Perimetry Results Research Articles

Incidence and prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive patients

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and incidence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in comparison to standard automated perimetry deficits in patients with ocular hypertension. METHODS: Five hundred eyes of 250 patients with ocular hypertension were recruited into a prospective, longitudinal study and tested with standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry annually for 5 years. Both eyes of 60 normal subjects, 21 to 85 years of age, were used to establish normative data for short wavelength automated perimetry and standard automated perimetry. This allowed independent evaluation of left and right eyes of patients. All normal data were corrected for age, and short wavelength automated perimetry results were corrected for lens transmission. The lowest fifth and first percentiles for the normal observers were derived for the 10 glaucoma hemifield test zones for short wavelength automated perimetry and standard automated perimetry. Visual fields were considered outside normal limits if two glaucoma hemifield test zones were below the normal fifth percentile or one glaucoma hemifield test zone was below the normal first percentile. RESULTS: Baseline prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry and standard automated perimetry deficits were 9.4% and 1.4%, respectively. During the study, incident rates of field loss were 6.2% (1.23% per year) for short wavelength automated perimetry and 5.9% (1.18% per year) for standard automated perimetry. Once abnormal, 80% of short wavelength automated perimetry fields remained abnormal on the next examination, whereas only 45% of abnormal standard automated perimetry fields remained abnormal. New short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensives were more prominent and more persistent than new standard automated perimetry deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with the interpretation that short wavelength automated perimetry deficits occur before standard automated perimetry deficits in glaucoma. The similar incidence rates suggest that both standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry are monitoring the same underlying glaucomatous disease process.

Multifocal ERG and full-field ERG in patients on long-term vigabatrin medication.

To examine the retinal function with different electrophysiological methods in twelve Swedish patients on long-term treatment (2-10 years) with the anti-epileptic drug vigabatrin. Ophthalmological examination of twelve consecutive patients included testing of visual acuity, fundus inspection and fundus photography, kinetic perimetry, full-field ERG and multifocal ERG. All patients had a visual acuity of 0.7 or better. Fundus inspection revealed no pathology except in one patient who had a pallor of the optic disc. All patients had a normal appearance of the macula. The result of kinetic perimetry was normal in five patients while seven patients had a concentric defect of the visual field. The 30 Hz flicker cone b-wave amplitude in the full-field ERG was abnormal in all of the seven patients with a visual field defect. None of the patients with normal visual fields had a reduction of the 30 Hz flicker cone b-wave amplitude. Six of the twelve patients had a reduced multifocal ERG response but without any correlation with visual field defect. Long-term treatment with vigabatrin seems to selectively reduce retinal cone function. The visual field defects in patients taking vigabatrin correlate with pathology in the full-field ERG (reduction of the cone b-wave amplitude). The results from this study indicate that electroretinography can be used for monitoring patients taking vigabatrin in a more objective manner than with visual field testing.

Electrophysiological findings in two young patients with Bothnia dystrophy and a mutation in the RLBP1 gene

Purpose: To characterize the clinical phenotype, with emphasis on electrophysiology, of two children with suspected Bothnia dystrophy. Methods: Two unrelated affected patients, 10 and 11 years old, were studied. Ophthalmological examination included testing of visual acuity, fundus inspection and fundus photography, kinetic perimetry, full-field electroretinogram (ERG), and multifocal ERG. The presence of a mutation in exon 7 of the RLBP1 gene was investigated by DNA sequencing. Results: Both patients were homozygous for the Arg234Trp-causing mutation in the RLBP1 gene, but the resulting disease phenotype appeared to vary somewhat between them. Visual acuity was moderately reduced in one patient and normal in the other. Fundus inspection at this age revealed no pathology in either patient and there were no signs of retinitis punctata albescens, which has been described previously as a frequent clinical feature of Bothnia dystrophy. The result of kinetic perimetry was normal. The final rod threshold was moderately elevated. Full-field ERG demonstrated the uncommon combination of absent rod response and normal cone response after 40 minutes of dark adaptation. However, after prolonged dark adaptation (20–24 h), both the rod response and the dark adaptation threshold became normal. Multifocal ERG was performed in one of the patients (the one with normal visual acuity and normal fundus appearance) and showed a reduced cone response in the central region of the tested area. There was no improvement of the multifocal ERG result after 20–24 h of dark adaptation. Conclusion: Patients with mutations in the RLBP1 gene (Arg234Trp) may have a normal fundus appearance early in the disease course. Multifocal ERG can be used for the objective documentation of the disturbed macular function, especially when the patient's visual acuity and fundus appearance are normal. The rod response is absent in the electroretinogram; however, after prolonged dark adaptation (20–24 hours), the rods recover completely. The central cones do not seem to recover.

