Osteonecrosis Of Jaw In Patients Research Articles

Risk of Invasive Fungal Infections and Osteonecrosis of Jaw in Patients Exposed to Current Therapeutic Drugs for COVID-19.

Risk of Invasive Fungal Infections and Osteonecrosis of Jaw in Patients Exposed to Current Therapeutic Drugs for COVID-19.

The status of jaw lesions and medication-related osteonecrosis of jaw in patients with multiple myeloma

Myeloma jaw lesions are not uncommon. The study aimed to investigate the status of jaw lesions and medication-related osteonecrosis of jaw (MRONJ) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. One hundred and twenty-two consecutive newly-diagnosed MM patients seeking dental care at a hospital of southern Taiwan was examined according to jaw lesions with complete follow-up data. Median age of the patients was 67.8 years, and 88.5% of patients were of DS stage III and 41.0% were of ISS stage III at diagnosis. Median survival was 37.9 months for 43 (35.2%) patients with jaw lesions and 57.4 months for 79 patients without jaw lesions. 1-year, 5-year and >7-year overall survival rates for patients with jaw lesions versus patients without jaw lesions were 94.9%, 67.2%, 56.7% vs 83.7%, 51.8%, 26.8% respectively. Patients with jaw lesions had the worse survival (P=0.03). Neither age nor stage affected survival. Jaw lesions involved the mandible more often than the maxilla and stopped progressing during remission, but did not repair. Jaw lesions were the first evidence or recurrent sign of MM in six (4.9%) patients. Long-term monthly antiresorptive therapy changed the radiographic patterns of jawbones and induced MRONJ developing in 16.7% (8/48) of patients. Five (62.5%) MRONJ sites spontaneously occurred without local risk factors. Nearly one-third of MM patients develop osteolytic jaw lesions that seem to be associated with poorer survival. Jaw lesion is an independent prognostic predictor of survival in myeloma. Antiresorptive drugs at less frequent dosing regimen are crucial to minimize spontaneous MRONJ.

Jaw osteonecrosis in patients treated with denosumab 120 mg with regular dental monitoring: 4-year retrospective study

Background: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an expected, but rare adverse effect of denosumab. There are few data denosumab 120 mg related MRONJ occurrence when regular dental monitoring is planned. International and French recommendations do not detail the schedule of the follow-up visits, allowing local interpretations. Methods: The aim of this retrospective study was to describe our local experience of regular dental monitoring in patients receiving denosumab 120 mg. We included all ≥18-year-old patients exposed to denosumab 120 mg, bisphosphonate- and denosumab-naive, and with regular dental monitoring (pre-treatment and every 4 months after denosumab initiation) at the University Hospital Center, France, from 2015 to 2019. The crude incidence of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw was estimated per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval). Results: During the study period, 251 patients were included, of whom 77 did not attend the 1st follow-up visit at 4 months. Almost all patients had osteonecrosis of the jaw risk factors. Ten MRONJ cases were reported (four stage 0 and six stage 1). The crude incidence rate was 5.1 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 1.9–8.2). Denosumab was stopped in all patients who developed MRONJ, with favorable outcome for 3 cases and stabilization in 4 cases after osteonecrosis of the jaw management. Conclusion: This study suggested that a regular dental follow-up every 4 months may be a suitable option for prevention and early detection/treatment of MRONJ. A randomized study should be performed to determine the best dental monitoring schedule.

Relationship between oral condition and risk factors for jaw osteonecrosis in patients with hip fractures.

