Oral Anticoagulants In Elderly Patients Research Articles

Features of pharmacokinetics and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in elderly patients

Clinical practice guidelines suggest long-term use of oral anticoagulation in elderly patients. An increased risk of bleeding is associated with age, low body weight, limited renal function, and multiple comorbidities that may be exacerbated by anticoagulation therapy. There is currently very little relevant pharmacological and clinical data on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), especially in older geriatric patients. This is very relevant since pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics often differ significantly in this group of patients. Therefore, studying and understanding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of DOACs in the elderly is necessary to achieve balance in anticoagulation strategies. We identified potentially relevant studies by searching the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar. Further, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as independent selection, all the authors of this article selected sources that were suitable according to the criteria and compiled this review.

Short and long-term renal function changes with direct oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently coexist in elderly patient. Previous evidence showed that vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) may be associated with an accelerated decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, there is little evidence on DOACs in the elderly population and in real life settings; the evidence available to us comes from randomized clinical trials with younger populations. Purpose The main objective of this study was to investigate the medium to long term renal function changes in older AF patients treated with DOACs and VKAs. Methods Enrolled patients underwent 3 eGFR measurements during follow-up, and the between arms difference in eGFR lost over time was investigated by 1) the Linear Mixed Models (LMM) and 2) group-based trajectory model (GBTM) analyses. Analysis was done according to short-term (3.2 years) and long-term follow-up (6.7 years). During the study period 420 enrolled AF patients (77.0±6.0 years, 136 on VKAs and 284 on DOACs) underwent 1260 eGFR assessments. Results After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, in the whole sample eGFR decreased from 67.4±18.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 to 47.1±14.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, p<0.001. Patients on DOACs experienced a significantly lower eGFR decrease that those treated with VKAs (-21.3% vs -45.1%, p<0.001). The benefit of DOACs compared with VKAs was evident both in the short term (eGFR decline -6.6 (95% CI: -9.1 to -4.0) ml/min/1.73 m2 vs -19.9 (95% CI: -23.6 to -16.2) ml/min/1.73 m2 respectively) and in the long-term, (eGFR -13.5 (95% CI: -16.1 to -11.0) ml/min/1.73 m2 in DOACs group vs -34.2 (95% CI: -37.9 to -30.5) ml/min/1.73 m2), respectively). After stratifying our study population into 5 groups according to trajectories of renal function decline, from the first (lowest decline in eGFR) to the fifth (greatest decline in eGFR), the first trajectory consisted of 80% patients on DOACs therapy. Logistic regression showed that the group on DOACs therapy was 3.03- to 4.24-fold more likely to belong to the trajectory with less eGFR decline than the VKAs group. Conclusions In conclusion, DOACs were associated with less long term decline in renal function in elderly patients with AF compared with VKAs.

Medium-term and long-term renal function changes with direct oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.

Objective: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease frequently coexist in the elderly. Warfarin-like drugs (WLDs) may be associated with a relatively greater decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but there is no evidence on the medium- and long-term changes. To further elucidate this issue in elderly patients with AF, we investigated the renal function deterioration in the two groups of the study (DOACs or WLDs). Patients and Methods: A total of 420 AF patients were enrolled (mean age: 77.0 ± 6.0 years; 136 on WLDs and 284 on DOACs). These patients underwent three eGFR measurements during the follow-up period. The between-arms difference of eGFR decline over time was investigated by Linear Mixed Models and group-based trajectory model analyses. Results: In the whole study cohort, after a median follow-up of 4.9 years (interquartile range: 2.7-7.0 years), eGFR decreased from 67.4 ± 18.2 to 47.1 ± 14.3mL/min/1.73m2 (p < 0.001). Remarkably, patients on DOACs experienced a significantly smaller eGFR decline than WLDs patients (-21.3% vs. -45.1%, p < 0.001) and this was true both in the medium-term (-6.6 vs. -19.9mL/min/1.73m2) and in the long-term (-13.5 versus -34.2mL/min/1.73m2) period. After stratification into five subgroups according to trajectories of renal function decline over time, logistic regression showed that DOACs patients had from 3.03 to 4.24-fold greater likelihood to belong to the trajectory with less marked eGFR decline over time than WLDs patients. Conclusion: Elderly patients with AF on treatment with DOACs had a relatively smaller decline of eGFR over time compared to those on treatment with WLDs. This is consistent with what was partly reported in the literature.

