Perioperative Death Research Articles

Oh Death, Here Is Your Sting.

Perioperative death is a harrowing experience that physicians often encounter while needing to continue life sustaining care for others. In this piece, an anesthesiology resident uses poetry to process the recent passing of one of his patients, highlighting the ways that it continues to impact the care that he provides.

A Retrospective Cohort Evaluation of Left Ventricular Remodeling, Perioperative Complications and Outcome in Medium and Large Size Dogs with Patent Ductus Arteriosus after Percutaneous Closure.

This retrospective cohort study included one hundred fifty-seven medium and large-size dogs with the aim of evaluating the effect of signalment and echocardiographic features on complications, outcomes and left ventricular modifications before and after patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure. The patients were divided in two groups based on the heart remodeling after closure: Group A included dogs that had a reduction in the end-systolic volume index (ESVI) after closure compared to the ESVI measured before; Group B included dogs without a reduction in ESVI after closure. Body weight, minimal ductal diameter (MDD) of PDA, end-diastolic volume index and presence of arrhythmias at presentation were significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A. The shortening fraction and ejection fraction after closure were reduced in both groups, but in Group B there was a major reduction, and the mean values indicated a possible systolic dysfunction. Complications during the procedure and death due to cardiac reasons were greater in Group B compared to Group A. In conclusion, a higher body weight, a larger MDD, a more severe heart enlargement or arrhythmias at presentation increased the risk of developing a worsening structural and functional condition after ductal closure, and this can be associated with perioperative complications and cardiac death.

The Impact of Intra-Operative Heparin on Thromboembolism and Death in a Matched Cohort of Patients with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Portuguese nationwide estimates indicate that 20% of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are treated when ruptured. In these cases, intra-operative unfractionated heparin (UFH) usage rates vary widely. Evidence on this topic is scarce and focused on patients treated by open repair (OSR). The aim was to determine the influence of UFH on peri-operative thromboembolic events (TEs) and death in a cohort of ruptured AAA (rAAA). Retrospective, single-centre, comparative study. From 2011 to April 2023, all consecutive rAAAs (endovascular repair [EVAR] and OSR) were considered. Primary outcomes were 30-day TE free survival and TE rates. The secondary outcome was 30-day death. Safety endpoints were procedural blood loss, blood product requirements, and secondary interventions due to haemorrhage. Using propensity score matching (PSM) each UFH patient was matched with one no UFH patient in a 1:1 ratio. The study included 250 patients. After PSM, 190 patients were analysed (EVAR: 60.0% no-UFH vs. 64.4% UFH). TE free survival estimates favoured the UFH group (67.3% vs. 47.2%, p = .009; UFH adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-4.17). TEs were more frequent in the no UFH group (20.0% vs. 44.2% patients, p < .001; UFH aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.65 for any TE), driven by an increase in bowel ischaemia (17.9% no UFH vs. 3.2% UFH, p = .001). Most events occurred in the first 72 hours. EVAR was associated with reduced TE and improved TE free survival (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.45 and aOR 5.54, 95% CI 2.34-13.08, respectively). No significant differences in 30-day survival were noted (75% no-UFH vs. 83% UFH, p = .26; aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.48-2.43) nor in blood loss, peri-operative red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma requirements, or secondary interventions due to haemorrhage (p = .10; p = .11; p = .13 and p = .18 respectively). In this cohort, intra-operative UFH was safe and associated with improved TE free survival, driven by a reduction in bowel ischaemia. Conversely, mortality remained unaffected. Randomised controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Impact of postoperative morbidity on outcomes in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing intestinal surgery at the time of primary or interval cytoreductive surgery: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of short-term postoperative complications on oncologic outcomes for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) or interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) with intestinal resection. MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed for patients with ovarian cancer who underwent PCS or ICS with at least one intestinal resection at our institution from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2020. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed for the PCS and ICS cohorts separately. Short-term complications within 30 days of surgery (surgical secondary events [SSEs]) were graded by a validated institutional SSE system. ResultsAmong 437 patients who underwent intestinal resections during PCS (n = 289) or ICS (n = 148), 183 (42%) had one, 180 (41%) had two, and 74 (17%) had three intestinal resections. Six (1.4%) of 437 patients experienced an anastomotic leak postoperatively. There were no perioperative deaths. There was no difference in PFS and OS for patients who underwent PCS with any SSE vs. no SSE within 30 days of surgery (HR, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.76–1.47; p = 0.75 and HR, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.49–1.26; p = 0.32, respectively). There was no difference in PFS and OS for patients who underwent ICS with any SSE vs. no SSE within 30 days of surgery (HR, 1.43; 95% CI: 0.99–2.07; p = 0.055 and HR. 1.18; 95% CI: 0.72–1.93; p = 0.52, respectively. ConclusionShort-term postoperative morbidity for patients who underwent intestinal surgery during primary surgical management for advanced ovarian cancer did not impact oncologic outcomes.

