Olaparib Maintenance Research Articles

Apollo: A randomized phase II double-blind study of olaparib versus placebo following curative intent therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 mutation—ECOG-ACRIN EA2192.

TPS4202 Background: A meaningful subset of PDAC is characterized by a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The most well-defined patients within this group are those with pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. In the metastatic setting, PARP inhibitor maintenance provides a progression-free survival benefit after a period of platinum based chemotherapy1,2, but the role of PARP inhibitors in the curative intent setting is undefined. The OlympiA study established one year of olaparib as the standard of care for patients with BRCA-related, early stage breast cancer who completed all other curative-intent treatment3. Therefore, we have designed a randomized, phase II double-blind study of one year of olaparib vs placebo in patients with pancreatic cancer and a germline or somatic variant in BRCA or PALB2 who have completed all curative intent therapy. Methods: We have enrolled and treated 29 of 152 planned patients on study NCT 04858334/EA2192. Eligibility criteria include: a pathogenic germline or somatic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 as determined by local laboratory (central review required); completion of curative-intent resection and ≥ three months of multi-agent chemotherapy; no evidence of recurrent disease. At enrollment, patients must be within 12 weeks of their last anti-cancer intervention. Patients are randomized 2:1 to receive oral olaparib 300 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival. Overall survival is a secondary endpoint. Tumor tissue, fecal material (for microbiome analysis) and serial ctDNA samples are being collected. 1) Golan T, Locker GY, Kindler HL: Maintenance Olaparib for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Reply. N Engl J Med 381:1492-1493, 2019. 2) Reiss KA, Mick R, O'Hara MH, et al: Phase II Study of Maintenance Rucaparib in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and a Pathogenic Germline or Somatic Variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2. J Clin Oncol 39:2497-2505, 2021. 3) Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Geyer CE, Jr.: Adjuvant Olaparib in BRCA-Mutated Breast Cancer. Reply. N Engl J Med 385:1440, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04858334 .

Olaparib plus bevacizumab first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 primary analysis, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients in clinical response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, irrespective of surgical status. Prespecified, exploratory analyses by molecular biomarker status showed substantial benefit in patients with a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD; BRCAm and/or genomic instability). We report the prespecified final overall survival (OS) analysis, including analyses by HRD status. Patients were randomized 2:1 to olaparib (300 mg bid; up to 24 months) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q3w; 15 months total) or placebo plus bevacizumab. Analysis of OS, a key secondary endpoint in hierarchical testing, was planned for ∼60% maturity or 3 years after the primary analysis. After median follow-up of 61.7 and 61.9 months in the olaparib and placebo arms, respectively, median OS was 56.5 versus 51.6 months in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR]=0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.12; P=0.4118). Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy was received by 105 (19.6%) olaparib patients versus 123 (45.7%) placebo patients. In the HRD-positive population, OS was longer with olaparib plus bevacizumab (HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.85; 5-year OS rate, 65.5% versus 48.4%); at 5 years, updated PFS also showed a higher proportion of olaparib plus bevacizumab patients without relapse (HR=0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.54; 5-year PFS rate, 46.1% versus 19.2%). Myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, aplastic anemia, and new primary malignancy incidence remained low and balanced between arms. Olaparib plus bevacizumab provided clinically meaningful OS improvement for first-line patients with HRD-positive ovarian cancer. These prespecified exploratory analyses demonstrated improvement despite a high proportion of patients in the placebo arm receiving PARP inhibitors post-progression, confirming the combination as one of the standards of care in this setting with the potential to enhance cure.

Analysis of adverse events and quality of life in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with Olaparib maintenance therapy: A single-center study in China.

