Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians Research Articles

Evaluating a Web-based Point-of-care Ultrasound Curriculum for the Diagnosis of Intussusception.

Intussusception is a pediatric medical emergency that can be difficult to diagnose. Radiology-performed ultrasound is the diagnostic study of choice but may lead to delays due to lack of availability. Point-of-care ultrasound for intussusception (POCUS-I) studies have shown excellent accuracy and reduced lengths of stay, but there are limited POCUS-I training materials for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) providers. We performed a prospective cohort study assessing PEM physicians undergoing a primarily Web-based POCUS-I curriculum. We developed the POCUS-I curriculum using Kern's six-step model. The curriculum included a Web-based module and a brief, hands-on practice that was developed with a board-certified pediatric radiologist. POCUS-I technical skill, knowledge, and confidence were determined by a direct observation checklist, multiple-choice test, and a self-reported Likert-scale survey, respectively. We assessed participants immediately pre- and postcourse as well as 3months later to assess for retention of skill, knowledge, and confidence. A total of 17 of 17 eligible PEM physicians at a single institution participated in the study. For the direct observation skills test, participants scored well after the course with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) score of 20 of 22 (20-21) and maintained high scores even after 3months (20 [20-21]). On the written knowledge test, there was significant improvement from 57.4% (95% CI= 49.8 to 65.2) to 75.3% (95% CI= 68.1 to 81.6; p<0.001) and this improvement was maintained at 3months at 81.2% (95% CI= 74.5 to 86.8). Physicians also demonstrated improved confidence with POCUS-I after exposure to the curriculum, with 5.9% reporting somewhat or very confident prior to the course to 76.5% both after the course and after 3months (p<0.001). After a primarily Web-based curriculum for POCUS-I, PEM physicians performed well in technical skill in POCUS-I and showed improvement in knowledge and confidence, all of which were maintained over 3 months.

Improving Emergency Care for Children With Medical Complexity: Parent and Physicians' Perspectives.

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have high rates of emergency department (ED) utilization, but little evidence exists on the perceptions of parents and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians about emergency care. We sought to explore parent and PEM physicians' perspectives about 1) ED care for CMC, and 2) how emergency care can be improved. We performed semistructured interviews with parents and PEM physicians at a single academic, children's hospital. English-speaking parents were selected utilizing a standard definition of CMC during an ED visit in which their child was admitted to the hospital. All PEM physicians were eligible. We developed separate interview guides utilizing open-ended questions. The trained study team developed and modified a coding tree through an iterative process, double-coded transcripts, monitored inter-rater reliability to ensure adherence, and performed thematic analysis. Twenty interviews of parents of CMC and 16 of PEM physicians were necessary for saturation. Parents identified specific challenges related to ED care of their children involving time, information gathering, logistics/convenience, and multifaceted communication between health teams and parents. PEM physicians identified time, data accessibility and availability, and communication as inter-related challenges in caring for CMC in the ED. Suggestions reflected potential solutions to the challenges identified. Time, data, and communication challenges were the main focus for both parents and PEM physicians, and suggestions mirrored these challenges. Further research and quality improvement efforts to better characterize and mitigate the identified challenges could be of value for this vulnerable population.

Procedural Training in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship: What Are We Teaching and What Do Fellows Need to Learn?

Life-saving procedures are rarely performed on children in the emergency department, making it difficult for trainees to acquire the skills necessary to provide proficient resuscitative care for children. Studies have demonstrated that residents in general pediatrics and emergency medicine lack exposure to procedures in the pediatric context, but no studies exist regarding procedural training in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) provides a list of procedures in which PEM fellows must be competent, the relevance of this procedure list to actual PEM practice has not been studied. This study sought to determine whether PEM fellowships currently provide sufficient exposure to the skills most relevant for practicing PEM physicians. Data were collected via anonymous electronic survey from physicians who graduated from PEM fellowship between 2012 and 2016. Survey items measured respondents' comfort with performing critical procedures, and their perceptions of the necessity of knowing how to perform each procedure in their current practice environment. A total of 133 individuals responded to the survey. Respondents unanimously agreed that 18 of the 36 procedures required by the ACGME are necessary to know in their current practice environment. For the remaining 18 mandated procedures, there was significant disagreement among respondents both as to the necessity of the procedure in current practice and respondents' degree of comfort with performing each procedure. Among recent PEM fellowship graduates, there is significant variation in comfort with performing ACGME-mandated procedures. These data highlight important opportunities for curricular enhancement in the procedural training of PEM physicians.

