Opportunistic Salpingectomy Research Articles

Opportunistic Salpingectomy Between 2017 and 2020: A Descriptive Analysis

ObjectivesOpportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during another pelvic surgery for the purpose of ovarian cancer prevention. Herein, we describe the rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization between 2017 and 2020. MethodsThis study uses the Canadian Institute of Health Information’s Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories except for Quebec between the fiscal years 2017 and 2020. A descriptive analysis on all people aged 15 years and older who had hysterectomies or tubal sterilizations was conducted to determine the proportion of hysterectomies that included bilateral salpingectomy (OS) and the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS compared to tubal ligation. ResultsThere were 174 006 people included in the study. The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 31.7% in 2017 to 39.9% by 2020. With respect to tubal sterilizations, rates of OS increased from 26.3% of all tubal sterilizations in 2017 to 42.5% in 2020. British Columbia remained the jurisdiction with the highest rates of OS, but rates increased significantly in many jurisdictions, particularly at the time of tubal sterilization. ConclusionThe rates of OS have continued to increase in all Canadian jurisdictions following the official Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada recommendation to consider OS in 2015. Assuming that all tubal ligations could have been OS and 75% of hysterectomies with ovarian conservation could have included OS, our data indicate 76 932 missed opportunities for ovarian cancer prevention.

Bilateral salpingectomy as an option of permanent contraception at time of caesarean section: A survey of practice.

Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy during benign gynaecologic surgery is advocated as a risk-reducing strategy due to the inverse association of epithelial ovarian cancers observed in epidemiological studies in a low-risk setting. Currently, no formal guidance exists for permanent surgical contraception at time of caesarean section in Australia. Our aim was to survey Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) regarding bilateral salpingectomy compared to other procedures offered for permanent contraception at the time of caesarean section. An online survey was utilised to collect clinician demographics, opinions, barriers, and justifications in regard to options of permanent surgical contraception at time of caesarean section. Bilateral salpingectomy was identified as the most effective method of permanent contraception at time of caesarean section. However, only 62% of respondents offer the procedure as a method of permanent contraception. The two most common reasons for clinicians to offer bilateral salpingectomy at time of caesarean section were evidence suggesting a link between the fallopian tube and gynaecological cancer (80%) and efficacy as a permanent form of contraception (16%). The primary barrier identified by 51% of respondents was perceived increased risk of surgical complications, followed by reasoning that it would not allow the possibility of future tubal reversal. This study identifies diverse opinions on surgical approach to permanent contraception at time of caesarean section and offered by clinicians of RANZCOG. Further research is required to establish safety profiles and short- and long-term risks of bilateral salpingectomy.

Feasibility of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of a vNOTES hysterectomy: A retrospective cohort.

SynopsisThe vNOTES approach has a high feasibility of performing a salpingectomy at the time of a hysterectomy.

Opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of non-gynecologic surgery (2170)

Opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of non-gynecologic surgery (2170)

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy during the menopausal transition as a predictor of climacteric disorders

Data on ovarian dysfunction after hysterectomy are found in literary sources, but the nature of changes in the hormonal profile, its chronological sequence, the issue of prognosis and possible preventive measures, even in the case of preservation of ovarian tissue, remain contradictory and fragmentary, which prompted the conduct of this research. The aim of the research is to assess the risk of menopausal disorders after hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy during the menopausal transition. Research materials and methods.A comprehensive assessment of the long-term consequences of hysterectomy in 160 women of reproductive age was carried out. Risk factors were identified during a general clinical examination, based on anamnestic data. Indicators were evaluated in the examined women. Inclusion criteria: age of menopause transition, hysterectomy due to benign uterine pathology, patient's consent to participate in the study. Research results. The data obtained by us after 12 months from the moment of surgical intervention demonstrate neurovegetative and psychoemotional manifestations in 87 patients - 46.25%. Conclusions. 12 months after GE with opportunistic salpingectomy, 46.25% of patients have a gradual formation of components of the menopausal syndrome. age older than 45, hysterectomy, hormonal therapy of benign uterine pathology demonstrate a connection with the development of metabolic disorders in the distant postoperative period, and their combined effect increases the risk of their development.