Olaparib showed good efficacy and tolerability in the maintenance treatment of patients with initial therapy or high-grade serous recurrent ovarian cancer patients. This study aimed to analyze adverse events (AEs) of patients taking Olaparib and the quality of life (QoL) with Olaparib in 1 center of China. The study included 98 patients who received Olaparib and 210 patients without Olaparib from July 2018 to October 2021 for high-grade serous ovarian cancer in the Gynecology Oncology Department of Jiangsu Provincial Hospital. Information of clinicopathologic characteristics was collected from medical records. Then, we used the QLQ-C30 and Quality of Life Ovarian Cancer 28 Questionnaire (QLQ-OV28) to determine the QoL of 98 patients with and 210 patients without Olaparib. Among all 98 patients with Olaparib, 66 patients in first-line and 32 patients in more than second-line treatment. Regarding the best objective response with Olaparib maintenance in 78 patients with partial remission from most recent chemotherapy, 3 (3.84%) patients showed complete response (CR) and 6 (7.69%) showed as partial response (PR), whereas stable disease was observed in 42 patients (53.84%) and 27 patients (34.6%) showed as progression disease. AEs of Grade 3 and more were: anemia in 16 patients (16.32%), neutropenia in 20 patients (20.40%), thrombocytopenia in 4 patients (4.08%), and headache in 4 patients (4.08%). Dose reduction and drug discontinuation accounted for 73.40% and 20.40%, respectively. Olaparib as maintenance therapy increased QoL on all functioning domains and several symptom domains. Consistent with previous clinical trials, Olaparib maintenance therapy was proved safe and effective. Most patients may experience Grade 1 and 2 AEs. Olaparib maintenance therapy can increase QoL in several domains.

Maintenance olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: Outcomes by somatic and germline BRCA and other homologous recombination repair gene mutation status in the ORZORA trial

BackgroundThe open-label, single-arm, multicenter ORZORA trial (NCT02476968) evaluated the efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSR OC) who had tumor BRCA mutations (BRCAm) of germline (g) or somatic (s) origin or non-BRCA homologous recombination repair mutations (HRRm) and were in response to their most recent platinum-based chemotherapy after ≥2 lines of treatment. MethodsPatients received maintenance olaparib capsules (400 mg twice daily) until disease progression. Prospective central testing at screening determined tumor BRCAm status and subsequent testing determined gBRCAm or sBRCAm status. Patients with predefined non-BRCA HRRm were assigned to an exploratory cohort. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1) in BRCAm and sBRCAm cohorts. Secondary endpoints included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and tolerability. Results177 patients received olaparib. At the primary data cut-off (17 April 2020), the median follow-up for PFS in the BRCAm cohort was 22.3 months. The median PFS (95% CI) in BRCAm, sBRCAm, gBRCAm and non-BRCA HRRm cohorts was 18.0 (14.3–22.1), 16.6 (12.4–22.2), 19.3 (14.3–27.6) and 16.4 (10.9–19.3) months, respectively. Most patients with BRCAm reported improvements (21.8%) or no change (68.7%) in HRQoL and the safety profile was as expected. ConclusionsMaintenance olaparib had similar clinical activity in PSR OC patients with sBRCAm and those with any BRCAm. Activity was also observed in patients with a non-BRCA HRRm. ORZORA further supports use of maintenance olaparib in all patients with BRCA-mutated, including sBRCA-mutated, PSR OC.

Abstract PD11-12: PD11-12 DORA: A Phase II, Multicenter, International, Non-Comparator Study of Olaparib (O) +/- Durvalumab (D) as a chemotherapy-free maintenance strategy in Platinum tReated Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (aTNBC)

Abstract Introduction: A significant proportion of aTNBC patients carry homologous recombination defects associated with platinum sensitivity. Olaparib is an approved PARP inhibitor (PARPi) for germline BRCA (gBRCA) associated early and metastatic breast cancer as well as maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer irrespective of gBRCA status. PARPi enhances immune response via cGAS/STING activation and is synergistic with anti-PD-1 blockade in preclinical models without overlapping toxicities. Here, the efficacy of maintenance olaparib (O) +/- durvalumab (D) in aTNBC patients following clinical benefit from platinum chemotherapy is investigated (NCT03167619). Methods: Eligible pts had aTNBC with investigator-assessed clinical benefit (SD, PR, CR) after a minimum of 3 q3-weekly or 6 q1-weekly cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy in the 1st or 2nd line treatment setting. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive O 300 mg BID daily or O 300mg BID daily + D 1.5g IV q4 wks. The study was a non-comparator trial; randomization aimed to reduce bias. Tumors were evaluated by RECIST1.1 at baseline and q8 wks. Known gBRCA carriers were limited to 10. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and overall survival (OS). Results: From 2/4/2019-12/24/2020, 45 pts were randomized (23 pts in O arm; 22 in O+D arm). 82.2% received platinum as 1st line therapy and 82% received a platinum-doublet. As of data cutoff (6/30/2021), median follow-up of 9.8m (7.2-15.1), the median PFS was 3.95m (p= 0.0023; 95% CI 2.55-6.13) with O monotherapy. The median PFS was 6.1 mos (p= <.0001; 95% CI 3.68-10.11) in the O+D arm. CBR (CR, PR or SD ≥ 24 wks) was 39.1% (19.7%-61.5%) and 36.4% (17.2%-59.3%) in the O and O+D arms, respectively. DCR was 52.2% (30.6%, 73.2%) and 68.2% (45.1%, 86.1%) in the O and O + D arms, respectively. Currently, 7 pts (15.6%) remain on study treatment, only 2 have gBRCA alterations. No new safety signals were reported. Correlative analysis including germline/somatic BRCA, HRR genes, BRCA methylation, TMB and PDL-1 in association with clinical outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: A subset of non-gBRCA altered aTNBC pts who derived clinical benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy had a durable disease control with a chemotherapy-free maintenance strategy of olaparib +/- durvalumab. Citation Format: Sarah L. Sammons, Tira J. Tan, Young Hyunk Im, Tiffany A. Traina, Carey Anders, Ezekiel Renzulli, Sung-Bae Kim, Rebecca Dent. PD11-12 DORA: A Phase II, Multicenter, International, Non-Comparator Study of Olaparib (O) +/- Durvalumab (D) as a chemotherapy-free maintenance strategy in Platinum tReated Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (aTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-12.

