Opioid Consumption Research Articles

The effect of lung-recruitment maneuver on postoperative shoulder pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Lung-recruitment maneuvers (LRM) have been shown to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the association of LRM with the incidence of shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized controlled study was conducted with 110 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy from July 2022 to March 2023. Participants were randomized to receive either routine exsufflation or LRM at pneumoperitoneum release. The postoperative shoulder pain and abdominal pain were assessed at 1, 4, 6, 12, and 24h after surgery using a numeric rating scale. Analgesic consumption and postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) were evaluated during the first 24h after surgery. The incidence of shoulder pain during the first 24h after surgery was significantly lower in the LRM group compared to the control group (26.9 vs. 59.3%; P = 0.001). The median [interquartile range] score of worst shoulder pain was significantly lower compared to the control group (3 [2-3] vs 4 [3-5.5]; P = 0.003). Participants in the LRM group showed reduced abdominal pain at rest at 4 and 24h after surgery, and experienced significantly lower intensities of abdominal pain during mobilization at all time points over 24h after surgery. There were no significant differences in opioid consumption or the incidence of PONV between the groups. LRM reduces both the incidence and intensity of shoulder pain during 24h after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Additionally, LRM was associated with reduced intensity of abdominal pain during mobilization over the study period.

Effect of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block on chronic pain in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia surgery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized double-blind study.

Pre-operative ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block (II-IHNB) has a proven role in lessening acute postoperative pain and opioid consumption following hernia repair. However, its role in preventing post-herniorrhaphy groin pain (PHGP) is still unknown. The current study aims to assess pre-operative II-IHNB's impact on PHGP three and six months after open inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia. Seventy patients posted for inguinal hernia surgery were randomly allocated into group A (received ultrasound-guided II-IHNB with 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and 4 mg [1 mL] dexamethasone) and group B (received ultrasound-guided II-IHNB with 11 mL of 0.9% normal saline). The time to first analgesic request, pain scores, opioid consumption, DN4 score, and PHGP at 3 and 6 months were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. The numerical pain rating scale at movement in group A was significantly reduced at all the time intervals of 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours compared to group B. Total opioid usage was lower in group A (3.71 mg [3.90]) versus group B (12.14 mg [4.90]) with a mean difference of -8.43 mg (95% CI -10.54, -6.32), P < 0.001. The time required for the first rescue analgesic was significantly longer in group A (360 min [180-360]) versus (180 min [180-360]) in group B (P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in the incidence of PHGP at three and six months between the two groups. Pre-operative ultrasound-guided II-IHNB reduces postoperative analgesic requirement but does not reduce the incidence of chronic PHGP following hernia surgery at 6 months.

Opioid Sparing Anesthesia for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Postoperative Pain, Length of Stay, Opioid Consumption, and Opioid-Related Complications: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

This study was a retrospective propensity-matched study of patients receiving opioid sparing anesthesia (OSA) and those who did not receive an opioid sparing anesthesia regimen. To determine whether patients undergoing spine fusion for deformity fared better with an OSA regimen than those not having an OSA regimen. There has been a tremendous focus on opioid overuse. Accordingly, OSA regimens are being introduced to reduce narcotic use. However, OSA has not been studied in the adult spine deformity population. 43 patients undergoing fusion of at least five levels in the thoracolumbar spine received OSA. They were matched to 43 patients who did receive an OSA regimen. We analyzed a number of metrics including blood loss, anesthesia time, post anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores, postoperative pain scores, complications, length of stay, and readmissions. The OSA group had significantly lower pain scores both before transfer to (4.6 vs. 7.6, P=0.000) and after transfer from (4.2 vs. 6.2 P=0.002) the PACU. Opioid use was significantly lower in the OSA group (454 vs. 241 MMEs by POD4, P=0.022). Fewer patients required blood transfusion in the OSA (1 vs. 28, P=0.000) group. Fewer patients in the OSA group had constipation and urinary retention (1 vs. 9, P=0.015). There was no difference in discharge home or to a facility. The lengths of hospital (4.33 vs. 6.19, P=0.009) and ICU (0.12 vs. 0.70 days, P=0.009) stay were significantly shorter in the OSA group. OSA regimens have numerous benefits in patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery including less opioid use, fewer postoperative complications, and a reduced length of stay.

