N ATURE SPREADS HER GIFTS unequally, so that inequalities among men on virtually any trait or characteristic one might mention are obvious and probably ineradicable. In this sense, it is manifestly false to say that all men are equal. Furthermore, think how stupefyingly dull the world would be if all men really were equal, as similar to each other as one brick to another. Inequality, while it may be the root of much that is cruel and hateful in human life, is also the root of just about everything that is admirable and interesting. In the face of these plain facts,, we have set equality as our moral and political ideal. Justice demands equality before the law; all men should receive equal treatment in the public realm; each to count for one and no man to count for more than one-these formulas are at the core of what it means to be liberal and democratic. Nature, then, shouts inequality. We reply, nonetheless, equality. It is as though the liberal democrat said with Rousseau, let us set the facts aside, as they do not affect the matter. This situation has seemed to many writers a theoretical embarrassment. When the outer eye, the eye of sense, reports so many manifest inequalities, how can the inner eye, the theoretical vision, still claim to see equality? But the case here is really no different in kind from that which the political theorist typically faces. He is, in a sense, forever flying in the face of facts. All theory, all artifice, civilization itself, is an embarrassment-if not an outrage against the facts of nature, then at least a thorough re-working of them. Nature urges man to procreate. Civilization replies, control yourself; rape and incest are not allowed. Nature tells the hungry man to eat. Civilization replies, do not take these apples for they belong to another man. In sum, the large discrepancy between the observed facts of inequality presents the political theorist with a case no different in kind from that which he typically faces when he deals with a large and complex subject: to point to the discrepancy here is merely to specify a particular example of the theorist's general problem.
Read full abstract