Experience in the use of olaparib poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in maintenance therapy of BRCA-associated ovarian cancer

Aim to study the frequency of BRCA1/2 gene mutations , the efficacy of ovarian cancer therapy depending on the presence of BRCA1/2 mutations as well as the efficacy of olaparib maintenance therapy in BRCAassociated ovarian cancer.Material and Methods. The retrospective analysis included 355 patients with high-grade, stage I–IV serous ovarian cancer. The examination for a mutation in the BRCA1/2 gene was carried out within the framework of the program “Improvement of molecular genetic diagnostics in the Russian Federation in order to increase the effectiveness of antitumor treatment”.Results. Mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes were detected in 98 out of 355 (27.6 %) patients. Mutations of the BRCA1+ gene were detected in 62 out of 230 patients with ovarian cancer of stages IIIC–IV (27.0 %), the BRCA2 gene – in 9 out of 230 (3.9 %). In ovarian cancer of stages III–IV, BRCA gene mutations were absent in 159 of 230 (69.1 %) patients. The median time to progression in stages III–IV of the disease with a mutation in the BRCA1 gene was 22.0 months, in the BRCA2 gene – 27.0 months, in patients without mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes – 17.0 months, median life expectancy – 70.0; 65.0 and 45.0 months, respectively. Patients with serous ovarian carcinoma of high-grade I–IV stages with the presence of mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes were divided into two groups. The first group (6 out of 26 patients, 23.1 %) consisted of patients with stage IIIC–IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, who received olaparib as maintenance therapy after the 1st line of chemotherapy, the second group (20 out of 26 patients, 76.9 %) were patients with stage I–IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, who received olaparib in maintenance mode after 2 or more lines of chemotherapy.Conclusion. The presence of BRCA1/2 gene mutations significantly increased the median life expectancy of patients with stage IIIC–IV serous ovarian cancer, and primary cytoreduction significantly improved both overall survival and survival to progression in this group of patients. Maintenance therapy with olaparib is more appropriate after the 1st line of treatment than after subsequent ones.

Phase II trial evaluating olaparib maintenance in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel treatment, reaching partial or stable response: SOGUG-IMANOL study.