OGBN O07 Factors in recurrence following 862 giant paraesophageal hernia repairs

Abstract Background Repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) is associated with a considerable hernia recurrence rate by objective measures. This study evaluated trends in outcomes of laparoscopic non-mesh repair of giant PEH over 30 years, and factors associated with anatomical recurrence. Methods Data was extracted from a single-surgeon prospective database of laparoscopic repair of giant PEH from 1991-2021. Upper endoscopy was performed within 12 months postoperatively and selectively thereafter. Any supra-diaphragmatic stomach was defined as anatomical recurrence. Cases were chronologically divided into tertiles with trends in casemix, operative factors and outcomes evaluated. Patient and hernia characteristics, and technical operative factors, including “composite repair” (360-degree fundoplication with esophagopexy and cardiopexy to right crus), were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analysis. Results 862 repairs met selection criteria. Mean age 69.3years, majority(65.8%) female and hernia type III(87.4%) with median hernia size 66%. There was an increasing proportion of “composite repair” after the first decade(Group1, 2.7%;Group2, 81.9%;Group3, 100%;p&amp;lt;0.001).There were less anatomical hernia recurrence(Group1, 36.6%;Group2, 22.9%;Group3, 22.7%;p&amp;lt;0.001) over time. The overall anatomical recurrence rate was 27.3% with median followup 33months(IQR 16, 68). There were 10(1.2%) Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications including two perioperative deaths(0.2%). Multivariate analysis identified age&amp;lt;70years, presence of Barrett’s, absence of “composite repair”, and hiatus closure under tension as independent factors associated with recurrence(HR1.27,95%CI0.88-1.82,p=0.01;HR1.58,95%CI1.12-2.23,p=0.009;HR1.72,95%CI1.2-2.44,p=0.002;HR2.05,95%CI1.33-3.17,p=0.001,respectively). Conclusions Hernia recurrence rates decreased with increasing case volume. This coincided with the increasing adoption of “composite repair”, supporting the possible improvement in recurrence rates with this approach. Repair was associated with substantial anatomical recurrence associated with patient and technique factors. Patient factors included age &amp;lt;70 years, Barrett’s esophagus, and hiatus tension. “Composite repair” was associated with lower recurrence rate.

Simultaneous Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Lung Resection.

The best surgical treatment strategy for coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) and lung cancer (LC) remains controversial. This study analyzed the safety and efficacy of a simultaneous minimally invasive procedure for patients with CAD and LC. Patients who underwent simultaneous minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and lung resection from January 2016 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure was performed in the fourth intercostal space through a small left anterolateral minithoracotomy. Harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and sewing of the anastomoses were performed under direct vision. Lung resections were performed with or without the assistance of a thoracoscope. Sixteen patients were included with a mean age of 67.13 ± 10.61 years. Procedural success occurred in all patients with a mean operative time of 366.88 ± 94.48 minutes. All patients received at least one coronary artery bypass LIMA graft. Pneumonectomy, lobectomy, segment resection, and wedge resection were performed in one (6.25%), eight (50%), two (12.5%), and five (31.25%) patients, respectively. There were no perioperative deaths or new myocardial infarctions. Complications included one case of postoperative bleeding, two lung infections, two cases of atelectasis, one case of pleural effusion, and one case of cardiac arrhythmia. All the patients were followed up for 1 to 57 months, cancer recurrence occurred in two patients, and one patient died. The remaining patients showed no evidence of tumor recurrence or myocardial infarction. This simultaneous minimally invasive procedure is safe and effective for selected patients with CAD and LC.