Use of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Spain.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have substantially improved anticoagulation. However, data on NOAC use among elderly patients are scarce. We sought to describe NOAC use among elderly AF patients in Spain. We performed a non-interventional, multicenter, multispecialty, cross-sectional study in elderly (≥75 years) AF patients treated with NOACs for stroke prevention. Patients' characteristics by NOAC treatment were compared using standardized differences (SDD). NOAC dosing was classified according to the Spanish summary of products characteristics (SmPC) into appropriate (recommended dose) and inappropriate (under and overdosed). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore factors associated with inappropriate dosing. 500 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 81.5 (4.7) years, and 50% were women. Mean (SD) creatinine clearance was 57.4 mL/min (18.8), and 23.6% were frail. Dabigatran treatment totaled 38.4%, rivaroxaban 15.2%, apixaban 33.2%, and edoxaban 13.2%. Almost one-fourth of elderly patients treated with NOACs in Spain were inappropriately dosed (underdosing 14.4% and overdosing 9.6%). Underdosing was significantly associated with weight (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.0-1.1), while higher a EHRA score decreased the risk of underdosing (OR = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.2-1.0). Overdosing was significantly associated with a history of ischemic stroke (OR = 2.95, 95%CI = 1.1-7.7). Addressing incorrect dosing among elderly AF patients is relevant to improve patient outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in real-world elderly patients with comorbidities of stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsElderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years old) diagnosed with SCAD and AF were consecutively recruited and grouped into patients with or without oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment. Follow-up was performed for 5 years. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, and systemic embolism. Major bleeding outcomes were defined as events that were type ≥ 3 based on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. The net clinical outcomes were defined as the combination of MACEs and bleeding of BARC type ≥ 3.ResultsA cohort of 832 eligible patients (78 ± 6.70 years) was included. Compared to the patients without OAC treatment (n = 531, 63.82%), the patients treated with OAC (n = 301, 36.18%) were much younger, had higher body mass index (BMI), and had lower prevalence of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), renal insufficiency, and previous myocardial infarction. During the follow-up of 5 years, compared to the patients without OAC treatment, patients with OAC had a significantly lower risk of MACEs (20.60% vs. 58.95%, adjusted HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.15–0.30, p < 0.001) but a higher risk of BARC ≥ 3 bleeding events (4.65% vs. 1.32%, adjusted HR: 4.71, 95% CI: 1.75–12.64, p = 0.002). In combination, a lower risk of net clinical outcomes could be observed in the patients with OACs (23.26% vs. 58.96%, adjusted HR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.19–0.38, p < 0.001). Among the patients with OAC treatment, no significant difference was found for MACEs or BARC ≥ 3 bleeding events between the patients with or without comedications of oral antiplatelet agents.ConclusionsA net clinical benefit of efficacy and safety could be observed in OAC-treated elderly patients with SCAD and AF. This benefit is independent of the comedications of oral antiplatelet treatment.

A personalised approach to the choice of oral anticoagulants in elderly and senile patients with atrial fibrillation

