Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Center Research Articles

Prehospital risk assessment and direct transfer to a percutaneous coronary intervention centre in suspected acute coronary syndrome

ObjectivePrehospital risk stratification and triage are currently not performed in patients suspected of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). This may lead to prolonged time to revascularisation, increased duration of...

Sheathless radial approach in contemporary coronary rotational atherectomy: data from two high-volume centers

Aim: To analyze the feasibility and procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using rotational atherectomy (RA), performed via transradial sheathless guiding catheter, as compared to a standard radial and femoral vascular approach. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing RA at two high-volume PCI centers from May 2011 to May 2023 were included. Comparisons were made between the two transradial approaches and between the three types of vascular access. Results: Two hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar, with the exception of gender. We observed, in percentages, fewer cases of failure for sheathless than standard transradial attempts (7.5% vs. 11.5%, respectively), whereas all trans-femoral attempts were successful. Transfemoral procedures were longer and more frequently performed under mechanical circulatory support. There was no difference in procedural success between the three vascular approaches. A trend towards a higher rate of vascular and bleeding complications was found in the femoral group. Conclusion: Sheathless transradial vascular access is a viable option when performing RA during complex PCI procedures, tending to result in fewer failures than the standard transradial approach and reduced bleeding and vascular complications compared to the femoral method.

Sex differences in incidence of self-reported adverse drug reactions after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Despite experiencing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) more often than men, the proportion of women participating in clinical drug trials is low. Thus, evidence for sex differences in the incidence of ADRs is limited. Aim To determine sex differences in incidence of self-reported ADRs after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Further, to determine whether receiving information about ADRs is associated with sex. Methods CONCARDPCI is a prospective multicentre cohort study (N=3417) conducted at seven referral PCI centres in two Nordic countries. Clinical data were collected from patients’ medical records. Socio-demographic characteristics were obtained by self-report after PCI. Two questions from the Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire (HCCQ) were used to determine if information about potential ADRs was received before hospital discharge. De novo created questions were used to determine if patients reported ADRs from prescribed therapy. Questionnaires were distributed two- (T1), six- (T2), and twelve months (T3) after hospital discharge to assess the incidence of self-reported ADRs in a longitudinal perspective. Logistic regression was utilised to scrutinize the aims, reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Patients were predominantly male (78%), with a mean age of 65 years (SD 11). Female patients were older (68, SD 10). Acute coronary syndrome was the most frequent cause of admission for PCI (62%). At T1, 2656 of the included patients responded to the questions from the HCCQ. Of these, 1019 patients (39%) reported being informed of potential ADRs from prescribed therapy, 1075 patients (42%) reported not having been informed, 511 patients (20%) reported ‘Hard to decide’, and 51 (2%) reported ‘Not applicable’. Patients reporting ‘Hard to decide’ or ‘Not applicable’ were excluded from further analysis. Women were less likely to receive information than men (OR 0.58, CI 0.45 – 0.75, p<0.001). For the total study population, 42%, 49% and 40% reported ADRs at T1-T3 respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables, the incidence of self-reported ADRs were significantly higher in women compared to men at T1 (OR 1.71, CI 1.36 – 2.15, p<0.001), T2 (OR 1.89, CI 1.49 – 2.38, p<0.001), and T3 (OR 1.79, CI 1.40 – 2.28, p<0.001). Conclusion Women report significantly more ADRs from prescribed therapy than men after PCI. However, they are less likely to receive information about potential ADRs compared to men. Efforts to improve communication on ADRs and gender equity should be a priority.