168 Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. A number of important systemic therapies have been developed to treat mCRPC and now comprise the current therapeutic landscape. Docetaxel became the first systemic therapy to improve survival in these men in a randomized study demonstrating superiority versus mitoxantrone (18.9 months versus 16.5, p=0,004). But, inexorably, after stopping, disease progresses. Methods: A prospective phase II trial was designed to test Olaparib maintenance efficacy, in terms of progression free survival (PFS), in patients with mCRPC with DNA-repair defects that have achieved partial or complete response after being treated with systemic therapy (at least six cycles of docetaxel). Results: 134 mCRPC patients were included since Feb-2018 to Nov-2020 and were tested for DDR alterations. 19.4% of patients had somatic mutations (30.8% BRCA2, 3.8% BRCA1, 19.2% ATM, 7.7% CHEK2, 7.7% PALB2). 53,8% received Olaparib maintenance treatment, with a median follow-up of 23.3 months. Median age was 73 years. Median basal PSA was 17 ng/dL. 100% were metastatic (14.3% de novo and 85.7% relapsed after primary treatment), 78.6% had bone metastasis, 35.7% visceral and 35.7% adenopathies. 42.9% had previous treatment with abiraterone and 35.7% with enzalutamide. 46.2% received at least 8 cycles of docetaxel. 7.1% achieved a partial response and 92.9% a disease stabilization. Response to Olaparib treatment was 14.3% partial response, 71.4% stabilization and 7.1% disease progression.14.3% had a PSA50 decrease. Median duration of response was 8.27 months. Median PFS was 10.1 months. Median PSA-PFS was 3.5 months. G3/4 adverse events were 21.4% asthenia,14.3% anemia and 7.1% neutropenia. Conclusions: Olaparib maintenance after at least six cycles of docetaxel shows promising activity in mCRPC with DDR alterations, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Our pathogenic mutations percentage (19,4%) is in line with previous publications. Clinical trial information: NCT03434158 .

Randomized phase II study of olaparib (Ola) maintenance following cabazitaxel-carboplatin induction chemotherapy (CabCarb) in men with aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC).

196 Background: An aggressive subset of prostate cancers (AVPC) respond poorly to androgen signaling inhibitors, have limited therapeutic options and a dismal prognosis. Preclinical models of AVPC display functional alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways linked to platinum and PARP inhibitor (PARPi) sensitivity. We hypothesized that PARPi (ola) maintenance following CabCarb would improve the progression free survival (PFS) of men with AVPC. We performed a tissue-rich randomized trial for men with AVPC to address this hypothesis and unravel the heterogeneity of AVPC by linking genomic and transcriptomic analyses with clinical outcomes. Methods: In a single-institution study, men with CRPC meeting ≥ 1 of 9 AVPC criteria and ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-2 received 6 cycles of Cab 20-25mg/m2 and Carbo (AUC 3-4). Men completing 6 cycles without progressive disease (PD) were randomized 2:1 to Ola 300mg BID vs. observation (Obs). The primary endpoint is to estimate PFS in those randomized and we aimed to detect a difference of 3.9 vs. 7.8 months. Subgroup comparisons between patients who had PD prior to randomization (platinum-resistant) vs. those randomized (platinum sensitive) were made with chi-square tests for categorical baseline characteristics, and Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous measures. Results: 96 patients started CabCarb. Their median age was 67 years (43-86), most were white/non-Hispanic (74%), had an ECOG score of 0 (64%), bone metastases (79%), and no prior docetaxel therapy (59%). Of the 96, 7 (7.3%) went off study for reasons unrelated to PD and 36 (37.5%) had PD prior to randomization. Patients with PD prior to randomization were more likely at baseline to have received prior docetaxel (59% vs. 29%; p=0.004), have bone metastases (92% vs. 71%; p=0.03), have lower hemoglobin (11.4 vs. 12. 4; p=0.02), higher LDH (359 vs. 260; p=0.01), lower albumin (4.0 vs. 4.2; p=0.04), and higher AlkPhos (181.5 vs. 98.5; p=0.01) compared to patients who went on to randomization. With a median follow up time of 38.9 months post randomization, the median PFS was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval: 1.3, 4.6 months) for Observation and 4.9 (3.5, 6.3) months with Olaparib (p=0.12). The median OS was 16.2 (6.8, 26.4) for observation and 15.3 (10.2, 28.4) months with Olaparib (p=0.56). Conclusions: These data highlight the heterogeneity within the AVPC subset. Ongoing molecular analyses of sequential liquid and tumor tissue will illuminate the underpinnings of this heterogeneity and identify targets for additional combinatorial strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT03263650 .

