BackgroundRapid diagnosis and treatment of stroke is important for good outcome. In some cases, patients with ischemic stroke arrive at hospital too late for reperfusion therapy. This may be the case especially in rural areas where time spent during transport may delay or even preclude thrombolytic treatment after hospital arrival. We aimed to estimate the extent and clinical relevance of this problem in the Norwegian population.MethodsWe collected data for all reported acute ischemic strokes for the years 2017 and 2018. Transport times from home to hospital were calculated from geographical data and related to frequency of thrombolysis, thrombectomy and clinical outcome after 3 months.ResultsThe frequency of reperfusion therapy decreased significantly as transport time increased. Six percent (564) of 9 428 patients were classified as having a prolonged time in transport. In this group, frequency of intravenous thrombolysis was 10,5% as opposed to 28,2% when prolonged transport was not present. Thrombectomy was performed in 2.1% versus 4.9% in the two groups respectively. We did not find a statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to clinical outcome as judged by the modified Rankin Scale.ConclusionIn the years 2017 and 2018 a relatively small group of Norwegian patients with prolonged time in transport was disfavored concerning access to reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke. In such cases a prehospital solution for diagnostic work up and treatment might improve access to acute stroke treatment.
Read full abstract