Introduction. In recent years, data have been accumulated regarding possible associations between cognitive impairment and atrial fibrillation. The results of retrospective and prospective studies confirm that anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF can reduce the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia.Objective. To study the individual characteristics of elderly and senile patients with atrial fibrillation, influencing the choice of anticoagulant therapy, with a view to its subsequent optimization.Materials and methods. The study included 159 patients with atrial fibrillation of non-valvular genesis aged over 60 years. 4 groups of patients were formed. The largest number of patients received rivaroxaban and warfarin (36.4% and 34.6%, respectively). 26 (16.3%) patients were treated with dabigatran, 20 (12.6%) patients with apixaban. The risk of thromboembolic complications was assessed on the CHA2DS2-VASc scale. The HAS-BLED scale was used to assess the risk of bleeding. A pharmacogenetic study (carriage of polymorphic alleles of the CYP2C9 and VCORC1 genes) was conducted in 138 patients. Cognitive impairment was assessed by a Mini-Cog test and a battery of frontal tests.Results. Taking oral anticoagulants reduces the risk of stroke and dementia in patients; the presence of cognitive impairment, in turn, significantly reduces the patient’s adherence to therapy and reduces the effectiveness of therapy. Patients’ adherence to therapy was significantly lower by 10–20% in patients with cognitive impairment according to the Mini-Cog test and a battery of frontal tests. In the absence of pronounced cognitive impairment (higher adherence to treatment) and availability and willingness to control INR, warfarin remains the drug of choice in patients with renal insufficiency.Conclusions. A number of problems with the use of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation have been identified. The ease of use of new oral anticoagulants, the absence of the need to select doses and monitor therapy is an important factor when choosing a drug.

Efficacy and Safety of Antithrombotic Therapy With Oral Anticoagulants in Real-World Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation.

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of antithrombotic treatment with oral anticoagulants (OACs) in elderly patients with comorbidities of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are unclear.MethodsA cohort of hospitalized elderly patients (≥65 years of age) diagnosed with ACS and AF and treated with oral antithrombotic agents were consecutively recruited. Follow-up was performed for at least 1 year. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, and systemic embolism. The safety outcomes of bleeding were defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.ResultsA cohort of 548 eligible patients (76 ± 6.6 years) was analyzed. Compared to the patients with OAC treatment (n = 184, 33.6%), patients treated without OAC (n = 364, 66.4%) were older, had a lower prevalence of persistent AF and unstable angina (UA), and more often presented with paroxysmal AF, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Compared to the patients without OAC treatment (n = 364, 66.4%), patients treated with OAC (n = 184, 33.6%) had a lower risk of MACEs at both the 1-year (4.3 vs. 15.1%, adjusted HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15–0.80, p = 0.014) and 5-year (17.5 vs. 48.4%, adjusted HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19–0.67, p = 0.001) follow-up. No significant difference was observed for bleeding events of BARC ≥2 between the groups (8.0 vs. 9.0%, adjusted HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.58–2.34, p = 0.667). Compared with warfarin-treated patients, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant-treated patients had lower risks of all-cause mortality (2.1 vs. 9.5%, HR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03–0.98, p = 0.047) and bleeding events of BARC ≥ 3 (2.1 vs. 4.8%, HR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.02–1.10, p = 0.062).ConclusionsAntithrombotic therapy with OACs in elderly patients with ACS and AF was associated with a lower risk of ischemic events without an increase in bleeding events. In real-world practice, the clinical awareness of anticoagulation treatments in elderly patients with ACS and AF needs to be strengthened.

A Smartphone App to Improve Oral Anticoagulation Adherence in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Observational Study.

BackgroundPoor adherence to oral anticoagulation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown to negatively impact health care costs, morbidity, and mortality. Although various methods such as automated reminders, counseling, telephone support, and patient education have been effective in improving medication adherence, the burden on health care providers has been considerable. Recently, an attempt has been made to improve medication adherence without burdening health care providers by using smartphone apps; however, the use of the app for elderly patients with AF is still limited.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether the newly developed smartphone app for patients with AF (the Smart AF), which integrates education, automatic reminder, and patient engagement strategies with a simple user interface, can improve medication adherence in elderly patients with AF.MethodsPatient enrollment was carried out by obtaining informed consent from patients with AF attending Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine hospital between May 2019 and September 2020. Follow-up was planned at 1, 3, and 6 months after enrollment, and questionnaire reminders were automatically sent to patient apps at designated follow-up time points. A questionnaire-based survey of medication adherence was performed electronically using the self-reported 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) as the survey tool.ResultsA total of 136 patients with AF were enrolled in this study. During the follow-up period, 112 (82%) patients underwent follow-up at 1 month, 107 (79%) at 3 months, and 96 (71%) at 6 months. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 64.3 years (SD 9.6), and male participants accounted for 79.4% (108/136) of the study population. The mean CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, previous stroke, or transient ischemic attack) score was 1.2, with hypertension being the most common comorbidity. At the time of enrollment, 126 (93%) and 10 (7%) patients were taking direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin, respectively. For medication adherence as measured according to the MMAS-8, MMAS scores at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were significantly improved compared with baseline MMAS scores (all P values less than .01). The overall improvement in medication adherence achieved by the 6-month intervention was as follows: 77.8% (14/18) of the patients in the high adherence group (score=8) at baseline remained in the same state, 45.3% (24/53) of the patients in the medium adherence group (score=6 to <8) at baseline moved to the high adherence group, and 72% (18/25) of the patients in the low adherence group (score <6) moved to either the medium or high adherence group.ConclusionsThe Smart AF app improved medication adherence among elderly patients with AF. In the realm of medication management, an approach using a mobile health technology that emphasizes education, automatic reminder, and patient engagement may be helpful.

