Community Treatment Orders Research Articles

Influence of assisted outpatient living in people with intellectual disabilities on individual quality of life and resilience – design of a doctoral thesis

Introduction The research field of disability and mental health is politically and socially relevant, because the psychological well-being of people with intellectual disabilities has often been trivialized in therapy and legislation. Since the pursuit of mental health is coming into focus due to removal of stigma and emerging awareness, people with disabilities must have equal opportunities to choose their place of residence and get suitable psychosocial support.Objectives Our aim is to investigate the influence of assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) on the quality of life and resilience of people with intellectual disabilities who are living self-determined.MethodsA participatory mixed-methods design is chosen as it enables the greatest possible standardization and allows a high flexibility. The project will be divided into three parts: A systematic literature search to gain knowledge about the field and to estimate the sample size, a pre-post-comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF to evaluate AOT in terms of self-perceived quality of life and a focus-group of handicapped people to reflect the study results with attention on resilience.ResultsTo foster the doctoral thesis, several questions can be discussed: 1) How is the relation of disability and mental health to be described? 2) What might be the pros and cons of self-determined living? 3) Which steps need to be taken to implement AOT more often?ConclusionsThe topic is relevant in the public health sector and the results could help to sensitize professionals and the general society regarding to participation in everyday life. The recommendations developed may serve to implement comparable forms of housing.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Can we really treat mentally ill patients involuntarily?

IntroductionThe therapeutic alliance is critical to the efficacy of psychiatric treatment and can be weakened by involuntary treatment measures. In Western culture, mental illness is still associated with violence and if significant risk of violence is detected, in Spain a civil court can order the application of involuntary treatments such as Involuntary Outpatient Commitment.ObjectivesTo discuss the effectiveness of some psychiatric involuntary treatments used in Spain.Methods- Literature review about involuntary psychiatric treatments used in Spain - Case report about a patient undergoing Involuntary Outpatient CommitmentResultsWe present the case of a 54-year-old man, diagnosed with schizophrenia, admitted to our acute psychiatric yard more than five times due to violent behavior and psychotic symptoms. Five years ago, he was summitted to a period of three years of Involuntary Outpatient Commitment. In Spain this measure can include the administration of involuntary medication, an injectable antipsychotic treatment in this case. At the end of the order, he immediately stops attending consultations and abandoned psychopharmacological treatment.ConclusionsInvoluntary Outpatient Commitment is a controversial measure and it stirs up the concepts of stigma, coercion, care, patient autonomy and, globally, the values of humanization in psychiatry.DisclosureNo significant relationships.

Changing Patient Profile in a Psychiatric Hospital During COVID Pandemic: A Comparison With Pre-COVID State

AimsCOVID-19 pandemic has a massively adverse mental health impact and people with pre-existing psychiatric illnesses are one of the most severely affected groups. We intended to study the changes in the patient profile in a psychiatric hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, comparing it to the period just before the pandemic.MethodsConsecutive patients (n = 210) admitted to psychiatric ward under one team during COVID-19 pandemic (February 2020 to January 2022) were compared with patients (n = 234) admitted in the immediate pre-pandemic period (January 2017 to January 2020). Demographic (age, gender, and ethnicity) and clinical variables (diagnosis, admission days, Mental Health Act status, risk to self and others) were collected from the electronic patient records and analysed.ResultsDuring the pandemic monthly admission rates have gone up by 38.1% over the base rate of 6.32/month. There was no difference in the mean age at admission; or the proportion of patients aged 18–40 years or above in the pre-pandemic and pandemic groups. Similarly the gender composition of patients in the two periods was comparable. Proportion of patients from Asian background increased from 7.7% to 16.8% during pandemic period (p < 0.05). The number of hospital days decreased from 31.97 ± 45.8 days in the pre-pandemic period to 22.44 ± 25.1 days during pandemic (p < 0.05). Along with increased admission rates, it suggested a rapid flow of the admission and discharge during the pandemic. Considering diagnostic composition between pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods, psychotic (27.8% v 26.7%) and mood disorders (18.8% v 23.3%) were the predominant; and substance related disorders (20.5% v 16.7%) were the most common comorbidities. Risk to self was associated with 84.3% admissions during the pandemic compared to 78.6% in the pre-pandemic period; however, risk to others was noted in 13.8% v 22.2% (p < 0.01) respectively. There was no difference in proportions getting admitted under Mental Health Act or being discharged with Community Treatment Order. Interestingly, proportions of patients getting discharged under the care of Home Treatment Team decreased from 31.1% pre-pandemic to 16.5% during pandemic period (p < 0.005).ConclusionThere is an increase in admission rate and decrease in the number of admission days, suggestive of increased demand of clinical resources during pandemic. This could be reflective of the stressful situation and adverse impact on mental health in the pandemic period. As the impact on mental health is expected to continue, there is a need for greater resources both in community and inpatient psychiatric services.

