Pharmacokinetics Of Gentamicin Research Articles

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Gentamicin in Pediatrics.

The primary objective of this work was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gentamicin across the whole pediatric age spectrum from premature neonates to young adults with a single model by identifying significant clinical predictors. A nonlinear mixed-effect population PK model was developed with retrospective therapeutic drug-monitoring data. A total of 6459 drug concentration measurements from 3370 hospitalized patients were collected for model building (n=2357) and evaluation (n=1013). In agreement with previously reported models, a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the drug PK. Patient-specific factors significantly impacting gentamicin clearance included fat-free mass, postmenstrual age, and serum creatinine (SCr). Based on our model, the deviation of the individual SCr from the age-dependent expected mean SCr value (SCrM) can result in a 40% lower clearance in a patient with renal impairment than that in a patient with normal kidney function, with SCrM:SCr ratios between 0.16 and 3.2 in this study. Consistent with the known age-dependent changes of the proportion of extracellular water in body weight, the inclusion of the impact of extracellular water maturation on the central volume of distribution was found to improve the model fitting significantly. In comparison with other published models, model evaluation suggested the developed model was the least biased and physiologically most representative. These results will be used to inform individualized initial dosing strategies and serve as a prior PK model for Bayesian updating and forecasting as individual clinical observations become available.

A review of population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients.

Gentamicin is often used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Due to pharmacokinetic variability in paediatric patients, appropriate dosing of gentamicin in the paediatric population is challenging. This article reviews published population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients, identifies covariates that significantly influence gentamicin pharmacokinetics, and determines whether there is a consensus on proposed dosing for intravenous gentamicin in this population. The PubMed database was searched for articles published until the end of 2017. If the articles described population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in the paediatric population (after intravenous administration of gentamicin), the following data were extracted: type of study, year of publication, population characteristics and number of patients, gentamicin dosing, total number of gentamicin (serum and/or plasma) concentrations, type of population modelling approach, developed model with pharmacokinetic parameters and covariates included. In most of the studies, one- or two-compartment modelling was applied. The mean estimated gentamicin clearance for newborns, infants and the complete paediatric population was 0.048, 0.13 and 0.067L/h/kg, respectively, and the mean predicted volume of distribution was 0.475, 0.35 and 0.33L/kg, respectively. The values reflect differences in body composition and kidney maturation within the different paediatric populations. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were most influenced by age, body size and renal function. Based on our review, the authors agree on a prolonged dosing interval for preterm and term newborns (up to 48hours). However, there was no agreement on proposed dosing with respect to gestational age. In general, the proposed daily doses were lower compared to those initially applied for preterm newborns and comparable to those for term newborns. For infants and children, the dosing interval remained unchanged (24hours), but the proposed daily doses were higher than actually applied. When differences in the paediatric population are considered and an appropriate population PK model with applicable covariates is applied, dosing can be individualized. In the future, studies of gentamicin pharmacokinetics in paediatric patients should focus on currently underestimated covariates, such as fat-free mass, concomitantly administered drugs, body temperature and critical illness because these can change gentamicin PK considerably. Consequently, different dosing is required and TDM becomes even more important.

Optimizing Gentamicin Dosing in Pediatrics Using Monte Carlo Simulations.

Gentamicin is known to have concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, and its nephrotoxic effect is well described. We developed a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to optimize gentamicin dosing in pediatrics. Data were retrospectively collected for pediatric patients 1 month to 12 years of age, admitted to general pediatric wards or intensive care units and received gentamicin for suspected or proven Gram-negative infections at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 306 gentamicin peak and trough concentrations sets from 107 patients were analyzed with mean (±standard deviation) patient age and weight of 4.5 ± 3.5 years and 16.7 ± 10.8 kg, respectively. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were adequately described with a one compartment system (R = 0.82, bias = 1.75% and precision = 88% for population predictions and R = 0.94, bias = 5% and precision = 29% for individual predictions). The gentamicin pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: volume of distribution = 8.9 L, total body clearance = 2.8 L/h for a 20-kg patient. Monte Carlo simulations showed that doses of 5-6 mg/kg/dose once daily are adequate only to treat infections with Gram-negative organisms having minimal inhibitory concentration less than 1 µg/mL. While, at minimal inhibitory concentration of 1 µg/mL, higher doses (7-8 mg/kg/dose once daily) are needed to maximize the efficacy of gentamicin. However, at minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 µg/mL, even a 10 mg/kg dose showed poor target attainment (52%). The finding of this study highlights the need to reevaluate the current breakpoints of gentamicin and also to assess the safety of higher doses of gentamicin in pediatrics.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Neonates with Hypoxemic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Receiving Controlled Hypothermia.