Problems of adherence to treatment with oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in the Kyrgyz Republic

Objectives assessment of adherence to treatment in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were prescribed anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonist, warfarin, and a new oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban.&#x0D; Material and methods. During the study, 322 patients with atrial fibrillation of nonvalvular etiology were observed. Depending on the type of anticoagulant taken, the patients were divided into 2 groups: the first group included 253 (78.6%) people who took warfarin, the second group 69 (21.4%) people, who were prescribed a new oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban.&#x0D; Results. By the end of the one-year follow-up from the start of anticoagulant treatment, only 8.7% of patients in the first group followed the doctor's prescription; the second group had 59.4% of adherent patients. The vast majority of patients refused warfarin therapy due to the inability to control INR. In the case of the appointment of rivaroxaban, the reason for the refusal to take was the high cost of the drugs.&#x0D; Conclusion. Effective prevention of thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation requires the development of appropriate measures to improve adherence to treatment.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Not Candidates for Warfarin in Real-World Setting.

Limited literature has established the role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are unsuited for warfarin. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to assess the effectiveness and safety of DOAC use in this vulnerable patient population. This was a retrospective propensity score matching cohort study. Among all patients aged 75+ years who were not candidates for warfarin, we matched those who initiated DOAC between September 2017 and September 2018 with those who did not receive DOAC or warfarin in a 1:1 ratio. Effectiveness outcome was a composite measure of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and pulmonary embolism. Safety outcome was a composite measure of non-trauma-related intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleed. Unless patients died or lost membership, follow-up period for the effectiveness outcome was until the end of 2019, whereas the safety outcome was for a period up to 1 year. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze both outcomes. We identified 7818 patients who met the inclusion criteria and started DOAC, which matched to 7818 patients who did not receive anticoagulants. The mean age was 82.3 ± 5.1 years, and 51.5% male. The DOAC group had a lower hazard ratio of 0.37 (confidence interval, 0.24-0.57; P < 0.01) for composite effectiveness outcomes, whereas no difference in the composite safety outcome (hazard ratio, 0.91; confidence interval, 0.65-1.25; P = 0.55) when compared with matched control. In conclusion, DOAC was found to be effective in preventing thromboembolic events in patients aged 75+ years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not eligible for warfarin.

Oral anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Results from EMIR study

