 566–574.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00519.x

Rescuing Ivan Ilych: How We Live and How We Die

Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesRescuing Ivan Ilych: How We Live and How We Die*F. M. KammF. M. Kamm Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 113, Number 2January 2003 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/342848 Views: 223Total views on this site Citations: 20Citations are reported from Crossref © 2003 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Lucas Scripter Remorse and the Ledger Theory of Meaning, Philosophy (Aug 2022): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819122000304Christopher Frugé Value after death, Ratio 21 (Mar 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12333DAVID O'BRIEN Conservatism Reconsidered, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8, no.11 (Aug 2021): 149–168.https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2020.50CHRISTOPHER FRUGÉ Permanent Value, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8, no.22 (Nov 2021): 356–372.https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2021.16Fatıma Firdevs ADAM KARDUZ, Adnan ÖZBEY MORAL IDENTITY, ALTRUISM AND MEANING IN LIFE IN TEACHER CANDIDATES, e-International Journal of Educational Research (Nov 2021).https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1001101Jennifer Tosti-Kharas, Christopher Michaelson To Mean Is To Be Perceived: Studying the Meaning of Work Through the Eyes of Others, Academy of Management Perspectives 35, no.33 (Aug 2021): 503–516.https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0156Thaddeus Metz Life Worth Living, (Jun 2021): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_4195-2Thaddeus Metz African theories of meaning in life: A critical assessment, South African Journal of Philosophy 39, no.22 (Jul 2020): 113–126.https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2020.1770429James L. D. Brown Additive Value and the Shape of a Life, Ethics 130, no.11 (Sep 2019): 92–101.https://doi.org/10.1086/704345Donald W. Bruckner The Shape of a Life and Desire Satisfaction, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100, no.22 (Jul 2018): 661–680.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12240Christopher Michaelson A Novel Approach to Business Ethics Education: Exploring How to Live and Work in the 21st Century, Academy of Management Learning & Education 15, no.33 (Sep 2016): 588–606.https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0129Amihud Gilead , Philosophia 44, no.33 ( 2016): 775.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9714-yStephen M. Campbell When the Shape of a Life Matters, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18, no.33 (Sep 2014): 565–575.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9540-xAaron Smuts To Be or Never to Have Been: Anti-Natalism and a Life Worth Living, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, no.44 (Oct 2013): 711–729.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9461-0Gerald Lang What Does Ivan Ilyich Need To Be Rescued From?, Philosophy 89, no.22 (Oct 2013): 325–347.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819113000764Dale Dorsey Desire-satisfaction and Welfare as Temporal, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, no.11 (Nov 2011): 151–171.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9315-6Joshua Glasgow The shape of a life and the value of loss and gain, Philosophical Studies 162, no.33 (Aug 2011): 665–682.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9788-0Christopher Michaelson Work and The Most Terrible Life, Journal of Business Ethics 77, no.33 (Mar 2007): 335–345.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9353-0Thaddeus Metz New Developments in the Meaning of Life, Philosophy Compass 2, no.22 (Mar 2007): 196–217.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00061.xWARD E. JONES PHILOSOPHERS, THEIR CONTEXT, AND THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES, Metaphilosophy 37, no.55 (Oct 2006): 623–645.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00462.x

Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equalityof Initial Opportunities

In the old days, material egalitarians tended to favor equality of outcome advantage, on some suitable conception of advantage (happiness, resources, etc.). Under the influence of Dworkin’s seminal articles on equality, contemporary material egalitarians have tended to favor equality of brute luck advantage—on the grounds that this permits people to be held appropriately accountable for the benefits and burdens of their choices. I shall argue, however, that a plausible conception of egalitarian justice requires neither that brute luck advantage always be equalized nor that people always bear the full cost of their voluntary choices. Instead, justice requires that initial opportunities for advantage be equalized—roughly along the lines suggested by Arneson and Cohen. Brute luck egalitarianism and initial opportunity egalitarianism are fairly similar in motivation, and as a result they have not been adequately distinguished. Once the two views are more clearly con-