Purpose : Antiresorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates, are useful for the prevention of the recurrence of hip fractures. However, their administration has a risk of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ), and risk factors include poor oral hygiene. It is difficult for an orthopedic surgeon to examine a patient's oral condition thoroughly. This study evaluated the relationship between risk factors for ARONJ and intraoral findings in hip fracture patients. Materials and Methods : We evaluated 79 patients (average age of 82.2 years) with hip fracture surgery who underwent an oral assessment by dentists. The risk assessments of the intraoral findings were classified into four levels (levels 0-3), with levels 2 and 3 requiring dental treatment intervention. Data that could be extracted as risk factors of ARONJ were also examined. Results : Level 1 was found most frequently (54.4%), followed by level 0 (35.4%), level 2 (8.9%), level 3 (1.3%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the number of risk factors for the two groups (dental treatment intervention required and unnecessary) and oral findings were 0.732. When the cut-off value was set to two risk factors, the specificity and sensitivity was 53.5% and 87.5%. Conclusions : For hip fracture patients with a more than 2 risk factors, dental visits are recommended to prevent ARONJ. This is a useful evaluation method that can be used to screen for ONJ from data obtained from other risk factors, even if it is difficult to evaluate the oral condition in hospitals where dentists are absent. J. Med. Invest. 67 : 328-331, August, 2020.

Care and management of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of jaw in patient with pathological fracture of mandible: case study

This is a case study of patient with bisphosphonate associated osteonecrosis of the mandible after an extraction of teeth 4.6 and 4.7 complicated with pathological fracture while receiving intravenous bisphosphonates is discussed. The patients presenting signs and symptoms are reviewed. Bisphosphonates induced osteonecrosis definition and are reviewed management.

Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.

Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.

Risk of Jaw Osteonecrosis After Intravenous Bisphosphonates in Cancer Patients and Patients Without Cancer

ObjectiveTo compare the risk of jaw osteonecrosis after intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate administered to patients with cancer vs patients without cancer. Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of a 5% national sample of Medicare patients administered IV bisphosphonate from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013, for cancer vs noncancer indications. Probable jaw osteonecrosis was estimated with an algorithm including diagnoses, surgical procedures, and imaging studies. A non-IV bisphosphonate comparison group included patients prescribed an oral bisphosphonate for 30 days or less. ResultsDuring follow-up, 40 (0.42%) out of 9482 patients with cancer developed probable jaw osteonecrosis compared with 8 (0.05%) out of 16,046 patients without cancer. In a Cox multivariable survival analysis controlling for patient characteristics and number of IV zoledronic infusions, patients without cancer had a hazard ratio of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.06-0.46) for developing jaw osteonecrosis compared with those with cancer. The lower rate of jaw osteonecrosis in patients without cancer was also confirmed in a number of sensitivity analyses. ConclusionThe low rate of jaw osteonecrosis in patients with osteoporosis who receive IV bisphosphonate should be weighed against the benefit of those agents in preventing hip and other fractures.

Surgical treatment of jaw osteonecrosis in “Krokodil” drug addicted patients

Retrospective study of jaw osteonecrosis treatment in patients using the “Krokodil” drug from 2009 to 2013.On the territory of the former USSR countries there is widespread use of a self-produced drug called “Krokodil”. Codeine containing analgesics (“Sedalgin”, “Pentalgin” etc), red phosphorus (from match boxes) and other easily acquired chemical components are used for synthesis of this drug, which used intravenously. Jaw osteonecrosis develops as a complication in patients who use “Krokodil”. The main feature of this disease is jawbone exposure in the oral cavity. Surgery is the main method for the treatment of jaw osteonecrosis in patients using “Krokodil”.40 “Krokodil” drug addict patients with jaw osteonecrosis were treated. Involvement of maxilla was found in 11 patients (27.5%), mandible in 21 (52.5%), both jaws in 8 (20%) patients. 35 Lesions were found in 29 mandibles and 21 lesions in 19 maxillas. Main factors of treatment success are: cessation of “Krokodil” use in the pre- (minimum 1 month) and postoperative period and osteonecrosis area resection of a minimum of 0.5 cm beyond the visible borders of osteonecrosis towards the healthy tissues. Surgery was not delayed until sequestrum formation. In the mandible marginal or segmental resection (with or without TMJ exarticulation) was performed. After surgery recurrence of disease was seen in 8 (23%) cases in the mandible, with no cases of recurrence in the maxilla.According to our experience in this case series, surgery is the main method for the treatment of jaw osteonecrosis in patients using “Krokodil”. Cessation of drug use and jaw resection minimize the rate of recurrences in such patients.

