Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia Research Articles

Efficacy of adductor canal and popliteal plexus block combined with local anesthetic injection in the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee and local infiltrative analgesia for postoperative pain and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled study

BackgroundAdductor canal block and periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) have been shown to relieve pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) effectively. However, their analgesic effectiveness has some limitations. Thus, we considered a novel blocking site that could achieve analgesia without affecting the muscle strength of the lower limbs. MethodsSeventy-two patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized into two groups. One group was treated with adductor canal and popliteal plexus (APB) combined with interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) and local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and the other was treated with PIA. The primary outcomes included postoperative pain, as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the consumption of oral tramadol. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery and daily ambulation distance. Tertiary outcomes included postoperative adverse effects. ResultsThe APB group had lower VAS scores after surgery at rest and during motion. Compared with the PIA group, the walking distance of the APB group on the second day was greater. The muscle strength of the APB group was lower than that of the PIA group at the early stage. Patients in the APB group also consumed less tramadol than those in the PIA group. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. ConclusionsAPB combined with iPACK and LIA is a novel block for TKA, and it can reduce postoperative pain sooner after TKA without affecting postoperative functional recovery or increasing complications.

Adductor Canal Block Combined With IPACK Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: There is no consensus on whether adductor canal block (ACB) combined with infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block can further increase analgesia and reduce opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with ACB and periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA). Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining ACB and PACK block on analgesia and functional recovery following TKA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 386 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA at our institution from January 2020 to October 2022. Patients were divided into 3 groups and treated with PIA, ACB, or ACB combined with IPACK block, respectively. Primary outcomes were postoperative morphine consumption and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery, evaluated by knee range of motion, quadriceps strength, daily mobilization distance, and postoperative length of stay. Other outcomes included incidence of complications. Results: Patients in the ACB + IPACK group had significantly less morphine consumption on postoperative day 1 and during hospitalization than patients in the PIA and ACB groups. Furthermore, the ACB + IPACK group had significantly lower VAS scores at rest and during motion at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (but not at other time points), better knee range of motion on postoperative days 1 and 2 (but not day 3), and a greater daily mobilization distance on postoperative day 1 (but not days 2 and 3). The ACB + IPACK group had significantly lower incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting than the PIA and ACB groups. Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study suggests that a combination of ACB and IPACK block may have a greater effect than PIA or ACB alone on analgesia following TKA, while providing better functional recovery. Further study is warranted.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block and knee periarticular infiltration for postoperative pain and functional outcomes in knee arthroplasty - A randomised trial.

Optimal analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enhances patients' and surgical outcomes. The study investigated the ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus the periarticular infiltration in TKA. Eighty-eight patients aged above 50 years scheduled for unilateral TKA were randomised as: Group 1 received intraoperative periarticular infiltration (0.5 mL adrenaline [4.5 µg/mL], 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5% with 89.5 mL saline) and Group 2 received immediate postoperative genicular nerve block (15 mL bupivacaine 0.25% with 2.5 g/mL adrenaline). The postoperative morphine consumption was during the first two postoperative days the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were time to rescue analgesia, pain scores and functional outcomes. The comparison between groups was performed using the Chi-square test, the Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. The postoperative morphine consumption during the first two postoperative days and pain scores at rest at 12 h postoperatively were less in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Pain scores during movement on the first postoperative day were lower in the periarticular group than the genicular group at 6, 12 and 24 h (P < 0.001). At 18 h, pain scores were higher in the periarticular group than in the genicular group at rest and movement (P < 0.001). Quadriceps motor strength scores were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). The knee range of motion and time up and go test during both days showed a statistically significant difference in the periarticular group compared to the genicular group (P < 0.05). Periarticular infiltration and genicular nerve block yield effective postoperative analgesia and functional outcomes after TKA without motor affection.