Emergency Liver Retransplantation With Marginal Donors

The goal of the present study is to determine if using marginal donors negatively impacts the outcomes of emergency liver retransplantation. A retrospective case-control study was performed, including all emergency liver retransplantations done in our center between 1990 and 2021. Recipients from the control group received the second grafts from "ideal donors", and patients from the case group received them from marginal donors. Analyzed variables included demographics of recipients and donors, complications, and survival rates. 38 emergency retransplantations were performed. 23 recipients were included in the control group, and the remaining 15 were in the case group. The second donors from the case group were significantly older (mean age 58 vs 71 years old, P < 0.0001). On the contrary, there were no differences between groups regarding the mean age of recipients, comorbidities, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, or causes of retransplantation (the most common was hepatic artery thrombosis). No differences were found in early perioperative death rates (control group 26.1% vs case group 20%, P =1) and, although the case group seemed to have slightly poorer outcomes in long-term survival (control group 70%, 61%, and 55% vs case group 73%, 59%, and 39%, respectively, at 1, 5, and 10 years), the differences were not statistically significant (log-rank=0.808). The use of marginal donors for emergency liver retransplantation was proved safe in our study, as there were no differences in complications or in short- or mid-term survival rates.

The impact of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a single center experience

Abstract Background Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) is still burdened by high morbidity and mortality, despite improvements in 30-day mortality, recently reported at around 30-35%. Although endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) offers encouraging results in elective setting, the evidence supporting its use as the primary treatment for patients with rAAAs remains controversial. Endovascular approach for rAAA has been increasing worldwide. According to some recent studies, rEVAR is associated with diminished 30-day mortality, but its superiority in long-term results in terms of mortality and morbidity is still to be defined. Purpose We review our single center experience of EVAR for all patients who had rAAA over 8 years. Methods A retrospective review of data extracted from medical records identified 82 consecutive patients with rAAA who were underwent endovascular repairs from January 2014 to December 2021. We used EVAR first protocol for all patients. Under local anesthesia, percutaneous puncture of both common femoral arteries and left brachial artery is performed. Endovascular balloon control (EBC) is placed at T12 or L1 through the left brachial artery. Induction of general anesthesia can then be obtained. Then it can be done EVAR in the usual fashion. The primary end point was to assess the rAAA-related mortality in the immediate postoperative period, within 1, 3 and 5 years after EVAR; secondary endpoints included the following: length of stay, rAAA-related postoperative complications such as acute limb ischemia, myocardial infarction, renal and respiratory failure, abdominal compartment syndrome and rAAA-related re-interventions. Results EVAR was performed in all patients. There were no patients who converted to open surgical repair. The average age of the patients was 77 years, and 76% were male. 64% were sent from other hospitals, and 60% presented with severe hypotension. Anatomically, 52 cases, or 63%, were considered ineligible for EVAR. EBC were used in 72%. In early results, 12% of patients required dialysis due to acute kidney injury, and 9% required prolonged intubation with tracheotomy. Abdominal compartment syndrome occurred in 8%. Perioperative deaths occurred in 10 patients (12.1%), all within 48 hours after surgery. In late outcomes, mean follow-up was 1100. No new complications were seen after the 30-day period. Endovascular reinterventions took place in 11%. The average time to re-intervention was 372 days, with the majority of cases taking less than a year. The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 71.9%, 66.3%, and 66.3%, respectively. Conclusions EVAR for rAAA is associated with lower perioperative and long-term mortality with our protocol. This single-center experience suggests genuine concerns and impediments to the adoption of an ‘‘EVAR-first’’ policy for all rAAAs.

Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following the Ross Procedure

The Ross procedure as treatment for adults with aortic valve disease (AVD) has been the subject of renewed interest. To evaluate the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes following the Ross procedure for the treatment of adults with AVD. This post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial included adult patients (age <69 years) who underwent a Ross procedure for the treatment of AVD, including those with active endocarditis, rheumatic AVD, decreased ejection fraction, and previous cardiac surgery. The trial, conducted from September 1, 1994, to May 31, 2001, compared homograft root replacement with the Ross procedure at a single center. Data after 2010 were collected retrospectively in November and December 2022. Ross procedure. The primary end point was long-term survival among patients who underwent the Ross procedure compared with that in the age-, country of origin- and sex-matched general population. Secondary end points were freedom from any reintervention, autograft reintervention, or homograft reintervention and time-related valve function, autograft diameter, and functional status. This study included 108 adults (92 [85%] male) with a median age of 38 years (range, 19-66 years). Median duration of clinical follow-up was 24.1 years (IQR, 22.6-26.1 years; 2488 patient-years), with 98% follow-up completeness. Of these patients, 9 (8%) had active endocarditis and 45 (42%) underwent reoperations. The main hemodynamic lesion was stenosis in 30 (28%) and regurgitation in 49 (45%). There was 1 perioperative death (0.9%). Twenty-five year survival was 83.0% (95% CI, 75.5%-91.2%), representing a relative survival of 99.1% (95% CI, 91.8%-100%) compared with the general population (83.7%). At 25 years, freedom from any reintervention was 71.1% (95% CI, 61.6%-82.0%); from autograft reintervention, 80.3% (95% CI, 71.9%-89.6%); and from homograft reintervention, 86.3% (95% CI, 79.0%-94.3%). Thirty-day mortality after the first Ross-related reintervention was 0% and after all Ross-related reinterventions was 3.8% (n = 1); 10-year survival after reoperation was 96.2% (95% CI, 89.0%-100%). This study found that the Ross procedure provided excellent survival into the third decade postoperatively that was comparable to that in the general population. Long-term freedom from reintervention demonstrated that the Ross procedure may be a durable substitute into late adulthood, showing a delayed but progressive functional decline. isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN03530985.