Derivation and Validation of the Management and Supervision Tool (MaST) Risk of Crisis (RoC) Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data

AimsThe Management and Supervision Tool (MaST) helps NHS mental health care professionals identify patients who are most likely to need psychiatric hospital admission or home treatment, due to severe mental illness, through a Risk of Crisis (RoC) algorithm driven by electronic health record (EHR) data analytics. We describe the derivation and validation of the MaST RoC algorithm, and its implementation to support preventative mental healthcare in the NHS.MethodsThe RoC algorithm was developed and evaluated with EHR data from six UK NHS trusts using Ordered Predictor List propensity scores informed by a priori weightings from pre-existing literature, as well as real-world evidence evaluating the associations of clinical risk factors with mental health crisis using NHS EHR data. Mental health crisis was defined as admission to a psychiatric hospital or acceptance to a community crisis service within a 28-day period. Predictor variables included age, gender, accommodation status, employment status, Mental Health Act (MHA) status (under section or Community Treatment Order), and previous mental health service contacts (including hospital admissions and crisis services). Data were analysed using Ordered Predictor List propensity scores. The algorithm was derived using structured EHR data from 2,620 patients in a single NHS trust and externally validated using data from 107,879 patients in five other NHS trusts. Qualitative and quantitative data on feasibility, acceptability and system efficiency impacts of MaST implementation were obtained through staff surveys and local audits.ResultsThe factors associated with greatest propensity for mental health crisis included recent previous crisis, multiple previous crises, higher number of mental health service contacts in recent weeks, MHA section, accommodation status and employment status. The RoC algorithm identified 64% and 80% crises in its top quintile. Sentiment analysis of staff surveys suggested that the use of MaST improved productivity by reducing time taken to access patient information to support caseload management that was previously difficult to obtain through manual review of EHRs. The systems efficiency audit revealed a reduction in duration of crisis and inpatient admissions following MaST implementation.ConclusionThe MaST RoC algorithm supports the identification of people more likely to use crisis services in NHS mental health trusts, is feasible to implement, and improves systems efficiency. EHR-derived algorithms can support real-world clinical practice to improve outcomes in people receiving NHS mental healthcare.

Detentions in BSMHFT (Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation NHS Trust) - Covering the Birmingham and Solihull Geographical Area Under the Mental Health Act Between 2018 to 2021