Survey of Current Institutional Practices in the Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Pediatric Patients.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an oxygen delivery device that provides heated humidified air with higher flow rates. The purpose of this survey is to look at institutional practice patterns of HFNC initiation, weaning, and disposition for pediatric patients across the United States. Survey was sent via electronic listservs to pediatric physicians in emergency medicine, hospital medicine, critical care, and urgent care. The questionnaire was divided into demographics and HFNC practices (initiation, management, and weaning). One response per institution was included in the analysis. Two hundred twenty-four responses were included in the analysis, composed of 40% pediatric emergency medicine physicians, 46% pediatric hospitalists, 13% pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) physicians, and 1% pediatric urgent care physicians. Ninety-eight percent of the participants have HFNC at their institution. Thirty-seven percent of the respondents had a formal guideline for HFNC initiation. Nearly all guideline and nonguideline institutions report HFNC use in bronchiolitis. Guideline cohort is more likely to have exclusion criteria for HFNC (42% in the guideline cohort vs 17% in the nonguideline cohort; P < 0.001) and less frequently mandates PICU admissions once on HFNC (11% in the guideline cohort vs 56% in the nonguideline cohort; P < 0.001). Forty-six percent of guideline cohort had an objective scoring system to help determine the need for HFNC, and 73% had a weaning guideline. Although there is general agreement to use HFNC in bronchiolitis, great practice variation remains in the initiation, management, and weaning of HFNC across the United States. There is also a discordance on PICU use when a patient is using HFNC.

Optimizing the workforce: a proposal to improve regionalization of care and emergency preparedness by broader integration of pediatric emergency physicians certified by the American Board of Pediatrics.

BackgroundEmergency care in the United States faces notable challenges with regard to children. In some jurisdictions, available resources are not sufficient to meet local needs. Physicians with specialty training in pediatric emergency care are largely concentrated in children's medical centers within larger urban areas. Rural emergency facilities, which are more likely to face ongoing staffing shortages in all specialties, are particularly deficient in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians. This paper addresses challenges in distribution of pediatric emergency care specialists into suburban and rural health care facilities, and proposes potential local and regional solutions to improve pediatric emergency care capabilities as well as to enhance disaster response in children.ObjectivesThe American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) committee on PEM generated the objective to study and explore methods and strategies to address current challenges and shortcomings in the distribution of pediatric emergency physicians and to develop recommendations to improve access to emergency pediatric expertise in all care settings. A sub‐committee was formed to generate a written report followed by full committee input. The content was reviewed by the ACEP Board of Directors.DiscussionPediatric emergency physicians are certified either by the American Board of Emergency Medicine or the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) depending on whether their training occurred through the emergency medicine or a pediatric residency program. ABP‐certified PEM that account for the majority of PEM physicians, remain largely concentrated in urban tertiary pediatric care centers, primarily children's hospitals. By contrast to the resources, the majority of pediatric patients receive emergency care in emergency departments (EDs) outside this setting. The goal of our recommendations is to help regionalize PEM expertise, allowing sharing of such resources with facilities that have traditionally not had access to PEM expertise. Financial or low number of pediatric cases likely contributed to lack of PEM resources in suburban and rural EDs, although a significant factor for lack of access to ABP‐certified PEM physicians may be local privilege and practice restrictions. Expanding the scope of practice for ABP‐certified PEM physicians beyond traditionally assigned arbitrary age limits to include selective adult patients has the potential to alleviate credentialing barriers and offset the financial and volume concerns while enhancing preparedness efforts, resource utilization, and access to specialized pediatric emergency care.ConclusionRecognition that the training of ABP‐certified PEM physicians allows for these individuals to safely care for selective adult patients with common disease patterns that extend beyond traditionally assigned arbitrary pediatric age limits has the potential to improve resource dissemination and utilization, allowing for greater access to pediatric emergency physicians in currently underserved settings.

