Many nutrient compounds incorporated into parenteral nutrition (PN) mixtures are sensitive to light. The most light-sensitive compounds can be found in the vitamin group, in particular retinol (vitamin A),1 tocopherol (vitamin E),2 vitamin K,3 and riboflavin.4 Some amino acids are also potentially sensitive to light. One of the most common questions asked of pharmacists is whether or not PN bags should be covered in a light-protecting overwrap during administration, and, if so, should the administration set also be protected. It is clearly somewhat illogical to recommend the need to protect the bag and not the administration set from light, if there is indeed a risk of degradation when PN is exposed to light. Despite the obvious response, that light protection should be mandatory, a range of issues is ignored, in particular the desire by care staff to be able to “observe” the infusion at all times, and the practicalities, especially of covering the administration set, or the non-availability of light-protecting sets in practice. And, as in all matters scientific, answers are far from simple. Here are a few questions to illustrate the pharmaceutical complexity of the issue: Which ingredients are light sensitive, and how rapid is the photoreaction that results in loss of biological activity? What intrinsic factors affect degradation (e.g., PN composition [Does fat emulsion provide a barrier to light?], the total volume of the PN mixture, frequency of mixing during infusion, flow rate, type of bag [ethyl vinyl acetate or multilayered], the composition, length, and thickness of the administration set tubing, and exposure time)? What contribution to total loss is due to infusion? Is the source of the light important (e.g., is it dependent on particular wavelengths)? If daylight causes degradation, how are losses influenced by the time of day, the season, weather conditions, and even geographic location? Even the position of the infusion in relation to a nearby window is significant.1 Then there are the difficulties associated with accurately determining losses likely to occur in practice, especially as the light (daylight) source cannot be controlled and there is no artificial-light–source alternative available that exactly reproduces the same wavelength distribution and intensity of daylight. It can also prove difficult to measure the range of light intensity in daylight because it differs across the wavelength spectrum. This spectrum is related to the photochemical reactions caused by daylight. Is it any wonder that the literature is confusing? For example, Billion-Rey et al.3 reported a 90% degradation of vitamin A in All-in-One PN mixtures during exposure to light, but Dahl et al.5 suggested that vitamin A is unaffected under such conditions. A similar contrast can be found with tocopherol. Drott et al.2 reported an approximate 30% loss in daylight, whereas Billion-Rey et al.3 observed no losses under similar conditions.
Read full abstract