INTRODUCTION: Interspinous process devices (IPDs) are a popular less invasive treatment option for lumbar degenerative disease. Studies suggest they may yield initial symptomatic relief but are not better than traditional surgery in improving function or quality of life and may increase reoperation and costs. Ideal indications remain contested. METHODS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary data sets (2017-2020) were queried by CPT codes for lumbar interlaminar/interspinous process stabilization/distraction devices without fusion. Utilization rates were normalized per 10,000 lumbar fusions. RESULTS: IPD utilization increased by 329% from 2017-2020. Percutaneous IPD utilization increased to 31.8 (+1,267%), while open procedures decreased to 4.4 (-27%). Pain management/anesthesia placed the majority of IPDs and increased utilization the most (27.4, +1,387%). Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) had the second-highest rate of utilization (3.5, +1,492%). Neurosurgery (2.3, -15%) and orthopedics (0.7, -63%) decreased utilization. Ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) increased utilization the most (25.8, +907%). Outpatient procedures increased (9.2, +162%), while inpatient procedures decreased (1.2, -49%). IPD reimbursements decreased to $400 (-44.6%), with decreasing trends in percutaneous ($364, -28.6%) and open placement ($776, -6.8%). Reimbursements were highest for orthopedics ($800, +0.6%) and lowest for pain management/anesthesiology ($362, -26.7%). Reimbursements decreased across all settings, especially outpatient (-48.8%) and inpatient (-35.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite uncertainty of indications for IPDs, utilization increased by 329% when normalized to lumbar fusions to account for changes in disease prevalence. IPDs are increasingly placed by PM&R and pain management in ASCs and outpatient settings. Utilization does not seem to be driven by reimbursement rates. It is unknown how the rapid increase in IPDs has affected clinical outcomes. Given the magnitude of increased utilization and limited data on the safety and efficacy of IPDs, closer examination of indications is warranted.
Read full abstract