The Outcome of Sac Filling With Fibrin Sealant and Gentamicin After Endovascular Aortic Repair of Brucella-Related Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

This study aimed to analyze the experience of our center and assess the efficacy of sac filling with fibrin sealant (FS) and gentamicin after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in patients with Brucella-related aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. All patients who received sac filling with FS and gentamicin after EVAR for Brucella-related aorto-iliac artery aneurysms between March 2019 and September 2022 were reviewed. Before and after sac filling with FS and gentamicin, aneurysm sac thrombosis and endoleak were evaluated using a preloaded catheter to monitor immediate repair outcome. Short- to mid-term outcomes were assessed by the incidence of vascular graft infection (VGI), all-cause mortality, maximum aneurysm diameter, aneurysm sac thrombosis, and other adverse events. There were 14 patients with Brucella-related aorto-iliac artery aneurysms who underwent sac filling with FS and gentamicin after EVAR. Perioperative death due to myocardial infarction in 1 patient resulted in a postoperative all-cause mortality rate of 7.1% (1/14). All patients received anti-Brucella drugs for a median of 6.0 (range: 3-12) months postoperatively. During a median follow-up period of 15.0 (range 0.5-36) months, the absolute and sagittal maximum diameters of the aorto-iliac aneurysm sac were significantly smaller than preoperation (from 46.3 ± 17.0 to 27.2 ± 16.3 mm, P<.001, and from 39.2 ± 13.1 to 24.0 ± 13.8 mm, P<.001). Two of these patients had a postoperative disappearance of the pseudoaneurysm. One patient was reintervened for bilateral femoral artery bypass surgery. Except for sac filling with gentamicin, all patients received anti-brucella medication for a median of 6.0 (range: 3-12) months. There were no allergic reactions, nephrotoxicity, endoleak, recurrence, VGI, aorta-related or infection-related deaths during the perioperative period and follow-up. Sac filling with FS and gentamicin adjunctive to EVAR, with targeted drug delivery to the sites of Brucella-related aorto-iliac artery aneurysm infection lesions, may be an effective solution to control pseudoaneurysm infection and rupture. Previous Brucella-associated aorto-iliac artery aneurysms have been limited to case reports. This study significantly increased the number of Brucella-associated aorto-iliac aneurysms by 19.7% (14/71) and extended the follow-up to 3 years. In this retrospective study of 14 patients with Brucella-associated aorto-iliac aneurysms treated endovascularly with fibrin sealant and gentamicin for sac filling and targeted administration to infection-related aneurysms, there were no aneurysm-related deaths or infection-related complications and may be an effective solution for controlling aneurysm infection and rupture. And, this approach is an attractive treatment for moving away from long-term dependence on antibiotics but still needs further evaluation.

Carotid endarterectomy for the management of carotid stenosis occurring concurrently with head and neck cancer.

Currently, most patients with concurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) and carotid stenosis (CS) are treated disjointedly for their oncologic and vascular lesions. The purpose of this review is to evaluate literature exploring a novel approach to these cases that poses several advantages, in which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is performed simultaneously with surgical resection of HNC. Carotid stenosis is a common comorbidity of patients presenting with head and neck cancer as these pathologies have overlapping risk factors. Adjuvant oncologic therapy such as radiation therapy to the site of the lesion is known to increase development or progression of carotid stenosis. Performing simultaneous surgical management of CS and HNC decreases total procedures for the patient, provides a less challenging surgical field, and eliminates prioritization of treatment initiation for one pathology over the other. There has been limited reporting of simultaneous CEA with oncologic resection of HNC in the literature. However, of the 21 cases reviewed here, no perioperative strokes were reported with only one perioperative death from myocardial infarction. Available literature supports that simultaneous CEA with oncologic resection of HNC is safe and may offer several advantages, although larger studies are required.