B - 109 Long-Term Cognitive Effects of Combined Opioid/Non-Opioid Use

Abstract Objective Chronic pain is estimated to afflict 25–50% of community-dwelling older adults (Cravello et al., 2019). Despite the growing epidemic, opioids remain commonly prescribed analgesics, and approximately 10% of older adults with intermittent opioid use become chronic users (Ramachandran et al., 2021). This is concerning given an observed association between cognitive decline and prescription opioid use within this population (Warner et al., 2022). In efforts to reduce opioid consumption, opioid/non-opioid combinations have been used (Pergolizzi et al., 2023); however, the long-term cognitive impact of such alternatives has not been investigated. Thus, the current case report investigates the neurocognitive outcome following longtime opioid/non-opioid combination cessation in the context of chronic pain. Method A 69-year-old Black woman with approximate 30-year history of chronic pain underwent neuropsychological re-evaluation 2 years post-initial assessment and 1.5 years after stopping combined hydromorphone/clonidine use via intrathecal pump. Baseline MRI brain revealed mild diffuse atrophy and punctate nonspecific T2 white matter hyperintensities. CT head approximately 1 year later was unremarkable. Results Neuropsychological re-assessment approximately 2 years post-baseline evaluation revealed significantly declined performances on speed-mediated tasks (e.g., oral numeric sequencing, fluency) amid an otherwise grossly stable, albeit globally impaired, cognitive profile. Conclusions This study elucidates the impact of a 1.5-year period of abstinence from 13 years of combined intrathecal opioid/non-opioid use. Overall, results suggest that cognitive performance, even following this abstinence period, is not improved. Thus, while opioid/non-opioid therapies may reduce opioid exposure, deleterious cognitive effects persist. This study highlights the importance of non-opioid analgesics in efforts to attenuate cognitive impairment risk.

Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors for Headache After Elective Cranial Neurosurgery: Results from a Systematic Review of Efficacy of Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors for Headache After Acute Brain Injury.

Headache management after acute brain injury (ABI) is challenging. Although opioids are commonly used, selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors (COXIBs) may be promising alternatives. However, concerns about cardiovascular effects and bleeding risk have limited their use. We aimed at summarizing available data on efficacy of COXIBs for headache management following ABI. A systematic review was conducted through MEDLINE and Embase for articles published through September 2023 (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022320453). No language filters were applied to the initial searches. Interventional or observational studies and systematic reviews assessing efficacy of COXIBs for headache in adults with ABI were eligible. Article selection was performed by two independent reviewers using DistillerSR. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis, and meta-analysis was unfeasible because of study heterogeneity. Of 3190 articles identified, 6 studies met inclusion criteria: 4 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective cohort studies, all conducted in elective cranial neurosurgical patients (total N = 738) between 2006 and 2022. Five studies used COXIBs in the intervention group only. Of the six studies, four found a reduction in overall pain scores in the intervention group, whereas one showed improvement only at 6h postoperatively, and one did not find significant differences. Pain scores decreased between 4 and 15%, the largest shift being from moderate to mild severity. Three studies found an overall opioid use reduction throughout hospitalization in the intervention group, whereas one reported a reduction at 12h postoperatively only. Opioid consumption decreased between 9 and 90%. Two studies found a decrease in hospital length of stay by ~ 1day in the intervention group. The one study reporting postoperative hemorrhage found a statistically nonsignificant 3% reduction in the intervention group. COXIBs may serve as opioid-sparing adjunctive analgesics for headache control after elective cranial surgery. Limited or no literature exists for other forms of ABI, and additional safety data remain to be elucidated.

Efficacy of Direct Versus Peripheral Adjuvant Dexamethasone on Duration and Rebound Pain in Regional Anesthesia for Outpatient Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Blinded Study.