Development of an in situ simulation-based continuing professional development curriculum in pediatric emergency medicine

BackgroundContinuing professional development (CPD) activities delivered by simulation to independently practicing physicians are becoming increasingly popular. At present, the educational potential of such simulations is limited by the inability to create effective curricula for the CPD audience. In contrast to medical trainees, CPD activities lack pre-defined learning expectations and, instead, emphasize self-directed learning, which may not encompass true learning needs. We hypothesize that we could generate an interprofessional CPD simulation curriculum for practicing pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians in a single-center tertiary care hospital using a deliberative approach combined with Kern’s six-step method of curriculum development.MethodsFrom a comprehensive core list of 94 possible PEM clinical presentations and procedures, we generated an 18-scenario CPD simulation curriculum. We conducted a comprehensive perceived and unperceived needs assessment on topics to include, incorporating opinions of faculty PEM physicians, hospital leadership, interprofessional colleagues, and expert opinion on patient benefit, simulation feasibility, and value of simulating the case for learning. To systematically rank items while balancing the needs of all stakeholders, we used a prioritization matrix to generate objective “priority scores.” These scores were used by CPD planners to deliberately determine the simulation curriculum contents.ResultsWe describe a novel three-step CPD simulation curriculum design method involving (1) systematic and deliberate needs assessment, (2) systematic prioritization, and (3) curriculum synthesis. Of practicing PEM physicians, 17/20 responded to the perceived learning needs survey, while 6/6 leaders responded to the unperceived needs assessment. These ranked data were input to a five-variable prioritization matrix generating priority scores. Based on local needs, the highest 18 scoring clinical presentations and procedures were selected for final inclusion in a PEM CPD simulation curriculum. An interim survey of PEM physician (21/24 respondents) opinions was collected, with 90% finding educational value with the curriculum. The curriculum includes items not identified by self-directed learning that PEM physicians thought should be included.ConclusionsWe highlight a novel methodology for PEM physicians that can be adapted by other specialities when designing their own CPD simulation curriculum. This methodology objectively considers and prioritizes the needs of practicing physicians and stakeholders involved in CPD.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Confirmation of Nasogastric and Orogastric Tube Placement in Pediatric Patients.

The aim of the study was to investigate the role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative imaging modality to confirm proper placement for nasogastric tubes (NGTs) and orogastric tubes (OGTs) in pediatric patients. This was a prospective descriptive study performed at a tertiary care free-standing children's hospital. Patients 21 years and younger requiring radiographic confirmation of NGT or OGT placement were eligible for enrollment. Bedside ultrasonography examination of the epigastric area was performed by a blinded pediatric emergency medicine physician. An abdominal radiograph was obtained to confirm NGT or OGT placement in all patients. A total of 26 patients with a mean age of 2.6 years (standard deviation, 3.9 years) were enrolled. All 26 patients had x-ray confirmation of NGT and OGTs correctly placed in the stomach. Confirmation of NGT or OGT placement by ultrasound was obtained in 23 patients. For these 23 patients, POCUS agreed with radiographic findings. For 3 patients, the NGT and OGT was unable to be identified by ultrasound. The sensitivity of ultrasound for detecting a properly placed tube was 88% (95% confidence interval, 70.0%-97.6%). This pilot study described ultrasound confirmation of NGT or OGT placement. If confirmed in larger studies, POCUS can be used as an objective tool for the confirmation of NGT or OGT placement in pediatric patients and limit the need for routine x-ray confirmation.

Never Just a Shot in the Dark: Pediatric Firearm Advocacy

Firearms remain a common cause of injury in children. Advocacy is a tool that can be useful in effecting systemic change. Yet for firearm injury prevention, traditional methods of effecting change face unique barriers not experienced in other areas of pediatric injury prevention. As pediatric emergency medicine physicians, we are on the front lines, and as part of the receiving end of the trauma inflicted on our communities by firearms, ours is a powerful voice well suited to overcome these barriers. Current firearm advocacy efforts include raising awareness via social media or editorials, organizing larger advocacy groups for support, challenging legislation, and implementing hospital-based violence intervention programs. Future advocacy directions should include collaborating with unique partners, teleadvocacy, direct action, and finding common ground with gun regulation opposition. Physician advocacy is essential to firearm injury prevention. Continuing to innovate around our advocacy efforts will be vital to the health and safety of our patients.