Opportunistic salpingectomy during non-gynaecological surgery in the United States: a population-based retrospective study.

Lay Summary The most common type of ovarian cancer likely begins in the fallopian tubes. Surgically removing the fallopian tubes decreases a person’s risk of ovarian cancer. ‘Opportunistic salpingectomy’ refers to the removal of the fallopian tubes during surgery that is done for other reasons. Opportunistic salpingectomy is commonly done during hysterectomy. The types of other surgery performed together with opportunistic salpingectomy in the USA were analysed in the present study. Opportunistic salpingectomy was found to be done at the time of bariatric surgery, bowel surgery, hernia repair, gallbladder surgery, and breast surgery. Offering opportunistic salpingectomy to all women who are scheduled for those types of surgeries could lead to between 3600 and 5800 fewer deaths from ovarian cancer in the USA per year.

Salpingectomy in Ovarian Cancer Prevention

This Viewpoint explains the use of opportunistic salpingectomy, removal of the fallopian tubes for the primary prevention of ovarian cancer in a woman already undergoing pelvic surgery for another indication.

Concept of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in a sample of Mexican gynecologists. What should residents be trained on?

BackgroundOvarian cancer is the fifth deadliest cancer among women. There is no effective screening method. It has been suggested that ovarian cancer originates from precursor lesions in the fimbriae of the fallopian tubes. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy by gynecologists. MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out and a survey was sent electronically to gynecologists and gynecology residents. Demographic characteristics as well as questions of interest related to clinical practice and indication for surgery were included. Results52 subjects were included, 21 women and 31 men, with a mean age of 40.7 years. Thirty-five board certified gynecologists, as well as 17 gynecology residents, were included as part of the total survey group. Thirty-six individuals (69.2%) reported performing elective salpingectomy. The motivation they had to perform salpingectomy as a method of sterilization was: “reduction in the risk of ovarian cancer in the future” (55.6%). The indication for elective salpingectomy while performing other procedures was: “to prevent ovarian cancer” (61.1%). Certified gynecologists (42.9%) as well as residents (41.1%) considered “transvaginal ultrasound screening” as the best primary prevention method for ovarian cancer in low-risk women. ConclusionsOpportunistic bilateral salpingectomy is safe and cost-effective. However, when gynecologists are interviewed to find out their level of knowledge, there is poor acceptance of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in Mexico. A training strategy should be designed in the gynecology residency in order to motivate ovarian cancer prevention.

Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy And Other Strategies For Prevention Of Ovarian And Tubal Carcinoma

Objective: To provide a review of most current evidence and data for risk-reducing strategies used in prevention of ovarian cancer. Methods of study selection: PubMed was used as a search tool for articles with key words focusing on current strategies on prevention of ovarian cancer such as “risk-reducing salpingectomy, “risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, “salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy”. General consensus and society guidelines from leading organizations such as Society of Gynecologic Oncology, American Cancer Society, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists were reviewed and summarized in this review article with supporting evidence and research studies on most current riskreduction strategies for prevention of ovarian and tubal carcinoma. Result: There is growing evidence that high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma arises in the fallopian tube in the form of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). Therefore, opportunistic salpingectomy has been increasingly offered at the time of routine benign gynecologic surgery. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy has been shown to reduce risk of ovarian cancer up to 90% and offered to women with high hereditary predisposition for ovarian cancer. Riskreducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (SDO) has been suggested in younger women to balance the effects of infertility and surgically induced menopause resulting from oophorectomy. Conclusion: Combined oral Contraceptive COCs confer long-term protection against ovarian cancer with reported 20% reduction for every 5 years of use, which have been cited as a confounding factor in most of the published studies. Women who used HRT (estrogen alone or combined estrogen and progesterone) carry 20% higher risk of ovarian cancer compared to never-users. The associated increased risk of cervical and breast cancer with COCs/HTR use, have recently let women prefer the RRSO over COCs for prevention of ovarian cancer. Bilateral risk reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) at the age of 40–45 in BRCA1 and 45–50 in BRCA2 mutation carriers is recommended to be the primary approach for risk reduction of ovarian cancer. There is well-supported evidence of lowering the risk of ovarian cancer in high-risk population by 90%. The American college of obstetrics and gynecology committee opinion, recommended opportunistic salpingectomy for the primary prevention of ovarian cancer in a woman already undergoing pelvic surgery for another indication. Bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery is recommended to replace the tubal ligation as the method of choice for sterilization performed with cesarean delivery. The novel alternative procedure of Risk-reducing Salpingectomy with delayed risk-reducing oophorectomy (RRSO-RRO) have growing attention as a better alternative to improve the menopause-related morbidity and quality of life.

Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention: A Call for Action.

Rius, Mariona MD, PHD1; Carugno, José MD2; Maurico S, Abrao MD, PHD3; Carmona, Francisco MD PHD Author Information

Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis to examine the utility and effectiveness of OS performed at the time of elective cholecystectomy [laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LAP-CHOL)]. OS has been adopted as a strategy to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women undergoing hysterectomy and tubal sterilization, although the procedure is rarely performed as a risk reducing strategy during other abdominopelvic procedures. A decision model was created to examine women 40, 50, and 60 years of age undergoing LAP-CHOL with or without OS. The lifetime risk of ovarian cancer was assumed to be 1.17%, 1.09%, and 0.92% for women age 40, 50, and 60 years, respectively. OS was estimated to provide a 65% reduction in the risk of ovarian cancer and to require 30 additional minutes of operative time. We estimated the cost, quality-adjusted life-years, ovarian cancer cases and deaths prevented with OS. The additional cost of OS at LAP-CHOL ranged from $1898 to 1978. In a cohort of 5000 women, OS reduced the number of ovarian cancer cases by 39, 36, and 30 cases and deaths by 12, 14, and 16 in the age 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old cohorts, respectively. OS during LAP-CHOL was cost-effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $11,162 to 26,463 in the 3 age models. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for OS were less than $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-years in 90.5% or more of 1000 simulations. OS at the time of LAP-CHOL may be a cost-effective strategy to prevent ovarian cancer among average risk women.

Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma detected during benign gynecologic surgery: a case report

High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common type of pelvic cancer among women. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is a precursor lesion of HGSC. Herein, we report a rare occurrence of STIC in patients undergoing surgery for benign indications without a family history of ovarian cancer. A 77-year-old woman underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for uterine prolapse. Pathological examination revealed bilateral STIC without ovarian abnormalities, and no other abnormal findings were noted. Another patient, a 49-year-old woman, underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy for uterine fibroids. STIC lesions were observed in both fallopian tubes. Subsequently, a staging was performed. No additional lesions were found, and the patient was followedup through imaging and blood tests. As reports of STIC lesions are rare, data on their clinical outcomes and management strategies are limited. In this report, we present cases of incidental STIC in benign surgery and discuss its proper interpretation and management. Through the early detection of STIC lesions, patients with risk factors can be identified in advance, which will allow prevention and early detection of ovarian cancer. Opportunistic salpingectomy was also actively discussed in this regard.