Effects of magnesium sulfate on periarticular infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

BackgroundTo investigate whether adding magnesium sulfate to a periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) cocktail could improve pain control and functional outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsNinety patients were randomly assigned to the magnesium sulfate and control groups, with 45 patients in each group. In the magnesium sulfate group, patients were given a periarticular infusion of a cocktail of analgesics consisting of epinephrine, ropivacaine, magnesium sulfate, and dexamethasone. The control group received no magnesium sulfate. The primary outcomes consisted of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, postoperative morphine hydrochloride consumption for rescue analgesia, and time to first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes were postoperative inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6 and CRP), postoperative length of stay, and knee functional recovery (assessed by knee range of motion, quadriceps strength, daily mobilization distance, and time to first straight-leg raising). Tertiary outcomes included the postoperative swelling ratio and complication rates.ResultsWithin 24 h of surgery, patients in the magnesium sulfate group had markedly lower VAS pain scores during motion and at rest. After the addition of magnesium sulfate, the analgesic effect was dramatically prolonged, leading to a reduction in morphine dosage within 24 h and the total morphine dosage postoperatively. Postoperative inflammatory biomarker levels were significantly reduced in the magnesium sulfate group compared with the control. There were no considerable differences between the groups in terms of the postoperative length of stay and knee functional recovery. Both groups had similar postoperative swelling ratios and incidences of complications.ConclusionsThe addition of magnesium sulfate to the analgesic cocktail for PIA can prolong postoperative analgesia, decrease the consumption of opioids, and effectively alleviate early postoperative pain after TKA.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200056549. Registered on 7 February 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=151489.

Dexmedetomidine Prolongs the Analgesic Effects of Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundPeriarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) is widely administered to relieve postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of prolonging the analgesic duration by adding dexmedetomidine to PIA for pain management after TKA. MethodsOne hundred and sixteen patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups based on PIA regimens including group R (ropivacaine), group E (ropivacaine plus epinephrine), and group D (ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine). The primary outcomes were postoperative visual analog scale scores, time until the administration of first rescue analgesia, and opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes included postoperative inflammatory biomarkers and functional recovery. The tertiary outcomes were postoperative complications and adverse events. ResultsThe patients in group D had significantly lower resting visual analog scale scores than those in groups R and E at 6 hours after surgery. Group R showed the higher pain scores at rest and motion than groups D and E 12 hours postoperatively. The use of dexmedetomidine or epinephrine postponed the time until the administration of first rescue analgesia and led to lower opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after TKA. The levels of interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α in groups D and E were significantly lower than those in group R on postoperative day 3. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in functional recovery, postoperative complications, or adverse events among the three groups. ConclusionsAdding dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to PIA could potentiate and prolong the analgesic effect in the early stage following TKA without increasing the risk of adverse events.

Combined suprascapular nerve block and axillary nerve block approach vs. peri-articular infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management following arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Postoperative pain following shoulder surgery is a devastating situation. Several approaches, including regional nerve blocks such as combined suprascapular nerve block and axillary nerve block (SSNB+ANB) and peri-articular infiltration (PAI) analgesia, have been investigated to manage postoperative pain. This study aimed to compare the effects of PAI and SSNB+ANB on postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. A single-center prospective, randomized interventional study with a two-arm parallel design was performed. Sixty patients with arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to SSNB+ANB (n=30) and PAI (n=30) group. Postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, and complications were evaluated in the postoperative anesthesia recovery unit and during the postoperative 24 hours. The age of patients in Group PAI was significantly higher than in Group SSNB+ANB (p<0.001). Groups were similar, considering demographic and clinical characteristics (p>0.05). The length of anesthesia and surgery was significantly longer in Group PAI (p=0.009 and p=0.025). Although there was no significant difference in the amount of change in pain scores for postoperative 24 hours (p=0.537), postoperative pain scores were significantly higher in Group SSNB+ANB group than Group PAI during postoperative 24 hours except for the 12th-hour evaluation (p<0.05). Postoperative opioid requirement and rescue analgesic medications were significantly higher in Group SSNB+ANB (p<0.001 and p=0.001). The number of postoperative nausea and vomiting attacks was similar (p=0.317). PAI seems to be a more feasible and practical analgesic approach for managing postoperative pain after arthroscopic shoulder surgery regarding pain score and cumulative analgesic requirement.

Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block and Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nerve block is a key technique in postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to compare ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) and anterior quadratus lumborum block (AQLB) in patients undergoing primary THA. In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing primary THA under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive an ultrasound-guided SFIB+ sham AQLB (SFIB group), or an ultrasound-guided AQLB+ sham SFIB (AQLB group). Before wound suture, all patients received periarticular infiltration analgesia which the local anesthetic was injected into joint capsule, exposed gluteal and abductor muscles, peritrochanteric zone, and subcutaneous tissue under the incision as multiple sites. The primary outcome was postoperative morphine consumption within 24hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative pain assessed on the visual analog scale, postoperative quadriceps strength, the time to hospital discharge, and the incidence of postoperative complications. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning morphine consumption within 24hours after surgery (P= .774), the time to first rescue analgesia (P= .890), the time to hospital discharge (P= .532), and the incidence of postoperative complications (P > .05). The visual analog scale pain scores at rest and during motion also were similar at all time points (P > .05). Significantly more patients in the SFIB group experienced quadriceps muscle weakness at 2hours (P= .008) and 6hours (P= .009) after surgery. Under the circumstances of this study, when combined with periarticular infiltration analgesia, the SFIB provided similar pain relief compared with AQLB in patients undergoing THA, but was associated with muscle weakness within 6hours after surgery.

The effect of visualized saphenous nerve block through minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach on the analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

Objective: To report a method of visualized saphenous nerve block (VSNB) through minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach distal to the adductor canal in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and investigate the effect of VSNB in this way on postoperative pain relief. Methods: A total of 100 patients with knee osteoarthritis were prospectively included from June 2018 to October 2019, 29 males and 71 females, aged 50-87(70±8) years. All patients undergoing TKA through minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach were randomized to visualized saphenous nerve block combined with periarticular infiltration analgesia group (Group VSNB+PIA) or only periarticular infiltration analgesia group (Group PIA),50 cases in each group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain degree of patients. Furthermore, the scores of VAS in resting and active state at 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours after operation and the proportion of patients receiving parecoxib within 72 hours after operation were compared between the two groups. Results: There was statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of VAS scores in resting state after surgery(F=15.295,P<0.05).The postoperative VAS scores of Group VSNB+PIA at 4, 8, 12, 24 hours at resting state were 1.3±0.8, 1.4±0.7, 1.7±0.8, 3.1±0.8 respectively, which were all significantly lower than those of Group PIA (1.6±0.9, 1.8±0.8, 2.3±0.9, 3.6±0.8) (P<0.05). The overall difference in terms of VAS scores at active state after surgery was statistically significant between the two groups(F=18.532, P<0.05). The postoperative VAS scores of Group VSNB+PIA at 4, 8, 12, 24 hours at active state were 2.0±0.8, 2.2±0.7, 2.7±0.6, 3.7±0.7 respectively, which were all significantly lower than those of Group PIA (2.3±0.8, 2.7±0.7, 3.3±0.8, 4.4±0.7)(P<0.05). Fourteen percent of patients (7/50) in VSNB+PIA group accepted parecoxib within 72 hours after surgery, which was significantly lower than that in PIA group (34%, 17/50) (P<0.05). Conclusions: It is easy to expose the saphenous nerve beyond the adductor canal through minimally invasive far medial-subvastus approach. The Combination therapy of VSNB+PIA is more effective than the simple per-articular infiltration analgesia in providing pain relief after total knee arthroplasty.

The Efficacy and Safety of Glucocorticoid on Periarticular Infiltration Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundThe objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect and safety of multimodal cocktail protocols implemented with or without glucocorticoids on periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsWe comprehensively searched the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to November 2020 for randomized controlled trials on glucocorticoids as a component of the cocktail protocol used in PIA for patients with TKA. ResultsOur meta-analysis included 11 randomized controlled trial studies with 1051 primary TKAs (930 patients). Visual analog scale scores at postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 2 in the glucocorticoid groups were significantly lower than those in the control group (95% CI [–1.01-−0.10], P = .02; 95% CI [–0.51-−0.13], P = .001). Furthermore, the glucocorticoid group was associated with a statistically significant improvement in the range of motion at POD 1 (95% CI [3.20-8.05] P < .00001), reduction in total morphine consumption at 24 hours, and lower levels of C-reactive protein on POD 2/3 compared with the control group. However, neither the length of hospital stays nor the long-term Knee Society Knee Score showed any differences between the two groups. In addition, the results of subgroup analyses favored triamcinolone acetonide over betamethasone, methylprednisolone, and dexamethasone regarding the postoperative visual analog scale scores and range of motion. ConclusionGlucocorticoid supplementation in PIA is effective and does not increase complications or side effects for patients with either unilateral or bilateral TKA. Moreover, triamcinolone acetonide could be recommended in multimodal cocktail protocols for glucocorticoid supplementation.

Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Iliohypogastric/Ilioinguinal Nerve Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks (LFCNB) and iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks (IHINB) on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA).MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing THA via the DAA between January 2019 and November 2019 were stratified into two groups based on their date of admission. Sixty‐seven patients received LFCNB and IHINB along with periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) (nerve block group), and 75 patients received PIA alone (control group). The outcomes included postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative pain assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the QoR‐15 score, and functional recovery measured as quadriceps strength, time to first straight leg rise, daily ambulation distance, and duration of hospitalization. The Oxford hip score and the UCLA activity level rating were assessed at 1 and 3 months after surgery. In addition, postoperative complications were recorded. Patients were also compared based on the type of incision used during surgery (traditional longitudinal or “bikini” incision).ResultsPatients in the nerve block group showed significantly lower postoperative morphine consumption, lower resting VAS scores within 12 h postoperatively, lower VAS scores during motion within 24 h postoperatively, and better QoR‐15 scores on postoperative day 1. These patients also showed significantly better functional recovery during hospitalization. At 1‐month and 3‐month outpatient follow up, the two groups showed no significant differences in Oxford hip score or UCLA activity level rating. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications. Similar results were observed when patients were stratified by type of incision, except that the duration of hospitalization was similar.ConclusionCompared to PIA alone, a combination of LFCNB and IHINB along with PIA can improve early pain relief, reduce morphine consumption, and accelerate functional recovery, without increasing complications after THA via the DAA.

Optimal Regional Anaesthesia – Analgesia for Knee Surgery: Current Trends &amp; Future Perspectives

Major orthopedic surgery is frequently associated with high pain scores. For many procedures, especially those that are known to cause severe postoperative pain, guidelines from many countries recommend the use of RA for postoperative pain control. Although randomized controlled trials have demonstrated clinically significant pain reduction after peripheral nerve blocks and wound infiltration with local anesthesia, these techniques are still underused [1]. Approximately 15% of patients report persistent knee pain despite surgical success following total knee arthroplasty. Acute postsurgical pain, generally regarded as pain within the first 72 hours postoperatively, has been found to be independent risk factor of chronic postsurgical pain [2]. Early mobilization is the cornerstone of enhanced recovery program. Early mobilization (sitting out of bed/walking) can result in a reduced length of stay of 1 to 2 days and should be considered within the first 24 hours after surgery [3]. Early ambulation (on post-operative day 1) is also associated with lower hospitalization costs [4]. What are the different approaches? Periarticular infiltration using the appropriate technique and knowledge of intraarticular knee anatomy may increase pain control and maximize rehabilitation [5]. Femoral block is also associated with lower opioid consumption and a better recovery at 6 weeks than periarticular infiltration [6]. Early postoperative activity measures were proved to be possible indicators of knee function recovery at 6 weeks after surgery. In a metaanalysis , Adductor Canal Block method was superior in terms of equivalent morphine consumption in the first 24 hours and 48 hours, without increasing the risk of complications, when compared to the Peri articular Infiltration method [7]. What’s the best approach? Blocking multiple nerves was preferable to blocking any single nerve, periarticular infiltration, or epidural analgesia. 1- Proximal blocksThe combination of femoral and sciatic nerve block appears to be one of the best approaches [8]. The combination of Femoral, Sciatic, Obturator and Lateral Cutaneous of the thigh nerve blocks has shown that the opioids requirements in the first 48hours were extremely low (20mg to 30mg Oral Morphine Equivalent). Quadruple nerve block could be considered as a reliable option to achieve per and postoperative analgesia for TKA in combination with a multimodal analgesia regimen (intravenous dexamethasone, intravenous ketamine, paracetamol, ketoprofen, etc). 2- Distal blocksCombined Obturator and Femoral triangle block reduces morphine consumption better than LIA after TKA [9]. There is moderate level evidence that iPACK might provide analgesia for posterior pain after total knee arthroplasty when compared with a control group at 12 h, but was not associated with any other meaningful benefits. Based on these results, there is currently limited evidence supporting the use of iPACK as a complement to adductor canal block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty [10]. Genicular nerve blockade may also be associated with a reduction in opioid consumption at 24 hours in primary total knee arthroplasty patients [11]. 3- Association of LIA and Distal BlocksIn a recent publication, the 24 h resting VAS score was lowest in Adductor Canal Block + Peri Articular Infiltration and 48 h resting and movement VAS score was lowest in continuous ACB also showing the interest of the catheter in this indications [12] . The best choice for optimal analgesia in TKA remains controversial. Combination of different techniques is preferable than using a single nerve injection or a unique approach. Early mobilization should be considered for an optimal enhanced recovery program. Suitable analgesia may reduce the risk of chronic postsurgical pain lasting more than 6 months after surgery.

Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block for post-operative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether adductor canal block (ACB) combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCNB) could improve the efficacy of post-operative analgesia in a comparison with a standard peri-articular infiltration analgesia (PIA) after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred and sixty patients of scheduled unilateral primary TKA were randomly allocated into two groups for post-operative analgesia. Eighty cases were treated with ACB combined with LFCNB and the other eighty treated with PIA. The primary outcomes were pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and rescue pain killer consumption, and the secondary outcomes were knee active range of motion (ROM), quadriceps strength, patients' ambulation ability, Knee Society Score (KSS), length of hospital stay, and adverse events. We found that ACB combined with LFCNB was better on decreasing the post-operative pain score within 12hours at rest and 8h with activity (p < 0.05) and provided longer duration of analgesia (19.91 ± 5.09 VS 12.06 ± 3.67h, p < 0.01) and less rescue morphine consumption (13.63 ± 9.84 vs 18.00 ± 11.52mg, p = 0.011) than the PIA. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05) in terms of knee ROM, quadriceps strength, daily mobilization distance, KSS, and complication occurrence. ACB combined with LFCNB provides a significantly better pain control, less opioid consumption, and longer duration of analgesia than peri-articular infiltration while preserving muscle function without affecting knee functional recovery nor the length of stay or side effects occurrence.

Effects of morphine on peri-articular infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Peri-articular infiltration analgesia (PIA) is a widely used method to control post-operative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. However, there are limited data that support the use of morphine in PIA. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of peri-articular morphine infiltration for pain management in TKA patients. Based on a double-blind, randomized approach, patients were allocated to the morphine or control group. Patients in the morphine group received a peri-articular infiltration of an analgesic cocktail consisting of ropivacaine, epinephrine, and morphine. Morphine was omitted from the cocktail in the control group. Primary outcomes were post-operative consumption of morphine hydrochloride used for rescue analgesia and post-operative pain as assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) score. Secondary outcomes were functional recovery as assessed by a range of knee motion, quadriceps strength, and daily ambulation distance. The duration of hospital stay was also recorded. Tertiary outcomes included the occurrence of post-operative adverse effects and the consumption of antiemetics. Patients in the morphine group had significantly lower post-operative morphine consumption in the first 24h and total morphine consumption. There was no significant difference between the two groups in post-operative VAS pain scores at rest or during motion. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the post-operative knee range of motion, quadriceps strength, daily ambulation distance, or duration of post-operative hospital stay. The two groups were similar in the incidence of adverse effects and the consumption of antiemetics. Adding morphine into the analgesic cocktail of PIA could reduce postoperative morphine consumption in TKA patients, but does not improve early pain relief or accelerate functional recovery or provide clinical benefits for TKA patients. In addition, the complications and safety of peri-articular morphine infiltration need to be further investigated in larger sample studies.