Arrow's Theorem, Indeterminacy, and Multiplicity Reconsidered

Previous articleNext article No AccessArrow's Theorem, Indeterminacy, and Multiplicity Reconsidered*Mathias RisseMathias Risse Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 111, Number 4July 2001 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/233570 Views: 53Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref © 2001 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Henrik D. Kugelberg Social choice problems with public reason proceduralism, Economics and Philosophy 38, no.11 (Feb 2021): 51–70.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267120000498Wesley H. Holliday, Eric Pacuit Axioms for defeat in democratic elections, Journal of Theoretical Politics 33, no.44 (Nov 2021): 475–524.https://doi.org/10.1177/09516298211043236Hannu Nurmi The Incidence of Some Voting Paradoxes Under Domain Restrictions, Group Decision and Negotiation 29, no.66 (Aug 2020): 1107–1120.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09697-9Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, Danielle Costa Morais, Hannu Nurmi More Than Two Alternatives, (Oct 2019): 21–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30955-8_4Eerik Lagerspetz Interpretations, (Jan 2016): 247–340.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23261-4_5MARK A. BURGMAN, HELEN M. REGAN, LYNN A. MAGUIRE, MARK COLYVAN, JAMES JUSTUS, TARA G. MARTIN, KRIS ROTHLEY Voting Systems for Environmental Decisions, Conservation Biology 28, no.22 (Jan 2014): 322–332.https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12209Rosa Camps, Xavier Mora, Laia Saumell A continuous rating method for preferential voting. The incomplete case, Social Choice and Welfare 40, no.44 (Apr 2012): 1111–1142.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0663-5Aki Lehtinen A welfarist critique of social choice theory, Journal of Theoretical Politics 23, no.33 (Jul 2011): 359–381.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629811411753Mathias Risse On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods I: The Nonobviousness of Majority Rule, Philosophy Compass 4, no.55 (Sep 2009): 793–802.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00224.xMathias Risse On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods II: Alternatives to Majority Rule, Philosophy Compass 4, no.55 (Sep 2009): 803–812.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00225.xArnold Shepperson An economy of impossibility: a preliminary study for an ordinal approach to research methods in cultural studies, Critical Arts 22, no.22 (Nov 2008): 333–357.https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040802472492Joel Parker Peter Emerson, ed., Designing an All-Inclusive Democracy: Consensual Voting Procedures For Use in Parliaments, Councils and Committees, Public Choice 135, no.3-43-4 (Nov 2007): 493–496.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9261-yMathias Risse On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods I: The Non-Obviousness of Majority Rule, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1296638MARC FLEURBAEY SOCIAL CHOICE AND JUST INSTITUTIONS: NEW PERSPECTIVES, Economics and Philosophy 23, no.11 (Mar 2007): 15–43.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001204Donald G. Saari Which is better: the Condorcet or Borda winner?, Social Choice and Welfare 26, no.11 (Jan 2006): 107–129.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-005-0046-2Mathias Risse Why the count de Borda cannot beat the Marquis de Condorcet, Social Choice and Welfare 25, no.11 (Nov 2005): 95–113.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-005-0045-3Gerry Mackie Democracy Defended, 20 (Sep 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490293 by Donald G. Saari Capturing the “Will of the People” Saari, Ethics 113, no.22 (Jul 2015): 333–349.https://doi.org/10.1086/342857

Theaters of Justice: Arendt in Jerusalem, the Eichmann Trial, and the Redefinition of Legal Meaning in the Wake of the Holocaust