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) in elderly patients increases both bleeding and thromboembolic risks. Elderly patients benefit as much from anticoagulation therapy with positive net clinical benefit. However, there have been few studies that focused on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in elderly patients. The aim of this subanalysis from EMIR study was to assess the effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients older than 75 years old. Methods EMIR Study (acronym from 'Estudio observacional para la identificaciόn de los factores de riesgo asociados a eventos cardiovasculares Mayores en pacientes con fIbrilaciόn auricular no valvular tratados con un anticoagulante oral directo (Rivaroxaban)') was an observational, multicenter, post-authorization and prospective study that involved AF patients under oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban at least 6 months before enrolment. We analyzed baseline clinical characteristics and adverse events after 2.5 years of follow up. Results We analyzed 1,433 patients with median age of 74.7 (67.7–81.6). Of them 691 (48.2%) were ≥75 years. Elderly patients had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors such previous stroke (16.8% vs 8.5%; p&amp;lt;0.001), heart failure (25.0% vs 20.6%; p&amp;lt;0.001), higher CHA2DS2-VASc (4.4±1.3 vs 2.7±1.2; p&amp;lt;0.001) and HAS-BLED (1.9±1.0 vs 1.2±1.0; p&amp;lt;0.001) scores. After 2.5 (2.2–2.6) years of follow-up, we observed low rate of adverse events in patients under rivaroxaban therapy. We observed higher rate of adverse events in elderly population for thromboembolic events (1.13%/year vs 0.36%/year; p=0.017) and major bleeding events (1.80%/year vs 0.36%/year; p&amp;lt;0.001) but those adverse rates were lower than expected according to previous studies (i.e. ROCKET-AF trial, rivaroxaban group had 4.86%/year of major bleeding or in XANTUS study was 3.2%/year of major bleeding in patients &amp;gt;75 years). We did not observe differences between groups from MACE (1.13%/year vs 1.01%/year; p=0.875) or cardiovascular death (0.86%/year vs 0.42%/year; p=0.170). Conclusion In real-world elderly population, rivaroxaban showed higher rates of thromboembolic and major bleeding events in elderly patients but with annual rates lower than expected according to previous studies like ROCKET-AF or XANTUS. Similar annual rates in elderly were observed for MACE and cardiovascular mortality than in younger patients, being rivaroxaban a good therapeutic alternative even for the elderly. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Bayer Hispania S.L.

Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation

ObjectivesTo assess the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding associated with the use of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a real-world population.MethodsWe identified...

Оценка безопасности прямых пероральных антикоагулянтов у пациентов старческого возраста с перенесенным тромбозом в системе нижней полой вены

to evaluate the frequency of hemorrhagic complications in elderly patients with deep vein thrombosis taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Patients and methods: depending on the type of prescribed DOACs, all patients were randomized by sequential numbers into 3 groups: group 1 (n=124, 79.7±4.3 years) — patients took apixaban at a dose of 5 mg 2 times a day; group 2 (n=125, 78.9±4.6 years) — patients received rivaroxaban at a dose of 20 mg once a day; group 3 (n=121, 77.8±2.3 years) — patients received dabigatran 150 mg twice a day. The groups were comparable by gender, age, and concomitant pathology. The follow-up period for patients was 3 or 6 months from the start of DOACs therapy, depending on the form of thrombosis (distal, proximal) and the terms of anticoagulant administration. Hemorrhagic complications were classified as "major" in the case of retroperitoneal or intracranial bleeding, if there was a need for transfusable components, as well as when surgical intervention was required. In all other cases, the bleeding was classified as "minor". Results and Discussion: in group 1, the total number of hemorrhagic complications was 10.3% less than in group 2 (p=0.029), and 8.4% less than in group 3 (p=0.049). No statistically significant differences were found, when comparing the frequency of hemorrhagic complications in patients from the rivaroxaban and dabigatran groups. Conclusion: in the study course, apixaban demonstrated a more favorable safety profile concerning the overall frequency of hemorrhagic complications in the treatment of inferior vena cava thrombosis versus the other DOACs. KEYWORDS: deep vein thrombosis, hemorrhagic complications, venous thromboembolism, senile asthenia, direct oral anticoagulants. FOR CITATION: Khruslov M.V., Ponomareva I.V., Safronova L.V., Sorokina A.S. Safety evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with inferior vena cava thrombosis. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(5):268–272 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021- 5-5-268-272.

The Oral Anticoagulants Administration in Elderly Patients with Geriatric Syndromes: What's New?

The administration of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with geriatric syndromes such as senile asthenia syndrome, falls and high risk of falls, dementia, polymorbidity, polypharmacy are discussed in the article. The evidence base for the anticoagulants taking in patients with atrial fibrillation aged ≥75, ≥80, ≥85 and ≥90 years, in patients with atrial fibrillation and various geriatric syndromes, as well as in elderly patients with venous thromboembolic complications and frailty syndrome is presented. Most studies indicate significant advantages of direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) over the vitamin K antagonist warfarin in elderly patients with geriatric syndromes. An updated version of the FORTA consensus document, which aims to optimize the prescription of medicines for the elderly, is also presented. Apixaban has a FORTA-A safety class and is the safest oral anticoagulant in elderly patients.