36MO Maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC): 5-year (y) progression-free survival (PFS) by molecular subgroup in the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

The first-line setting represents the only opportunity for cure in advanced OC. 5-y PFS rates may predict cure as most pts not relapsing at 5 years are potentially cured. In the final overall survival (OS) analysis of the Phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644), maintenance olaparib + bev provided a clinically meaningful OS benefit vs placebo (pbo) + bev in pts with newly diagnosed advanced OC who tested positive for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD+; tumour BRCA1/2 mutation [tBRCAm] and/or genomic instability) regardless of tBRCAm status (Ray-Coquard et al. Ann Oncol 2022:LBA29). We evaluated 5-y PFS by molecular subgroup to help inform the potential for cure. Pts in response after platinum-based chemotherapy + bev were randomized 2:1 to olaparib (300 mg bid for up to 24 months) + bev (15 mg/kg q3w for up to 15 months) or pbo + bev. A post hoc, updated descriptive PFS analysis by molecular subgroup was conducted at the final OS data cutoff (DCO). 537 pts were randomized to olaparib + bev and 269 to pbo + bev (median PFS follow-up in censored pts was 56.7 and 57.8 months, respectively). At DCO (22 March 2022), the 5-y PFS rate was 46% with olaparib + bev vs 19% with pbo + bev in the HRD+ group, 50% vs 25%, respectively, in the tBRCAm group, 41% vs 15%, respectively, in the HRD+ excluding tBRCAm group, 13% vs 13%, respectively, in the HRD−/unknown group, and 8% vs 12%, respectively, in the HRD− group. Updated data for time to first or second subsequent therapy or death will be presented.Table: 36MONo. of events/no. of pts5-y Median PFSHR (95% CI)5-y PFS rate,* (%)Olaparib + bevPbo + bevOlaparib + bevPbo + bevOlaparib + bevPbo + bevITT366/537222/26922.916.60.63 (0.53–0.74)2916HRD+136/255104/13246.817.60.41 (0.32–0.54)4619tBRCAm78/15758/8060.721.70.45 (0.32–0.64)5025HRD+ excluding tBRCAm58/9746/5530.016.60.47 (0.32–0.70)4115HRD−/unknown230/282118/13717.316.00.90 (0.72–1.13)1313HRD−167/19274/8516.616.21.01 (0.77–1.33)812Investigator assessed (RECIST 1.1). tBRCAm status by central labs and HRD status by Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus.*Kaplan–Meier estimates.CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat. Open table in a new tab Investigator assessed (RECIST 1.1). tBRCAm status by central labs and HRD status by Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus. *Kaplan–Meier estimates. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat. The 5-y updated descriptive PFS rates suggest the benefit of adding olaparib to bev is sustained beyond end of treatment and may indicate the potential of cure in HRD+ newly diagnosed advanced OC, supporting use of maintenance olaparib + bev as a standard of care in pts with HRD+ tumours, regardless of tBRCAm status.

32O 5-year (y) overall survival (OS) with maintenance olaparib (ola) plus bevacizumab (bev) by clinical risk in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial, adding maintenance ola to bev improved progression-free survival in homologous recombination deficiency-positive (HRD+; tumour BRCA1/2 mutation [tBRCAm] and/or genomic instability) pts with newly diagnosed AOC at higher and lower risk of progression by disease stage and surgical status. Greatest benefits were seen in lower-risk pts (Harter et al. Gynecol Oncol 2022). Here, we analysed 5-y OS according to clinical risk and HRD status. Pts in response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy + bev were randomized 2:1 to ola (300 mg bid; up to 24 months [mo]) + bev (15 mg/kg q3w; up to 15 mo) or placebo [pbo] + bev. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated OS in pts classified as higher risk (stage III with upfront surgery and residual disease or neoadjuvant chemotherapy; stage IV) or lower risk (stage III with upfront surgery and no residual disease), and by HRD status. 537 pts were randomized to ola + bev and 269 to pbo + bev (median OS follow-up 61.7 and 61.9 mo, respectively). Of 806 randomized pts, 595 (74%) were classified as higher risk and 211 (26%) as lower risk. At final data cutoff (22 March 2022), OS events had occurred in 377 higher-risk pts (data maturity 63%) and 69 lower-risk pts (data maturity 33%). OS was prolonged with ola + bev in higher- and lower-risk pts with a tBRCAm or who were HRD+. No OS benefit was seen in HRD− pts in any clinical risk subgroup. Subsequent PARP inhibitor therapy was received by 19.5% and 19.6% of ola + bev pts, and 45.9% and 45.2% of pbo + bev pts, in higher- and lower-risk groups, respectively.Table: 32OHRD statusHigher risk (n=595)Lower risk (n=211)No. of events/no. of pts (%)5-y OS rate† (%)No. of events/no. of pts (%)5-y OS rate† (%)Ola + bevPbo + bevOla + bevPbo + bevOla + bevPbo + bevOla + bevPbo + bevFull analysis set249/399 (62)128/196 (65)38.535.339/138 (28)30/73 (41)72.758.3HRD+*82/177 (46)53/89 (60)55.242.211/78 (14)16/43 (37)88.361.3tBRCAm43/109 (39)29/55 (53)65.248.35/48 (10)8/25 (32)91.466.1HRD−116/144 (81)46/62 (74)18.226.324/48 (50)12/23 (52)48.048.5HRD status by Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus assay; tBRCAm status by central labs.*HRD+ defined as a tBRCAm and/or genomic instability score of ≥42 on the Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus assay; †Kaplan–Meier estimates. Open table in a new tab HRD status by Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus assay; tBRCAm status by central labs. *HRD+ defined as a tBRCAm and/or genomic instability score of ≥42 on the Myriad MyChoice HRD Plus assay; †Kaplan–Meier estimates. This post hoc analysis of 5-y OS suggests that adding maintenance ola to bev should be considered for all HRD+ pts with newly diagnosed AOC, irrespective of their clinical risk status. Particular benefit was observed in HRD+ lower-risk pts who achieved 5-y OS rates of 88.3%.