Jaw Osteonecrosis in Patients Receiving Oral Bisphosphonates Therapy

We describe the cases of three patients, under the care of the rheumatology service, who presented with osteonecrosis of the jaw whist on oral bisphosphonate therapy. The first case is of a 74-year-old woman with a 12 year history of sero-negative inflammatory arthritis, having been on oral steroids for 11 years, Methotrexate for the preceding 6 years, and oral bisphosphonates for 9 years. Clinical and radiographic examination revealed extensive jaw necrosis. The second patient was a 72-year-old woman with temporal arteritis, on long term oral steroids, and oral bisphosphonates presenting with jaw osteonecrosis. The third case is of an 81-year-old lady with a diagnosis of Polymyalgia Rheumatica on reducing dose of prednisolone along with calcium and vitamin D3 and oral bisphosphonate therapy as part of steroid induced prophylaxis guidelines. On reviewing the literature regarding bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is indeed recognition of this occurring with oral bisphosphonates. However, this is far less common than with intravenous preparations. Reports to the UK MHRA regarding adverse reactions have shown 53 cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with oral bisphosphonates, but this is thought to represent under-reporting. We suggest consideration of patient counselling and consent, and preventive dental work prior to initiation of oral bisphosphonate therapy.

Decreasing Frequency of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Cancer and Myeloma Patients Treated with Bisphosphonates: The Experience of the Oncology Network of Piedmont and Aosta Valley (North-Western Italy)

Background. Data concerning frequency of Osteonecrosis of Jaws (ONJ) are mostly based on single center experiences. Patients and Methods. Since 2005 a multidisciplinary study group collected data of cases of ONJ in patients treated with Bisphosphonates (BP) and observed in oncology and hematology centers of a regional network. Results. By December 2008, 221 cases were registered. We report details of 200 cases, identified after cross-checking reports from centres of medical oncology, haematology, and oral care. Primary neoplasm was breast cancer (39%), myeloma (32%), prostate cancer (16%), and other types of cancer (8%). In about 50% of the cases a history of dental extraction was present. Zoledronic acid was administered (alone or with other BP) to 178 patients (89%). Median time from first infusion to ONJ diagnosis was 21.0 (zoledronic acid only) and 39.0 months (pamidronate only). The number of ONJ cases per year was 3 in 2003, 21 in 2004, 58 in 2005, 60 in 2006, 37 in 2007, and 21 in 2008. Conclusion. The number of new ONJ cases in cancer and myeloma patients increased until 2006 and then reduced. The possible reasons of this trend (introduction of zoledronic acid; increase of ONJ awareness; diffusion of preventive dental measures; late modifications of BP prescription) are herein discussed.

Jaw Osteonecrosis in Patients Treated with Bisphosphonates: An Ultrastructural Study

Osteonecrosis of the jaw is a severe bone disorder traditionally associated with periodontal disease, local malignancy, chemotherapy, glucocorticoid therapy, or trauma. Recently a growing number of publications reported the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients undergoing treatment with bisphosphonates. The mechanism by which bisphosphonates might contribute to the development of osteonecrosis of the jaw is far from being fully elucidated. Suppression of bone turnover, infection, tissue hypoxia and cellular toxicity were proposed as possible mechanisms by which bisphosphonates may exert adverse effects on bone metabolism. Here, we studied 25 consecutive patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis or tumoral pathologies. We provide good evidence of hyperactive osteoclastic bone resorption and suggest a direct cytotoxic effect of bisphosphonates on bone tissue through induction of osteocyte cell death. We also demonstrate that bisphosphonates only have limited adverse effects on bone vascular network.

Clinical Features and Management of Jaw Osteonecrosis in Patients Receiving Bisphosphonate Therapy.

Osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) in patients receiving bisphosphonates is currently being discussed in the scientific literature. Oral bisphosphonates such as alendronate are commonly used to treat osteoporosis and have rarely been associated with ONJ in the benign setting. There is a greater number of reported ONJ cases in patients using intravenous bisphosphonates such as pamidronate and zoledronic acid for cancer-related indications. Many authors have associated local factors, such as dental extraction, periodontal disease, abscesses, and other oral problems, with the development of ONJ, and some have also suggested risk factors other than dental irritation. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical data from oncology patients with ONJ from a single institution. A total of 18 ONJ cases were identified among all patients treated at or referred to our institute (Hospital do Cancer A C Camargo, Sao Paulo, Brazil). These patients had a variety of primary malignancies: breast cancer (n = 7), multiple myeloma (n = 4), prostate cancer (n = 3), lung cancer (n = 3), and renal cancer (n = 1). Current bisphosphonate therapy included zoledronic acid (n = 15; 7 [47%] had received prior pamidronate therapy), pamidronate (n = 2), and alendronate (n = 1). The ONJ cases were managed conservatively using local irrigation with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, debridement, and antibiotics. A total of 29 local ONJ lesions were found: 13 patients had 1 lesion, 3 patients had 2 lesions, and 2 patients had 5 lesions. The majority (n = 16 [89%]) of the patients experienced some level of local discomfort/pain, 6 complained of halitosis, and only 2 patients were asymptomatic. Clinically, 62% of the ONJ lesions were associated with dental work and extractions; only 20% occurred spontaneously. The majority (59%) of the ONJ lesions completely healed in 9 patients. Overall, most of the ONJ lesions were associated with dental procedures, and pain was the symptom most frequently reported. Excellent dental hygiene was found to be important for preventing infections and ONJ and also to contribute to lesion healing in the majority of the cases.

Thirteen cases of jaw osteonecrosis in patients on bisphosphonate therapy

Introduction We report on our experience with 13 cases of jaw osteonecrosis in patients treated with amino-bisphosphonates. Method Data were collected by a regional observatory for jaw osteonecrosis in northern France via letters sent to all physicians likely to manage patients with this condition. All study patients were evaluated at a multidisciplinary jaw osteonecrosis clinic between June and December 2005. Results We identified 13 cases, in 12 women and 1 man, with a mean age of 62.6 years. Intravenous amino-bisphosphonate therapy was given for metastatic bone disease from breast cancer in 7 patients and multiple myeloma in 5 patients; the remaining patient was on oral alendronate for osteoporosis. Mean treatment duration was 24 months. A history of dental extraction was found in 11 (84.6%) patients. The mandible was involved in all 13 patients and the maxillary in 3 (23%) patients. Amino-bisphosphonate therapy was discontinued in all 13 patients. We suggest a classification scheme for the clinical and computed-tomography patterns seen in our patients. Conclusion Jaw osteonecrosis is a severe complication of amino-bisphosphonate therapy. In addition to the application of published guidelines, we propose discontinuing bisphosphonate therapy whenever possible. We are evaluating our classification scheme to identify early diagnostic criteria and/or clinical and computed-tomography outcome criteria that would improve the management of patients with jaw osteonecrosis.

Jaw osteonecrosis in patients treated with bisphosphonates: MDCT evaluation

This study was done to evaluate the use of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the evaluation of jaw osteonecrosis, a recently described medical entity in patients receiving long-term intravenous or oral bisphosphonates, and to help radiologists recognise it to enable early diagnosis and appropriate management. Thirty-eight patients with a history of neoplasm (breast, prostate, multiple myeloma, pancreas) or osteoporosis and bisphosphonate use and recent oral surgery who presented with pain in the mouth and temporomandibular joints, soft tissue infections, altered taste and numbness were examined with MDCT. In all patients, MDCT revealed the presence of structural bony alterations referable to osteonecrosis associated with orosinusal fistula in four of them and bony intraoral spicules in 25. Jaw osteonecrosis is an established medical entity discovered in patients who have undergone treatment with bisphosphonates and dental extraction or other oral surgery. MDCT with multiplanar (MPR), volume rendering (VR) and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions allows accurate assessment of affected bone structures, enabling early diagnosis and suitable treatment planning. Radiologists should be aware of the risk of osteonecrosis in patients treated with bisphosphonates and be able to distinguish it from other bone diseases (osteomyelitis and osteoradionecrosis) with which it enters the differential diagnosis.