Previous articleNext article No AccessTheaters of Justice: Arendt in Jerusalem, the Eichmann Trial, and the Redefinition of Legal Meaning in the Wake of the HolocaustShoshana FelmanShoshana Felman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Critical Inquiry Volume 27, Number 2Winter, 2001 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/449006 Views: 54Total views on this site Citations: 28Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 2000 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Sahar Ghumkhor Charleston and Christchurch and the Politics of Postracial Forgiveness, ReOrient 7, no.11 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.1.0004Jo-Anne Dillabough Higher education, violent modernities and the ‘global present’: the paradox of politics and new populist imaginaries in HE, Globalisation, Societies and Education 20, no.22 (Aug 2021): 178–192.https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1954497Nerijus Milerius, Agnė Narušytė, Violeta Davoliūtė, Lukas Brašiškis Cold War Cinema and the Traumatic Turn in Europe, (Aug 2022): 11–36.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07135-5_2Violeta Davoliūtė Local Testimony and the (Un)Silencing of Sexual Violence in Lithuania under German Occupation during WWII, Humanities 10, no.44 (Dec 2021): 129.https://doi.org/10.3390/h10040129David Sausdal, Kjersti Lohne Theatrics of transnational criminal justice: Ethnographies of penality in a global age, Theoretical Criminology 25, no.33 (Jul 2021): 361–378.https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806211029562Zeina Al Azmeh, Joanne Dillabough, Olena Fimyar, Colleen McLaughlin, Shaher Abdullateef, Wissam Aldien Aloklah, Adnan Rashid Mamo, Abdul Hafiz Abdulhafiz, Samir Al Abdullah, Yasser Al Husien, Ammar Al Mohamad Al Ibrahim, Ziad Al Ibrahim, Taiseer Barmu, Abdulnasser Farzat, Bakry Kadan Cultural trauma and the politics of access to higher education in Syria, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 42, no.44 (Feb 2020): 528–543.https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1715922Nidesh Lawtoo The Case of Eichmann Restaged : Arendt, Evil, and the Complexity of Mimesis, Political Research Quarterly 74, no.22 (Apr 2020): 479–490.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920911201Violeta Davoliūtė The aesthetics of justice: recognition and the Holocaust in Soviet films of the Thaw, Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema 15, no.22 (Apr 2021): 104–121.https://doi.org/10.1080/17503132.2021.1904115Lynne Humphrey The Holocaust and the law: a model of ‘good history’?, Rethinking History 24, no.11 (Oct 2019): 94–115.https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2019.1655852C. McLaughlin, J. Dillabough, O. Fimyar, Z. Al Azmeh, S. Abdullateef, M. Abedtalas, S. Al Abdullah, W.A. Al Oklah, A.H. Abdulhafiz, Y. Al-Hussein, Z. Al Ibrahim, A. Al Mohamad Al Ibrahim, T. Barmu, A. Rashid Mamo, F. Shaban Testimonies of Syrian academic displacement post-2011: Time, place and the agentic self, International Journal of Educational Research Open 1 (Jan 2020): 100003.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100003Peter Adey Evacuated to Death: The Lexicon, Concept, and Practice of Mobility in the Nazi Deportation and Killing Machine, Annals of the American Association of Geographers 24 (Aug 2019): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1633904Martin Shuster Hannah Arendt on the evil of not being a person, Philosophy Compass 13, no.77 (Apr 2018): e12504.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12504nancy viva davis halifax, David Fancy, Jen Rinaldi, Kate Rossiter, Alex Tigchelaar Recounting Huronia Faithfully: Attenuating Our Methodology to the “Fabulation” of Truths -Telling, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 18, no.33 (Dec 2017): 216–227.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708617746421Jo-Anne Dillabough Gender, Social Justice and Citizenship in Education: Engaging Space, the Narrative Imagination, and Relationality, (Oct 2016): 49–71.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51507-0_3Amos Goldberg Empathy, Ethics, and Politics in Holocaust Historiography, (Jan 2016): 52–76.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552372_4Irma Erlingsdóttir The Politics of Justice and the French Blood Affair in Hélène Cixous's The Perjured City, Paragraph 38, no.33 (Nov 2015): 369–385.https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2015.0173Jo-Anne Dillabough, Philip Gardner 4.3 “Of Time and the City”: Young People’s Ethnographic Accounts of Identity and Urban Experience in Canada, (Nov 2014): 727–751.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_35 EICHMANN AND HIS GHOSTS, Cultural Critique 88 (Oct 2014): 79–124.https://doi.org/10.5749/culturalcritique.88.2014.0079Kriss Ravetto-Biagioli Noli me tangere, (Apr 2014): 456–487.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118586815.ch29Stefanie Rosenmüller Recht kraft Urteilens, (Jan 2013): 157–179.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19829-3_7Dan Stone Saul Friedländer and the Future of Holocaust Historiography, (Jan 2013): 37–48.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029539_4David Kaposi Between Orient and Occident, Journal of Language and Politics 9, no.33 (Nov 2010): 409–432.https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.3.04kap Michael Rothberg Between Auschwitz and Algeria: Multidirectional Memory and the Counterpublic Witness Michael Rothberg, Critical Inquiry 33, no.11 (Jul 2015): 158–184.https://doi.org/10.1086/509750John Fritch, Catherine Helen Palczewski, Jennifer Farrell, Eric Short Disingenuous Controversy: Responses to Ward Churchill's 9/11 Essay, Argumentation and Advocacy 42, no.44 (Feb 2017): 190–205.https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2006.11821654Geraldine Pratt Abandoned Women and Spaces of the Exception, Antipode 37, no.55 (Nov 2005): 1052–1078.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00556.xCatherine Helen Palczewski When Times Collide: Ward Churchill's Use of an Epideictic Moment to Ground Forensic Argument, Argumentation and Advocacy 41, no.33 (Feb 2017): 123–138.https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2005.11821624Dan Stone Genocide as Transgression, European Journal of Social Theory 7, no.11 (Jul 2016): 45–65.https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431004040019Donald Bloxham From Streicher to Sawoniuk: the Holocaust in the Courtroom, (Jan 2004): 397–419.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524507_19