Despite increasingly wider use, there remains controversy among anesthesiologists regarding preferred formulations and the role of steroid adjuvants in regional anesthesia. There is also uncertainty in the role of dexamethasone when administered directly versus peripherally. We hypothesize that directly mixing dexamethasone into the regional nerve block rather than peripherally administered intravenous dexamethasone will demonstrate a difference in efficacy concerning duration and rebound pain, decreased postoperative pain scores, or opioid consumption within the short-term postoperative period. A prospective, randomized controlled blinded study was conducted for patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation with a volar plate technique for distal radius fractures. Patients were randomized for their preoperative anesthesia. One group had ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block with ropivacaine with a direct mix of dexamethasone 4 mg (Direct group), while the other group had ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block with ropivacaine and peripheral intravenous dexamethasone 4 mg (Indirect group). Data was collected pre, intra, and postoperatively. Fifty patients consented and participated in the study, with 27 participants in the direct group and 23 participants in the indirect group. Compared to intravenous administration, directly administered dexamethasone demonstrated a significant difference in the average time for the block to fade, onset of motor and sensory recovery, and block resolution. Our findings prove that directly mixing dexamethasone compared to peripherally administered intravenous dexamethasone will demonstrate a difference in efficacy with regards to duration and rebound pain, but do not prove that there will be a difference in decreased postoperative pain scores or opioid consumption within the 24-hour postoperative period. Prognosis Level I.

Recovery quality of transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine after cesarean delivery: A randomized trial

Study objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effect of liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) on recovery quality after cesarean delivery. DesignA randomized trial. SettingAn operating room, a post-anesthesia care unit, and a hospital ward. PatientsA total of 147 women scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled and randomized to receive a TAP block with plain bupivacaine (bupivacaine group), liposomal bupivacaine (liposomal group), or a mixture of plain bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine (mixture group). InterventionsThe bupivacaine group received bilateral TAP blocks with plain bupivacaine 50 mg alone. The liposomal group received bilateral TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine 266 mg alone. The mixture group received bilateral TAP blocks with plain bupivacaine 50 mg followed by liposomal bupivacaine 266 mg. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery−15 (QoR − 15) score assessed 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes encompassed the QoR − 15 score at 48 h post-surgery, the VAS pain score at rest and with movement at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively, opioid consumption within the 0–24 h and 24–48 h periods following surgery, as well as patient's satisfaction with analgesic. Main resultsThe QoR − 15 score at 24 h postoperatively was significantly higher in both the liposomal group and the mixture group compared to the bupivacaine group. Specifically, the QoR − 15 score for the liposomal group versus the bupivacaine group (median [IQR]: 120 [107, 128] vs. 109 [104, 120]; median difference, 7; 95 % CI, 2 to 13; P = 0.011) and for the mixture group versus the bupivacaine group (median [IQR]: 122 [112, 128] vs. 109 [104, 120]; median difference, 9; 95 % CI, 4 to 14; P = 0.001). The QoR − 15 score in both the liposomal group and the mixture group were also higher than those in the bupivacaine group at 48 h postoperatively, though the difference was not clinically meaningful. Additionally, both the liposomal and mixture groups exhibited lower pain score at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively compared to the bupivacaine group, but no significant clinical differences were achieved in either pain scores or opioid consumption. Patients in both the liposomal and mixture groups reported higher satisfaction score with analgesia than those in the bupivacaine group. ConclusionsTAP block using either liposomal bupivacaine or a mixture of plain bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine provided superior quality of recovery at 24 h after cesarean delivery compared to using plain bupivacaine alone.

Wastewater-based evaluation of the efficacy of oxycodone regulations in Australia.

Between 2018 and 2020, Australia implemented major policy changes to improve the quality and safety of opioid prescribing, with a specific focus on oxycodone. This study used wastewater-based epidemiology to assess the efficacy of Australia's regulatory reforms by measuring change in consumption of oxycodone via exploratory analysis. Wastewater analysis data on oxycodone consumption was from the National Wastewater Drug Monitoring Program. The program captures data from more than 50 wastewater treatment plant catchments across Australia, equivalent to more than 50% of the national population. Geographic trend analyses were conducted for both major cities and regional areas within all states and territories of Australia over a 6-year period between 2017 and 2023. Oxycodone consumption showed a statistically significant increase nationally from 78 mg/day/1000 people (95% confidence interval [CI] = 71, 84) in 2017 to 120 mg/day/1000 people in August 2019 (95% CI = 110, 120), an increase of 52% (95% CI = 42, 62, P < 0.0001). From August 2019 to December 2020, there was a statistically significant decrease from 120 to 65 mg/day/1000 people (95% CI = 60, 71), a decrease of 45% (95% CI = 40, 51), followed by a modest 2.4% increase to the end of the study period in April 2023 (95% CI [2.0,2.7]). A 45% reduction in oxycodone consumption in Australia from 2019 to 2020 coincided with national policy changes that aimed to reduce consumption of prescription opioids. The overall declining trend in consumption was suggestive of the effectiveness of national interventions in reducing pharmaceutical opioid use. Wastewater-based epidemiology provides an effective approach for assessing the effectiveness of controlled substances policy changes.

