Recent studies of supercavitating projectiles primarily focus on the formation and evolution of the cavity, as well as its underwater ballistic characteristics, while neglecting the terminal damage effects. Little attention has been given to exploring the combined damage effects of armor-piercing-explosion supercavitating projectiles (APESP). Therefore, this study comparatively analyzes the response processes and failure modes of an underwater aluminum alloy cylindrical shell target under the action of three different types of loads: armor piercing, explosion, and combined armor-piercing and explosion. This study investigates the underwater combined damage mechanisms of the APESP, clarifies each damage phase under the combined effect, discusses the advantages of damage resulting from the combined armor-piercing and explosion effect based on the target responses and damage modes, and explores the reasons for dissipation of explosion energy. The results show that: the APESP combines localized point damage characteristics of armor piercing with overall surface damage features of underwater explosion. Depending on load stages and target responses, the target response process under the action of the APESP can be divided into the hydrodynamic ram phase, penetration phase, shock wave phase, stable vibration phase, and bubble pulsation phase. The entire physical system can be abstracted as a low-frequency series spring system (equivalent to bubble pulsation frequency) with high-frequency external energy input, based on the energy relationship of the medium and the structure. The concept of the 'blower effect' is proposed based on target behavior during the stable vibration phase. Following the application of different loads, the plastic deformation of the target in a stable state is ranked as: underwater explosion > combined armor-piercing and explosion > underwater armor piercing. Supercavity, shell casing and penetration hole will cause the dissipation of explosion energy.
Read full abstract