The problem of underdosing with direct-acting oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Unless contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy should be prescribed to elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are superior to vitamin K antagonists for preventing stroke. This, together with their higher net clinical benefit, makes DOACs the treatment of choice in this population. However, due to the concerns about bleeding and the need for dose adjustment based on clinical variables, underdosing of DOACs is common and the risk of stroke high. Drugs with more easily adjusted doses are likely associated with a lower risk of dosing errors and, therefore, a greater protective effect. Correct dosing can ensure a maximal net benefit of DOACs in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.

Current status of rivaroxaban in elderly patients with pulmonary embolism (Review).

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) occurs with a high incidence rate in elderly patients, demonstrating complex clinical manifestations, as well as a difficult anticoagulant treatment strategy. Currently, there is limited understanding of the selection criteria for anticoagulant treatment in elderly patients with PE. In fact, the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, a commonly prescribed anticoagulant, has multiple disadvantages, including a narrow therapeutic range, unpredictable pharmacokinetics, multiple food and drug interactions and genetic polymorphisms resulting in poor response to this therapy; therefore, routine laboratory monitoring is required. Most elderly patients with PE fail to adhere to the treatment regimen or even discontinue it, and clinicians are equally hesitant to initiate oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with PE. This leads to a dilemma regarding the use of anticoagulation therapies and a worse prognosis for the patients. Rivaroxaban, a direct Xa factor inhibitor, has demonstrated considerable practical and clinical advantages, exhibits fast-start action pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, and has an enhanced predictable anticoagulant effect with fewer drug-drug interactions. Based on randomized controlled trials and real-world clinical practice, rivaroxaban has also been recognized as a safe and effective anticoagulant, and these advantages have improved the therapeutic compliance of elderly patients with PE. Thus, this review focused on the current status of rivaroxaban treatment for elderly patients with PE, and described its significance in changing the current anticoagulation treatment regimens for patients. It is expected that rivaroxaban will become a good choice for the treatment of PE in elderly patients.

Impact of anticoagulation in patients with dementia and atrial fibrillation. Results of the CardioCHUVI-FA registry

Introduction and objectivesPopulation aging is associated with an increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and dementia. This study aimed to analyze the impact of oral anticoagulation in elderly patients with AF and moderate-severe dementia. MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study analyzing patients aged ≥ 85 years with a diagnosis of AF between 2013 and 2018. The impact of anticoagulation on mortality, embolisms, and bleeding events was assessed by multivariate Cox analysis. In patients with dementia, this analysis was complemented by propensity score matching, depending on whether the patients were prescribed anticoagulant treatment or not. ResultsOf the 3549 patients aged ≥ 85 years with AF, 221 had moderate-severe dementia (6.1%), of whom 88 (60.2%) were anticoagulated. During a follow-up of 2.8 ±1.7 years, anticoagulation was associated with lower embolic risk and higher bleeding risk both in patients with dementia (hazard ratio [HR]embolisms, 0.36; 95%CI, 0.15-0.84; HRbleeding, 2.44; 95%CI, 1.04-5.71) and in those without dementia (HRembolisms, 0.58; 95%CI, 0.45-0.74; HRbleeding, 1.55, 95%CI, 1.21-1.98). However, anticoagulation was associated with lower mortality only in patients without dementia (HR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.53-0.75) and not in those with dementia (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95%CI, 0.63-1.72; P=.541; HR after propensity score matching 0.91, 95%CI, 0.45-1.83; P=.785). ConclusionsIn patients aged ≥ 85 years with moderate-severe dementia and AF, oral anticoagulation was significantly associated with a lower embolic risk and a higher bleeding risk, with no differences in total mortality.