Nerve fiber analyzer and short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects: A pilot study

Purpose To test the relationship between the results of short-wavelength automatic perimetry (SWAP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements with scanning laser polarimetry (Nerve Fiber Analyzer, NFA) in age-matched normal subjects, glaucoma suspects, and early glaucoma patients. Design Case-control study. Participants and methods Thirty-eight normal subjects, 32 glaucoma suspects, and 14 early glaucoma patients were recruited. All subjects underwent RNFL assessment by NFA, achromatic visual field testing (24-2 threshold), and repeated SWAP (24-2 threshold blue-on-yellow). Main outcome measures Mean deviation (MD) of visual field testing and RNFL values were obtained. Results Glaucoma suspects were divided into two groups according to their SWAP results: high risk (with SWAP abnormalities) and low risk (with normal SWAP result). No statistically significant difference in SWAP MD and RNFL values were observed between normal and low-risk groups ( P > 0.05), but these values were found to be significantly lower in high-risk and early glaucoma groups ( P < 0.01). Conclusions This study suggests that RNFL examination by NFA may be a useful test for the early detection of glaucomatous damage of glaucoma suspects. It appears to provide agreement with SWAP abnormalities and is more sensitive than conventional standard automated perimetry.

Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of glaucoma detection by frequency-doubling perimetry. METHODS: Stereoview optic nerve photographs, visual field examination, intraocular pressure measurements, medical and ocular history, and a screening and full threshold frequency-doubling perimetry examination were performed in a prospective study of consecutive subjects. Inclusion criteria included age of 45 years or older, absence of ocular disease other than glaucoma, cataract, or mild drusen, and Snellen visual acuity of 20/60 or better. A total of 125 eyes in 102 glaucoma subjects and 95 eyes of 95 normal subjects were included. Each eye was classified as “normal,” “glaucoma,” or “uncertain” by each of three ophthalmologists on the basis of all available clinical information with the exception of frequency-doubling perimetry results. Those in the glaucoma group were subclassified as having early (n = 51), moderate (n = 42), or severe (n = 32) glaucoma on the basis of automated Humphrey visual field criteria. In the glaucoma group, two eyes from a subject were allowed to be included (23 of 102 subjects) if they differed in level of damage because they were never analyzed within the same statistical analysis. RESULTS: Several diagnostic algorithms were evaluated. Algorithms based on the most depressed single point, pair of adjacent points, and cluster of three points performed nearly identically. For the screening test, if any abnormality was identified, specificity was 95%, whereas sensitivity was 39%, 86%, and 100% for early, moderate, and severe glaucoma, respectively. For the full threshold test, with at least one point depressed to the P < 0.5% level, specificity measured 91%, whereas sensitivity was 35%, 88%, and 100% for early, moderate, and severe glaucoma, respectively. The two global indices, mean deviation and pattern standard deviation, were also evaluated and were generally less accurate. CONCLUSION: Frequency-doubling perimetry, which is rapid and easily administered, is effective at detecting moderate and severe disease and appears well suited for glaucoma screening.

Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency doubling perimetry

PURPOSE: To evaluate an algorithm for the identification of glaucomatous visual field defects with the screening mode of frequency doubling technology. METHODS: Screening-mode frequency doubling technology and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm perimetry were performed on 137 of 150 consecutive patients referred to a glaucoma specialist. We created an algorithm for the frequency doubling technology that gave increased importance to both more severe defects and defects closer to fixation. These values were then compared with the results of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm visual fields evaluated by the glaucoma hemifield test, two masked glaucoma specialists, and a published definition of glaucomatous damage to determine sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling technology screening mode for detecting glaucoma. RESULTS: The frequency doubling technology score obtained with our algorithm had a sensitivity of 80% or more and specificity of 93% or more irrespective of the criteria for defining glaucoma. Sensitivity increased to 95% in detecting moderate or severe field loss without a compromise in specificity. All subjects with normal visual fields completed the frequency doubling technology examination within 90 seconds. In most cases, eyes were abnormal if they had two peripheral defects or one central defect. CONCLUSIONS: Our frequency doubling technology algorithm had both high sensitivity and high specificity in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects, allowing for bilateral screening in less than 5 minutes.

Comparison of central and peripheral visual field properties in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial

PURPOSE: To compare the results of peripheral kinetic visual field testing and central static perimetry for patients enrolled in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial to determine (1) whether loss and recovery of visual field sensitivity in the far periphery was different from that observed in the central visual field and (2) whether the far peripheral visual field provided additional useful information that was not available in the central visual field results. METHODS: Both affected and fellow eyes of 448 patients with optic neuritis in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial were evaluated according to the trial protocol during the patients’ first 3 years in the study. Central static visual field tests were performed with program 30-2 on the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and peripheral kinetic testing consisted of plotting the I 3e and II 4e isopters on the Goldmann perimeter. Both test procedures were conducted according to the trial protocols, and quality control assessments and clinical evaluations were performed on all the visual fields. RESULTS: For both affected and fellow eyes at all 11 visits, there was a greater number of abnormal visual fields in the central static perimetry results than in the peripheral kinetic data. Only 2.9% of affected eyes had an abnormal peripheral visual field with a normal Humphrey mean deviation during year 1. At baseline, 97.1% of affected eyes had an abnormal Humphrey mean deviation on central static testing, whereas only 69.9% had abnormal peripheral kinetic visual fields. Approximately 80% of the I 3e and II 4e isopters for affected eyes that were abnormal at baseline were within normal limits at 30 days, but it took until week 19 for even 70% of the Humphrey mean deviations to return to normal. In addition, the II 4e isopters (more peripheral than the I 3e isopters) that were abnormal at baseline showed a somewhat greater percentage of improvement from baseline through day 30 than the abnormal I 3e isopters. Although this difference is statistically significant, it is probably not clinically significant. For visits after week 19, approximately 25% to 30% of affected eyes had an abnormal Humphrey mean deviation, whereas only 10% to 15% of peripheral kinetic fields were abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: For the affected eye in optic neuritis, the central visual field shows greater abnormalities than the far peripheral visual field. When the results obtained through Humphrey automated central static visual fields and Goldmann peripheral kinetic isopters are compared, the far periphery appears to recover more rapidly and more completely than the central field, at least in more severe cases of optic neuritis. In most cases, recovery in optic neuritis can probably be monitored effectively with automated perimetry of the central visual field alone. However, in cases of severe loss of the central visual field, a peripheral kinetic visual field obtained with a Goldmann perimeter may provide additional information about the patient’s vision in the far periphery.

Scanning laser densitometry and color perimetry demonstrate reduced photopigment density and sensitivity in two patients with retinal degeneration