High bleeding risk mainly predicts non-access site bleeding events in the first month after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background/Introduction The majority of bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) occur in the first month after PCI. To predict and anticipate on events during hospitalisation and in the first month, the CRUSADE- and ACUITY scores have been developed. In order to enhance the use of bleeding risk stratification, a consortium of PCI centres in the South East of the Netherlands has created and implemented a simple binary variant of the existing models. High bleeding risk (HBR) is defined by one of the following: eGFR< 30; anaemia (Hb < 7mmol/L); a spontaneous bleeding within one year before PCI; a history of intracranial haemorrhage. Purpose We evaluated the predictive value of our risk model and other risk factors for bleeding events in the first month after PCI and discriminated between access site- non-access site bleedings. Methods In an ongoing multicentre prospective PCI registry in the South East of the Netherlands collects baseline and follow-up data of all patients undergoing PCI. We compared access site- and non- access site bleedings between HBR and non HBR using the Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression. Also, we performed multivariate analysis of the separate factors of the model and other probable risk factors. Results We collected baseline and 30 day follow-up data in 3996 patients of which 357 with HBR (9%). Access site bleedings occurred in 3% of patients with HBR vs 2% without (sens. 0.13; spec. 0.98). Patients with HBR showed 5% non-access site bleedings versus 1% in non HBR (sens. 0.21; spec. 0.99). Survival curves and hazard ratios presented in figure 1 show that these differences are significant only for non-access site bleedings (HR: 4.2, 95% CI: 2.47-7.30). The multivariate analysis is presented in table 1. All bleeding events were predicted by age ≥ 60 and peripheral arterial disease. Furthermore, non-access site bleedings were predicted by anaemia and bleeding events in the previous year. Additional risk factors for access site bleedings were female sex and double access site punction. Conclusion The simplified risk model showed to be conservative in the determination of HBR as depicted by the sensitivity and specificity. However, it showed good discriminative value for non-access site bleedings which was driven by anemia and a history of bleedings. Furthermore, these results suggest that age ≥60 and peripheral arterial disease should be taken into consideration. Extra precaution for access site bleedings should also be taken in female patients and in the case of double access site punction.Figure 1Table 1

Association between cholesterol crystals and 6-month prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome: an optical coherence tomography study

Abstract Background Optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been demonstrated to improve short and long-term outcomes compared with standard angiography-guided PCI. However, little is known about the impact of cholesterol crystals on the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the setting of receiving OCT-guided PCI. Purpose This study aims to investigate the association between cholesterol crystals and 6-month outcomes in ACS patients who underwent OCT-guided PCI. Methods Patients with ACS who underwent OCT-guided PCI in a high-volume PCI center between July 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively enrolled and were further divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of cholesterol crystals. OCT imaging characteristics including plaque morphology before the PCI procedure in target lesions were assessed. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, ischemia-driven revascularization, or readmission for heart failure in a 6-month follow-up period. The association between cholesterol crystals and 6-month outcomes was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Independent predictors for cholesterol crystals and 6-month outcomes were evaluated by the logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, respectively. Results 403 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 61 years old and 79.4% were men. Cholesterol crystals were presented in 224 (55.6%) target lesions in patients with ACS. Baseline characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups in age, sex, smoke, previous hyperlipidemia, and other clinical features, except for diabetes, multivessel disease, and ACS classification (p <0.05). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, cholesterol crystals were associated with diabetes, plaque rupture, lipid length, calcification, macrophage infiltration, and thin-capped fibroatheroma (all p <0.05). Patients with cholesterol crystals had higher risks of poor 6-month composite outcomes when compared to those without cholesterol crystals (13.4% vs. 6.7%, HR 2.09, 95%CI 1.07-4.09, p = 0.031), even after confounders adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, multivessel disease and ACS classification using inverse probability of treatment weighting (p = 0.027). Subgroup analysis showed significant interactions between cholesterol crystals and 6-month outcomes with respect to the male (HR 2.82, 95%CI 1.22-6.51, p = 0.015), target lesions in LAD (HR 4.47, 95%CI 1.29-15.44, p = 0.018), and incomplete revascularization (HR 3.08, 95%CI 1.04-8.98, p = 0.042). The Cox regression analysis identified cholesterol crystal as an independent predictor for 6-month composite outcomes (HR 2.12, 95%CI 1.08-4.19, p = 0.030). Conclusions The presence of cholesterol crystals was associated with a poor 6-month prognosis in patients with ACS, even in the setting of receiving OCT-guided PCI.