Identify population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment of gentamicin in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) undergoing controlled hypothermia (CH). Prospective open-label pharmacokinetic study. Gentamicin concentrations were modeled and dosing regimens simulated for a 5000-patient neonatal population with HIE receiving CH using PMetrics, a nonparametric, pharmacometric modeling, and simulation package for R. A 189-bed children's tertiary care teaching hospital. Twelve patients, 5 (42%) females and 7 (58%) males, met inclusion criteria with a median gestation age of 39.9weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 38.5-40.2wks) and a median birthweight (BW) of 3.3 kg (IQR 3.1-3.7 kg). Gentamicin concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination with BW as a covariate on volume of distribution (Vd). The mean total body population clearance (CL) was 2.2±0.7ml/minute/kg, and the volume of the central compartment was 0.44±0.06L/kg. The R2 , bias, and precision for the observed versus population predicted model were 0.917, 1.15, and 10.9μg/ml; the R2 , bias, and precision for the observed versus individual predicted model were 0.982, -0.132, and 0.932μg/ml, respectively. The calculated mean population estimate for the total Vd was 0.96±0.4L/kg. The dosing regimen that most consistently produced a maximum concentration (Cmax ) in the range of 10-12mg/L with a minimum concentration (Cmin ) level less than 2mg/L was 5mg/kg/dose given every 36hours. These data suggest the population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonates with HIE receiving CH have an increase in gentamicin CL and are different from previous reports in neonates with HIE not receiving CH and/or neonates without HIE. This analysis suggests a dosing regimen of 5mg/kg/dose every 36hours results in a gentamicin Cmax within the range of 10-12mg/L with a Cmin lower than 2mg/L, which is appropriate for treating susceptible gram-negative organisms with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 1mg/L or lower.

Antibiotic Elution Characteristics and Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin and Vancomycin from a Mineral Antibiotic Carrier: An in vivo Evaluation of 32 Clinical Cases.