Purpose. To test the feasibility of scanning laser densitometry with a modified Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) to measure the rod and cone photopigment distribution in patients with retinal diseases. Methods. Scanning laser densitometry was performed using a modified Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope. The distribution of the photopigments was calculated from dark adapted and bleached images taken with the 514 nm laser of the SLO. This wavelength is absorbed by rod and cone photopigments. Discrimination is possible due to their different spatial distribution. Additionally, to measure retinal sensitivity profiles, dark adapted two color static perimetry with a Tübinger manual perimeter was performed along the horizontal meridian with 1° spacing. Results. A patient with retinitis pigmentosa had slightly reduced photopigment density within the central ±5° but no detectable photopigment for eccentricities beyond 5°. A patient with cone dystrophy had nearly normal pigment density beyond ±5°, but considerably reduced photopigment density within the central ±5°. Within the central ±5°, the patient with retinitis pigmentosa had normal sensitivity for the red stimulus and reduced sensitivity for the green stimulus. There was no measurable function beyond 7°. The patient with cone dystrophy had normal sensitivity for the green stimulus outside the foveal center and reduced sensitivity for the red stimulus at the foveal center. The results of color perimetry for this patient with a central scotoma were probably influenced by eccentric fixation. Conclusion. Scanning laser densitometry with a modified Rodenstock SLO is a useful method to assess the human photopigment distribution. Densitometry results were confirmed by dark adapted two color static perimetry. Photopigment distribution and retinal sensitivity profiles can be measured with high spatial resolution. This may help to measure exactly the temporal development of retinal diseases and to test the success of different therapeutic treatments. Both methods have limitations at the present state of development. However, some of these limitations can be overcome by further improving the instruments.

Correlation of Functional MR Imaging with Perimetric Examination in Patients with Visual Field Defects Due to Lesions Involving the Afferent Visual System

We assessed fMRI in the objective evaluation of visual function during treatment planning and postoperative follow-up in patients with occipital lobe and/or the afferent visual system lesions. Ten normal volunteers and eleven patients harbouring brain lesions with MR evidence of calcarine cortex and/or visual pathway damage underwent ophthalmoscopy, Goldmann perimetry and fMRI examination. Blood oxygenation sensitive series (gradient-echo, T2*-weighted, single-shot EPI: TR = 2 sec, TE = 40 ms, FA = 40 degrees voxel volume 3.1 mm x 3.1 mm x 5 mm) were obtained using a 1.5-Tesla clinical imager with six contiguous slices, covering the occipital lobe parallel to the calcarine fissure. A repetitive, phasic experiment for visual stimulation was achieved using a binocular, stroboscopic, white light flashing at 10 HZ and was repeated twice to test reproducibility. Functional maps, generated using a cross correlation technique, were overlaid onto concurrent high resolution anatomic MR images and compared to Goldmann perimetry results. All volunteers demonstrated symmetric, bilateral, regional signal intensity changes (2%-5%) between photic stimulation and darkness in the primary visual cortex and dorsolateral and ventrolateral al extrastriate areas. Cortical activation maps in ten patients clearly localised asymmetric response within specific regions in the primary visual cortex and correlated with Goldmann perimetry results. Displacement of the eloquent calcarine cortex was demonstrated in a patient with normal perimetry results. Primary visual area activation increased in two patients following surgery. fMRI performed on a conventional MR system can objectively evaluate visual function in neurosurgical patients with occipital lobe and/or afferent visual system lesions as part of treatment planning and postoperative follow-up.

Short-wavelength sensitive visual field loss in patients with clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.

The aim of the study was to compare the sensitivity of short-wavelength and conventional automated static threshold perimetry for the psychophysical detection of abnormality in patients with clinically significant diabetic macular oedema. The sample comprised 24 patients with clinically significant diabetic macular oedema (mean age 59.75 years, range 45-75 years). One eye of each patient was selected. Exclusion criteria included the presence of lenticular opacity. The sensitivity of the macular visual field of each patient was determined with programme 10-2 of the Humphrey Field Analyser on two occasions, using both short-wavelength and conventional stimulus parameters; the results of the second session were analysed to minimise learning effects. A pointwise horizontal hemifield asymmetry analysis was derived for short-wavelength perimetry (thereby negating the influence of pre-receptoral absorption); the pointwise pattern deviation probability plot was analysed for conventional perimetry. Abnormality was defined as 3 or more contiguous stimulus locations with negative asymmetries (short-wavelength) or reduced sensitivity values (conventional) that resulted in a statistical probability level of p less than 0.05. The fields of 8 patients were abnormal as assessed by conventional perimetry while all were classified as abnormal using short-wavelength perimetry. In the 8 patients who exhibited both abnormal conventional and abnormal short-wavelength perimetry results, the extent of field loss was generally greater using short-wavelength perimetry. The position of the localised field loss (i.e. as distinct from field loss that was generalised across the visual field) assessed by short-wavelength perimetry corresponded with the clinical mapping of the area of diabetic macular oedema but the extent of this loss was generally greater than that suggested by clinical assessment. Short-wavelength automated perimetry offers improved sensitivity for the psychophysical detection of clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.

Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry in Neuro-Ophthalmologic Disorders

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in the assessment of patients with neuro-ophthalmologic disorders, especially optic neuropathies. Methods: A modified Humphrey field analyzer was used to perform standard automated perimetry and SWAP, a technique that isolates the activity of short-wavelength-sensitive (blue) mechanisms. Forty patients (80 eyes) were evaluated by SWAP and standard automated perimetry. Thirteen patients (26 eyes) had recovered from optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis, 15 (30 eyes) were in various stages of treatment for pseudotumor cerebri, and 12 (24 eyes) had other miscellaneous neuro-ophthalmologic conditions. Six additional patients (12 eyes) with neuro-ophthalmologic conditions were tested twice on different days during a 2-week period, with the order of SWAP and standard perimetric testing being reversed on the second day. Results: Of the 80 eyes tested, 38 (48%) had SWAP visual fields that were worse than standard automated perimetry results; 29 (36%) showed no difference between standard and SWAP visual fields; and 13 (16%) had standard automated perimetry results that were worse than SWAP visual fields. Of the 26 eyes in patients with optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis, 15 (58%) had SWAP results that were worse than standard visual fields. Ten (33%) of the 30 eyes with pseudotumor cerebri had SWAP results worse than standard automated perimetry results, and 13 (54%) of 24 eyes with miscellaneous neuro-ophthalmologic conditions had SWAP results worse than standard automated perimetry results. For the 12 eyes undergoing repeated testing, SWAP visual fields were worse when they were performed last, perhaps indicating that some fatigue effect was present. This was observed for standard visual fields as well, but to a smaller extent. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest that SWAP may be useful in detecting certain neuro-ophthalmologic deficits more readily than standard automated visual field testing, especially for optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Further evaluations will be necessary to define the effects of fatigue for SWAP visual fields in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.

Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.

To evaluate the efficacy of short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in the assessment of patients with neuro-ophthalmologic disorders, especially optic neuropathies. A modified Humphrey field analyzer was used to perform standard automated perimetry and SWAP, a technique that isolates the activity of short-wavelength-sensitive ("blue") mechanisms. Forty patients (80 eyes) were evaluated by SWAP and standard automated perimetry. Thirteen patients (26 eyes) had recovered from optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis, 15 (30 eyes) were in various stages of treatment for pseudotumor cerebri, and 12 (24 eyes) had other miscellaneous neuro-ophthalmologic conditions. Six additional patients (12 eyes) with neuro-ophthalmologic conditions were tested twice on different days during a 2-week period, with the order of SWAP and standard perimetric testing being reversed on the second day. Of the 80 eyes tested, 38 (48%) had SWAP visual fields that were worse than standard automated perimetry results; 29 (36%) showed no difference between standard and SWAP visual fields; and 13 (16%) had standard automated perimetry results that were worse than SWAP visual fields. Of the 26 eyes in patients with optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis, 15 (58%) had SWAP results that were worse than standard visual fields. Ten (33%) of the 30 eyes with pseudotumor cerebri had SWAP results worse than standard automated perimetry results, and 13 (54%) of 24 eyes with miscellaneous neuro-ophthalmologic conditions had SWAP results worse than standard automated perimetry results. For the 12 eyes undergoing repeated testing, SWAP visual fields were worse when they were performed last, perhaps indicating that some fatigue effect was present. This was observed for standard visual fields as well, but to a smaller extent. Preliminary findings suggest that SWAP may be useful in detecting certain neuro-ophthalmologic deficits more readily than standard automated visual field testing, especially for optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Further evaluations will be necessary to define the effects of fatigue for SWAP visual fields in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.

Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness.

The efficacy of a systematic training of saccadic eye movements was evaluated in hemianopic patients with three main objectives: (1) to determine the role of visual field recovery, (2) to assess the transfer of treatment gains to functional outcome measures, and (3) to evaluate the patients' subjective experience throughout therapy. Within-subject repeated measures design. The mean follow-up interval was 3 months (range, 1 to 10 months). Outpatients of a day clinic for the treatment of neuropsychological disorders that is associated with a city hospital. A consecutive sample of 22 hemianopic patients without neglect after unilateral stroke. Follow-up was possible in all cases. Saccadic eye movement strategies were treated regularly (30-minute daily sessions 5 days per week; 25 to 27 total treatment sessions). Visual perimetry results, visual search field within the scotoma, visual search on projected slides with wide eccentricity, search times for identifying objects visually on a table (table test), and standardized rating of the degree of subjective visual impairment due to the field defect. All outcome measures were planned before initiation of the study. (1) Increase in visual search field size (mean, 30 degrees). (2) Training-related visual field increases in 12 (54%) of 22 patients (mean increase, 6.7 degrees; range, 2 degrees to 24 degrees). (3) Transfer of treatment gains to functional measures (table test) and improvement after training in patients' subjective rating of their visual impairments. (4) Stability of improvements at the 3-month follow-up visit. (5) Return to part-time work in 20 (91%) of 22 patients. All mentioned results were significant (nonparametric tests; alpha level, .05; two-sided; adjusted for the number of tests). Training of compensatory eye movement strategies restores oculomotor functions, improves performance in functional visual activities, and reintegrates hemianopic patients into vocational life.

Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.

The multi-fixation glaucoma screening chart, which uses the oculokinetic perimetry (OKP) technique, is a hand-held tangent screen with a central black test stimulus on a white background and a series of 26 numbered fixation targets arranged around the stimulus at various locations. When the numbers on the chart are read by the patient from 40 cm distance, the test stimulus passes through the relevant parts of the central visual field which are most vulnerable to glaucomatous damage. The test is positive (that is, abnormal) if at least one fixation number is associated with consistent disappearance of the stimulus. The OKP test was performed in 222 eyes of 126 glaucoma patients (aged 16-91 years) and 186 right eyes of 186 normal individuals (aged 19-86 years) using a 1.5 mm diameter stimulus. A further 144 eyes of 88 glaucoma patients (aged 60-85 years) and 31 right eyes of 31 normal individuals (aged 60-85 years) were tested with a 3 mm diameter stimulus. All eyes were also tested with conventional perimetry and the results of the conventional perimetry were categorised according to the Aulhorn-Karmeyer classification by four ophthalmologists without any knowledge of the OKP results. When the 1.5 mm stimulus was used, a true positive OKP result was obtained in 45% of eyes with relative scotomas, 81% of eyes with small absolute scotomas separate from the blind spot and 100% of eyes with more severe visual field defects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether blue-on-yellow (B/Y) perimetry is capable of predicting the onset and location of impending glaucomatous visual field loss in patients with ocular hypertension. A Humphrey Field Analyzer (Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, Calif) was modified to perform B/Y perimetry to isolate and measure the sensitivity of short-wavelength-sensitive mechanisms. Participants were tested annually with standard white-on-white (W/W) and B/Y automated perimetry for a period of 5 years. The study population consisted of 38 patients with ocular hypertension and 62 age-matched normal control subjects. Initially, all 76 ocular hypertensive eyes had normal W/W automated perimetry results, with 67 eyes having normal and nine eyes having abnormal B/Y test results. Five years later, five of the nine ocular hypertensive eyes with initial B/Y abnormal results developed glaucomatous visual field loss measured by standard W/W automated perimetry, while none of the 67 ocular hypertensive eyes with initially normal B/Y results developed abnormal W/W perimetry results. Blue-on-yellow perimetry deficits are an early indicator of glaucomatous damage and are predictive of impending glaucomatous visual field loss for standard W/W automated perimetry. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective, long-term longitudinal study that demonstrates the ability to predict the onset of glaucomatous visual field loss in patients with ocular hypertension on the basis of psychophysical testing.