AimsTo continue to monitor trends in detentions under the Mental Health Act based on race, age, gender, and sexuality during the COVID-19 Pandemic to consider if there were any specific areas that would need to be addressed.MethodsWe investigated available mental health detention documents stored in mental health legislative office, Birmingham and Solihull mental health foundation NHS Trust.ResultsWe found that detentions under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act have increased very gradually over the last three years (2018 to2021). However, there has been gradual reduction in detentions under Section 3 within the white population beginning in 2019 and continuing with a marked acceleration in reduction during the two peaks of the pandemic. This is marked in the 66yrs plus age group. As the pandemic has eased this reduction has stopped and reversed with increased section 3 admissions in last few months in this population. The detentions in the black and Asian population have followed a reverse pattern, with marked increase during the pandemic peaks in 2020/2021 and a marked fall as the pandemic has eased.Conclusion1.Mental health act detention data during the Pandemic shows that the pandemic has disproportionality impacted black and Asian population of all ages and Elderly white population.2.During the pandemic there has been a marked increase in detentions under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act (for treatment) in the Black and Asian population with a marked reduction in the white population. This difference is stark in the working age population.3.This highlights: a.The need for a well-functioning community based health and social care offer to reduce detentions in the black and Asian population.b.Return of admissions under the mental health act of white elderly post vaccination (which are vast majority white) shows a reversal of the trend of this group not accessing inpatient treatment fully during the pandemic.4.Community Treatment Order (CTO) detentions in the Black and Asian population continue to increase through the pandemic disproportionately5.There is no material change during the pandemic, in short term detentions (section 2, 5(2)) or other inpatient detentions under the Mental health act6.There are no significant trend changes noted based on gender or sexuality or age during the pandemic in BSMHFT (Birmingham and Solihull mental health foundation NHS Trust).

A DVLA Notification Audit in Forensic Supported Accommodation

AimsThe Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) in England, Scotland and Wales are legally responsible for deciding if a person is medically unfit to drive. This means they need to know if a person holding a driving licence has a condition or is undergoing treatment that may now, or in the future, affect their safety as a driver. The driver is legally responsible for telling the DVLA about any such condition or treatment. Doctors should therefore alert patients to conditions and treatments that might affect their ability to drive and remind them of their duty to tell the appropriate agency. Patients with acute schizophrenia or an acute psychotic disorder must not drive and must notify the DVLA. In alliance with the above, the GMC advises that clinicians have a responsibility to explain the above information to the patient and inform them that they have a legal duty to inform the DVLA. Doctors should also inform patients that relevant medical information may need disclosing about them to the DVLA if they continue to drive against advice, and any advice given should be documented. The main objective of this audit is to identify if notification of DVLA for forensic patients living in supported accommodation, is in accordance with the DVLA guidelines.MethodsA total of 12 residents living in community forensic supported accommodation who have a notifiable diagnosis were included. Data collection took place in September 2021, looking through all previous records relating to the search words “DVLA”, “drive”, “driving” and “license”. Data audited were from the trust's electronic patient records.ResultsDiagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, delusional disorder and personality disorder. Antipsychotic medications included Olanzapine (oral and IM), Clozapine and Zuclopenthixol +/- antidepressants. Legal status included community treatment orders (civil section), voluntary community patients and those on a conditionally discharged restriction under secretary of State supervision. Two patients held full driving licences and a further two held provisional licences, with DVLA documented discussions and notification compliance at 100%. The remaining eight patients had no documentation regarding driving nor DVLA discussions or notification.ConclusionThis audit found that DVLA discussions are not currently well documented, with only four patient records that have this recorded. Although it is the clinical team's responsibility to advise the patient to notify the DVLA, it is ultimately the patient's responsibility to notify the DVLA themselves. DVLA discussions need to be had regardless of driving status and documentation should reflect this.

Transparency and accountability are needed to clarify large differences in the use of forensic orders across Australia

ObjectiveAlthough wide variation in the use of community treatment orders mandating treatment for patients with mental illness is well known, there is much less information on the use of forensic orders mandating treatment for patients diverted from justice systems. We therefore examined the use of forensic mental health orders in Australia using routinely available data. MethodWe completed a retrospective review of publicly reported data about forensic orders and health or criminal justice outcomes across Australia's jurisdictions. Data on the initiation and prevalence of forensic orders were extracted from annual reports by health and justice system entities with governance of forensic mental health patients. Linear mixed models were used to test for differences between jurisdictions in the number and rate of increase of forensic orders per capita open at the end of each calendar year, and the patterns of forensic order use and reporting were analysed for lessons regarding a minimum data set about the number of forensic orders, rates of re-offending, and vulnerable cohorts including Indigenous and female patients. ResultsWhile larger states generally provided useful information about the health engagement of people on forensic orders, no states routinely reported recidivism data or fully addressed vulnerable cohorts, although Victoria provided some information about Indigenous patients and Victoria and Tasmania about female patients. There were significant differences between jurisdictions on both the number of forensic orders in place in 2003, and in the rate of increase in forensic orders between 2003 and 2020. Consistent with the relative number of forensic orders extant in 2003, Queensland showed a large and NSW a moderate rate of increase in the number of people on forensic orders per capita compared with Victoria and WA. ConclusionsA standard set of minimum reported data is needed to monitor and interpret the causes and consequences of large variations in forensic systems across jurisdictions, with the greatest potential benefits for Indigenous and female patients.