HOPPSA update: changes in the study protocol of Hysterectomy and OPPortunistic SAlpingectomy, a registry-based randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe HOPPSA trial is a multi-center national registry-based randomized controlled trial to test the safety and effectiveness of performing opportunistic salpingectomy at hysterectomy to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The study protocol was first published in January 2019 and is available at https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-3083-8. Here, we report amendments made to the study protocol since commencement of the trial.Changes in methods and analysisThe primary outcomes analyses have been changed. (1) Complications will be analyzed using binomial generalized estimating equation (GEE) with log link function, while the unadjusted analyses according to Miettinen and Nurminen will be performed as a sensitivity analysis. (2) Absolute change in Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) will primarily be analyzed using a mixed effects model, adjusted for baseline MRS and center as a random effect. (3) Time to EOC will be analyzed using the mixed effects Cox regression model with center as random effect, while the unadjusted log-rank test will be performed as a sensitivity analysis.The primary outcome Complications will be based solely on the specific assessment in the GynOp quality registry. The Clavien-Dindo classification will be evaluated as a secondary outcome.Furthermore, MRS is also measured three years postoperatively to better pinpoint the onset of menopausal symptoms.DiscussionThe changes to the protocol mainly concern the analyses of data. No changes to recruitment, randomization, intervention, or follow-up of primary outcomes have been made. An interim analysis during 2021 concluded that the study should continue until the target sample size is reached.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03045965. Registered 8 February 2017.

Postpartum Opportunistic Salpingectomy Compared With Bilateral Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

To compare the cost effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy and bilateral tubal ligation for sterilization immediately after vaginal delivery. A cost-effectiveness analytic decision model was used to compare opportunistic salpingectomy with bilateral tubal ligation during vaginal delivery admission. Probability and cost inputs were derived from local data and available literature. Salpingectomy was assumed to be performed with a handheld bipolar energy device. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in 2019 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the proportion of simulations in which salpingectomy would be cost effective. Opportunistic salpingectomy was more cost effective than bilateral tubal ligation with an ICER of $26,150/QALY. In 10,000 patients desiring sterilization after vaginal delivery, opportunistic salpingectomy would result in 25 fewer ovarian cancer cases, 19 fewer ovarian cancer deaths, and 116 fewer unintended pregnancies than bilateral tubal ligation. In sensitivity analysis, salpingectomy was cost effective in 89.8% of simulations and cost saving in 13% of simulations. In patients undergoing sterilization immediately after vaginal deliveries, opportunistic salpingectomy is more cost effective and may be more cost saving than bilateral tubal ligation for reducing ovarian cancer risk.

Temporal trends of opportunistic salpingectomy at time of hysterectomy for pre-invasive gynecologic malignancy

Temporal trends of opportunistic salpingectomy at time of hysterectomy for pre-invasive gynecologic malignancy

Influence of hysterectomy due to leiomyoma on woman’s psychological status

The objective: to study the clinical-psychopathological features and psycho-emotional symptoms and borderline mental disorders in women of reproductive age after hysterectomy due to leiomyoma.Materials and methods. An assessment of the psychological state of 160 women after hysterectomy for leiomyoma was carried out. 90 patients of them (average age – 45.9±1.3 years old) had transvaginal hysterectomy, both classic and laparoscopically assisted one with opportunistic salpingectomy (I group) and 70 patients (average age – 47.2±1.6 years old) – abdominal hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy (II group). The control group included 50 women 45.7±1.3 years old with asymptomatic leiomyoma. Clinical psychopathological, anamnestic and experimental psychological methods were used. Pathopsychological methods included methods of visual presentation of the personality profile using the Minnesota Multifaceted Personality Questionnaire. The survey was conducted at the pre-operative period, during the adaptation period and during 12 months. Statistical processing of monitoring data was carried out according to the φ-criterion using the statistical analysis software package STATISTICA v. 10 and Microsoft Office Excel application. Results. The results of the questionnaire determined that 44 (48.89 %) patients of the I group and 33 (47.14 %) women of the II group had disorders related to anxiety, and 6 (6.67 %) and 5 (7 .14 %) of the patients of both groups, respectively, were diagnosed depression before surgical treatment. After hysterectomy the number of patients with an anxiety disorder increased to 52 (57.78 %) in the I group and 41 (52.57 %) – II group, with depression – to 10 (11.11 %) and 8 (11.43 %) women, respectively. However, the psychopathological analysis with psychologists in 12 months after hysterectomy determined affective symptoms in 11 (15.7±7.0 %), and latent depression with a somatopsychic correlation, manifested by a feeling palpitation, cardialgias, vegetative disorders was found in 8 (11.4±6.0 %) cases. The type of personality accentuation influenced the development of psychoemotional manifestations. In this structure, the largest rate consisted of psychoasthenic and hysterical character traits. The age of the patient was important when analyzing additional psychological factors. Women under 44 years old associated hysterectomy with loss of femininity with premature aging of the organism. The patients with successful implementation of their role in the family and society had better postoperative psychological adaptation.Conclusions. There is a trend toward an increased number of anxiety and depressive disorders after hysterectomy in women with leiomyoma. After 12 months, affective symptoms were present in 11 (15.7±7.0 %) cases and in 8 (11.4±6.0 %) cases – hidden depression. Postoperative rehabilitation should include a consultation with a psychologist to identify and treat borderline mental disorders, which will lead to the initiation of compensatory and adaptive reactions of the body and the normalization of the psycho-emotional status.