Effect of adductor canal block combined with infiltration between the popliteal artery and posterior capsular of the knee on chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

IntroductionTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is accompanied by severe postoperative pain, which is reported to be an important cause of chronic pain. Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) combined with infiltration between the popliteal artery and posterior capsular of the knee (IPACK) has been proven to have a better effect on relieving acute pain after TKA. However, whether it has a significant effect on the incidence of chronic pain after TKA has not been reported. This trial was designed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided ACB combined with IPACK on the incidence and intensity of chronic pain after TKA.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 100 subjects scheduled for TKA were randomly (1:1) divided into two groups: the ropivacaine group and the placebo group. Patients in each group received ultrasound-guided ACB + IPACK procedures with 0.25% ropivacaine or equal volume normal saline. All patients received multimodal analgesia. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The primary outcome was the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months after TKA by telephone follow-up. In addition, pain intensity in early resting and mobilized states, chronic pain intensity, the time to first rescue analgesia; opioid consumption; CRP and IL-6 after the operation; length of postoperative hospital stay; and cost of hospitalization and postoperative complications; as well as the function of the knee in the early stage after the operation, were recorded.ResultsNinety-one participants were included in the final analysis. At 3 months, the incidence of chronic pain was 30.4% in the ropivacaine group, significantly lower than 51.1% in the placebo group. Compared with the placebo group, the ACB + IPACK with ropivacaine group had significantly lower pain scores at 4 hours, 8 hours, 16 hours, and 24 hours after the operation; increased the knee range of motion at 8 hours and 24 hours after the operation; and a significantly decreased incidence of chronic pain at 3 months after the operation. During the follow-up period, there were no nerve block-related complications in either group.ConclusionIn the context of multimodal analgesia protocols, ACB combined with IPACK before surgery decreases the incidence and intensity of chronic pain 3 months after TKA compared with placebo injection. In addition, it reduces the NRS scores, whether at rest or during mobilization, and improves knee function within 24 hours after TKA.Trial registrationThis trial was registered in the China Clinical Trial Center (registration number ChiCTR2200065300) on November 1, 2022.

Efficacy of perioperative pain management in paediatric cardiac surgery: a protocol for a network meta-analysis

IntroductionCongenital heart disease is a common birth defect, but advancements in diagnosis and treatment have improved survival rates. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes have emerged in paediatric cardiac surgery....

Non-invasive temporal interference brain stimulation reduces preference on morphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats

Long-term use of opioid drugs such as morphine can induce addiction in the central nervous system through dysregulation of the reward system of the brain. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a non-pharmacological technique capable of attenuating behavioral responses associated with opioid drug consumption and possesses the capability to selectively activate and target localized brain regions with a high spatial resolution. However, long-term implantation of electrodes in brain tissue may limit the effectiveness of DBS due to changes in impedance, position, and shape of the tip of the stimulation electrode and the risk of infection of nerve tissue around the implanted electrode. The main objective of the current study is to evaluate the effect of temporal interference (TI) brain stimulation on addictive behaviors of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats. TI stimulation is a non-invasive technique used transcranially to modulate neural activity within targeted brain regions. It involves applying two high-frequency currents with slightly different frequencies, resulting in interference and targeted stimulation of different brain areas with the desired spatial resolution. The results indicated that TI stimulation with the amplitude of I1=I2=0.5\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$${\ ext{I}}_{1}{ = }{\ ext{I}}_{2}{ = 0.5}$$\\end{document} mA, carrier frequency of 2 kHz, frequency difference of 25 Hz, ON–OFF stimulation frequency of 0.25 Hz, and total duration of 10 min in three consecutive days resulted in a significant reduction of morphine preference in the morphine-stimulation group in comparison with the morphine group (p < 0.001). These findings highlight the potential of TI stimulation as a modulatory intervention in mitigating the addictive properties of morphine and provide valuable insights into the therapeutic implications of this stimulation paradigm for treatment of opioid drugs in human subjects.