P64 Jaw osteonecrosis in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy: results from a single institution

A growing number of reported cases of jaw osteonecrosis in patients receiving bisphosphonate have been published in the last several years. The clinical features of this condition include pain, paresthesia, bone exposure and fistula. Risk factors have been recognized and classified as local and/or systemic. Objective: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinical data of the patients with osteonecrosis assisted at a single institution. Patients and Methods: A total of 42 patients presenting 49 areas of jaw osteonecrosis were evaluated. Medical records were analyzed in order to collect information on underlying disease, bisphosphonate information, clinical features related to bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw, as well as precipitating events related to its occurrence. Results: Most patients were female (71%) and the mean age was 64.7 years old. Breast cancer was the most frequent underlying disease (40.5%) followed by multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, lung and osteoporosis. In addition, the average use of bisphosphonate was 36.8 months and most patients had received zoledronic acid. The posterior region of the mandible was the main affected site. Among the possible triggering factors, exo dontia was associated with 73.8% of the cases. The treatment modalities consisted of surgical, local irrigation with clorexidin and antibiotics and a majority of cases presented complete or partial remission. Conclusion: Most cases of jaw osteonecrosis were related to tooth extraction and surgical interventions showed a good control of the osteonecrosis cases.

Bisphosphonates and jaw osteonecrosis in patients with advanced breast cancer

In recent years, several cases of mandibular necrosis associated with long-term use of bisphosphonates have been reported. The estimated incidence varies from 1% to 4.6%. We conducted an observational study with the aim of determining the incidence of jaw osteonecrosis in advanced breast cancer patients with bone metastases under bisphosphonate treatment and to identify subjects at higher risk of developing this complication evaluating preclinical signs. We considered two groups of patients. All the patients complaining of odontostomatological symptoms underwent maxillary CT scan and maxillo-surgeon clinical examination. Asymptomatic patients were asked to perform a standard orthopantomography (OPT). From February 2005 to October 2005, we observed five patients with jaw bone necrosis (6%). Diagnosis was radiological and clinical. In two patients a confirmatory biopsy was performed. In the same time interval, OPTs were collected from 76 asymptomatic patients. Three OPTs revealed radiological features of suspicious mandibular necrosis. Maxillary CT scan confirmed the presence of an osteolityc area with signs of periosteal reaction. All the three patients were referred to maxillo-surgeon and two out of three patients underwent mandibular biopsy, but histopathological results were not conclusive. In our experience, the incidence of jaw bone necrosis in breast cancer patients seems to be higher than in other reports (6%). Radiological features of suspicious jaw necrosis were observed in three asymptomatic patients. We do not know how these findings should be considered. Anyway, standard OPT is a simple procedure, and may allow identification of periodontal conditions that in some way can predispose to the development of this uncommon event.

Osteonecrosis of jaw in patient with hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with zoledronic acid

Intravenous bisphosphonates are widely used in the management of metastatic bone disease, as well as osteoporosis. Recent published reports have documented a possible link between treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw. We report a case of osteonecrosis of the jaw in 1 patient with prostate cancer receiving both chemotherapy and intravenous zoledronic acid (Zometa). Bisphosphonates have been demonstrated to alter the normal bone microenvironment and appear to have direct effects on tumors as well. These changes may contribute to the development of osteonecrosis of the jaw, particularly after tooth extractions or other invasive dental procedures.