The Urgent Need to Review the use of CTOs and Compliance with the UNCRPD Across Australian Jurisdictions

In every Australian jurisdiction, legislation permits mental health service providers and/or mental health tribunals to force people with mental illness to engage in treatment, under Community Treatment Orders (CTOs). Despite considerable efforts made by every Australian state and territory to meet human rights obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) (2008; Maylea & Hirsch, 2017), Australia has rates of CTO usage that are very high by world standards (Light, 2019). Even within Australia, rates of CTO usage vary considerably between and within jurisdictions in spite of the legislation being very similar (Light, 2019; Adult mental health quarterly KPI report, 2019). This occurs in the context of mixed evidence about the efficacy of CTOs and a lack of clear understanding of their purpose (Segal et al., 2017; Kisely et al., 2017). The use of CTOs remains one of the most contentious issues in mental health service delivery. Not only is their efficacy unresolved, they also raise serious ethical and human rights concerns. The current debates, and attempts at reform, must be informed by valid and reliable data. This brief commentary will make the case for a research agenda that addresses the minimal research that has been undertaken to address the variations of CTO use across Australian jurisdictions.

Practitioner Perspectives About Managing Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) in England and the Importance of Social Influences.

Previous research in England has suggested a medical acceptance of Community Treatment Order (CTO) coercion, but none have explored the importance of social influences on practitioner decision making. A sample of 181 practitioners with Mental Health Act responsibilities completed an online survey. They recorded their perspectives about the influence of medical and social items. Sixteen questionnaire items were subdivided into three operational aspects: discharge, renewal, and recall. Medical item averages scored significantly higher as influences than social items (medical items mean = 4.43; social items mean = 3.58; t = -19.38, p = 0.001). The influence of separate medical and social factors was evidenced by exploratory factor analysis when related to discharge and renewal, but not for recall, where items divided into factors that resembled 'risk' and 'disengagement'. Participants' scores showed no statistically significant difference for a practitioner's professional allegiance. The findings demonstrate that social influences are a homogeneous influence on managing CTOs, in addition to the higher scoring influence of medical factors.

Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order

BackgroundCapacity-based mental health legislation was introduced in Norway on 1 September 2017. The aim was to increase the autonomy of patients with severe mental illness and to bring mental health care in line with human rights. The aim of this study is to explore patient experiences of how far the new legislation has enabled them to be involved in decisions on their treatment after they were assessed as capable of giving consent and had their community treatment order (CTO) revoked due to the change in the legislation.MethodIndividual in-depth interviews were conducted from September 2019 to March 2020 with twelve people with experience as CTO patients. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis inspired by hermeneutics.ResultsAlmost all interviewees were receiving the same health care over two years after their CTO was terminated. Following the new legislation, they found it easier to be involved in treatment decisions when off a CTO than they had done in periods without a CTO before the amendment. Being assessed as having capacity to consent had enhanced their autonomy, their dialogues and their feeling of being respected in encounters with health care personnel. However, several participants felt insecure in such encounters and some still felt passive and lacking in initiative due to their previous experiences of coercion. They were worried about becoming acutely ill and again being subjected to involuntary treatment.ConclusionThe introduction of capacity-based mental health legislation seems to have fulfilled the intention that treatment and care should, as far as possible, be provided in accordance with patients’ wishes. Systematic assessment of capacity to consent seems to increase the focus on patients’ condition, level of functioning and opinions in care and treatment. Stricter requirements for health care providers to find solutions in cooperation with patients seem to lead to new forms of collaboration between patients and health care personnel, where patients have become more active participants in their own treatment and receive help to make more informed choices.