Adductor canal block combined with genicular nerve block versus local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized noninferiority trial

ObjectiveThis randomized controlled and double-blind study aimed to investigate whether the analgesic effect of the adductor canal block (ACB) combined with the genicular nerve block (GNB) after total knee arthroplasty is noninferior to that of the adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia (LIA).MethodsA total of 102 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia were included and randomly divided into: ACB + GNB and ACB + LIA groups; the ACB + LIA group received 80 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with adrenaline 10 µg/mL for LIA, whereas the ACB + GNB group received 4 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for the blockade of five peri-knee nerves. The primary outcome was the median difference in the visual analog scale scores at rest at 24 h between the two groups. Secondary outcomes involved the median differences in the pain scores at other time points. Other outcomes included the cumulative dosage of opioids calculated in morphine equivalents in the first 24 h and indicators related to knee joint functional recovery.ResultsIn total, 36 and 38 patients were included in the ACB + GNB and ACB + LIA groups, respectively. We found that the median difference (95% confidence internal) in postoperative rest pain at 24 h (noninferiority criteria, △ = 1) was − 0.5 (− 1 to 0, p = 0.002). The median difference in cumulative opioid consumption was 1 mg (− 1 to 3, p = 0.019), meeting the noninferiority criteria, △ = 7.7 mg.ConclusionsACB combined with GNB provides noninferior analgesia compared to ACB with LIA on the first day after total knee arthroplasty while significantly reducing local anesthetic use.Trial registrationName of the Registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2300074274; Date of Registration. August 2, 2023.

Efficacy and Safety of Different Preemptive Analgesia Measures in Pain Management after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different preemptive analgesia measures given before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for postoperative pain in patients. We conducted a comprehensive search in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2024, and collected relevant research data on the 26 preemptive analgesia measures defined in this article in LC surgery. Outcomes included postoperative Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) at different times (2, 6, 12, and 24h), opioid consumption within 24h post-operation, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and incidence of postoperative headache or dizziness. Forty-nine articles involving 5987 patients were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that multimodal analgesia, nerve blocks, pregabalin, and gabapentin significantly reduced postoperative pain scores at all postoperative time points and postoperative opioid consumption compared to placebo. Tramadol, pregabalin, and gabapentin significantly extended the time to first rescue analgesia. Ibuprofen was the best intervention for reducing PONV incidence. Tramadol significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative headache or dizziness. Subgroup analysis of different doses of pregabalin and gabapentin showed that compared to placebo, pregabalin (300mg, 150mg) and gabapentin (600mg, 300mg, and 20mg/kg) were all more effective without significant differences in efficacy between these doses. Higher doses increased the incidence of PONV and postoperative headache and dizziness, with gabapentin 300mg having a lower adverse drug reaction (ADR) incidence. Preemptive analgesia significantly reduced postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, extended the time to first rescue analgesia, and decreased the incidence of PONV and postoperative headache and dizziness. Multimodal analgesia, nerve blocks, pregabalin, and gabapentin all showed good efficacy. Gabapentin 300mg given preoperatively significantly reduced postoperative pain and ADR incidence, recommended for preemptive analgesia in LC. PROSPERO CRD42024522185.

Comparing postoperative pain relief: ketorolac and nasocalcin spray versus lidocaine and nasocalcin spray in abdominal surgery patients

Objectives: Postoperative pain management is critical for patient recovery after abdominal surgery. This study compared intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac for reducing postoperative pain and opioid use, along with Nasocalcin nasal spray. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 58 abdominal surgery patients were allocated to receive either intravenous lidocaine plus Nasocalcin spray (n=29) or intravenous ketorolac plus Nasocalcin spray (n=29) before surgery. Pain intensity (visual analog scale) and postoperative opioid consumption were assessed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Results: Patients receiving ketorolac plus Nasocalcin spray reported significantly lower pain scores at all time points compared to lidocaine plus Nasocalcin (P&lt;0.001). Average 24-hour pain scores were 4.5 with ketorolac versus 5.1 with lidocaine. Mean opioid consumption was also lower in the ketorolac group (31.9 mg) versus the lidocaine group (43.9 mg, P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Preoperative ketorolac plus Nasocalcin nasal spray resulted in superior pain relief and less opioid use compared to lidocaine plus Nasocalcin after abdominal surgery. Ketorolac may be a more effective analgesic option, while Nasocalcin spray is a safe adjunct. These findings can inform clinical practice for optimizing postoperative analgesia.