Ovarian cancer prevention by opportunistic salpingectomy is a new de facto standard in Germany

PurposeThe most prevalent and aggressive subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), originates in many cases from the fallopian tubes. Because of poor prognosis and lack of effective screening for early detection, opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for prevention of EOC is being implemented into clinical routine in several countries worldwide. Taking the opportunity of a gynecological surgery in women at average cancer risk, extramural fallopian tubes are completely resected preserving the ovaries with their infundibulopelvic blood supply. Until recently, only 13 of the 130 national partner societies of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) have published a statement on OS. This study aimed to analyze the acceptance of OS in Germany.Methods(1) Survey of German gynecologists in 2015 and 2022 by the Department of Gynecology of the Jena University Hospital in co-operation with the Department of Gynecology at Charité-University Medicine Berlin with support of NOGGO e. V. and AGO e. V. (2) Salpingectomy numbers in Germany for years 2005–2020 as retrieved from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis).Results(1) Survey: Number of participants was 203 in 2015 and 166 in 2022, respectively. Nearly all respondents (2015: 92%, 2022: 98%) have already performed bilateral salpingectomy without oophorectomy in combination with benign hysterectomy with the intention to reduce the risk for malignant (2015: 96%, 2022: 97%) and benign (2015: 47%, 2022: 38%) disorders. Compared to 2015 (56.6%), considerably more survey participants performed OS in > 50% or in all cases in 2022 (89.0%). Recommendation of OS for all women with completed family planning at benign pelvic surgery was approved by 68% in 2015 and 74% in 2022. (2) Case number analysis: In 2020, four times more cases of salpingectomy were reported by German public hospitals compared to 2005 (n = 50,398 vs. n = 12,286). Of all inpatient hysterectomies in German hospitals in 2020, 45% were combined with salpingectomy, and more than 65% in women at the age of 35 to 49 years.ConclusionMounting scientific plausibility regarding involvement of fallopian tubes in the pathogenesis of EOC led to change of clinical acceptance of OS in many countries including in Germany. Case number data and widespread expert judgment demonstrate that OS has become a routine procedure in Germany and a de facto standard for primary prevention of EOC.

First step in implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer: Current care and its determinants.

Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) refers to additional removal of the fallopian tubes during abdominal surgery performed for another medical indication, as prevention for ovarian cancer. As OS has been inconsistently implemented, its clinical practice varies worldwide. To reduce this variation, insight is required into current clinical practice and its determinants. Therefore, the study aim was to determine the implementation of counseling and performance of OS between 2015 and 2018, and its patient, surgical, physician, and hospital characteristics. Retrospective study using electronic medical records from six different Dutch hospitals: two academic, two large teaching, and two non-teaching hospitals. Patients were considered eligible for OS if they underwent elective non-obstetric abdominal surgery for a gynecological indication from January 2015 through December 2018. Primary outcomes were uptake of counseling and performance of OS. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify characteristics associated with OS. A total of 3214 patients underwent elective non-obstetric abdominal surgery for a gynecological indication and were eligible for OS. Counseling on OS increased significantly from 2.9% in 2015 to 29.4% in 2018. In this period, 440 patients were counseled on OS, of which 95.9% chose OS. Performance of OS increased significantly from 6.9% in 2015 to 44.5% in 2018. Counseling for and performance of OS were more likely in patients who had surgery by laparoscopic approach, were counseled by a gynecological resident, or had more than three contact moments before surgery. Additionally, OS was less likely in patients who had vaginal surgery. Although the uptake of OS increased from 2015 to 2018, the majority of patients who were eligible for OS were not counseled and did not undergo OS. Its clinical practice varies on patient, surgery, and physician characteristics. Therefore, an implementation strategy tailored to associated determinants is recommended.