Introduction: Locally implanted antibiotic-eluting carriers may be a valuable adjuvant to the management of prosthetic joint infections. Aim: to assess local and plasma antibiotic concentrations as well as cumulative antibiotic urine excretion associated with clinical use of a gentamicin - or vancomycin-loaded mineral composite antibiotic carrier.Methods: 32 patients (male/female=19/13, mean age=56; 21-82 years) were prospectively followed after implantation of gentamicin (n=11), vancomycin (n=15), or a combination (n=7), using an antibiotic carrier (CERAMENT™|G or CERAMENT™|V, mean amount 11 (3-20) mL) during resection arthroplasty of the hip/knee. We measured antibiotic concentrations in plasma (1h, 3h, 24h, 48h and 72h post-implantation), urine (24h, 48h and 72h post-implantation) and in drain (n=15).Results: We observed low antibiotic concentrations in plasma (Gentamicin: 0.33 mg/L (95%-CI: 0.25-0.44) and vancomycin: 1.33 mg/L (95%-CI: 1.02-1.66)) and high concentrations in drain (Gentamicin: mean 57.8 mg/L (95%-CI: 45.8-69.7) and vancomycin: mean 234.4 mg/L (95%-CI: 198.9-269.7)). Use of a drain was associated with a statistically significant reduction in vancomycin urine excretion (55.6% (95% CI: 36.45-74.92) to 28.71% (95% CI: 13.07-44.35), p=0.042). A similar trend was observed for gentamicin (34.17% (95% CI: 24.62-43.72) to 16.22% (95% CI: 0-33.86), p=0.078).Conclusions: CERAMENT™G/V was associated with safe plasma concentrations and high local concentrations above minimum inhibitory concentration. Installation of a surgical drain results in removal of a substantial amount of antibiotics and reduces antibiotic urine excretion.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Gentamicin in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Gentamicin pharmacokinetics may be altered in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Description of gentamicin pharmacokinetics and relevant variables can improve dosing. A retrospective population pharmacokinetic study was designed, and pediatric patients who received gentamicin while undergoing ECMO therapy over a period of 6 1/2 years were included. Data collection included the following: patient demographics, serum creatinine, albumin, hematocrit, gentamicin dosing and serum concentrations, urine output, and ECMO circuit parameters. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with NONMEM, and simulation was performed to identify empiric doses to achieve therapeutic serum concentrations. A total of 37 patients met study criteria (75.7% male patients), with a median age of 0.17 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.12-0.82] years. Primary indications for ECMO included the following: congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n = 17), persistent pulmonary hypertension (n = 5), and septic shock (n = 4). Patients received a total of 117 gentamicin doses [median 1.8 (IQR 1.4-2.9) mg/kg/dose] and had 125 serum concentrations measured at a median of 22.8 (IQR 15.8-25.5) hours after a dose. Population pharmacokinetic analysis identified a 2-compartment model with additive error as the best fit. Covariates included the following: allometrically scaled fat-free mass on clearance, central and peripheral volume of distribution (VDcentral and VDperipheral), and intercompartmental clearance; serum creatinine on clearance; ultrafiltration rate on central volume of distribution. Simulation identified dosage of 4-5 mg/kg/dose every 24 hours for neonates and infants as an acceptable empiric dosing regimen. Children and adolescents had elevated trough concentrations when dosed according to traditional dosing methods. Fat-free mass should be used to dose gentamicin in pediatric ECMO patients. Serum creatinine is a marker of gentamicin clearance and should be used to adjust gentamicin dosing in pediatric ECMO patients.

Retrieving the Optimal Gentamicin Dose for (Morbidly) Obese Patients: A Prospective Clinical Study

Background: Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic predominantly used in bloodstream infections. While the prevalence of obesity is increasing dramatically, there is no consensus on how to adjust the dose in these individuals, for which adjusted body weight (ABW) or, more recently, lean body weight (LBW) have been proposed. In this prospective clinical study, we study the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in obese and non-obese individuals to develop a dosing algorithm that results in adequate drug exposure across the whole clinical population. Methods: Morbidly obese subjects undergoing bariatric surgery and non-obese healthy volunteers received one IV dose of gentamicin (obese: 5 mg/kg LBW, non-obese: 5 mg/kg total body weight) over 30 minutes with subsequent 24 hour sampling. Statistical analysis, modelling and Monte Carlo simulations were performed using R 3·4·3 and NONMEM 7·3. Findings: In morbidly obese individuals (n = 20, 109-221 kg) dosed on LBW, both AUC0-24h and Cmax were lower compared to non-obese individuals (n = 8, 53-86 kg) dosed on total body weight (mean difference (95% CI): -25·0 mg/L*h (-16·7 - -33·3 mg/l*h) and -8·7 mg/L, (-6·5 - -11·0 mg/L), respectively). Body weight was the best predictor for both clearance and central volume of distribution (P< 0·001, P < 0·001). Simulations show that dosing based on an allometric dose weight (70 x (TBW/70)0·73) will lead to similar exposure across the entire population. Clincial Trial Number: The study was registered in the Dutch Trial Registry (NTR6058) Funding Statement: ZonMW (grant 836041004). Declaration of Interests: R.J.M. Bruggemann declares that he has no conflicts of interest with regards to this work. Outside of this work, he has served as consultant to and has received unrestricted research grants from Astellas Pharma Inc., F2G, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharpe and Dohme Corp., and Pfizer Inc. All payments were invoiced by the Radboud University Medical Center. Other authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by the local human research and ethics committee and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and nebulized gentamicin in critically ill patients.