The effectiveness and outcomes of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundOpen liver resection necessitates a substantial upper abdominal inverted-L incision, resulting in severe pain and compromising patient recovery. Despite the efficacy of epidural analgesia in providing adequate postoperative analgesia, the potential epidural-related adverse effects should be carefully considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in open liver resection.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted, collecting data from patients who underwent open liver resection between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate confounding variables, with patients being matched in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative outcomes, and epidural-related adverse effects.ResultsA total of 612 patients were included, and after matching, there were 204 patients in each group. Opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively was statistically lower in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.422). Additionally, perioperative hypotension requiring treatment, as well as nausea and vomiting, were significantly higher in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsEpidural analgesia is superior to intravenous morphine in terms of reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the initial 72 h after open liver resection. Nevertheless, perioperative hypotension, which necessitates management, should be approached with consideration and vigilance.Trial registrationThe study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry at www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT number: NCT06301932.

Magnesium sulfate enhances the effect of the peripheral analgesic cocktail in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Although magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) is widely used as an analgesic adjuvant to peripheral analgesic cocktails, its efficacy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. Therefore, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the literature to assess the analgesic efficacy of MgSO4 as an adjuvant to the analgesic cocktail in TKA. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data were qualitatively synthesized or meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. Five randomized controlled trials involving 432 patients were included. Meta-analyses detected significant differences between the MgSO4 and control groups in the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (rest) at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; VAS pain scores (motion) at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively; morphine consumption within 24 h, 24-48 h, and during the total hospitalization period; time to first rescue analgesia after TKA; and length of hospital stay. Regarding the functional recovery, the meta-analysis demonstrated significant differences between groups in terms of knee range of motion on postoperative day 1; daily mobilization distance on postoperative day 1; and daily mobilization distance. There was no significant intergroup difference in surgical complications. The findings suggest that MgSO4 is a promising adjunct to the analgesic cocktail, achieving significant improvements in pain scores and total opioid consumption during the early postoperative period after TKA.

Effect of a comfort scale compared with a pain numerical rate scale on opioids consumption in postanaesthesia care unit: the COMFORT study

BackgroundThe way that pain is assessed in the PACU could impact on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. However, there is currently no evidence to support this speculation. The authors hypothesised that using a comfort scale reduces postoperative opioid consumption when compared with a standard numerical rating scale (NRS) to evaluate pain in the PACU. MethodsIn this cluster-randomised trial, patients were assessed using either a comfort scale (comfort group) or a pain NRS (NRS group). The primary outcome was the opioid consumption in the PACU. The main secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, length of stay in the PACU, and satisfaction. ResultsOf 885 randomised patients, 860 were included in the analysis. Opioid consumption in the PACU was comparable in the comfort and NRS groups (median [interquartile range [IQR] 0 (0–5) vs 0 (0–6); P=0.2436), irrespective of the type of surgical procedure. The majority of patients did not need any postoperative opioid (59% in the comfort group and 56% in the NRS group, P=0.2260). There was no difference in postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, time to reach an Aldrete score ≥9 after extubation, and global satisfaction. ConclusionsUsing a comfort scale to assess pain in the PACU did not spare any opioid compared with use of a standard NRS. Further studies focusing on patients at risk of increased postoperative opioid consumption are necessary. Clinical trial registrationNCT05234216.

Role of Cav2.3 (R-type) Calcium Channel in Pain and Analgesia: A Scoping Review.

Voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) play an important role in pain development and maintenance. As Cav2.2 and Cav3.2 channels have been identified as potential drug targets for analgesics, the participation of Cav2.3 (that gives rise to R-type calcium currents) in pain and analgesia remains incompletely understood. Identify the participation of Cav2.3 in pain and analgesia. To map research in this area as well as to identify any existing gaps in knowledge on the potential role of Cav2.3 in pain signalling, we conducted this scoping review. We searched PubMed and SCOPUS databases, and 40 articles were included in this study. Besides, we organized the studies into 5 types of categories within the broader context of the role of Cav2.3 in pain and analgesia. Some studies revealed the expression of Cav2.3 in pain pathways, especially in nociceptive neurons at the sensory ganglia. Other studies demonstrated that Cav2.3-mediated currents could be inhibited by analgesic/antinociceptive drugs either indirectly or directly. Some articles indicated that Cav2.3 modulates nociceptive transmission, especially at the pre-synaptic level at spinal sites. There are studies using different rodent pain models and approaches to reduce Cav2.3 activity or expression and mostly demonstrated a pro-nociceptive role of Cav2.3, despite some contradictory findings and deficiencies in the description of study design quality. There are three studies that reported the association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the Cav2.3 gene (CACNA1E) with postoperative pain and opioid consumption as well as with the prevalence of migraine in patients. Cav2.3 is a target for some analgesic drugs and has a pro-nociceptive role in pain.

759. P02.04 PARAVERTEBRAL VERSUS EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGEAL RESECTION (PEPMEN): A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED MULTICENTER TRIAL

Abstract Background Thoracic epidural analgesia has been the mainstay for pain control in esophageal cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Although effective epidural analgesia potentially contributes to achieving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) goals in patients undergoing MIE, it can have counterproductive side effects such as hypotension, urinary retention and reduced mobility. Paravertebral analgesia may be a promising alternative to epidural analgesia, avoiding potential side effects and improving postoperative recovery. Methods This open randomized controlled superiority trial was conducted across four Dutch centers. A total of 192 patients with esophageal cancer, scheduled for elective transthoracic MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis, were included and randomized to receive either epidural analgesia or paravertebral analgesia. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) on the third postoperative day (POD). Secondary outcomes included the quality of life, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, need for inotropic/vasopressor medication, duration of admission, mobilization, complications, readmission, and mortality. Results From December 2019 to February 2023, 94 patients were assigned to epidural and 98 to paravertebral analgesia. QoR-40 score on POD3 did not differ between groups (mean difference 3.7; P=.268). The epidural group had higher QoR-40 scores on POD1 and 2 (mean difference 7.7; P=.018, mean difference 7.3; P=.020) and lower pain scores (1 versus 2; P=&amp;lt;.001, 1 versus 2; P=.033). More patients in the epidural group required vasopressor-medication on POD1 (38.3% versus 13.3%; P&amp;lt;.001). In the paravertebral group, the urinary catheter was removed one day earlier (P=&amp;lt;.001). No significant differences in complications or length of stay were observed. Conclusion This multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial did not show superiority of paravertebral analgesia over epidural analgesia in quality of recovery on the third day after minimally invasive esophagectomy. These results, however, support the safety of paravertebral analgesia as a viable alternative to epidural analgesia, enabling the provision of both techniques to patients in clinical practice.

Biological sex differences in pain response and functional outcomes after orthopedic surgery procedures: a scoping review

Background/Objective: Post-operative pain is frequently experienced by patients following orthopedic surgery procedures despite improved surgical technology and anesthesia techniques. The intensity of postoperative pain is multifactorial and biological sex is a key component of pain analysis. In this review article, the authors examine the impact of biological sex on post-operative pain scores and surgical outcomes following orthopedic surgery procedures. Methods: A keyword-based search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Center for Biotechnology Information was utilized for this review. Through our literature search we identified 56 articles related to the impact of sex on post-operative pain. These studies were then tabulated and analyzed in detail to provide data for this review article. Results: There are a variety of factors that influence surgical outcomes in orthopedics including age, comorbidities, and biological sex. The reviewed studies found that women report higher pain scores in the initial 6 wk post-operative period after total joint arthroplasty, upper extremity surgery, spine surgery, and general orthopedic surgery. Female sex was also associated with higher opioid consumption following surgery. In addition, men tend to have better surgical outcomes following total joint arthroplasty, upper extremity procedures, and spine surgery. Discussion/Conclusion: Biological differences including hormones, anatomy, and psychosocial factors influence post-operative pain differences between sexes. Little data is available on orthopedic surgery post-operative pain scores between the sexes and therefore further research is needed. Biological sex must be considered when evaluating patient wellness following orthopedic surgery procedures.