Interactions across sectors have intensified in recentyears, particularly in the form of cross-sector socialpartnerships that span four broad arenas (Selsky andParker, 2005):(1) Nonprofit and business interactions (Austin,2000; Elkington and Fennell, 2000; Gala-skiewicz and Colman, 2006; Googins andRochlin, 2000; Gray, 1989; Hamann et al.,2008; Jamali and Keshishian, 2009; Kanter,1999; Le Ber and Branzei, 2009; Linder andRosenau, 2000; London et al., 2005; Mur-phy and Bendell, 1999; Muthuri, 2008;Rondinelli and London, 2003; Seitanidi andCrane, 2009; Stafford and Hartman, 2001;van Huijstee and Glasbergen, 2010; Wymerand Samu, 2003; Young, 1999).(2) Government and busin ess (Chettiparamb,2007; Dixon et al., 2004; Doh, 2003;Millimanand Grosskopf, 2004; Osborne and Gaebler,1992; Pongsiri, 2002;Rosenau,1999, 2000;Sullivan and Skeltcher 2002; Teegen and Doh,2003).(3) Government and nonprofit organizations(Brinkerhoff, 2002; Deakin, 2002; Farring-ton et al., 1993; Hodgson, 2004; Huxhamand Vangen, 1996; Lister, 2000).(4) Tripartite social interactions (Babiak andThibault, 2009; Glasbergen et al., 2007;Hardy, 1994; Nelson and Zadek, 2000;Waddell, 2000; Waddock, 1991; Warnerand Sullivan, 2004; Westley and Vreden-burg, 1997).In all their different constellations, organizationsfrom different economic sectors – public, nonprofit,and business – cooperate to address social issues byproviding society with ‘‘public goods’’ (Waddock,1988), such as clean water, clean air, environmentalprotection, health care, or education (Warner andSullivan, 2004) in different degrees. However, whena particular form of interaction grows more popular,its shortcomings often become more manifest,leading to greater criticisms (Seitanidi and Ryan,2007). For example, cross-sector social partnershipscan suffer from overreaching rhetorical claims thatpromise to deliver social goods (Reed and Reed,2009; Weaver et al., 1999), but instead comprisetransactional efforts that benefit only the partnerorganizations (Gray and Wood, 1991; Seitanidi,2010).Social partnerships and collaboration have cap-turedtheinterestoftheresearchcommunityforsometime.In1991,BarbaraGrayandDonnaWoodeditedtwo special issues (Collaborative Alliances: Movingfrom Practice to Theory) of the Journal of AppliedBehavioral Science that focused on processes of collab-oration and forms of collaborative alliances. Twentyyears later, with this special issue of the Journal ofBusiness Ethics, we re-visit the notion of collaborationbyaddressingtheinteractionsacrossorganizationsandsectors that focus on the level of interactions (micro,meso, macro; see next paragraph) that have thepotentialanalyticallytoofferaframeworkforcom-parisons across different frames of practice, organiza-tionalforms,industries,sectors,contexts,andprocesses,and reveal emergent patterns.The dynamic constellations of interactions havethe potential for impacts at micro (individual), meso(organisational), and macro (societal) levels of socialreality. In this way, the aim of this special issue is notto treat an individual organization as the sole cen-terpiece of theory (Gray and Wood, 1991) andinstead to focus on the interdependences associatedwith complex networks of relationships. Moreover,by investigating cross-sector social interactions acrossthe three levels of reality, the collection of articles in
Read full abstract