Abstract 13825: Post-PCI Outcomes in Patients on SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy

Introduction: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to improve cardiorenal outcomes among patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Hypothesis: We aimed to investigate their impact on the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI at a high-volume PCI center between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed. Patients on SGLT2 inhibitors prior to PCI were compared to those not on SGLT2 inhibitors. The primary outcome was AKI, as defined as serum creatinine increase of ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25% from baseline within 30 days of PCI. MACE was defined as death or myocardial infarction (MI) and was assessed at 1 year post PCI. Results: There were significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between patients on (n = 347) vs. not on (n = 16,594) SGLT2 inhibitors. Patients on SGLT2 inhibitors had higher prevalence of diabetes (90.5% vs. 45.5%), hypertension (96.8% vs. 92.1%), hyperlipidemia (95.7% vs. 90.5%), and prior CABG (21.0% vs 15.8%). SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a decreased rate of post-PCI AKI (3.3% vs. 6.6%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.89, P=0.025). At one year after PCI, patients on SGLT2 inhibitors had increased rates of MACE (8.2% vs. 3.9%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.74, 95% CI 0.99-3.06, P=0.052), driven by an increased risk of MI (6.9% vs. 2.1%; HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.42-4.90, P=0.002). Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with lower post-PCI AKI, but was associated with an increased risk of MACE. The latter finding was driven by increased risk of MI, which may be explained by unmeasured confounders in these heterogeneous groups of patients.

Can the MIRACLE2 Score Be Used in the Prehospital Environment and Is It Useful? An Observational Study

ObjectiveThe MIRACLE2 score has been developed for use in a primary percutaneous coronary intervention center. It is unclear if it is feasible in the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) setting. MethodsThe computerized system at 1 UK HEMS was interrogated between December 1, 2020, and May 1, 2022, for the components of the MIRACLE2 score (recorded contemporaneously) plus demographics and outcomes in all post–return of spontaneous circulation patients conveyed to the hospital. pH was excluded because of no point-of-care testing resulting in a modified MIRACLE2 score (maximum score of 9). Data were analyzed using the chi-square test; P < .05 was statistically significant. ResultsThree hundred thirty patients (240 males) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were reviewed. Ninety-two adult patients with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests had sustained return of spontaneous circulation and a median MIRACLE2 score of 4 (range, 0-7). Forty-seven patients died before hospital discharge; the median MIRACLE2 score was higher in those who died (4) than those who survived (1.5, P < .01); 90.3% of those with a score ≥ 5 were triaged to an emergency department rather than directly to a catheterization laboratory. ConclusionA modified MIRACLE2 score can be calculated in the HEMS setting. The benefit of point-of-care testing pH requires investigation. There may be a benefit in predicting outcomes in this nondifferentiated group, but additional research is required.

Stent for life initiative in Portugal: Progress through years and Covid-19 impact.

During Stent for Life Initiative in Portugal lifetime, positive changes in ST elevation myocardial infarction treatment were observed, by the increase of Primary Angioplasty numbers and improvements in patients' behaviour towards myocardial infarction, with an increase in those who called 112 and the lower proportion attending non primary percutaneous coronary intervention centres. Despite public awareness campaigns and system educational programmes, patient and system delay did not change significantly over this period. The aim of this study was to address the public awareness campaign effectiveness on peoples' behaviour facing STEMI, and how Covid-19 has affected STEMI treatment. Data from 1381 STEMI patients were collected during a one-month period each year, from 2011 to 2016, and during one and a half month, matching first lockdown in Portugal 2020. Four groups were constituted: Group A (2011); Group B (2012&2013); Group C (2015&2016) and group D (2020). The proportion of patients who called 112, increased significantly (35.2% Group A; 38.7% Group B; 44.0% Group C and 49.6% Group D, p = 0.005); significant reduction was observed in the proportion of patients who attended healthcare centres without PPCI (54.5% group A; 47.6% Group B; 43.2% Group C and 40.9% Group D, p = 0.016), but there were no differences on groups comparison. Total ischemic time, measured from symptoms onset to reperfusion increased progressively from group A [250.0 (178.0-430.0)] to D [296.0 (201.0-457.5.8)] p = 0.012, with statistically significant difference between group C and D (p = 0.034). During the term of SFL initiative in Portugal, patients resorted less to primary health centres and called more to 112. These results can be attributed the public awareness campaign. Nevertheless, patient and system delays did not significantly change over this period, mainly in late years of SFL, probably for low efficacy of campaigns and in 2020 due to Covid-19 pandemic.

Myocardial infarction care in low and high socioeconomic environments: claims data analysis.