A novel remnant liver-first strategy for liver autotransplantation in patients with end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis: a retrospective case series.

Ex vivo liver resection combined with autotransplantation is an effective therapeutic strategy for unresectable end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE). However, ex vivo liver resection combined with autotransplantation is a technically demanding and time-consuming procedure associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The authors aimed to present our novel remnant liver-first strategy of in vivo liver resection combined with autotransplantation (IRAT) technique for treating patients with end-stage HAE. This retrospective study included patients who underwent IRAT between January 2014 and December 2020 at two institutions. Patients with end-stage HAE were carefully assessed for IRAT by a multidisciplinary team. The safety, feasibility, and outcomes of this novel technique were analyzed. IRAT was successfully performed in six patients, with no perioperative deaths. The median operative time was 537.5min (range, 501.3-580.0), the median anhepatic time was 59.0min (range, 54.0-65.5), and the median cold ischemia time was 165.0min (range, 153.8-201.5). The median intraoperative blood loss was 700.0ml (range, 475.0-950.0). In-hospital complications occurred in two patients. No Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications were observed. At a median follow-up of 18.6 months (range, 15.4-76.0) , all patients were alive. No recurrence of HAE was observed. The remnant liver-first strategy of IRAT is feasible and safe for selected patients with end-stage HAE. The widespread adoption of this novel technique requires further studies to standardize the operative procedure and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from it.

Transfemoral Access to Implant Iliac Branch Devices After Previous Aortic Grafts.

To report on the outcomes of patients undergoing an iliac branch device implantation after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair, using exclusively femoral access for catheterization and delivery of the covering stent to the hypogastric artery. Single-center retrospective study in which all patients in whom an iliac branch device was implanted after previous open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair were identified. Patients in whom the hypogastric artery catheterization and delivery of the bridging cover stent were achieved via exclusive femoral access were included. Different techniques were used based on surgeon preference. Technical success and access-related complications, as well as iliac branch device endoleak or occlusions during follow-up, were evaluated. From 2015 to 2021, 28 patients with a prior open or endovascular aorto-biliac repair underwent 34 iliac branch device implantations. Most (71%) had juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, 82% had common iliac artery aneurysms, and 25% had hypogastric artery aneurysms. Bilateral iliac branch device implantations were performed in 21% of the patients, and in 26% of cases, landing in the superior gluteal artery was obtained. An "up-and-over" technique from the contralateral groin was used in 65% of the cases, and a steerable sheath in 35%. Technical success was 94%, with no complications related to access or technique to catheterize and deliver the stents in the hypogastric artery. The cohort had 20% of major complications, with 3 perioperative deaths. Kaplan-Meier estimated an iliac branch device freedom from occlusion and endoleak was 92% and 83% at 2 years. The implantation of an iliac branch device over previous aortic or open endografts involving the aortic bifurcation is feasible and safe. We suggest using a femoral approach as the primary access of choice. In this study we present 28 patients with previous aortoiliac grafts in which iliac branch devices were performed as a subsequent step.We demonstrated the feasibility of the technique despite the difficulty of crossing a neobifurcation, with a steep angle, without complications associated with the technique. Based on our experience, we recommend transfemoral access as the first option for bypassing the hypogastric artery stent, preserving upper extremity access and its possible complications.

Pelvic exenteration for late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury: a preliminary study