Civic Education and Liberal Legitimacy

Soulevant le paradoxe de l'obligation de l'education civique des enfants et de l'apprentissage des valeurs fondamentales du liberalisme telle que l'autonomie de l'individu, l'A. montre que la permissibilite de l'education civique pose probleme, tant du point de vue de l'autorite de l'ecole en matiere d'enseignement et de l'autorite des parents en matiere d'education, que du point de vue de la legitimite de l'etat liberal au regard du consentement hypothetique des citoyens. Examinant les arguments en faveur de l'education civique developpes par W. Galston et A. Gutmann, ainsi que l'argument instrumental en faveur de l'education falicitant l'autonomie, l'A. montre que le debat souleve la question de la place de la famille religieuse de l'enfant et la question des programmes scolaires dans le cadre limite de la doctrine liberale

Trust as Noncognitive Security about Motives

Examinant les approches cognitive et non-cognitive de la confiance dans le domaine de la theorie politique contemporaine, l'A. souligne la pertinence de la seconde pour le gouvernement, ainsi que l'importance d'un sens de la securite concernant la bienveillance, le caractere consciencieux et la reciprocite des acteurs politiques dans la vie publique moderne

The Necessity of Differences: Constructing a Positive Category of Women

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Necessity of Differences: Constructing a Positive Category of WomenMarilyn FryeMarilyn Frye Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 21, Number 4Summer, 1996Feminist Theory and Practice Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/495128 Views: 37Total views on this site Citations: 29Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1996 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Sara-Maria Sorentino Mistresses as Masters?, differences 32, no.22 (Sep 2021): 69–93.https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-9309345 Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender, (Jan 2021): 17–43.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4090-9.ch002Alasia Nuti Injustice and the Reproduction of History, 25 (Mar 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108325592Ulrika Dahl Queering Sexism and Whiteness with Marilyn Frye, Paragraph 41, no.33 (Nov 2018): 333–348.https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2018.0275Mari Mikkola On the apparent antagonism between feminist and mainstream metaphysics, Philosophical Studies 174, no.1010 (Jul 2016): 2435–2448.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0732-1Dongping Zheng, Yuanfang Dai, Yang Liu Place, identity and becomings with mobile technologies: feminist and Chinese philosophies in dialogue, International Communication of Chinese Culture 4, no.33 (Aug 2017): 319–337.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-017-0106-1Amina Alrasheed Nayel Research Area Problem and Methodology, (Jan 2017): 1–44.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44051-4_1Adam Ellwanger No Exit, Pedagogy 17, no.11 (Jan 2017): 35–58.https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-3658382Mari Mikkola Feminist Metaphysics and Philosophical Methodology, Philosophy Compass 11, no.1111 (Nov 2016): 661–670.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12349Rosi Braidotti Thinking with an Accent: Françoise Collin, Les cahiers du Grif, and French Feminism, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 39, no.33 (Jul 2015): 597–626.https://doi.org/10.1086/674299Ajnesh Prasad Beyond analytical dichotomies, Human Relations 65, no.55 (Apr 2012): 567–595.https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711432183Theodore Bach Gender Is a Natural Kind with a Historical Essence, Ethics 122, no.22 (Jul 2015): 231–272.https://doi.org/10.1086/663232Linda Martín Alcoff Gender and Reproduction, (Jan 2012): 12–28.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283696_2Mari Mikkola Gender Concepts and Intuitions, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39, no.44 (Jan 2020): 559–583.https://doi.org/10.1353/cjp.0.0060Allison Weir Global Feminism and Transformative Identity Politics, Hypatia 23, no.44 (Mar 2020): 110–133.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01436.xLinda Martín Alcoff Gender and Reproduction, Asian Journal of Women's Studies 14, no.44 (Jan 2016): 7–27.https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2008.11666054Maya J. Goldenberg The Problem of Exclusion in Feminist Theory and Politics: A Metaphysical Investigation into Constructing a Category of ‘Woman’, Journal of Gender Studies 16, no.22 (May 2007): 139–153.https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230701324603Shweta Singh Deconstructing ‘gender and development’ for ‘identities of women’, International Journal of Social Welfare 16, no.22 (Sep 2006): 100–109.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00454.xMari Mikkola Elizabeth Spelman, Gender Realism, and Women, Hypatia 21, no.44 (Mar 2020): 77–96.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01129.xFiona Wilson Caught between difference and similarity: the case of women academics, Women in Management Review 20, no.44 (Jun 2005): 234–248.https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420510599061Gaile Pohlhaus Knowing communities: An investigation of Harding's standpoint epistemology, Social Epistemology 16, no.33 (Jul 2002): 283–293.https://doi.org/10.1080/0269172022000025633 Wini Breines What’s Love Got to Do with It? White Women, Black Women, and Feminism in the Movement Years Breines, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 27, no.44 (Jul 2015): 1095–1133.https://doi.org/10.1086/339634Kathryn Rountree The Past is a Foreigners' Country: Goddess Feminists, Archaeologists, and the Appropriation of Prehistory, Journal of Contemporary Religion 16, no.11 (Aug 2010): 5–27.https://doi.org/10.1080/13537900123321J. Lorber Using Gender to Undo Gender: A Feminist Degendering Movement, Feminist Theory 1, no.11 (Apr 2000): 79–95.https://doi.org/10.1177/14647000022229074DEBORAH W. KILGORE Understanding learning in social movements: a theory of collective learning, International Journal of Lifelong Education 18, no.33 (May 1999): 191–202.https://doi.org/10.1080/026013799293784Heike Kahlert Differenz als Positivität, (Jan 1999): 83–102.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10133-8_5 Rosi Braidotti Comment on Felski's "The Doxa of Difference": Working through Sexual Difference, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 23, no.11 (Oct 2015): 23–40.https://doi.org/10.1086/495232Bernice Lott The Personal and Social Correlates of a Gender Difference Ideology, Journal of Social Issues 53, no.22 (Apr 2010): 279–297.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02444.xMaureen A. Mathison The Complicity of Essentializing Difference., Communication Theory 7, no.22 (May 1997): 149–161.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00146.x