To date, claims data have not been used to study outcome differences between low and high socioeconomic status (SES) patients surviving ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in the Netherlands. To evaluate STEMI and NSTEMI care among patients with low and high SES in the referral area of three Dutch percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres, using claims data as asource. STEMI and NSTEMI patients treated in 2015-2017 were included. Patients' SES scores were collected based on their postal code via an open access government database. In patients with low (SES1) and high (SES4) status, revascularisation strategies and secondary prevention medication were compared. Atotal of 2065 SES1 patients (age 68 ± 13years, 58% NSTEMI) and 1639 SES4 patients (age 68 ± 13years, 63% NSTEMI) were included. PCI use was lower in SES1 compared to SES4 in both STEMI (80% vs 84%, p < 0.012) and NSTEMI (42% vs 48%, p < 0.002) patients. Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed more often in SES1 than in SES4 in both STEMI (7% vs 4%, p = NS) and NSTEMI (11% vs 7%, p < 0.001) patients. Optimal medical therapy use in STEMI patients was higher in SES1 compared to SES4 (52% vs 46%, p = 0.01) but comparable among NSTEMI patients (39% vs 40%, p = NS). One-year mortality was comparable in SES1 and SES4 patients following STEMI (14% vs 16%, p = NS) and NSTEMI (10% vs 11%, p = NS). Combined analysis of claims data and area-specific socioeconomic statistics can provide unique insight into how to improve myocardial infarction care for low and high SES patients.

The France PCI registry: Design, methodology and key findings

Obstructive coronary artery disease is the main cause of death worldwide. By tracking events and gaining feedback on patient management, the most relevant information is provided to public health services to further improve prognosis. To create an inclusive and accurate registry of all percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures performed in France, to assess and improve the quality of care and create research incentives. Also, to describe the methodology of this French national registry of interventional cardiology, and present early key findings. The France PCI registry is a multicentre observational registry that includes consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or PCI. The registry was set up to provide online data analysis and structured reports of PCI activity, including process of care measures and assessment of risk-adjusted outcomes in all French PCI centres that are willing to participate. More than 150 baseline data items, describing demographic status, PCI indications and techniques, and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes, are captured into local reporting software by medical doctors and local research technicians, with subsequent encryption and internet transfer to central data servers. Annual activity reports and scoring tools available on the France PCI website enable users to benchmark and improve clinical practices. External validation and consistency assessments are performed, with feedback of data completeness to centres. Between 01 January 2014 and 31 December 2022, participating centres increased from six to 47, and collected 364,770 invasive coronary angiograms and 176,030 PCIs, including 54,049 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cases and 31,631 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cases. Fifteen studies stemming from the France PCI registry have already been published. This fully electronic, daily updated, high-quality, low-cost, national registry is sustainable, and is now expanding. Merging with medicoeconomic databases and nested randomized scientific studies are ongoing steps to expand its scientific potential.

Delayed first medical contact to reperfusion time increases mortality in rural emergency medical services patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines recommend an emergency medical services (EMS) first medical contact (FMC) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) time of ≤90 min. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association between FMC to PCI time and mortality in rural STEMI patients. We conducted a cohort study of patients ≥18 years old with STEMI activations from January 2016 to March 2020. Data were obtained from a rural North Carolina Regional STEMI Data Registry, which included eight rural EMS agencies and three PCI centers, the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, and the EMS electronic health record. Prehospital and in-hospital time intervals were digitally abstracted. The outcome of index hospitalization mortality was compared between patients who did and did not meet FMC to PCI time goal using Fisher's exact tests. Negative predictive value (NPV) for index hospitalization death was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed and an optimal FMC to PCI time goal was identified by maximizing NPV to prevent index hospitalization death. Among 365 rural EMS STEMI patients, 30.1% (110/365) were female with a mean ± SD age of 62.5 ± 12.7 years. PCI was performed within the 90-min time goal in 60.5% (221/365) of patients. Among these patients, 3% (11/365) died during initial STEMI hospitalization, with 1.4% (3/221) mortality in the group that met the 90-minute time goal compared to 5.6% (8/144) in patients exceeding the time goal (p = 0.03). Meeting the 90-min time goal yielded a 98.6% (95% CI 96.1%-99.7%) NPV for index death. A 78-min FMC to PCI time was the optimal cut point, yielding a NPV for index mortality of 99.3% (95% CI 96.1%-100%). Death among rural patients with STEMI was four times more likely when they did not receive PCI within 90 min.