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for treating late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury. Methods: This was a descriptive case series study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) confirmed radiation-induced pelvic injury after radiotherapy for pelvic malignancies; (2) late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury, such as bleeding, perforation, fistula, and obstruction, involving multiple pelvic organs; (3) TPE recommended by a multidisciplinary team; (4) patient in good preoperative condition and considered fit enough to tolerate TPE; and (5) patient extremely willing to undergo the procedure and accept the associated risks. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis of tumor recurrence or metastasis; (2) had only undergone diversion or bypass surgery after laparoscopic exploration; and (3) incomplete medical records. Clinical and follow-up data of patients who had undergone TPE for late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury between March 2020 and September 2022 at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were analyzed. Perioperative recovery, postoperative complications, perioperative deaths, and quality of life 1 year postoperatively were recorded. Results: The study cohort comprised 14 women, nine of whom had recto-vagino-vesical fistulas, two vesicovaginal fistulas, one ileo-vesical fistula and rectal necrosis, one ileo-vesical and rectovaginal fistulas, and one rectal ulcer and bilateral ureteral stenosis. The mean duration of surgery was 592.1±167.6 minutes and the median blood loss 550 (100-6000) mL. Ten patients underwent intestinal reconstruction, and four the Hartmann procedure. Ten patients underwent urinary reconstruction using Bricker's procedure and 7 underwent pelvic floor reconstruction. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 23.6±14.9 days. Seven patients (7/14) had serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo IIIa to IVb), including surgical site infections in eight, abdominopelvic abscesses in five, pulmonary infections in five, intestinal obstruction in four, and urinary leakage in two. Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) was diagnosed in five patients, none of whom had undergone pelvic floor reconstruction. Five of the seven patients who had not undergone pelvic floor reconstruction developed EPS, compared with none of those who had undergone pelvic floor reconstruction. One patient with EPS underwent reoperation because of a pelvic abscess, pelvic hemorrhage, and intestinal obstruction. There were no perioperative deaths. During 18.9±10.1 months of follow-up, three patients died, two of renal failure, which was a preoperative comorbidity, and one of COVID-19. The remaining patients had gradual and significant relief of symptoms during follow-up. QLQ-C30 assessment of postoperative quality of life showed gradual improvement in all functional domains and general health at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (all P<0.05). Conclusions: TPE is a feasible procedure for treating late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury combined with complex pelvic fistulas. TPE is effective in alleviating symptoms and improving quality of life. However, the indications for this procedure should be strictly controlled and the surgery carried out only by experienced surgeons.

Transanal total mesorectal excision: single center study on risk factors for major complications.

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) as a novel surgical approach for mid and low rectal cancer has gained significant research interest in recent years. The main objective of this study is to identify the risk factors associated with major complications after TaTME and evaluate the perioperative clinical outcomes. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer who underwent TaTME surgery and were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from January 2018 to May 2023. Univariate and multivariate regression methods were employed to analyze the risk factors influencing the occurrence of major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V). This study included a total of 179 eligible cases, with no perioperative deaths. The overall incidence of early complications was 25.1%, with a rate of 10.1% for mild complications and 15.0% for major complications. The postoperative anastomotic leakage rate within 30 days was 6.7%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that male (P=0.030), pathological T ≥ 3 (P=0.018) and manual anastomosis (P=0.009) were independent risk factors for the development of major complications after surgery. In this study, the incidence of early complications and anastomotic leakage rate in TaTME were both relatively low. Male, pathological T stage ≥ 3 and manual anastomosis were independent risk factors for the occurrence of major complications in a cohort of patients with mid and low rectal cancer undergoing TaTME.

Effect of Perioperative Stroke on Survival After Carotid Intervention.

Perioperative stroke is the most dreaded complication of carotid artery interventions and can severely affect patients' quality of life. This study evaluated the impact of this event on mortality for patients undergoing interventional treatment of carotid artery stenosis with three different modalities. Patients undergoing carotid revascularization at participating Memorial Hermann Health System facilities were captured from 2003-2022. These patients were treated with either carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid stenting (TF-CAS), or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). Perioperative outcomes, including stroke and mortality, as well as follow-up survival data at 6-month intervals, were analyzed and stratified per treatment modality. Of the 1681 carotid revascularization patients identified, 992 underwent CEA (59.0%), 524 underwent TCAR (31.2%), and 165 underwent TF-CAS (9.8%). The incidence of stroke was 2.1% (CEA 2.1%, TCAR 1.7%, and TF-CAS 3.6%; P = .326). The perioperative (30-day) death rate was 2.1% (n = 36). The perioperative death rate was higher in patients who suffered from an intraoperative stroke than in those who did not (8.3% vs 1.9%, P = .007). Perioperative death was also different between CEA, TCAR, and TF-CAS for patients who had an intraoperative stroke (.0% vs 33.3% vs .0%, P = .05). TCAR patients were likely to be older (P < .001), have a higher body mass index (P < .001), and have diabetes mellitus (P < .001). Patients who suffered from an intraoperative stroke were more likely to have a symptomatic carotid lesion (58.3% vs 28.8%, P < .001). The TCAR group had a significantly lower survival at 6months and 12months when compared to the other two groups (64.9% vs 100% P = .007). Perioperative stroke during carotid interventions significantly impacts early patient survival with otherwise no apparent change in mid-term outcomes at 5years. This difference appears to be even more significant in patients undergoing TCAR, possibly due to their baseline higher-risk profile and lower functional reserve.

