This study examines cognitive bias in news language by analyzing the reporting styles of Fox News and CNN, particularly in their coverage of the United States Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action. Despite the journalistic principle of objectivity, both news outlets demonstrate media bias through various linguistic and rhetorical techniques. By comparing articles from these two networks, this study identifies four key areas of bias: title framing, selective opinions, statistical representation, and quotation choices. The study highlights how Fox News tends to employ more aggressive language targeting Democrats, whereas CNN presents viewpoints that align with its left-leaning audience while maintaining a more professional tone. Furthermore, the study discusses instances where both outlets have produced relatively unbiased reports, demonstrating that neutrality in media is achievable. Ultimately, the research underscores the importance of critical media literacy in discerning bias and forming well-informed opinions.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
2512 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Linguistic Perspective
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
2476 Search results
Sort by Recency