Developing an Injury Prevention Advocacy Program: Learning From the Experts

While injury is the leading cause of death for children, unlike many other fatal disease states injury is also particularly amenable to prevention efforts to decrease its morbidity and mortality. Pediatric emergency medicine physicians have a particularly important vantage point from which to craft and deliver injury prevention interventions. Here we interviewed successful physician advocates in order to summarize collective wisdom for those interested in increasing their own advocacy work or simply wanting to best support those who are. Key themes included the importance of each of the following; clinical experience informing advocacy efforts, use of multiple streams of data to drive research, frequent reassessments of efforts, overcoming funding obstacles, combined interventions, building trust in the community, and learning from previous successes. In addition, experts offered specific advice for advocacy at the individual, community, and national level. All physicians should seek to include advocacy, or the support of advocacy efforts, in their own practice. By seeking out the wisdom of experts we can identify the methods most likely to be effective in changing behaviors and ultimately decrease the impact of injury on our pediatric patients.

Exposure and Confidence With Critical Nonairway Procedures: A Global Survey of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians.

Children rarely experience critical illness, resulting in low exposure of emergency physicians (EPs) to critical procedures. Our primary objective was to describe senior EP confidence, most recent performance, and/or supervision of critical nonairway procedures. Secondary objectives were to compare responses between those who work exclusively in PEM and those who do not and to determine whether confidence changed for selected procedures according to increasing patient age. Survey of senior EPs working in 96 emergency departments (EDs) affiliated with the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks. Questions assessed training, performance, supervision, and confidence in 11 nonairway critical procedures, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), vascular access, chest decompression, and cardiac procedures. Of 2446 physicians, 1503 (61%) responded to the survey. Within the previous year, only CPR and insertion of an intraosseous needle had been performed by at least 50% of respondents: over 20% had performed defibrillation/direct current cardioversion. More than 50% of respondents had never performed or supervised ED thoracotomy, pericardiocentesis, venous cutdown, or transcutaneous pacing. Self-reported confidence was high for all patient age groups for CPR, needle thoracocentesis, tube thoracostomy, intraosseous needle insertion, and defibrillation/DC cardioversion. Confidence levels increased with increasing patient age for central venous and arterial line insertion. Respondents working exclusively in PEM were more likely to report being at least somewhat confident in defibrillation/DC cardioversion, intraosseous needle insertion, and central venous line insertion in particular age groups; however, they were less likely to be at least somewhat confident in ED thoracotomy and transcutaneous pacing. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intraosseous needle insertion were the only critical nonairway procedures performed by at least half of EPs within the previous year. Confidence was higher for these procedures, and needle and tube thoracostomy. These data may inform the development of continuing medical education activities to maintain pediatric procedural skills for emergency physicians.

A Call to Restore Your Calling: Self-care of the Emergency Physician in the Face of Life-Changing Stress: Part 6 of 6: Trainee Burnout.

Whereas our last article focused on burnout in practicing pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, this article centers on burnout in PEM fellows. Our discussion is based solely on trainee burnout literature. As graduates of pediatrics or emergency medicine residencies, PEM fellows are charged with achieving attending-level clinical expertise while continuing to cope with trainee challenges, such as limited practice autonomy, low pay, financial debt, and uncertain future employment. In this article, we discuss PEM fellow burnout and review risk and protective factors, presentation, and evidence-based interventions to mitigate it. In the absence of PEM fellow-specific literature, we share pediatrics and emergency medicine residency data.This article is dedicated to the trainees we have lost to suicide. We miss you.

Antibiotic Prescribing for Viral Respiratory Infections in the Pediatric Emergency Department and Urgent Care.