Safety of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Aim. To study the safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) over 75 years old. Material and methods. The observation study included patients ≥75 years of age with confirmed AF, receiving dabigatran in a reduced dosage, apixaban or rivaroxaban in full or reduced dosage. Previous experience of NOAC treatment from the very beginning of therapy, if a patient was ≥75 years old, or from the point a patient reached 75 years was considered; episodes of NOAK change, as well as hemorrhagic and ischemic events associated with taking an anticoagulant, were recorded. Patient groups were comparable in risk score by CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scales. Results. Patients with AF (n=102; 39 men and 63 women; an average age 79.4Ѓ}4.1 years) were included: 32 patients were in dabigatran group, 34 patients – in apixaban group and 36 patients – in rivaroxaban group. 19 clinically significant bleedings were recorded, 10 occurred in patients taking dabigatran and 9 in those taking rivaroxaban. No hemorrhagic events in patients treated with apixaban were observed. Hematuria (31.6%), large subcutaneous hematomas (26.3%) and intensive nasal bleedings (26.3%) were the most frequent events. No ischemic cardioembolic stroke was recorded. Conclusions. In elderly patients, all NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) demonstrated good safety profile without major bleeding within a 1.5-year follow-up period.

Impacto de la anticoagulación en los pacientes con demencia y fibrilación auricular. Resultados del registro CardioCHUVI-FA

Introduction and objectivesPopulation aging is associated with an increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and dementia. This study aimed to analyze the impact of oral anticoagulation in elderly patients with AF and moderate-severe dementia. MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study analyzing patients aged ≥ 85 years with a diagnosis of AF between 2013 and 2018. The impact of anticoagulation on mortality, embolisms, and bleeding events was assessed by multivariate Cox analysis. In patients with dementia, this analysis was complemented by propensity score matching, depending on whether the patients were prescribed anticoagulant treatment or not. ResultsOf the 3549 patients aged ≥ 85 years with AF, 221 had moderate-severe dementia (6.1%), of whom 88 (60.2%) were anticoagulated. During a follow-up of 2.8 ±1.7 years, anticoagulation was associated with lower embolic risk and higher bleeding risk both in patients with dementia (hazard ratio [HR]embolisms, 0.36; 95%CI, 0,15-0.84; HRbleeding, 2.44; 95%CI, 1.04-5.71) and in those without dementia (HRembolisms, 5.58; 95%CI, 0.45-0.74; HRbleeding, 1.55, 95%CI, 1.21-1.98). However, anticoagulation was associated with lower mortality only in patients without dementia (HR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.53-0.75) and not in those with dementia (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95%CI, 0.63-1.72; P=.541; HR after propensity score matching 0.91, 95%CI, 0.45-1.83; P=.785). ConclusionsIn patients aged ≥ 85 years with moderate-severe dementia and AF, oral anticoagulation was significantly associated with a lower embolic risk and a higher bleeding risk, with no differences in total mortality.

Safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies and 440 281 patients.

The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral antagonists (NOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and indirectly compare NOACs in this population. MEDLINE, Cochrane, ISI Web of Sciences, and SCOPUS were searched for randomized or adjusted observational studies comparing NOACs vs. VKAs for stroke prevention in AF patients ≥75 years. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes of this meta-analysis were the composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleedings, respectively. Other secondary outcomes were also analysed. The analysis included 22 studies enrolling 440281 AF patients ≥ 75 years. The risk of SSE was significantly lower with NOACs vs. VKAs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.89], whereas no differences were found for major bleedings (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.85-1.05). NOACs reduced the risk of intracranial bleeding (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.38-0.58), haemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48-0.79) and fatal bleeding (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.30-0.72) but increased gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.30-1.65), compared to VKAs. The adjusted indirect comparison showed no significant differences in term of SSE between NOAC agents. Conversely, the risk of major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban vs. apixaban (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.39-2.08) and edoxaban (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14-1.67), and for dabigatran vs. apixaban (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.18-1.85). In elderly patients with AF, NOACs are associated to a lower risk of SSE, intracranial bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke and fatal bleeding than VKAs, but increase GI bleedings. In this analysis, the safety profile of individual NOAC agents was significantly different.