Reviewed by: Learning from All the Faithful: A Contemporary Theology of the Sensus Fidei ed. by Bradford E. Hinze and Peter C. Phan Austin Walker (bio) Learning from All the Faithful: A Contemporary Theology of the Sensus Fidei. Edited by Bradford E. Hinze and Peter C. Phan. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2016. Pages 400. Paper and E-pub: $46.00. ISBN: 9781498280211. When in The Letter to the Duke of Norfolk Newman tells us that the publication of an authoritative judgment is as likely to open as to close debate, if only because theologians must try to discover what the magisterium meant, he could have been speaking proleptically of Lumen Gentium's claim that "the entire body of the faithful, anointed as they are by the Holy One, cannot err in matters of belief."1 In so speaking, council fathers laid the seeds for a theology of the sensus fidei,2 though they made clear that the infallibility of a universal consensus had always been in the soil, as it were, and at least implicitly at work throughout the Church's history.3 But how the entire body of the faithful could be considered infallible, and in what way the lay faithful related to the episcopacy and the magisterium, has been the topic of intense discussion in the fifty years following the Second Vatican council. Within the last five years, three events have coincided to give these investigations a new urgency: the publication of two documents (in 2012 and 2014) on the sensus fidei by the International Theological Commission (ITC) and the ascension of Pope Francis, who in interviews and writings has drawn attention to the sensus fidei.4 In this milieu, with a renewed interest in the unerring and Spirit-given sense of the faithful, editors Bradford E. Hinze and Peter C. Phan have [End Page 75] produced the anthology, Learning from All the Faithful: A Contemporary Theology of the Sensus Fidei. They boldly mark out the "contemporary" character of their approach in the introduction, which begins by identifying the relevant interpretive categories as those of "generation, gender, race, sexual orientation, and country of origin, and [those who have] their doubts . . . about official church teaching and policy" (xv). The volume moves beyond those categories, even if it often returns to them in its 25 essays, which are separated into four sections: (1) a historical survey of theological reflection on the sensus fidei (including a chapter on Newman); (2) a consideration of the adequacy of sociological methods for ascertaining the "true sense" of the faithful; (3) a broad category on "systematic theology and social ethics," with essays on topics as diverse as hermeneutics, Lonergan, and gender theory; and (4) a discussion of how the sensus fidei could be ascertained in light of "World Christianity." As is to be expected from an anthology that brings together diverse authors, the essays are individual efforts to build up a theology of the sensus fidei by drawing on a wide variety of academic disciplines, which is both a challenge and a reward for the reader who follows the whole volume. The bold reader must be prepared to move from the Thomistic language of connaturality to that of Bourdieu's power relations. One helpful unifying feature is that for all their differences, most of the essays take as their point of departure Lumen Gentium and the ITC's reports. Because the ITCs 2014 report on "Sensus Fidei in the Life of the Church" credits Newman's An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine and On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine as instrumental in the recovery of the sensus fidei as a locus theologicus,5 Newman is (by my count) the second-most referenced personage in this collection, behind only Pope Francis. For all that, scholars of Newman may be frustrated by the general level of engagement with his thought. It may be the case that the Newman who is engaged in this volume is the Newman summarized in a necessarily truncated fashion by "Sensus Fidei in the Life of the Church," which may unintentionally open him to charges of rationalism and clericalism.6 Two examples should suffice. First, the eighteenth and nineteeth...
Read full abstract