Adding corticosteroids to periarticular infiltration analgesia improves the short-term analgesic effects after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) is widely used to control postoperative pain in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding corticosteroids to the PIA cocktail for pain management in patients who underwent TKA. The patients were randomized to the corticosteroid or control group (double-blind). The patients in the corticosteroid group received a periarticular infiltration of an analgesic cocktail of ropivacaine, epinephrine, and dexamethasone. Dexamethasone was omitted from the cocktail in the control group. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain [assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS)], time until the administration of first rescue analgesia, morphine consumption, and postoperative inflammatory biomarkers [C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)]. The secondary outcomes were functional recovery, assessed by the range of knee motion, quadriceps strength, and daily ambulation distance. The tertiary outcomes included postoperative adverse effects. The patients in the corticosteroid group had significantly lower resting VAS scores at 6 and 12h after surgery, lower VAS scores during motion up to 24h after surgery, and lower levels of inflammatory biomarkers. All the differences in the VAS scores between the two groups did not reach the point to be considered clinically significant. The additional use of corticosteroid significantly prolonged analgesic effects and led to lower rescue morphine consumption. The patients in the corticosteroid group had significantly better functional recovery on the first day after surgery. The two groups had a similar occurrence of adverse effects. Adding corticosteroids to an analgesic cocktail for PIA could lightly improve early pain relief and accelerate recovery in the first 24h after TKA. Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Peri-articular infiltration analgesia for shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effective analgesic alternatives to interscalene brachial plexus block are sought for shoulder surgery. Peri-articular infiltration analgesia is a novel, less invasive technique, but evidence surrounding its use is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the utility of peri-articular infiltration analgesia in shoulder surgery. We searched literature for trials comparing peri-articular infiltration analgesia with control or with interscalene brachial plexus block. Control groups received no intervention, placebo or systemic opioids. The primary outcome was cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption during the first 24h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included: rest pain scores up to 48h; risk of side-effects; and durations of post-anaesthetic care unit and hospital stay. Data were pooled with random-effects modelling. Seven trials (383 patients) were included. Compared with control, peri-articular infiltration analgesia reduced 24-h oral morphine consumption by a mean difference (95%CI) of -38.0mg (-65.5 to -10.5; p=0.007). It also improved pain scores up to 6h, 36h and 48h, with the greatest improvement observed at 0h (-2.4 (-2.7 to -1.6); p<0.001). Peri-articular infiltration analgesia decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting by an odds ratio (95%CI) of 0.3 (0.1-0.7; p=0.006). In contrast, peri-articular infiltration analgesia was not different from interscalene brachial plexus block for analgesic consumption, pain scores or side-effects. This review provides moderate evidence supporting peri-articular infiltration for postoperative analgesia following shoulder surgery. The absence of difference between peri-articular infiltration analgesia and interscalene brachial plexus block for analgesic outcomes suggests that these interventions are comparable, but further trials are needed to support this conclusion and identify the optimal peri-articular infiltration technique.

A Comparative Study of Periarticular Infiltration with Dexmedetomidine versus Ketorolac as an Additive to Ropivacaine after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Background:Periarticular infiltration (PAI) analgesia has been found to be an effective analgesia modality after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Dexmedetomidine has many beneficial effects on postoperative analgesia by different routes, but studies on PAI are lagging.Aims and Objectives:In this study, we compared postoperative analgesia after PAI with dexmedetomidine versus ketorolac as an additive to ropivacaine after TKA.Setting and Design:This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study conducted on 75 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III, undergoing total knee arthroplasty, of either gender, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III.Materials and Methods:After institutional ethics committee approval and written informed consent, patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Group C (n = 25) received cocktail of 60 mL ropivacaine (0.25%) infiltration with adrenaline 5 mL (0.1 mg.mL−1), Group D (n = 25) received additive dexmedetomidine 1 ug.kg−1 to above cocktail, and Group K (n = 25) received ketorolac 30 mg. Postoperatively pain by Visual Analog Scale, vitals, total duration of analgesia, need for rescue analgesia, sedation, patient satisfaction, mobilization time, and complications were recorded.Statistical Analysis:The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 was used for statistical analysis. Analysis of variance has been used to find the significance of study parameters between the three groups of patients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Postoperative pain score was lesser in the ketorolac group (1.52 ± 0.71, P = 0.001) than the other two groups. Duration of analgesia was more with ketorolac (343.00 ± 144.45, P < 0.001) compared with the other two groups, and epidural activation timings (462 ± 235.84) were significantly delayed in Group K compared to Group C and Group D. There was no significant difference in mobilization time, patient satisfaction, and complications between the three groups.Conclusion:Ketorolac was a better additive to ropivacaine than dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia after TKA.

Efficacy of Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block Combined With Posterior Capsular Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

BackgroundAdductor canal block (ACB) may preserve muscle strength and promote faster recovery than other methods of analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are contradictory reports on the efficacy of ACB. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of single-shot ACB combined with posterior capsular infiltration (PCI) vs multimodal periarticular infiltration analgesia in treating postoperative pain. MethodsThis study involved patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA at our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. Patients were randomized into 2 groups, one of which was treated with ACB combined with PCI, and the other with periarticular infiltration analgesia. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) and consumption of morphine hydrochloride. The secondary outcome was functional recovery, as assessed by range of knee motion, quadriceps strength, and daily ambulation distance. Tertiary outcomes included the duration of hospital stay and postoperative adverse effects. ResultsPatients treated with ACB and PCI had lower resting VAS scores at 8 and 24 hours after surgery, and lower VAS scores during motion within 48 hours after surgery. Patients treated with ACB and PCI also consumed less morphine. There was no difference in functional recovery, duration of hospitalization, or incidence of adverse events. ConclusionThe ACB combined with PCI can reduce postoperative pain sooner after TKA without affecting postoperative functional recovery and increasing complications.