Control in the community: A qualitative analysis of the experience of persons on conditional discharge in Hong Kong

Mandatory outpatient treatment schemes such as community treatment orders remain controversial despite being commonly used around the world. Given concerns about patient autonomy and civil liberties, such schemes need to be closely scrutinised. Though Hong Kong's mandatory outpatient treatment scheme, the conditional discharge (CD) regime, has a number of significant legal concerns, empirical research on how it operates on the ground remains limited, and data on the subjective experience of relevant stakeholders is limited to healthcare professionals. This two-part cross-sectional study, the first on the service user perspective in Hong Kong, rectifies this gap. Data was collected through a self-reported survey and semi-structured interviews. Results demonstrated that, while similar themes to those in the literature were raised, such as powerlessness, a lack of understanding about the regime and in particular their rights thereunder, concerns about restrictive aspects of the regime and poor attitudes of healthcare professionals, and in some cases positive sentiments about beneficial aspects, the Hong Kong experience differs in the significant extent to which many of these concerns are demonstrated. The insights which this data provides in relation to how the implementation of the CD regime can be improved prior to legal reform is discussed, and suggestions for the way forward are proposed.

Alberta’s Mental Health Review Panels: Accountable, Transparent Adjudication?

This article examines issues of accountability and transparency in Alberta’s Mental Health Review Panel process. A person who is involuntarily admitted to a mental health facility, or who is subject to a community treatment order (CTO), can appeal to the Review Panel to have their admission certificates or CTO cancelled. This process is intended to provide access to a decision-maker to review decisions that affect the liberty of those living with mental illness. Unfortunately, Alberta’s Mental Health Review Panels are not transparent or accountable decision-makers. The article begins with a brief outline explaining the delivery of mental health care in Canada, followed by a description of Canadian law on CTOs. The article then examines Alberta’s Mental Health Review Panels — first in terms of their role in relation to CTOs, followed by concerns about accountability and transparency in the Review Panel process. Finally, the article looks at legal and system reforms that will enhance the accountability of the process.

Advocacy coalitions and political control

AbstractThe Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) posits that policy actors, including elected officials and bureaucrats, aggregate into coalitions based on shared beliefs and coordinate to achieve policy objectives. Yet, bureaucrats are often subject to political control mechanisms understood within a principal‐agent framework. Combining insights from principal‐agent theory and the ACF, we explore the nature of principal‐agent relationships within and across advocacy coalitions in the United States using case studies of nuclear waste management and fair housing policy. Specifically, we develop three propositions regarding principals and agents as members of advocacy coalitions and examine those propositions by comparing the two case studies. We find that powerful elected officials and expert bureaucrats are important resources for coalitions; bureaucrats are in coalitions but face cross‐pressure from principals in opposing coalitions; and control mechanisms embedded in policy designs by principals can limit bureaucratic discretion in a way that aligns with coalition goals.Related ArticlesNeill, Katharine A., and John C. Morris. 2012. “A Tangled Web of Principals and Agents: Examining the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill through a Principal–Agent Lens.” Politics & Policy 40(4): 629–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2012.00371.xPeterson, Holly L., Mark K. McBeth, and Michael D. Jones. 2020. “Policy Process Theory for Rural Studies: Navigating Context and Generalization in Rural Policy.” Politics & Policy 48(4): 576–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12366Swigger, Alexandra, and Bruce Timothy Heinmiller. 2014. “Advocacy Coalitions and Mental Health Policy: The Adoption of Community Treatment Orders in Ontario.” Politics & Policy 42(2): 246–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12066

Impact of introducing capacity-based mental health legislation on the use of community treatment orders in Norway: case registry study.