38MO Validation study of the ShallowHRDv2 assay for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) detection in high-grade ovarian carcinomas (HGOC) in the first-line setting, from the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

The bevacizumab(bev)/olaparib(ola) maintenance regimen was approved for women affected with BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) and HRD HGOC, based on a greater progression-free survival (PFS) compared to bevacizumab alone in the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644). HRD status in this trial was determined by the centralized MyChoice CDx test by Myriad Genetics (MG test). Belonging to the second part of the ENGOT HRD European initiative we evaluated the analytical and clinical validity of the ShallowHRDv2 test, an assay that analyzes the genome-wide copy number alterations, as compared with the MG test on PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 tumor samples. We performed shallow Whole Genome Sequencing (sWGS) with a mean coverage of ∼1x (XT-HS capture kit; Agilent) on 449 tumor DNAs from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-OV25 trial. HRD status was determined using the shallowHRDv2 bio-informatics pipeline with a single cut-off at 20 Large scale Genomic Alterations. We further evaluated our test on 109 prospective samples from our routine practice. In the PAOLA-1 cohort, positive agreement for the ShallowHRDv2 vs. MG test status was 95% (196/206), negative agreement was 92% (173/188) and the overall agreement was 94% (369/394). Patients with shallowHRDv2-HRD-positive (including BRCAm) tumors showed a significantly prolonged PFS with bev/ola versus bev/placebo (median PFS: 44.8 vs. 20.3 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.35 [95% CI, 0.23–0.54]). This benefit was still significant after exclusion of BRCAm tumors (41.7 vs. 18.6 months, HR: 0.47 [95% CI, 0.27–0.84]). Less non-contributive analyses were observed with the ShallowHRDv2 test (15/449; 3%) than with MG test (51/449; 11%). We confirmed the high overall percentage agreement of 91% (86/94) between ShallowHRDv2 and MG tests in the prospective cohort, with less non contributive results for ShallowHRDv2 (5% vs. 12%). The ShallowHRDv2 test is a robust, cost-effective, clinically validated & highly performant test for HRD determination and is a valid alternative to MG to detect HRD in ovarian cancers.

Olaparib First-Line Maintenance Monotherapy in BRCA-Mutated Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Descriptive Analysis of the First French Real-World Data Study.

Olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, was approved by the European Commission in June 2019, following the results of the SOLO-1/GOG 3004 trial as maintenance monotherapy in adult patients with BRCA-mutated epithelial ovarian cancer. This study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of the first real-world data from patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer who received olaparib as first-line maintenance monotherapy in the French cohort Temporary Authorisation for Use (Autorisation Temporaire d'Utilisation de cohorte, ATUc) programme from 11 March, 2019 to 16 January, 2020. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and over with confirmed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or Fallopian tube cancer and a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline or somatic BRCA 1/2 mutation. Patients were in complete or partial clinical response at the end of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Olaparib maintenance therapy was initiated within 8 weeks of the patients' last dose of chemotherapy. Real-world data were collected through treatment access request forms completed by physicians. Clinical and safety data were collected monthly until the end of the ATUc programme. A total of 107 centres in metropolitan France and the French Overseas Departments and Territories requested the inclusion for 238 patients, of whom 194 received maintenance olaparib. In total, 87.6% of the primary tumour locations were ovary, the most common histology was high-grade serous (93.0%) and the most common International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique) stage was IIIC (56.8%). BRCA testing was performed in routine practice, prior to inclusion into the ATUc programme. All patients had a BRCA mutation: 52.5% had a somatic mutation, 38.4% had a germinal mutation and 9.1% had germinal and somatic mutations. Twenty-four (12%) patients experienced serious adverse drug reactions at the last safety follow-up (17 February, 2020). The most common were anaemia (12 [6%] patients), neutropenia (3 [2%] patients) and thrombocytopenia (3 [2%] patients). The rapid enrolment into the ATUc programme highlighted the strong unmet need for patients with ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation in first-line maintenance treatment. Olaparib was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed in this real-world patient population.