Sympathy, Simulation, and the Impartial Spectator

Hume observed that our minds are mirrors to one another: they reflect one another's passions, sentiments, and opinions.' This "sympathy," or "propensity we have to sympathize with others, to ... receive by communication [the] inclinations and sentiments [of others], however different from, or even contrary to, our own," he held to be the chief source of moral distinctions.2 Hume presented an account of how this mirroring of minds works. After a brief presentation of the account, I will show how it needs to be updated and corrected in the light of recent empirical research. Then I will give some reasons to think that the mirroring of minds is more pervasive than even Hume had thought: that mirroring is an essential part of the way in which we think about other minds. Finally, I will make some remarks about the relevance of mirroring to ethics.

Civic Education and Social Diversity

How can civic education in a liberal democracy give social diversity its due? Two complementary concerns have informed a lot of liberal thinking on this subject. Liberals like John Stuart Mill worry that "the plea of liberty" by parents not block "the fulfillment by the State of its duties" to children. They also worry that civic education not be conceived or conducted in such a way as to stifle "diversity in opinions and modes of conduct."' Some prominent contemporary theorists add a new and interesting twist to these common--concerns. They criticize liberals like Mill and Kant for contributing to one of the central problems, the stifling of social diversity, that they are trying to resolve.2 The comprehensive liberal aim of educating children not only for citizenship but also for individuality or autonomy, these political liberals argue, does not leave enough room for social diversity. Would a civic educational program consistent with political liberalism accommodate significantly more social diversity than one guided by comprehensive liberalism?3 Political liberals claim that it would, and some recommend political liberalism to us largely on this basis. This article shows that political liberalism need not, and often does not, accommodate more social diversity through its civic educational program than comprehensive liberalism. Section I examines the defining difference between political and comprehensive liberalism and suggests why we might expect to find a significant difference in the accommodation of social diversity by political and comprehensive liberalism through civic education.

Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship

An ideal of universal citizenship has driven the emancipatory momentum of modern political life. Ever since the bourgeoisie challenged aristocratic privileges by claiming equal political rights for citizens as such, women, workers, Jews, blacks, and others have pressed for inclusion in that citizenship status. Modern political theory asserted the equal moral worth of all persons, and social movements of the oppressed took this seriously as implying the inclusion of all persons in full citizenship status under the equal protection of the law. Citizenship for everyone, and everyone the same qua citizen. Modern political thought generally assumed that the universality of citizenship in the sense of citizenship for all implies a universality of citizenship in the sense that citizenship status transcends particularity and difference. Whatever the social or group differences among citizens, whatever their inequalities of wealth, status, and power in the everyday activities of civil society, citizenship gives everyone the same status as peers in the political public. With equality conceived as sameness, the ideal of universal citizenship carries at least two meanings in addition to the extension of citizenship to everyone: (a) universality defined as general in opposition to particular; what citizens have in common as opposed to how they differ, and (b) universality in the sense of laws and rules that say the same for all and apply to all in the same way; laws and rules that are blind to individual and group differences. During this angry, sometimes bloody, political struggle in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, many among the excluded and disadvantaged thought that winning full citizenship status, that is, equal political and civil rights, would lead to their freedom and equality. Now in the late twentieth century, however, when citizenship rights have been formally extended to all groups in liberal capitalist societies, some groups still find themselves treated as second-class citizens. Social movements of oppressed and excluded groups have recently asked why extension of equal citizenship rights has not led to social justice and equality. Part of the answer is

Integrity

Integrity

Coordination and the Moral Obligation to Obey the Law

Previous articleNext article No AccessCoordination and the Moral Obligation to Obey the LawWilliam S. BoardmanWilliam S. Boardman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 97, Number 3Apr., 1987 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/292865 Views: 22Total views on this site Citations: 9Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1987 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ludvig Beckman Popular sovereignty facing the deep state. The rule of recognition and the powers of the people, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2018 (Jul 2019): 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1644583Matthias Brinkmann Coordination Cannot Establish Political Authority, Ratio Juris 31, no.11 (Feb 2018): 49–69.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12193Anthony R. Reeves Practical Reason and Legality: Instrumental Political Authority Without Exclusion, Law and Philosophy 34, no.33 (Nov 2014): 257–298.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-014-9221-xDorota Mokrosinska Communal Ties and Political Obligations, Ratio Juris 26, no.22 (May 2013): 187–214.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12010Kenneth Ehrenberg Critical Reception of Raz’s Theory of Authority, Philosophy Compass 6, no.1111 (Nov 2011): 777–785.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00444.xOliver Black Conceptual Foundations of Antitrust, 17 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494666Oliver Black Reliance and Obligation, Ratio Juris 17, no.33 (Sep 2004): 269–284.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2004.00269.xMatthew D. Adler Popular Constitutionalism and the Rule of Recognition: Whose Practices Ground U.S. Law?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.603442George Klosko The Moral Force of Political Obligations, American Political Science Review 84, no.44 (Aug 2014): 1235–1250.https://doi.org/10.2307/1963261

Democracy and Social Choice

The problem ofjustifying democracy arises when a society sees the need for cooperative, collective action. Collective action may be needed to solve coordination problems, public goods problems, Prisoner's Dilemmas, and other structural problems of human interaction or perhaps to realize common ideals of justice in concrete political institutions. Once the need for collective action is established, one must ask how the goals of a cooperative endeavor are to be secured. Cooperation requires that individuals, at least over a specified range of activity, pursue a joint strategy. To assure voluntary compliance in a joint venture, cooperation must be to each person's advantage. However, each person may have an incentive to induce others to cooperate and to defect from the joint strategy in the hope of enjoying the fruits of cooperation without incurring the opportunity costs of compliance. This is the essence of the Prisoner's Dilemma, and considerations of this sort suggest that if collective action is to succeed, policies or strategies formed collectively must be coercively enforceable. Coercion, however, requires justification. Because solving the problem of rational noncompliance requires that collective decisions be coercively enforceable, the rules by which collective decisions are reached require justification. Douglas Rae neatly puts the problem of justification that emerges when political solutions are coercively enforceable as follows: "Once a political community has decided which of its members are to participate directly in the making of collective policy, an important question remains: 'How many of them must agree before a policy is imposed on the community?"" This is essentially the question to which the principle of democratic rule provides an answer: by what process are collective decisions to be made? Answering Rae's question requires a normative framework. We could say that a procedure for making collective decisions is justified if and

Intervals ("Ma") in Space and Time: Foundations for a Religio-Aesthetic Paradigm in Japan