Periarticular Knee Injection With Liposomal Bupivacaine and Continuous Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundLocal periarticular infiltration (PAI) analgesia has emerged as an important component of multimodal approaches to treat total knee arthroplasty postoperative pain. Liposomal bupivacaine may provide prolonged analgesic duration when injected into the surrounding tissues. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and serum bupivacaine levels of a continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) with bupivacaine to PAI with liposomal bupivacaine. MethodsSixty-five patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized into 2 groups: (1) CFNB and PAI with bupivacaine (CFNB group) or (2) PAI with bupivacaine:liposomal bupivacaine mixture at the end of surgery (LB group). The primary outcome was pain intensity at maximum knee flexion 24 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain intensities at rest and movement at timed intervals and serum bupivacaine levels. ResultsPatients in the CFNB group experienced lower pain scores at maximum knee flexion at 24 hours (7.91; 95% confidence interval, 7.19-8.61) compared to the LB group (8.95; 95% confidence interval, 8.42-9.48; P = .02). The mean peak serum bupivacaine level in the LB group up to 72 hours was 0.55 μg/mL versus 1.4 μg/mL for CFNB group (P = .0008) with one patient in the CFNB group exceeding the reported minimum serum bupivacaine threshold for toxicity. ConclusionWhile similar pain control was observed on the day of surgery for both groups, patients with a CFNB experienced lower pain intensities during maximum knee flexion at 24 hours. Total serum concentrations in LB group remained below the toxicity threshold over the study period.

Pain Management Modalities after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-analysis of 170 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Optimal analgesia for total knee arthroplasty remains challenging. Many modalities have been used, including peripheral nerve block, periarticular infiltration, and epidural analgesia. However, the relative efficacy of various modalities remains unknown. The authors aimed to quantify and rank order the efficacy of available analgesic modalities for various clinically important outcomes. The authors searched multiple databases, each from inception until July 15, 2016. The authors used random-effects network meta-analysis. For measurements repeated over time, such as pain, the authors considered all time points to enhance reliability of the overall effect estimate. Outcomes considered included pain scores, opioid consumption, rehabilitation profile, quality of recovery, and complications. The authors defined the optimal modality as the one that best balanced pain scores, opioid consumption, and range of motion in the initial 72 postoperative hours. The authors identified 170 trials (12,530 patients) assessing 17 treatment modalities. Overall inconsistency and heterogeneity were acceptable. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, the best five for pain at rest were femoral/obturator, femoral/sciatic/obturator, lumbar plexus/sciatic, femoral/sciatic, and fascia iliaca compartment blocks. For reducing opioid consumption, the best five were femoral/sciatic/obturator, femoral/obturator, lumbar plexus/sciatic, lumbar plexus, and femoral/sciatic blocks. The best modality for range of motion was femoral/sciatic blocks. Femoral/sciatic and femoral/obturator blocks best met our criteria for optimal performance. Considering only high-quality studies, femoral/sciatic seemed best. Blocking multiple nerves was preferable to blocking any single nerve, periarticular infiltration, or epidural analgesia. The combination of femoral and sciatic nerve block appears to be the overall best approach. Rehabilitation parameters remain markedly understudied.

2015

Periarticular infiltration analgesia when used as a component of multimodal analgesia regimen has been shown to provide excellent pain relief after major joint replacement surgery. Recently, a liposomal formulation of bupivacaine (Exparel) has been approved for administration into the surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia. It is a sustained release preparation of bupivacaine that has been shown to provide pain relief for up to 72 hours with a single local administration. Because the success of infiltration technique depends on systematic, extensive, meticulous tissue injection before surgical wound closure, a group convened to address the best practice for periarticular injection techniques for hip and knee replacement surgery. This article provides recommendations for optimal solution for injection (i.e., drug combinations or ``cocktail'' and total volume) as well as detailed description (including illustrations) of the infiltration technique for primary, revision, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and primary and revision hip arthroplasty using various surgical approaches.