In 2017, a capacity-based criterion was added to the Norwegian Mental Health Act, stating that those with capacity to consent to treatment cannot be subjected to involuntary care unless there is risk to themselves or others. This was expected to reduce incidence and prevalence rates, and the duration of episodes of involuntary care, in particular regarding community treatment orders (CTOs). The aim was to investigate whether the capacity-based criterion had the expected impact on the use of CTOs. This retrospective case register study included two catchment areas serving 16% of the Norwegian population (aged ≥18). In total, 760 patients subject to 921 CTOs between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019 were included to compare the use of CTOs 2 years before and 2 years after the legal reform. CTO incidence rates and duration did not change after the reform, whereas prevalence rates were significantly reduced. This was explained by a sharp increase in termination of CTOs in the year of the reform, after which it reduced and settled on a slightly higher leven than before the reform. We found an unexpected significant increase in the use of involuntary treatment orders for patients on CTOs after the reform. The expected impact on CTO use of introducing a capacity-based criterion in the Norwegian Mental Health Act was not confirmed by our study. Given the existing challenges related to defining and assessing decision-making capacity, studies examining the validity of capacity assessments and their impact on the use of coercion in clinical practice are urgently needed.

Intensive outpatient acceptance and commitment therapy with exposure and response prevention for adolescents

Intensive treatments for youth obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are important and underresearched. This study used three adolescent cases to assess the preliminary efficacy of an intensive treatment combining acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with exposure and response prevention (ERP) for OCD. Participants received intensive treatment for 15 h per week for three weeks. Assessments were collected at pre-treatment, weekly during treatment, and at posttreatment. All participants ended treatment in the mild range of OCD severity with 32–60% reductions in symptoms.Participants also reported notable improvements in psychological flexibility and ended treatment in the non-clinical range of depression, anxiety, and stress. These results indicate promise and preliminary support for the use of ACT+ERP in intensive settings for adolescents with OCD. This paper focuses on the clinical application of these techniques.

Gilles Deleuze's societies of control: Implications for mental health nursing and coercive community care.

Since the era of deinstitutionalisation, many clinical approaches have emerged to enable the care and treatment of people suffering from mental illness. In recent years, the use of coercive approaches in the community (e.g., outpatient commitment or community treatment orders) has also increased internationally. Although nurses' role regarding these coercive approaches is central and significant, few empirical and theoretical writings have tackled this controversial nursing practice. The purpose of this paper is to analyse coercive nursing care through the lens of French philosopher Gilles Deleuze's concept of 'societies of control'. Taking up Michel Foucault's work on disciplinary power, Deleuze explores how the move from the striated spaces of closed institutions to the smooth spaces of societies of control took place since the middle of the 20th century. According to Deleuze, the overall objective of 'societies of control' is no longer simply to govern deviant behaviour in closed environments (e.g., psychiatric hospitals and prisons) but to ensure a regime of unrelentless surveillance in the open spaces of our communities.

Suicide rates among patients subject to community treatment orders in England during 2009–2018

Background Community treatment orders (CTOs) enable patients to be treated in the community rather than under detention in hospital. Population-based studies of suicide among patients subject to a CTO are scarce. Aims To compare suicide rates among patients subject to a CTO with all discharged psychiatric patients and those detained for treatment but not subject to a CTO at discharge (‘CTO-eligible’ patients). Method From a national case series of patients who died by suicide within 12 months of contact with mental health services in England during 2009–2018, we estimated average annual suicide rates for all discharged patients, those on a CTO at the time of suicide, those ever treated under a CTO and CTO-eligible patients. Results Suicide rates for patients on a CTO at the time of suicide (191.3 per 100 000 patients) were lower than all discharged patients (482.3 per 100 000 discharges). Suicide rates were similar in those ever treated under a CTO (350.1 per 100 000 CTOs issued) and in CTO-eligible patients (382.9 per 100 000 discharges). Suicide rates within 12 months of discharge were higher in persons ever under a CTO (205.1 per 100 000 CTOs issued) than CTO-eligible patients (161.5 per 100 000 discharges), but this difference was reversed for rates after 12 months of discharge (153.2 per 100 000 CTOs issued v. 223.4 per 100 000 discharges). Conclusions CTOs may be effective in reducing suicide risk. The relative benefits of CTOs and intensive aftercare may be time-dependent, with the benefit of a CTO being less before 12 months after discharge but greater thereafter. CTO utilisation requires a careful balancing of patient safety versus autonomy.