Cost-effectiveness of fuzuloparib compared to routine surveillance, niraparib and olaparib for maintenance treatment of patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma in China.

Background: Maintenance therapy with the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma (OC) have proven to be effective compared with placebo. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of maintenance fuzuloparib compared to routine surveillance (RS), niraparib and olaparib for platinum-sensitive recurrent OC from the Chinese healthcare systems. Method: A partitioned survival model with three-state (progression-free, progressed, death) was constructed utilizing TreeAge Pro 2011 software to evaluate the economic value of fuzuloparib, niraparib and olaparib maintenance treatment for platinum-sensitive recurrent OC based on the clinical data derived from FZOCUS-2, ENGOT-OV16/NOVA and ENGOT-Ov21/SOLO2. Transition probabilities were estimated from the reported survival probabilities in those trials. Cost and health preference data were derived from the literature. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs were measured for this analysis. A 5years horizon and 5%/year discount rates were used. One-way analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to explore the model uncertainties. Results: Total cost of fuzuloparib, niraparib and olaparib were $31628.10, $48183.48 and $54605.54, whereas they had an incremental cost-utility ratio of $31992.69, $32216.08 and $23359.26 per additional progression-free survival (PFS) QALYs gained compared with RS, relatively. Model showed that maintenance fuzuloparib achieved at least an 85.5% probability of CE at the threshold of $37654.50/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were sensitive to the PFS and the price of medicines. Conclusion: Fuzuloparib was less cost-effective for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation and platinum-sensitive recurrent OC compared to olaparib, but was superior to niraparib from the Chinese healthcare systems perspective.

Overall Survival With Maintenance Olaparib at a 7-Year Follow-up in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer and a BRCA Mutation: The SOLO1/GOG 3004 Trial

(Abstracted from J Clin Oncol 2022; doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01549) Because of nonspecific symptoms at disease presentation and inadequate screening methods, ovarian cancer is often advanced at the time of diagnosis results in a 10-year survival of 17% in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib is the new standard of care in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutation.

Pathologic complete response following FOLFIRINOX and olaparib treatment for hepatic metastasized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a germline BRCA mutation.

A 47-year-old female who was previously treated for BRCA1 germline mutant breast cancer presented with increasing back pain. Radiological and pathological investigations led to the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with multiple hepatic metastases. Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were highly elevated at 14,784 U/mL (normal, < 37 U/mL). After nine cycles of FOLFIRINOX treatment, radiological findings revealed remarkable shrinkage of the primary pancreatic tumor, disappearance of hepatic metastases, and normalized levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels. Because of increased neuropathy following FOLFIRINOX treatment, the patient was switched to maintenance olaparib treatment. Ten months later, her radiological response and normalized carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were stable. After staging laparoscopy, the patient underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy as a conversion surgery. Histopathological examination revealed no signs of residual adenocarcinoma in the resected pancreatic specimens, which was diagnosed as a pathological complete response. The patient recovered without complications. Adjuvant olaparib treatment was administered with no signs of recurrence at 7 months after surgery. In conclusion, a pathologic complete response after FOLFIRINOX and olaparib maintenance treatment in hepatic metastasized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is extremely rare. These bridging treatments may contribute to increased surgical resection rates and improved survival rates.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab in ovarian cancer patients aged ≥65 years from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

