Methyl passivation has been demonstrated to be better than the silicon oxide passivation commonly used in Si/PEDOT:PSS solar cells; however, the reason is still unclear. Based on first-principle calculations on the carrier transport behaviors at the Si/PEDOT:PSS interface, we found that methyl passivation is superior to silicon oxide passivation in five aspects. First, methyl plays better than silicon oxide in eliminating the dangling bonds and introducing fewer defect levels in the bandgap. Secondly, the effective carrier mass in methyl passivated Si substrate is smaller than silicon oxide passivated. Thirdly, the carrier transfer rate through the Si/PEDOT:PSS interface with methyl passivation will be much larger than that with silicon oxide passivation. Fourthly, an additional electric field that can boost the separation of carriers will form at the methyl passivated Si/PEDOT:PSS interface. Finally, the energy band bending of the Si substrate with methyl passivation, ∼0.08 eV, will not hinder the holes extraction as significantly as that with silicon oxide passivation, ∼0.63 eV. This article provides a complete process for evaluating a passivation scheme based on first-principle calculations.
Read full abstract