Compulsory Community Treatment Orders in New Zealand and the provision of care: An examination of national databases and predictors of outcome.

BackgroundCompulsory Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) are contentious because they impose severe restrictions on individuals in community settings. The existing evidence for CTOs is constrained by ethical and methodological limitations and may not support usual clinical practise. This study examines the effectiveness of CTOs using routine data in the New Zealand context.MethodsMinistry of Health, New Zealand databases provided demographic, service use, and medication dispensing data for all individuals placed on a CTO between 2009 and 2018. We examined the effectiveness of CTOs through a comparison of psychiatric endpoints identified as useful in the literature according to CTO status. Further analyses examined the moderating influences of age, sex, ethnicity, and diagnosis on outcome.Findings14,726 patients were placed under a CTO over the 10 year period between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018. Patients on CTOs experienced a reduced frequency of admissions (rate ratio of 0∙94, 95% CI 0.93-0.95, p<0.01) reduced admission days (rate ratio 0∙97, 95% CI 0.97-0.98 p<0∙01), increased frequency of psychiatric community contacts (rate ratio 3∙03, 95% CI 3.02-3.03 p<0.01), and increased dispensing of psychiatric medication (rate ratio 2.27, 95% CI 2.27-2.28, p<0.01). When sub-group analyses were undertaken, the association between treatment under a CTO and reduced admission frequency was only present for those with Psychotic Disorders.InterpretationCTOs in New Zealand are associated with increased community care, and increased dispensing of psychiatric medication. Patients with Psychotic Disorders also experienced reduced frequency and length of admissions whilst under a CTO.FundingNo specific funding was received for this study.

Community treatment orders and care planning: How is engagement and decision‐making enacted?

BackgroundIn many jurisdictions worldwide, individuals with a mental illness may be forced to receive care and treatment in the community. In Australia, legislation states that such care should be driven by a care plan that is recovery‐focussed. Key components in the care planning process include engagement and decision‐making about a person's support needs and care options, with trust being an essential component of care planning relationships.ObjectiveThis study examines how these components were enacted during service care contacts for individuals on community treatment orders.MethodsThe study was located at two community mental health teams in South Australia. Ethnographic observations of care planning discussions between consumers, their carers and clinicians, and interviews with individuals from these groups, were conducted over 18 months. Carspecken's critical ethnography provided a rigorous means for examining the data to identify underlying cultural themes that were informing day‐to‐day care interactions.ResultsCare planning was not occurring as it was intended, with service culture and structures impeding the development of trusting relationships. Clinicians striving to work collaboratively with consumers had to navigate a service bias and culture that emphasized a hierarchy of ‘knowing’, with consumers assumed to have less knowledge than clinicians.ConclusionsServices and clinicians can challenge prejudicial ethical injustice and counter this through testimonial justice and implementation of tools and approaches that support genuine shared decision‐making.Patient or Public ContributionThis study included individuals with lived experience of mental illness, their carers and clinicians as participants and researchers.

Characteristics of people on community treatment orders in Australia: Data from the 2010 National Survey of High Impact Psychosis.

Existing evidence on factors associated with community treatment order placement is largely restricted to administrative data. We utilised the data from a large nationally representative sample to compare the demographic, clinical, social functioning, substance use and service utilisation profiles of people living with psychosis under community treatment orders with those who were not. Participants were grouped based on whether they had been subject to a community treatment order in the past 12 months or not. We conducted logistic regressions to examine demographic, clinical, social functioning, substance use and service utilisation profiles associated with the two groups. People who had recently been subject to community treatment orders were more likely to be treated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics and lacked insight but were less likely to report suicidal ideation. They also had higher psychiatric inpatient admission rates but a lower frequency of general practitioner visits. People on community treatment orders in Australia may differ from those who are not under a community treatment order in their treatment needs. Resources and care provision must match the needs of this particularly vulnerable group.