Optimal dosing for nebulized gentamicin is unknown. We compared the pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of gentamicin following intravenous and nebulized administration in mechanically ventilated patients. Twelve critically ill male patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia received a 30 min intravenous infusion of 8 mg/kg gentamicin , followed 48 h afterwards by the same dose nebulized. Blood samples were collected immediately before and until 24 h after intravenous and nebulized administration; mini-bronchoalveolar lavages (mini-BALs) were performed at 3 and 7 h or 5 and 10 h (six patients each) after each intravenous and nebulized administration. The PK analysis was conducted using a population approach. After intravenous administration, concentrations of gentamicin measured in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were very variable, and overall in the same range of magnitude (from 0.3 to 28 mg/L) as in plasma. After nebulization, gentamicin concentrations were much higher (∼3800-fold) in ELF than in plasma. The average systemic bioavailability of nebulized gentamicin was estimated to be 5%, with considerable inter-individual variability. Compared with intravenous administration, after nebulization the exposure (expressed as AUC) to gentamicin was 276-fold greater in ELF and 18-fold lower in plasma. Compared with intravenous administration, nebulization of gentamicin in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia provides higher pulmonary concentrations and lower systemic concentrations but the inter-individual variability is large.

Effect of hypothermia treatment on gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hypothermia is the current standard therapy for asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Gentamicin is used for the empirical treatment of early-onset neonatal sepsis. We investigated the influence of hypothermia treatment on gentamicin pharmacokinetics and suggested the appropriate dosing recommendations for gentamicin in neonates with HIE receiving hypothermia treatment. We searched studies published until February 2017 in MEDLINE using PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Three independent reviewers screened the literature and extracted data from each study. All of the studies that reported the blood concentrations or pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin in hypothermic neonates with HIE were included in this review. Articles were excluded if they were not original research. A total of 8 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed in which the mean difference of gentamicin for the trough concentration and clearance between hypothermic and normothermic neonates were 0.81mg/L (95% confidence interval [-0.07, 1.69]) and -0.21 mL/kg/min (95% confidence interval [-0.31, -0.12]), respectively. The factors affecting gentamicin clearance in hypothermic neonates with HIE were gestational age, birthweight and serum creatinine. Gentamicin clearance is decreased in neonates with HIE receiving hypothermia treatment compared to those not receiving hypothermia treatment. Modified gentamicin dosing regimens are required to avoid potential toxicity related to higher concentrations during hypothermia treatment.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Gentamicin in Pediatric Oncology Patients To Facilitate Personalized Dosing.

To ensure the safe and effective dosing of gentamicin in children, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended. TDM utilizing Bayesian forecasting software is recommended but is unavailable, as no population model that describes the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in pediatric oncology patients exists. This study aimed to develop and externally evaluate a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin to support personalized dosing in pediatric oncology patients. A nonlinear mixed-effect population pharmacokinetic model was developed from retrospective data. Data were collected from 423 patients for model building and a further 52 patients for external evaluation. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the gentamicin disposition. The final model included renal function (described by fat-free mass and postmenstrual age) and the serum creatinine concentration as covariates influencing gentamicin clearance (CL). Final parameter estimates were as follow CL, 5.77 liters/h/70 kg; central volume of distribution, 21.6 liters/70 kg; peripheral volume of distribution, 13.8 liters/70 kg; and intercompartmental clearance, 0.62 liter/h/70 kg. External evaluation suggested that current models developed in other pediatric cohorts may not be suitable for use in pediatric oncology patients, as they showed a tendency to overpredict the observations in this population. The final model developed in this study displayed good predictive performance during external evaluation (root mean square error, 46.0%; mean relative prediction error, -3.40%) and may therefore be useful for the personalization of gentamicin dosing in this cohort. Further investigations should focus on evaluating the clinical application of this model.

Early postnatal gentamicin and ceftazidime treatment in normal and food restricted neonatal wistar rats: Implications for kidney development.