Viral acute respiratory tract infections (vARTI) are a frequent source of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. We describe the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing for vARTI in the pediatric emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) within a health system, and identify factors associated with overall and broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing. Retrospective chart review within a single pediatric referral health system. Visits of patients, 3 months- 17 years old, with a discharge diagnosis of a vARTI from 2010 to 2015. Data collected included specific vARTI diagnosis, site type (ED or UC), provider type [pediatric emergency medicine subspecialist or physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants (non-PEM)] and discharge antibiotics. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated where appropriate. There were 132,458 eligible visits, mean age 4.1 ± 4.3 years. Fifty-three percent were treated in an ED. Advanced practice providers, a term encompassing nurse practitioners and physician assistants, were the most common provider type (47.7%); 16.5% of patients were treated by a pediatric emergency medicine subspecialist. Antibiotics were prescribed for 3.8% (95% CI: 3.72-3.92) of children with vARTI; 25.4% (95% CI: 24.2-26.6) of these were broad-spectrum, most commonly first-generation cephalosporins (11%; 95% CI 10.2-11.9). Patients treated in an ED or by a non-PEM and those receiving chest radiograph (CXR) received antibiotics most frequently. Prescribing rates varied by specific vARTI diagnosis. Patients discharged from the pediatric ED or UC with vARTI receive inappropriate antibiotics at a lower rate than reported in other community settings; however, they frequently receive broad-spectrum agents.

Understanding Graduating Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow Priorities for Career Pathways and Faculty Recruitment for Academic or Community Emergency Departments.

Factors influencing the employment of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows in a career in academic medicine versus community emergency department (ED) settings have not previously been explored. The purpose of this study was to explore PEM fellows' priorities in selecting jobs and to identify factors that influence their decisions regarding career choices through a multicenter, qualitative approach. We also explored program directors' beliefs about graduates' job selection priorities. This was a cross-sectional study among a convenience sample of PEM fellows and PEM fellowship program directors and/or associate program directors in the United States. The data were collected in 2017, using a qualitative methodology known as free listing. The fellows and program directors were solicited through the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine. Using content analysis, all free-listing responses from participant samples were categorized into 14 distinct groupings. Thematic saturation was achieved, and member checking was performed to ensure trustworthiness. A sample of 63 fellows from six geographically diverse programs and 41 program and/or associate program directors were surveyed. Location, schedule/work-life balance and compensation were the most frequently cited factors taken into consideration for employment; these are not specific to PEM as a career choice. Other factors included patient population and ED resources. When deciding between academic and community employment, similar areas for the PEM physician emerged on both sides of the dichotomy: work-life balance, clinical hours, burnout, and acuity/patient complexity. There are universal factors that PEM physicians consider when choosing employment. The information elicited from this exploratory technique can inform content for national survey or other qualitative work to achieve richer descriptions of reported items and dichotomies to guide fellow recruitment and retention strategies.

Burnout Rates in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians.

Burnout is a syndrome in which a reduced sense of personal accomplishment, depersonalization, and emotional exhaustion develop in response to prolonged stress. It is well known that physicians suffer high rates of burnout; emergency medicine physicians experience significantly increased rates of burnout, whereas physicians in other specialties, like pediatrics, may be spared. Pediatric emergency medicine physicians are on the frontline of care for the critically ill child, which could put them at high risk for burnout. This study evaluates the rate of burnout in pediatric emergency medicine physicians. We conducted a survey assessing burnout using a sample of pediatric emergency medicine physicians who subscribe to an open Listserv server maintained by Brown University. Burnout was measured using a validated instrument, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, which was distributed by e-mail to the study group. Respondents averaged a score of 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-10), 23 (95% CI, 21-25), and 39 (95% CI, 38-40) in the subscales of depersonalization, emotional exhaustion, and personal accomplishment, respectively. This placed our cohort into the average range for all subscales. The percentage of respondents who scored in the high levels of burnout (moderate to high scores in both depersonalization and emotional exhaustion and low to moderate scores in personal accomplishment) was 25% (95% CI, 18-32). Unlike previous literature showing burnout prevalence in excess of 60% in emergency medicine physicians and 38% in pediatricians, our pediatric emergency medicine physicians fared better with only 25% (95% CI, 18-32), showing elevated levels of burnout.