High-pass Resolution Perimetry in Eyes With Ocular Hypertension and Primary Open-angle Glaucoma

We analyzed the results of high-pass resolution perimetry on normal eyes, eyes with ocular hypertension, and eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. The subjects were matched for age and lens density. We controlled for refraction, visual acuity, pupil size, miotic medications, and learning effects. Under these conditions the glaucomatous eyes showed a significant reduction in overall resolution threshold compared to both normal (P less than or equal to .01) and hypertensive eyes (P less than .01). The hypertensive eyes were not significantly different from normal. Standard increment threshold fields and high-pass resolution visual fields had an agreement of abnormality of 67%. Resolution perimetry showed a 92% agreement with standard perimetry in the location of the defect, when the defect was apparent on both tests. These results indicated that resolution perimetry may be useful for diagnosis and management of primary open-angle glaucoma.

High‐pass resolution perimetry and age‐related loss of visual pathway neurons

The normal, age-related decline of results of high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP) predicts a loss of approximately 9,000 retino-cortical neural channels per year of age, or about 1 channel each hour. Previously published counts of numbers of neurons in the optic nerve indicate a loss of approximately 5,000 neurons per year. The HRP results can be accounted for by postulating that neurons are lost at the same rate also in the geniculo-striate visual pathway.

The Effect of Topical Antiglaucoma Drugs on the Results of High-Pass Resolution Perimetry

We conducted a randomly assigned, double-masked, crossover study of the effects of betaxolol, epinephrine, pilocarpine, and timolol on the high-pass resolution perimetry results in normal subjects. The influence of topical administration of these intraocular pressure-reducing drugs was negligible, which confirmed the reliability of high-pass resolution perimetry results. The method seems appropriate for the diagnosis of glaucoma and the follow-up of patients with glaucoma.

Patterns of Rod and Cone Dysfunction in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome

We studied visual function in 16 patients with the Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Visual acuity, kinetic perimetry, and electroretinography results indicated a severe loss of central and peripheral vision and rod and cone function by the second or third decade of life. Light- and dark-adapted static perimetry in patients 10 to 15 years of age with early involvement showed a parallel and marked loss of rod and cone sensitivity across the visual field. Patients with more advanced disease and no measurable peripheral visual field showed different patterns of central visual dysfunction: an island of only cone function centered in a bull's-eye lesion; patches of rod function surrounding geographic atrophy; or a central island of excellent rod sensitivity but severely impaired cones. In the two least-affected patients, a 13-year-old boy and the asymptomatic 45-year-old sibling of a patient, there were more rod than cone abnormalities as determined by electroretinography and static perimetry.

Evaluation of Visual Fields by Ophthalmologists and by OCTOSMART Program

The introduction of Goldmann perimetry standardized measuring conditions as much as possible. In spite of this, it had been possible for the perimetrist to influence the results of perimeter measurements. The introduction of computer-controlled perimetry, however, has largely eliminated the influence of the investigator on perimetry results. Nevertheless, the interpretation of a perimetric result in the everyday clinical situation is still extensively subjectively coloured and is liable to vary, depending on the doctor carrying it out. The OCTOPUS Program G1 was introduced a few years ago and used above all for glaucoma. This program greatly simplified visual field assessment thanks to its visual field indices. The indices make it possible to compare visual field results with those of a normal population. The present introduction of the OCTOSMART program represents a further step forward. This program analyses measured visual fields with the aid of standardized, statistical criteria based on a large, normal value study. This analysis standardizes and thereby simplifies the interpretation of visual field results. This study compares the outcome of the OCTOSMART program with visual field interpretations by eye doctors.