Up to two-thirds of premature born neonates are treated for infections with aminoglycosides such as gentamicin. Although acute toxicities are well described, there is uncertainty on developmental changes after treatment of premature born neonates. We studied the effect of gentamicin and ceftazidime on kidney development in the rat. Additionally, we evaluated the modulating effect of extrauterine growth restriction. On postnatal day (PND) 2, Wistar rats were cross-fostered into normal sized litters (12 pups) or large litters (20 pups) to create normal food (NF) or food restricted (FR) litters to simulate growth restriction and dosed daily intraperitoneally with placebo, 4 mg/kg of gentamicin or 50 mg/kg ceftazidime until PND 8. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were studied in a separate group of animals. Kidneys were weighed. Renal expression of 18 developmental genes was evaluated by quantitative PCR on PND 8. On PND 35, glomerular number was assessed by stereology and glomerular generations were counted. Food restricted litters showed 22% less body weight compared with controls by day 35 (p < 0.001), 1.4- to 1.5-fold down regulation of Renin, Oat1, and Agtr1a (p < 0.05) expression and a 12% reduction in glomerular numbers (mean 30841 vs. 35187, p < 0.001), whereas glomerular generation count was unaffected. Gentamicin pharmacokinetic parameters were found to be in a human clinical range (mean maximum concentration in plasma of 4.88 mg/L and mean area under the plasma-concentration time curve up to the last measured concentration after 4 hr of 10.71 mg.h/L for sexes combined) and all endpoints were unaffected. Ceftazidime reduced Renin expression by 1.7-fold (p < 0.01). Our experiments showed that gentamicin at clinical levels did not disturb kidney development, ceftazidime can affect Renin expression, and extrauterine growth restriction impairs kidney development, but did not modulate potential drug toxicity. Birth Defects Research 109:1228-1235, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Neonates

Gentamicin is a bactericidal aminoglycoside antibiotic, it inhibits the protein synthesis. Gentamicin is active against the majority of aerobic gram-negative bacilli such as Pseudomonas, Klebsiella and Escherichia coli. The gentamicin doses are 3 mg/kg once-daily for preterm newborns 35 weeks of gestation. The monitoring of gentamicin serum concentration is recommended when infants are treated for 48 hours or more. The gentamicin peak concentration must be at least 8 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to be bactericidal and the gentamicin trough concentration must be < 2 µg/ml to avoid ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity.Once-daily dosing of gentamicin (4 mg/kg), is preferred than twice-daily dose of 2.5 mg/kg gentamicin. A gentamicin loading dose (4 mg/kg), followed by once-daily dosing of 2.5 mg/kg yields safe and target range in neonates. An extended dosing interval of 48-hour (5 mg/kg gentamicin), was compared with twice-daily dose of 2.5 mg/kg gentamicin. Infants in the 48-hour interval and in the twice-daily achieved peak gentamicin concentrations of 9.43 µg/ml and 6.0 µg/ml, respectively, (p<0.001), and trough gentamicin concentrations were 1.08 µg/ml and 1.54 µg/ml, respectively, (p<0.001). The infants born small for gestational age have a reduced gentamicin clearance, and a more prolonged gentamicin half-life than infants born appropriate for gestational age. Patent ductus arteriosus, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, therapeutic hypothermia, and asphyxia reduce the gentamicin clearance.

Mannitol and the blood-labyrinth barrier

BackgroundCharacterization of the blood labyrinth barrier (BLB) is extremely important to determine whether the BLB can be manipulated pharmacologically. However, experiments to investigate the BLB are technically difficult to perform. In this report, we demonstrated a unique method of controlling the BLB, and established the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in perilymph, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood with and without mannitol.Study designControlled animal research project.MethodsPermeability of the BLB and the blood brain barrier (BBB) to gentamicin with and without mannitol was studied by collecting 175 samples from 44 guinea pigs using concentrations relevant to human clinical situations. Samples were taken from two groups of 22 animals, with each animal undergoing sampling at a different time after administration of either 10 mg/ml gentamicin (4 mg/kg) (Gardena, CA) alone or gentamicin with 20% mannitol (250 mg/kg) (Mallinckrodt Inc., KY). The sample times varied from 0.5 to 17.5 h post-infusion. Samples were also taken from 4 animals as negative controls after administration of normal saline. Our goal was to simultaneously assess the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in each of three different fluid samples in the same animal. Thus at the pre-determined post-infusion sampling time, each animal was sampled once for perilymph, CSF, and blood before being euthanized. Each animal contributed to a single time point on the subsequent pharmacokinetic curves with more than one animal per time point.ResultsMannitol increased the rate of entry and egress of gentamicin through BLB significantly (p = 0.0044) but the effects on the BBB did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.581). Mannitol did not alter renal clearance of gentamicin from the blood (p = 0.433). The concentration of gentamicin in perilymph and CSF was always significantly lower than in blood.ConclusionsMannitol administration transiently increases the permeability of the BLB. Potential clinical benefits may accrue from selected timing of administration of osmotic agents such as mannitol augmenting the rate of entry and egress of compounds such as gentamicin into and out of perilymph.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Considerations for Gentamicin in Newborns with Suspected or Proven Sepsis Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria

The aim of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of gentamicin in neonates with suspected or proven Gram-negative sepsis and determine the optimal dosage regimen in relation to the bacterial MICs found in this population. Data were prospectively collected between October 2012 and January 2013 in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at the Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. A single nonlinear mixed-effects regression analysis (NONMEM) was performed to describe the population PK of gentamicin. Dosage regimens based upon gestational age (GA) were generated using Monte Carlo simulations with the final model. Target values were based on the MIC distribution in our patient population. In total, 136 gentamicin concentrations from 65 (pre)term neonates were included. The PK was best described by an allometric 2-compartment model with postmenstrual age (PMA) as a covariate on clearance (Cl). The MIC distribution (median, 0.75 [range, 0.5 to 1.5] mg/liter) justified a gentamicin target peak concentration of 8 to 12 mg/liter. This study describes the PK of gentamicin in (pre)term neonates. Dosage regimens of 5 mg/kg of body weight every 48 h, 5 mg/kg every 36 h, and 5 mg/kg every 24 h for patients with GAs of <37 weeks, 37 to 40 weeks, and ≥40 weeks, respectively, are recommended.

Perilymph pharmacokinetics of locally-applied gentamicin in the guinea pig

Intratympanic gentamicin therapy is widely used clinically to suppress the vestibular symptoms of Meniere's disease. Dosing in humans was empirically established and we still know remarkably little about where gentamicin enters the inner ear, where it reaches in the inner ear and what time course it follows after local applications. In this study, gentamicin was applied to the round window niche as a 20 μL bolus of 40 mg/ml solution. Ten 2 μL samples of perilymph were collected sequentially from the lateral semi-circular canal (LSCC) at times from 1 to 4 h after application. Gentamicin concentration was typically highest in samples originating from the vestibule and was lower in samples originating from scala tympani. To interpret these results, perilymph elimination kinetics for gentamicin was quantified by loading the entire perilymph space by injection at the LSCC with a 500 μg/ml gentamicin solution followed by sequential perilymph sampling from the LSCC after different delay times. This allowed concentration decline in perilymph to be followed with time. Gentamicin was retained well in scala vestibuli and the vestibule but declined rapidly at the base of scala tympani, dominated by interactions of perilymph with CSF, as reported for other substances. Quantitative analysis, taking into account perilymph kinetics for gentamicin, showed that more gentamicin entered at the round window membrane (57%) than at the stapes (35%) but the lower concentrations found in scala tympani were due to greater losses there. The gentamicin levels found in perilymph of the vestibule, which are higher than would be expected from round window entry alone, undoubtedly contribute to the vestibulotoxic effects of the drug. Furthermore, calculations of gentamicin distribution following targeted applications to the RW or stapes are more consistent with cochleotoxicity depending on the gentamicin concentration in scala vestibuli rather than that in scala tympani.

Gentamicin Pharmacokinetics and Monitoring in Pediatric Patients with Febrile Neutropenia.

The pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia is described, and the adequacy of initial dosing of once-daily gentamicin assessed at Queensland's largest Children's Hospital. Data were retrospectively collected from all pediatrics with febrile neutropenia admitted over a 2-year period who had at least 2 gentamicin concentration-time measurements (a paired set within 1 dosing interval). Gentamicin clearance, volume of distribution, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours postdose (AUC0-24), and maximum concentration values were estimated with log-linear regression using each paired set. The percentage of paired sets associated with gentamicin exposure within predefined hospital targets was calculated, and exposure was examined in relation to the bacterial culture status. Data were collected from 69 patients [median (interquartile range) age 3.7 years (2.2-8.9)] and comprised 121 paired concentration sets characterizing 80 separate admissions. Median (interquartile range) gentamicin clearance and volume of distribution were 8.1 L·h·70 kg (5.8-12.4) and 21.8 L/70 kg (16.9-29.5), respectively. Predefined hospital exposure targets were achieved for both AUC0-24 and maximum concentration for 10% of paired sets; one or the other of these targets were met for 36% of paired sets, and neither target was achieved for 54% of paired sets. Achievement of targets improved with repeated monitoring during the same admission. Median AUC0-24 achieved was significantly higher in patients with a confirmed Gram-negative infection compared with those without 71 (50-91) mg·h·L versus 55 (40.8-67.5) mg·h·L, respectively (P = 0.003). Over the study period, a median gentamicin dose of 10.8 and 6.4 mg/kg was estimated to be necessary to achieve an AUC target of 80 mg·h·L in children ≤10 years and >10 years of age. Based on a log-linear method of analysis, current dosing seems to be consistently producing gentamicin exposure below predefined pharmacokinetic targets, suggesting that an increase in the recommended starting dose of gentamicin may be required.

Gentamicin Pharmacokinetics and Monitoring in Pediatric Febrile Neutropenic Patients

The pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in pediatric febrile neutropenia patients is described and the adequacy of initial dosing of once daily gentamicin assessed at Queensland's largest Children's Hospital. Data were retrospectively collected from all pediatrics with febrile neutropenia admitted over a two-year period who had at least two gentamicin concentration-time measurements (a paired set within one dosing interval). Gentamicin clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours post-dose (AUC0-24), and maximum concentration (Cmax) values were estimated using log-linear regression using each paired set. The percentage of paired sets associated with gentamicin exposure within pre-defined hospital targets was calculated and exposure was examined in relation to bacterial culture status. Data were collected from 69 patients (median [IQR] age 3.7 years [2.2, 8.9]) and comprised 121 paired concentration sets characterizing 80 separate admissions. Median [IQR] gentamicin CL and Vd were 8.1 L/h/70 kg [5.8, 12.4] and 21.8 L/70 kg [16.9, 29.5], respectively. Pre-defined hospital exposure targets were achieved for both AUC0-24 and Cmax for 10% of paired sets; one or the other of these targets were met for 36% of paired sets and neither target was achieved for 54% of paired sets. Achievement of targets improved with repeated monitoring during the same admission. Median AUC0-24 achieved was significantly higher in patients with a confirmed Gram-negative infection compared to those without 71 [50, 91] mg·h/L versus 55 [40.8, 67.5] mg·h/L, respectively (p= 0.003)). Over the study period, a median gentamicin dose of 10.8 and 6.4 mg/kg was estimated to be necessary to achieve an AUC target of 80 mg·h/L in children ≤10 years and >10 years of age. Based on a log-linear method of analysis, current dosing appears to be consistently producing gentamicin exposure below pre-defined pharmacokinetic targets, suggesting that an increase in the recommended starting dose of gentamicin may be required.

Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin eluted from a regenerating bone graft substitute: In vitro and clinical release studies.