Procedural Training and Assessment for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians Within the United States and Canada: A Survey Study.

The aims of this study were to determine current practices in procedural training and skill assessment for attending physicians working in pediatric emergency departments within the United States and Canada and identify barriers to providing training and assessment. This was a cross-sectional survey study. Members of the pediatric emergency medicine fellowship program directors and associate program directors Listserv were invited to participate in an anonymous survey about attending physician training and assessment practices for 9 specific procedures and barriers to training and assessment. Eighty-two (56.2%) of 146 recipients responded, with 79 surveys fully completed; 58.5% of responders report that their division offers procedural training, whereas 14.6% report assessment of procedural skills. The most common procedure for which participants report training and assessment is orotracheal intubation (53.1% and 7.5%, respectively), with training rates for other procedures ranging from 2.5% to 43.0%. Most sites that report training use simulation in some form for education. For assessment, simulation is used almost exclusively. Cost (50.6%), lack of faculty interest (36.7%), and lack of standardized guidelines (36.7%) are the most common barriers to training. Lack of standardized guidelines (51.9%), cost (43.0%), and lack of faculty interest (38.0%) are the most common barriers for assessment. Although pediatric emergency medicine physicians may be required to perform emergent procedures, opportunities to receive training and assessment in these procedures are limited. Simulation and other educational modalities are being used to provide skill training and assessment, but cost and lack of resources, standardized protocols, and faculty interest are barriers to the implementation of training and assessment programs.

Factors influencing termination of resuscitation in children: a qualitative analysis

BackgroundPediatric Advanced Life Support provides guidelines for resuscitating children in cardiopulmonary arrest. However, the role physicians’ attitudes and beliefs play in decision-making when terminating resuscitation has not been fully investigated. This study aims to identify and explore the vital “non-medical” considerations surrounding the decision to terminate efforts by U.S.-based Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) physicians.MethodsA phenomenological qualitative study was conducted using PEM physician experiences in terminating resuscitation within a large freestanding children’s hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 physicians, sampled purposively for their relevant content experience, and continued until the point of content saturation. Resulting data were coded using conventional content analysis by 2 coders; intercoder reliability was calculated as κ of 0.91. Coding disagreements were resolved through consultation with other authors.ResultsCoding yielded 5 broad categories of “non-medical” factors that influenced physicians’ decision to terminate resuscitation: legal and financial, parent-related, patient-related, physician-related, and resuscitation. When relevant, each factor was assigned a directionality tag indicating whether the factor influenced physicians to terminate a resuscitation, prolong a resuscitation, or not consider resuscitation. Seventy-eight unique factors were identified, 49 of which were defined by the research team as notable due to the frequency of their mention or novelty of concept.ConclusionPhysicians consider numerous “non-medical” factors when terminating pediatric resuscitative efforts. Factors are tied largely to individual beliefs, attitudes, and values, and likely contribute to variability in practice. An increased understanding of the uncertainty that exists around termination of resuscitation may help physicians in objective clinical decision-making in similar situations.

Point-of-care ultrasound for confirmation of gastrostomy tube replacement in the pediatric emergency department.

Gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are frequently used in children for feeding and nutrition. Complications related to G-tubes (and G-buttons) in children represent a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). G-tube replacement is usually performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians. Misplacement may lead to tract disruption, perforation, fistula tract formation, or feeding into the peritoneum. Contrast-enhanced radiographs are traditionally used for confirmation. In addition to a longer length-of-stay, repeat ED visits result in repeated radiation exposure. The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) instead of radiography avoids this exposure to ionizing radiation. Here, we describe three patients who presented with G-tube complications in whom POCUS alone performed by pediatricians was used for confirmation of the tubes' replacement. Two children presented to the ED with G-tube dislodgement, and one child presented with a ruptured balloon. In all three cases, a new G-tube was replaced at the bedside using POCUS guidance without the need for further radiographic studies. There were no known ED or clinic returns for G-tube complaints over the next 30days. This is the first report of pediatricians using POCUS to guide and confirm G-tube replacement in children. The success of these cases suggests the technique's feasibility. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the learning curves, diagnostic accuracy, ED length-of-stay, and use of confirmatory imaging.

