Abstract Aim:To assess the long-term outcome for women with DCIS of the breast treated in clinical practice by breast conservation surgery (BCS) without definitive breast irradiation in comparison to those treated by mastectomy (ME).Patients and MethodsWe studied 534 (of 599) patients with DCIS treated between 1992 and 2003 in a German regional cancer center. 287 patients underwent BCS without adjuvant radiotherapy whereas 247 patients were treated by ME. The decision was made after radiologic-pathological correlation and based on results of standardized pathology work-up including radiograms of whole specimen and slices. The decision was based on margins in 6 directions and maximum size of DCIS. In all cases with margins <10 mm a re-resection was performed, all patients with lesions >40 mm with margins <10 mm were advised to ME. All patients who decided for ME although their lesions did not show these criteria as all patients who could not followed were excluded. The median follow-up for the study population was 82 months.ResultsDuring the follow-up period 8/287 (2.8 %) patients of the BCS group and 10/247 (4.0 %) patients of the ME showed local recurrences. 2/8 (25 %) and 5/10 (50 %) of the recurrences were invasive. Neither regional nor systemic metastases were found, no patient died. Regarding these events there was no statistical significant difference between both groups.The BCS and ME group differed significantly in maximum diameters of DCIS (median 23 mm vs. 64 mm; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in nuclear grade distribution (BCS: 52 (18 %) grade 1, 115 (40 %) grade 2, 120 (42 %) grade 3; ME: 54 (22 %) grade 1, 99 (40 %) grade 2, 94 (38 %) grade 3).ConclusionsOur results support that under the precondition of margins >10mm, patients treated with BCS without radiotherapy can expect very low local recurrence risks similar to those treated with ME. This study continues to support the incremental benefit of margin width on recurrence under the precondition of standardised readilogic and pathological work-up of the specimens. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 953.
Read full abstract