Thoracic Endovascular Repair after Total Aortic Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk for Type a Aortic Dissection

The management of residual aortic dissection after initial type A repair with the Frozen elephant trunk technique remains mostly unexplored. This work aimed to evaluate endovascular second-stage surgery for patients with residual aortic dissection. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients that underwent Type A aortic repair with Frozen elephant trunk, followed by a second-stage endovascular procedure was done from March 2016 to December 2021. The primary outcome was aortic-related adverse events or mortality, and secondary outcomes were aortic remodeling and perioperative complications. Remodeling was assessed by comparing the difference in ratios for true lumen/total aortic diameters on pre-operative and follow-up scans. Thirty-four patients underwent second-stage surgery after Type A repair during the study period (7 thoracic endovascular aortic repair extensions, 1 STABLE/PETTICOAT, and 26 STABILISE). Median follow-up was 23months (range 2-66months). There were no perioperative deaths or major complications and 1 reoperation for left subclavian re-embolization. At the last follow-up, there was no aortic-related mortality. There were 5 aortic-related adverse events, including another subclavian re-embolization and a preplanned open conversion. Risk factors were connective tissue disorders (P=0.01) and aortic aneurysms >55mm (P=0.03). Distal remodeling reached statistical significance in all segments (P<0.01) and was greater for patients treated with the STABILISE technique when compared to extended thoracic endovascular aortic repair (P=0.01). Second-stage endovascular management of residual aortic dissection after initial Frozen elephant trunk repair showed excellent perioperative and good midterm outcomes and induced significant remodeling of the entire aorta in most cases, particularly with the STABILISE procedure.

Carotid Endarterectomy With Simultaneous Proximal Common Carotid Endovascular Intervention is Beneficial for Symptomatic Stenosis and Likely Confers No Advantage for Asymptomatic Lesions.

Carotid bifurcation stenosis may co-exist simultaneously with more proximal common carotid artery (CCA) atherosclerotic plaquing, primarily at the vessel origin in the aortic arch. This scenario is relatively infrequent and its' management does not have quality randomized data to support medical vs surgical treatment. It is logical to treat any high grade common carotid lesions proximal to a carotid bifurcation endarterectomy (CEA) site both to prevent perioperative emboli or thrombosis as well as future embolization. Prior long-term investigations of the combined treatment paradigm have been low volume analysis. Further, prior studies focus on perioperative outcomes with respect to stroke prevention. The only prior VQI study investigating mid-term outcomes following simultaneous CEA with proximal CCA endovascular therapy provided data on less than 10 patients beyond 1.5years. The long-term follow-up (LFTU) component initiative within VQI has been emphasized in recent years, now allowing for much more robust LTFU analysis. Four cohorts were created for perioperative outcome analysis and Kaplan Meier freedom from event analysis: CEA in isolation for asymptomatic disease; CEA in isolation for symptomatic patients; CEA with proximal CCA endovascular intervention for asymptomatic; and, CEA with proximal CCA intervention for symptomatic patients. Binary logistic multivariable regression was performed for perioperative neurological event and 90-day mortality risk determination and Cox multivariable regression analysis was performed for long term freedom from cumulative ischemic neurological event and long-term mortality analysis. Symptomatology and type of surgery (CEA with or without CCA intervention) were individual variables in the multivariable analysis. Neurological ischemic event in this study encompassed transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke combined. We noted a statistically significant (P < .001) escalation in rates of perioperative neurological event, myocardial infarction (MI), carotid re-exploration, 90day mortality and combined neurological event and 90day mortality moving from: A) asymptomatic CEA in isolation to B) symptomatic CEA in isolation to C) asymptomatic CEA combined with proximal CCA intervention to D) symptomatic CEA in combination with proximal CCA intervention. The positivity rate for the combined outcome of perioperative ischemic neurological event and 90 day mortality was 2.2% amongst asymptomatic CEA in isolation, 4.1% amongst symptomatic CEA in isolation, 4.4% amongst asymptomatic CEA in combination with proximal CCA intervention; and 8.8% in patients with symptomatic lesions undergoing combined CEA with proximal CCA intervention. On multivariable analysis patients undergoing CEA with proximal CCA endovascular intervention experienced greater risk for perioperative neurological ischemic event (aOR 2.03, 1.43-2.90, P < .001), combined perioperative neurological ischemic event and 90day mortality (aOR 2.13, 1.62-2.80, P < .001), long term mortality (HR 1.62, 1.12-2.29, P < .001), and cumulative neurological ischemic event in long term follow up (HR 1.62, 1.12-2.29, P = .007). Amongst 4395 cumulative ischemic neurological events in all study patients, 34% were TIA. Carotid bifurcation endarterectomy in combination with proximal endovascular common carotid artery intervention caries an over two fold higher perioperative risk of neurologic ischemic event and 90 day mortality relative to CEA in isolation for asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts respectively. After surgery, freedom from cerebral ischemia and mortality for patients undergoing dual intervention is closely aligned with patients undergoing CEA in isolation. Despite high adverse perioperative event rates for the combined CEA and CCA treatment, there is likely long term stroke reduction and mortality benefit to this approach in symptomatic patients based on the event free rates seen herein after initial hospital discharge. The benefit of treating asymptomatic tandem ICA and CCA lesions remains vague but the 4.4% perioperative neurologic event and death rate suggests that these patients would be better managed with medical therapy.

Analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of hand-sewn anastomosis for the digestive tract with Da Vinci robot in rectal cancer surgery

PurposeThe study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of hand-sewn anastomosis for the digestive tract with Da Vinci robot in rectal cancer surgery.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted to collect the clinical data from 27 patients who underwent Da Vinci robotic rectal cancer radical surgery in the department of gastrointestinal surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from August 2019 to February 2022. All patients received a manual suture for digestive tract reconstruction. After the posterior wall was sutured, the anterior wall was sutured continuously. Finally, a prilling thread was used to sew the junction of the front and rear walls. Perioperative indexes and complications were recorded.ResultsAll 27 patients successfully underwent the operation. Neither conversion to laparotomy nor perioperative death occurred. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were 183.6 ± 44.8 min and 54.8 ± 34.4 ml, respectively. A total of 15.3 ± 7.8 lymph nodes were harvested. The pain score 24 h after operation was 1.3 ± 1.3. The time out of bed, the time to exhaust, and the time to eat were 15.6 ± 2.9 h, 2.2 ± 0.8 days, and 2.1 ± 0.6 days, respectively. A total of 4 patients (14.8%) developed complications after the operation. Grade B anastomotic leakage gradually resolved after drainage and antibiotic therapy in 1 case. A patient with grade C anastomotic leakage received a second operation for ileostomy. One patient with postoperative pneumonia recovered after anti-infective treatment. Another patient with intraperitoneal hemorrhage improved after symptomatic treatment with blood transfusion and hemostasis. The postoperative hospitalization time and total hospitalization costs were 8.9 ± 4.4 days and 89,236.1 ± 13,527.9 yuan, respectively.ConclusionsManual suture with Da Vinci robotic surgery system is safe and feasible for reconstructing the digestive tract in rectal cancer surgery.

Early and long-term results of surgical treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms using a heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluorethilene graft.

The aim of the present study was to assess early and long-term results of open surgical interventions for popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) with the use of heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (HePTFE) in a single center, retrospective, non-comparative cohort study. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained dataset, including 207 open interventions for PAAs between 2002 and 2022, was performed and 170 procedures carried on with the use of a HePTFE graft were found. Perioperative results were analyzed in terms of mortality, graft thrombosis and amputation rates. Follow-up results were analyzed in terms of survival, primary and secondary patency, freedom from amputation, freedom from reintervention with life-table analysis and Kaplan Meier curves. Follow-up results were considered as primary outcomes, whereas perioperative results were considered as secondary outcomes. In 82 interventions (48%) the PAA was asymptomatic. In 140 cases a medial approach was used, while in 30 cases a posterior approach was preferred. The level of the distal anastomosis was the p3 tract of the popliteal artery in 89% of the cases. One perioperative death occurred; early thromboses occurred in eight cases and the overall perioperative amputation rate was 2.8%. The median duration of follow-up was 48 months (range 1-251). Estimated survival rate at 10 years was 55% (standard error, SE, 0.065). The 10-year rates of primary and secondary patency and freedom from amputation were 40.8% (SE 0.06), 47.6% (SE 0.065) and 93.4% (SE 0.04), respectively. The estimated freedom from reintervention rate at 10 years was 57% (SE 0.05). The results of this large monocentric experience showed that open surgical repair of PAAs with HePTFE is a safe procedure, with low rates of perioperative complications, and excellent results in the long-term setting.