Best Practices for Discussing Injury Prevention With Pediatric Patients and Families

Pediatric emergency centers treat millions of unintentional injuries cases every year, and many of these injuries could have potentially been avoided by proper counseling about trauma safety and prevention. Through such discussions, clinicians have the ability to meaningfully decrease the number of these unintentional injuries. Not enough attention has been placed on critically injured children and adolescents who have a substantial burden on health care resources and morbidity. Emergency medicine providers and pediatricians have the responsibility to educate patients and families about proper child passenger safety and to remain up to date on this information. However, numerous barriers still exist for physicians to fully counsel patients and their families about firearms. Pediatric emergency medicine physicians can play a foundational role in the safety, prevention, and treatment of childhood injuries. Clinicians can become effective instructors for injury prevention by using the Haddon Matrix: host, agent, and environment; and the 3 Es of injury prevention: education, engineering, and enforcement of strategies. Legislative changes, educational approaches, and product modifications must come together to effectively achieve this goal. Although the idea of educating families in the emergency department may seem ideal because the immediacy of the current injury may make the families more receptive to the counseling, the integration of primary care physicians is beneficial for regular follow-ups and maintenance.

Emergency Care Connect: Extending Pediatric Emergency Care Expertise to General Emergency Departments Through Telemedicine.

Increasingly, children with common and lower-acuity conditions are being transferred from general emergency departments (EDs) to pediatric centers for subspecialty care. While transferring children with high-risk conditions has benefit, transferring children with common conditions may expose them to redundant care and added costs. Emergency Care Connect (ECC) is a novel telemedicine program that uses videoconferencing to connect general ED and urgent care providers to pediatric emergency medicine physicians with the goal of keeping children in their communities for definitive care, when safe and feasible. ECC objectives are to: 1) facilitate transfer decision-making for children receiving care in general ED and urgent care sites and 2) increase access to pediatric providers for real-time management, regardless of disposition. In its first 20 months, ECC partnered with 4 general EDs and 1 urgent care location, which together made 1327 contacts with our pediatric center, of which 202 (15%) became ECC consultations for 200 unique patients. Of those consultations, 71% patients remained locally for treatment and 25% experienced a care plan change. Overall, ECC was rated highly by surveyed families and providers. Barriers to implementation, such as lack of familiarity with telemedicine and fears of changes in workflow, were overcome with strong institutional support and frequent, sustained stakeholder engagement. With greater adoption of this model, ECC and programs like it have the potential to allow more children to be treated in their communities, minimize preventable transfers, and reserve beds in children's hospitals for those with potentially higher risk and more medically complex conditions.

Qualitative Study to Understand Pediatric Hospitalists and Emergency Medicine Physicians' Perspectives of Clinical Pathways.

Introduction:Healthcare costs are rising, and clinical pathways (CPW) are one means to promote high-value care by standardizing care and improving outcomes without compromising cost or quality. However, providers do not always follow CPW, and our understanding of their perceptions is limited. Our objective was to examine pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician perspectives of CPW.Methods:We conducted semistructured, in-depth, one-on-one qualitative interviews with PHM and PEM physicians between February 2017 and August 2017. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and accuracy verified. Using an inductive analytic strategy, we systematically coded the data to identify themes.Results:We interviewed 15 PHM and 15 PEM physicians. These providers identified many benefits and limitations of CPW, which positively or negatively impact resource utilization, communication, education of personnel, patients, and families, as well as practice behaviors and attitudes. Perceived benefits included (1) reduction of unnecessary utilization, (2) standardization of care, (3) improved communication, (4) education of oneself and others, and (5) confidence and validation when actions align with CPW. Limitations of CPW were (1) resource utilization for revisions, updates, and dissemination; (2) “tunnel vision” and cognitive biases; (3) loss of autonomy; (4) prescriptive medicine; (5) information overload; (6) pressure to adhere; and (7) guilt if actions do not align with CPW.Conclusions:CPW are tools with advantages and disadvantages that are used and viewed differently by providers. Such insight into how physicians perceive CPW may help to optimize hospital improvement work and enhance high-value care.