Trends in Modifiable Risk Factors Amongst First Presentation ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients in a Large Longitudinal Registry.

Recent studies suggest that the risk factor profile of patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is changing. The aim is to determine if there has been a shift of cardiovascular risk factors to cardiometabolic causes in the first presentation STEMI population. We analysed data from a STEMI registry from a large tertiary referral percutaneous coronary intervention centre to determine the prevalence and trends of the modifiable risk factors of hypertension, diabetes, smoking and hypercholesterolaemia. Consecutive first presentation STEMI patients between January 2006 to December2018. Among the 2,366 patients included (mean age 59, SD 12.66, 80% male) the common risk factors were hypertension (47%), hypercholesterolaemia (47%) current smoking (42%) and diabetes (27%). Over the 13 years, patients with diabetes (20% to 26%, OR 1.09 per year, CI 1.06-1.11, p<0.001) and patients with no modifiable risk factors increased (9% to 17%, OR 1.08, CI 1.04-1.11, p<0.001). Concurrently there was a fall in prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia, (47% to 37%, OR 0.94 per year, CI 0.92-0.96, p<0.001) and smoking (44% to 41%, OR 0.94, CI 0.92-0.96, p<0.001) but no significant change in rates of hypertension (53% to 49%, OR 0.99, CI 0.97-1.01, p=0.25). The risk factor profile of first presentation STEMI has changed over time with a reduction in smoking and a concurrent rise in patients with no traditional risk factors. This suggests the mechanism of STEMI may be changing and further investigation of potential causal factors is warranted for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease.

Evaluation of Mortality Frequency in Cardiogenic Shock in Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction in the Patients Presented to Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar

Background: The insufficient supply oxygen and blood to the myocardium is characterized by the coronary artery disease. The coronary arteries occlusion leads to this condition. The plaques formation in coronary arteries lumen is indicative of the condition. These plaques impede blood flow. It is a major concern worldwide. Objective: To evaluate the mortality frequency in cardiogenic shock in anterior wall myocardial infarction in patients presenting to Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. Study Design: It is a descriptive case study conducted at department of Cardiology, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar and NICVD, Nawabshah. This study was conducted from 1st June 2021 to 30th November 2021. Subjects and Methods: A total of 139 patients diagnosed with cardiogenic shock were selected for the study. According to the operational definition the followed up of all patients till discharge and mortality was recorded. Results: The age range of the patients selected for the study was 18-70 years. The mean of age was 47.841±6.66 years, mean weight 83.259±7.39 Kg and mean duration of symptoms was 8.870±3.76 hours. Male patients were 77.7% and females were 22.3%. Mortality was seen in 20.9% patients. Conclusion: Patients with anterior wall myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention have better clinical out-comes. The decreased mortality is also observed. Without the delay of time the patients must be transferred to the primary percutaneous coronary intervention facility if it is far away. There is need to establish more primary percutaneous coronary intervention centers. Keywords: Anterior wall myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, mortality.

Survival of Myocardial Infarction Patients with Diabetes Mellitus at the Invasive Era (Results from the Városmajor Myocardial Infarction Registry).

Due to the lifelong nature of diabetes mellitus (DM), it has been demonstrated to have significant effects on patients' morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to assess the effects of DM on the clinical outcome and survival in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to myocardial infarction (MI) and to examine the relationship of DM to the type of the MI and to left ventricular (LV) and renal functions. A total of 12,270 patients with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) were revascularized at our Institution between 2005 and 2013. In this pool of patients, 4388 subjects had DM, while 7018 cases had no DM. In both STEMI and NSTEMI, the 30-day and 1-year survival were worse in diabetic patients as compared to non-diabetic cases. In the patients with DM, NSTEMI showed worse prognosis within 1-year than STEMI similarly to non-diabetic subjects. Regarding survival, the presence of DM seemed to be more important than the type of MI. Regardless of the presence of DM, reduced LV function was a maleficent prognostic sign and DM significantly reduced the prognosis both in case of reduced and normal LV function. Survival is primarily affected by LV function, rather than DM. Worse renal function is associated with worse 30-day and 1-year survival in both cases with and without DM. Considering different renal functions, the presence of DM worsens both short- and long-term survival. Survival is primarily affected by renal function, rather than DM. The results from a high-volume PCI center confirm significant the negative prognostic impact of DM on survival in MI patients. DM is a more important prognostic factor than the type of the MI. However, survival is primarily affected by LV and renal functions, rather than DM. These results could highlight our attention on the importance of recent DM treatment with new drugs including SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 antagonists with beneficial effects on survival.