ObjectivesDeep bone and joint infections (DBJI) are directly intertwined with health, demographic change towards an elderly population, and wellbeing.The elderly human population is more prone to acquire infections, and the consequences such as pain, reduced quality of life, morbidity, absence from work and premature retirement due to disability place significant burdens on already strained healthcare systems and societal budgets.DBJIs are less responsive to systemic antibiotics because of poor vascular perfusion in necrotic bone, large bone defects and persistent biofilm-based infection. Emerging bacterial resistance poses a major threat and new innovative treatment modalities are urgently needed to curb its current trajectory.Materials and MethodsWe present a new biphasic ceramic bone substitute consisting of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate for local antibiotic delivery in combination with bone regeneration. Gentamicin release was measured in four setups: 1) in vitro elution in Ringer’s solution; 2) local elution in patients treated for trochanteric hip fractures or uncemented hip revisions; 3) local elution in patients treated with a bone tumour resection; and 4) local elution in patients treated surgically for chronic corticomedullary osteomyelitis.ResultsThe release pattern in vitro was comparable with the obtained release in the patient studies. No recurrence was detected in the osteomyelitis group at latest follow-up (minimum 1.5 years).ConclusionsThis new biphasic bone substitute containing antibiotics provides safe prevention of bone infections in a range of clinical situations. The in vitro test method predicts the in vivo performance and makes it a reliable tool in the development of future antibiotic-eluting bone-regenerating materials.Cite this article: M. Stravinskas, P. Horstmann, J. Ferguson, W. Hettwer, M. Nilsson, S. Tarasevicius, M. M. Petersen, M. A. McNally, L. Lidgren. Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin eluted from a regenerating bone graft substitute: In vitro and clinical release studies. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:427–435. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0108.R1.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Mexican Children With Severe Malnutrition

To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin in children with complicated severe malnutrition and to study the influence of covariates (weight and age) on pharmacokinetic indices. In addition, we use the model to perform Monte Carlo simulations to explore the efficacy of several dosage regimens. Twenty-six children with severe complicated malnutrition were studied. Ninety-six samples of gentamicin plasma concentrations, obtained from 0.5 to 8 hours after intravenous dosing, were analyzed. Population pharmacokinetic models were built using the program Monolix 4.2 (Lixoft, Antony, France). Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate optimal dosage regimens, using the final pharmacokinetic model, based on the probability of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment. The concentration-time data were fitted best to 1-compartment model. The estimated population clearance was 1.1 L/h, and the volume of distribution was 2.23 L, with an interindividual variability of 47.2% and 35.6%, respectively. The final models for the clearance and volume of distribution were as follows: CL (L/h) = CL = 1.15 (age/median age) and V (L) = 2.33 (weight/median weight). In Monte Carlo simulations, gentamicin given in dosages of 7.5 to 15 mg/kg optical density was effective in achieving the pharmacodynamic target Cmax:minimal inhibitory concentration >10 for minimal inhibitory concentrations ≤2.5 mg/L, with a probability lower than 1% for Cmin >1 mg/L. Based on the available evidence, an intravenous dose of 7.5 to 15 mg/kg once daily in children with complicated severe malnutrition and normal renal function ensures high probability of efficacy and low risk of nephrotoxicity, which gives further support to the recommendations issued by the World Health Organization treatment for this patient population.

Altered gentamicin pharmacokinetics in term neonates undergoing controlled hypothermia.

Little is known about the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of gentamicin in newborns undergoing controlled hypothermia after suffering from hypoxic−ischaemic encephalopathy due to perinatal asphyxia. This study prospectively evaluates and describes the population PK of gentamicin in these patients Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of patients included in a multicentre prospective observational cohort study (the ‘PharmaCool Study’) were collected. A non-linear mixed-effects regression analysis (nonmem®) was performed to describe the population PK of gentamicin. The most optimal dosing regimen was evaluated based on simulations of the final model. A total of 47 patients receiving gentamicin were included in the analysis. The PK were best described by an allometric two compartment model with gestational age (GA) as a covariate on clearance (CL). During hypothermia the CL of a typical patient (3 kg, GA 40 weeks, 2 days post-natal age (PNA)) was 0.06 l kg−1 h−1 (inter-individual variability (IIV) 26.6%) and volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vc) was 0.46 l kg−1 (IIV 40.8%). CL was constant during hypothermia and rewarming, but increased by 29% after reaching normothermia (>96 h PNA). This study describes the PK of gentamicin in neonates undergoing controlled hypothermia. The 29% higher CL in the normothermic phase compared with the preceding phases suggests a delay in normalization of CL after rewarming has occurred. Based on simulations we recommend an empiric dose of 5 mg kg−1 every 36 h or every 24 h for patients with GA 36–40 weeks and GA 42 weeks, respectively.