Prophylactic Salpingectomy during Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Prospective Study to Evaluate High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Precursors

Recent findings suggest that high-grade serous ovarian cancer can originate in the fallopian tube. Not only has that made the identification of precursor lesions pivotal in early detection and prevention of these cancers, prophylactic salpingectomy alongside hysterectomy for benign indications has been increasingly proposed as well. The present prospective single-center study included 273 women who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy alongside laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Uterine and tubal histopathological results as well as intra- and postoperative complications were evaluated. The complication rate was 3.3%, of which none were caused by salpingectomy. Uterine histopathology diagnosed 181 patients (66.8%) with uterine myomas, 60 patients (22.1%) with adenomyosis, 29 patients (10.7%) with adenomyomatosis, and, 1 patient (0.4%) without pathological abnormality. p53 signatures were detected in 221 right fallopian tubes (80.9%) and in 229 left tubes (83.9%). In total, 8 patients showed bilateral STIL (2.9%), whereas in 1 patient (0.4%) STIL was detected in the left tube only. No STIC were detected. Laparoscopic opportunistic salpingectomy is demonstrated to be both safe and feasible. It appears to be promising to reduce the risk for ovarian cancer, yet more studies are needed to undoubtedly confirm this.

Racial Disparities in Sterilization Procedure Performed at Time of Cesarean Section.

While bilateral tubal ligation has historically been performed for sterilization at cesarean delivery (CD), recent data supports the use and safety of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy during CD to decrease lifetime ovarian cancer risk. Prior studies have described racial disparities in sterilization rates, but there is a paucity of data regarding racial disparities in type of sterilization procedure. Our objective was to determine differences in sterilization procedure type performed at CD by race (Black vs. non-Black) to evaluate for equity in bilateral salpingectomy utilization. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients included in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent sterilization at time of CD from January 2019, to December 2020, identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients without documented race were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine odds of undergoing bilateral salpingectomy compared with bilateral tubal ligation by race while controlling for confounders. Of 28,147 patients who underwent CD, 3,087 underwent concurrent sterilization procedure, and 2,161 met inclusion criteria (Black: n = 279; non-Black: n = 1,882). Black patients were significantly more likely to have hypertension (10.8 vs. 5.3%, p < 0.01), bleeding disorders (3.9 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.01), preoperative anemia (hemoglobin < 11 g/dL; 36.9 vs. 21.3%, p < 0.01), and be of American Society of Anesthesiologist class 3 or higher (29.4 vs. 22.5%, p = 0.01) than non-Black patients. After adjusting for differences, Black patients were almost 50% less likely than non-Black patients to undergo bilateral salpingectomy compared with bilateral tubal ligation for sterilization at CD (adjusted odds ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.75). Despite evidence that bilateral salpingectomy decreases ovarian cancer risk and is safe at CD, there is a racial disparity in bilateral salpingectomy utilization. While the cause of this disparity is unclear, further research is warranted to determine root causes and equitable solutions. · Opportunistic salpingectomy is recommended for primary prevention of ovarian cancer in patients undergoing pelvic surgery who have completed childbearing.. · Black patients were almost 50% less likely to undergo bilateral salpingectomy compared with bilateral tubal ligation than non-Black patients even after controlling for possible confounders.. · Further research is needed to determine root cause of the racial disparity in bilateral salpingectomy utilization rate..