Previous articleNext article No AccessIntervals ("Ma") in Space and Time: Foundations for a Religio-Aesthetic Paradigm in JapanRichard B. PilgrimRichard B. Pilgrim Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by History of Religions Volume 25, Number 3Feb., 1986 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/463043 Views: 55Total views on this site Citations: 20Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1986 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Morna Simpson A missiological reflection on an intercultural encounter at St Alban’s Anglican-Episcopal Church, Tokyo, Practical Theology 14, no.33 (Sep 2020): 253–263.https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2020.1805908Clifford H. Clarke, Naomi Takashiro Sustaining Love and Building Bicultural Marriages Between Japanese and Americans in Japan, (May 2021): 975–993.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45996-3_51Philip Constable, Nooch Kuasirikun From cosmological to commercial form: A Buddhist theory of ‘form’, ‘space’ and ‘stream of re-becoming’ in mid-19th century Thai accounting, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 72 (Oct 2020): 102113.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102113José Vela Castillo Un jardín rocoso. Cinco estampas de Ryōan-ji, VLC arquitectura. Research Journal 7, no.11 (Apr 2020): 33.https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2020.10901Clifford H. Clarke, Naomi Takashiro Turning Bicultural Critical Incidents into Inclusive Bicultural Identities and Organizations in US Subsidiaries in Japan, (Mar 2020): 281–298.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35574-6_14Simon Morley Retaining plenitude: Lee Ufan and the ‘Indistinct’, Journal of Visual Art Practice 17, no.2-32-3 (Jul 2018): 173–187.https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2018.1466457Yoko Akama Kokoro of Design: Embracing Heterogeneity in Design Research, Design and Culture 9, no.11 (Feb 2017): 79–85.https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2017.1280266Jun Ohashi, Wei-Lin Melody Chang (Im)politeness and Relationality, (May 2017): 257–285.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_11Luis Pancorbo Crespo, Ines Martin Robles El umbral habitado. Dialéctica del límite en la casa de Julio Cano Lasso, VLC arquitectura. Research Journal 3, no.22 (Oct 2016): 29.https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2016.5817Daniel E. Ferguson, Candace R. Kuby Curricular, Relational, and Physical Spaces in the Japanese Hoikuen, International Journal of Early Childhood 47, no.33 (Sep 2015): 403–421.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-015-0151-zNicolas Standaert Don't Mind the Gap: Sinology as an Art of In-Betweenness, Philosophy Compass 10, no.22 (Jan 2015): 91–103.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12199Michael Turner, Tal Tomer Community Participation and the Tangible and Intangible Values of Urban Heritage, Heritage & Society 6, no.22 (Nov 2013): 185–198.https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000013Roy Daly, Abigail Keating, Deborah Mellamphy, Jill Murphy Ma, mu and the interstice, Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media , no.55 (Aug 2013): 87–100.https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.5.06Miho Nakagawa Mamoru Oshii’s Production of Multi-layered Space in 2D Anime, Animation 8, no.11 (Mar 2013): 65–83.https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847712473810Naoko Komori Visualizing the negative space: Making feminine accounting practices visible by reference to Japanese women's household accounting practices, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 23, no.66 (Sep 2012): 451–467.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.04.006Mikyoung Jun Pearce, Rebecca Woodford-Smith The (dis)location of time and space: Trans-cultural collaborations in Tokyo, Journal of Media Practice 13, no.33 (Jan 2014): 197–213.https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.13.3.197_1Thomas A. Tweed Space, Material Religion 7, no.11 (Apr 2015): 116–123.https://doi.org/10.2752/175183411X12968355482295 Steven Heine From Rice Cultivation to Mind Contemplation: The Meaning of Impermanence in Japanese Religion, History of Religions 30, no.44 (Oct 2015): 373–403.https://doi.org/10.1086/463247Lesley Di Mare Ma and Japan, Southern Communication Journal 55, no.33 (Sep 1990): 319–328.https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949009372798Judith Hamera Silence that reflects: Butoh, Ma , and a crosscultural gaze, Text and Performance Quarterly 10, no.11 (Jan 1990): 53–60.https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939009365955