Gender Difference in the Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mechanical Reperfusion and 30-Day Mortality for STEMI: Results of the ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 Registry.

Several reports have demonstrated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management and outcome of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of the current analysis is to investigate the potential gender difference in the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mechanical reperfusion and 30-day mortality for STEMI patients within the ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 Registry. This retrospective multicenter registry was performed in high-volume primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centers on four continents and included STEMI patients undergoing PPCIs in March-June 2019 and 2020. Patients were divided according to gender. The main outcomes were the incidence and timing of the PPCI, (ischemia time ≥ 12 h and door-to-balloon ≥ 30 min) and in-hospital or 30-day mortality. We included 16683 STEMI patients undergoing PPCIs in 109 centers. In 2020 during the pandemic, there was a significant reduction in PPCIs compared to 2019 (IRR 0.843 (95% CI: 0.825-0.861, p < 0.0001). We did not find a significant gender difference in the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the numbers of STEMI patients, which were similarly reduced from 2019 to 2020 in both groups, or in the mortality rates. Compared to prepandemia, 30-day mortality was significantly higher during the pandemic period among female (12.1% vs. 8.7%; adjusted HR [95% CI] = 1.66 [1.31-2.11], p < 0.001) but not male patients (5.8% vs. 6.7%; adjusted HR [95% CI] = 1.14 [0.96-1.34], p = 0.12). The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the treatment of patients with STEMI, with a 16% reduction in PPCI procedures similarly observed in both genders. Furthermore, we observed significantly increased in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates during the pandemic only among females. Trial registration number: NCT 04412655.

Trends in the likelihood of receiving percutaneous coronary intervention in a low-volume hospital and disparities by sociodemographic communities.

Over the past two decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capacity has increased while coronary artery disease has decreased, potentially lowering per-hospital PCI volumes, which is associated with less favorable patient outcomes. Trends in the likelihood of receiving PCI in a low-volume center have not been well-documented, and it is unknown whether certain socioeconomic factors are associated with a greater risk of PCI in a low-volume facility. Our study aims to determine the likelihood of being treated in a low-volume PCI center over time and if this likelihood differs by sociodemographic factors. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 374,066 hospitalized patients in California receiving PCI from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. Our primary outcome was the likelihood of PCI discharges at a low-volume hospital (<150 PCI/year), and secondary outcomes included whether this likelihood varied across different sociodemographic groups and across low-volume hospitals stratified by high or low ZIP code median income. The proportion of PCI discharges from low-volume hospitals increased from 5.4% to 11.0% over the study period. Patients of all sociodemographic groups considered were more likely to visit low-volume hospitals over time (P<0.001). Latinx patients were more likely to receive PCI at a low-volume hospital compared with non-Latinx White in 2010 with a 166% higher gap in 2018 (unadjusted proportions). The gaps in relative risk (RR) between Black, Latinx and Asian patients versus non-Latinx white increased over time, whereas the gap between private versus public/no insurance, and high versus low income decreased (interaction P<0.001). In low-income ZIP codes, patients with Medicaid were less likely to visit low-volume hospitals than patients with private insurance in 2010; however, this gap reversed and increased by 500% in 2018. Patients with low income were more likely to receive PCI at low-volume hospitals relative to patients with high income in all study years. The likelihood of receiving PCI at low-volume hospitals has increased across all race/ethnicity, insurance, and income groups over time; however, this increase has not occurred evenly across all sociodemographic groups.

Assessment of distance to primary percutaneous coronary intervention centres in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Overcoming inequalities with process mining tools.