On the Right to Be Punished: Some Doubts

Previous articleNext article No AccessOn the Right to Be Punished: Some DoubtsJohn DeighJohn Deigh Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 94, Number 2Jan., 1984 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/292527 Views: 14Total views on this site Citations: 13Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1984 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Chad Flanders Punishment and Public Reason: Reply to Hoskins, Criminal Justice Ethics 42, no.11 (Feb 2023): 38–51.https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2023.2181524Adriana Placani, Stearns Broadhead Right to be Punished?, European journal of analytic philosophy 16, no.11 (Jun 2020): 53–74.https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.16.1.3David Alm , Criminal Law and Philosophy 13, no.11 ( 2019): 63.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-018-9459-8Chad Flanders Political Philosophy and Punishment, (Dec 2019): 521–545.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22811-8_22David Alm Is There a Claim to Deserved Punishment?, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 52, no.33 (Sep 2014): 403–425.https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12081Whitley R. P. Kaufman Can Retributive Punishment Be Justified?, (Aug 2012): 47–72.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4845-3_3David Wood Punishment: Consequentialism, Philosophy Compass 5, no.66 (Jun 2010): 455–469.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00287.xDIMITRI LANDA On the Possibility of Kantian Retributivism, Utilitas 21, no.33 (Sep 2009): 276–296.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820809990057Bertrand Guillarme Bibliographie, (May 2003): 175–184.https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.guill.2003.01.0175 R. A. Duff Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment, Crime and Justice 20 (Oct 2015): 1–97.https://doi.org/10.1086/449241Wojciech Sadurski Social Justice and the Problem of Punishment, Israel Law Review 25, no.3-43-4 (Feb 2016): 302–331.https://doi.org/10.1017/S002122370001044XWojciech Sadurski Liberal Neutrality and Theory of Punishment, (Jan 1990): 149–165.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1928-0_6Clifton Perry A problem with refusing certain forms of psychiatric treatment, Social Science & Medicine 20, no.66 (Jan 1985): 645–648.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(85)90403-4

Self-Defense, Pacifism, and the Possibility of Killing

Previous articleNext article No AccessSelf-Defense, Pacifism, and the Possibility of KillingCheyney C. RyanCheyney C. Ryan Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 93, Number 3Apr., 1983 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/292463 Views: 28Total views on this site Citations: 20Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1983 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:David Hershenov, Philip A Reed How Not to Defend the Unborn, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 46, no.44 (Jul 2021): 414–430.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhab011Amanda Cawston Pacifism as Re-appropriated Violence, (Mar 2019): 41–60.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13427-3_3Tyler Doggett Killing Innocent People, Noûs 52, no.33 (Jan 2017): 645–666.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12188Jeremy Moses Peace without perfection: The intersections of realist and pacifist thought, Cooperation and Conflict 53, no.11 (Sep 2017): 42–60.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836717728539Cécile Fabre On Jan Narveson’s “Pacifism: A Philosophical Analysis”, Ethics 125, no.33 (Sep 2015): 823–825.https://doi.org/10.1086/679545J. Angelo Corlett Pacifism and Punishment, Philosophia 41, no.44 (Aug 2013): 945–958.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9468-8Cheyney Ryan Pacifism, Just War, and Self-Defense, Philosophia 41, no.44 (Sep 2013): 977–1005.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9493-7William J. Hawk Pacifism, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee102M S Wallace Fighting the good fight? Legitimating violence in a world of contested and contingent moral frameworks, International Politics 49, no.66 (Oct 2012): 671–695.https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.24Ian Fishback The Common Defense Paradigm: A Moral Approach to the Culpable Threat Problem, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2584005by Cheyney Ryan Democratic Duty and the Moral Dilemmas of Soldiers, Ethics 122, no.11 (Jul 2015): 10–42.https://doi.org/10.1086/662532Tyler Doggett Recent Work on the Ethics of Self-Defense, Philosophy Compass 6, no.44 (Mar 2011): 220–233.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00382.xMilla Emilia Vaha CHILD SOLDIERS AND KILLING IN SELF-DEFENCE: CHALLENGING THE ‘MORAL VIEW’ ON KILLING IN WAR, Journal of Military Ethics 10, no.11 (Mar 2011): 36–51.https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2011.561639by Seth Lazar Responsibility, Risk, and Killing in Self‐Defense Lazar, Ethics 119, no.44 (Jul 2015): 699–728.https://doi.org/10.1086/605727THADDEUS METZ RESPECT FOR PERSONS PERMITS PRIORITIZING TREATMENT FOR HIVAIDS, Developing World Bioethics 8, no.22 (Aug 2008): 89–103.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00186.xAndrew Botterell Why we ought to be (reasonable) subjectivists about justification, Criminal Justice Ethics 26, no.11 (Jan 2007): 36–58.https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2007.9992210UWE STEINHOFF Torture — The Case for Dirty Harry and against Alan Dershowitz, Journal of Applied Philosophy 23, no.33 (Aug 2006): 337–353.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00356.xLionel K. McPherson Innocence and Responsibility in War, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34, no.44 (Jan 2020): 485–506.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2004.10716576Cheyney Ryan The One Who Burns Herself for Peace, Hypatia 9, no.22 (Mar 2020): 21–39.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00431.x A Guide to the Literature on Aggressive Behavior, Aggressive Behavior 9, no.33 (Jan 1983): 277–279.https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1983)9:3<277::AID-AB2480090311>3.0.CO;2-3