In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), time delay between symptom onset and treatment is critical to improve outcome. The expected transport delay between patient location and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centre is paramount for choosing the adequate reperfusion therapy. The "Centro" region of Portugal has heterogeneity in PCI assess due to geographical reasons. We aimed to explore time delays between regions using process mining tools. Retrospective observational analysis of patients with STEMI from the Portuguese Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes. We collected information on geographical area of symptom onset, reperfusion option, and in-hospital mortality. We built a national and a regional patient's flow models by using a process mining methodology based on parallel activity-based log inference algorithm. Totally, 8956 patients (75% male, 48% from 51 to 70 years) were included in the national model. Most patients (73%) had primary PCI, with the median time between admission and treatment <120 minutes in every region; "Centro" had the longest delay. In the regional model corresponding to the "Centro" region of Portugal divided by districts, only 61% had primary PCI, with "Guarda" (05:04) and "Castelo Branco" (06:50) showing longer delays between diagnosis and reperfusion than "Coimbra" (01:19). For both models, in-hospital mortality was higher for those without reperfusion therapy compared to PCI and fibrinolysis. Process mining tools help to understand referencing networks visually, easily highlighting its inefficiencies and potential needs for improvement. A new PCI centre in the "Centro" region is critical to offer timely first-line treatment to their population.

Kounis Syndrome: A Sting to the Heart.

A 67-year-old woman experienced pruritus, an urticarial rash, and acute, pressure-like chest pain following an insect sting. Initial electrocardiographic findings were notable for ST-segment elevations in the inferior leads without reciprocal changes, but a follow-up electrocardiogram showed pronounced ST-segment elevations in the inferior leads with reciprocal changes. Her troponin I level peaked at 3,053 pg/mL, and she was transferred to a large academic center for percutaneous coronary intervention. Balloon angioplasty was performed for 95% thrombotic occlusion of the mid-right coronary artery, and a drug-eluting stent was placed. The patient's presentation was consistent with type II Kounis syndrome.

Dependence of clinical outcomes on time of hospital admission in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

There are conflicting results in studies investigating the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during or outside of usual hospital working hours. While some researchers have reported higher mortality rates in STEMI patients admitted outside of working hours, others did not find a statistically significant difference. Investigate the short-term endpoints and long-term outcomes of STEMI patients by time of admission. Retrospective SETTING: Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center. Patients were grouped by admission, which consisted of four intervals: 06:00 to <12:00, 12:00 to <18:00, 18:00 to <24:00, and 24:00 to <06:00. We analyzed demographic, clinical and mortality by admission time interval and mortality by multivariate analyses, including the time intervals. Clinical data and mortality SAMPLE SIZE: 735 patients; median (IQR) age 62 (22) years; 215 (29.3%) women. Patients admitted at night were 1.37 times more likely to experience pulmonary edema than patients whose symptoms started in the daytime (P=.012); 32.9% of the patients whose symptoms started at night presented with Killip class II-IV, while during the daytime, 21.4% presented with Killip class II-IV (P=.001). Among the patients, the most common was inferior STEMI (38.6%). However, no-reflow was significantly higher during the daytime compared to the nighttime (P=.12). The risk of the cardiac arrest on admission was 1.2 times higher in patients admitted at night (P=.034). Neither time interval of admission nor several other variables had an effect on clinical outcome or mortality. While patients admitted at night presented with pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock more frequently, no reflow was observed during the day after the procedure. Although patients admitted at night with STEMI presented with worse clinical conditions, similar results were observed between the groups in clinical outcomes. More "real world" results might have been obtained if the study had replicated more typical referral conditions for PCI. None.

The relationship between degree of coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography and ACEF risk score in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

The ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) has been associated with satisfactory predictive values not only for short-term and long-term mortality but also for major adverse cardiovascular events. Investigate the relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis. Retrospective, observational study. Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center. In patients with coronary coronary artery stenosis <70% were compared with patients with stenosis ≥70%. All were diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the cut-off value of the ACEF risk score. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for significant parameters related to degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA. Relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA. 148 patients. In the multivariable regression analysis; left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, P=.015) and ACEF risk score (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 1.62-19.57, P=.007) were independent predictors for degree of coronary artery stenosis. The ACEF risk score was statistically significantly higher in with patients with stenosis ≥70% (1.43 [0.59]) than in patients with stenosis <70% (0.98 [0.35]), P<.001). An ACEF risk score value >1.04 was a predictor of the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA in patients with CCS, with 66% sensitivity and 69% specificity. A high ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) in patients with CCS is associated with the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA, and was useful as an assessment tool for coronary angiography in patients with CCS. Since we do not have long-term follow-up results, we do not know the prognostic value of the ACEF risk score in the long-term follow-up of patients with CCS. None.