BackgroundThe phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 study (NCT02477644) showed that addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients in PAOLA-1. MethodsBaseline clinical and molecular data, and PFS, were compared between older (aged ≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years). Factors associated with olaparib efficacy, and safety in age subgroups, were also assessed. ResultsOf 806 randomised patients, 292 (36.2%) were ≥65 years. A lower proportion of older versus younger patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (61.0% versus 76.2%) and upfront surgery (42.0% versus 55.7%). Older patients were less likely to have a BRCA1/2 mutation (17.1% versus 36.7%) or homologous recombination deficiency-positive status (34.1% versus 55.7%). After median follow-up of 22.1 months, median PFS was 21.6 months with olaparib versus 16.6 months with placebo in the older population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–0.75), comparable with the younger population (median 22.9 versus 16.9 months; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49–0.77). PFS benefits were observed in patients with a BRCA mutation or homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumours. Incidence of olaparib-related grade ≥3 adverse events in older patients was comparable with that of younger patients (36.8% versus 31.7%) although hypertension and anaemia were more common in older patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred in older patients receiving olaparib. ConclusionOlder patients enrolled in PAOLA-1 achieved similar PFS benefits compared with younger patients, with a similar safety profile.

Association of location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with benefit from olaparib and bevacizumab maintenance in high-grade ovarian cancer: phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial subgroup exploratory analysis

In the phase III PAOLA-1 study, the addition of maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) resulted in prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), particularly for homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumors, including those with a BRCA mutation (BRCAm). The magnitude of benefit from olaparib and bevacizumab according to the location of mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2 remains to be explored. Patients with advanced-stage HGOC responding after platinum-based chemotherapy+ bevacizumab received maintenance therapy bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q3w for 15 months)+ either olaparib (300 mg b.i.d. for 24 months) or placebo. PFS was analyzed in the subgroup of patients with BRCA1m/BRCA2m according to mutation location in the functional domains of BRCA1 [Really Interesting Gene (RING), DNA-binding domain (DBD), or C-terminal domain of BRCA1 (BRCT)] and BRCA2 [RAD51-binding domain (RAD51-BD); DBD]. From 806 randomized patients, 159 harbored BRCA1m (19.7%) and 74 BRCA2m (9.2%). BRCA1m in RING, DBD, and BRCT domains was detected in 18, 40, and 33 patients, and BRCA2m in RAD51-BD and DBD in 36 and 13 patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 25.5 months, benefit from maintenance olaparib+ bevacizumab was observed irrespective of location of BRCAm. The benefit was particularly high for those with BRCA1m located in the DBD, with 24-month PFS estimated to be 89% and 15% [olaparib+ bevacizumab versus placebo+ bevacizumab hazard ratio= 0.08 (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.28); interaction P= 0.03]. In BRCA2m patients, 24-month PFS rates for those with mutations located in the DBD were 90% and 100% (olaparib+ bevacizumab versus placebo+ bevacizumab), respectively. Advanced-stage BRCA-mutated HGOC patients reported PFS benefit from maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab regardless of mutation location. The benefit is particularly high for patients with mutations located in the DBD of BRCA1. Mutations located in the DBD of BRCA2 are also associated with excellent outcome.

176O Final overall survival (OS) results from the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial evaluating maintenance olaparib (ola) plus bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (AOC)

In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (NCT02477644) primary analysis, adding ola to maintenance bev after first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) + bev led to a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in AOC (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49–0.72; P<0.001), particularly in pts with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD+; BRCA1/2 mutation [BRCAm] and/or genomic instability; Ray-Coquard et al NEJM 2019). Here, we report the prespecified final OS analysis.

Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?

In 2020, ASCO recommended that all women with epithelial ovarian cancer have germline testing for BRCA1/2 mutations, and those without a germline pathogenic variant (PV) should have somatic tumor testing to determine eligibility for a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Consequently, the majority of patients with ovarian cancer will have both germline testing and somatic testing. An alternate strategy is tumor testing first and then germline testing if there is a PV in the tumor and/or significant family history. The objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the two testing strategies. The Markov model compared the costs (US dollars) and benefits of two testing strategies for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: (1) ASCO strategy and (2) tumor testing triage for germline testing. Data were applied from SOLO-1, and costs were from wholesale acquisition prices, Medicare, and published sources. Sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty around various parameters. Monte Carlo simulation estimated the number tested and identified with germline and somatic BRCA PV for olaparib maintenance treatment annually in the US population. The ASCO strategy was more effective but more costly than tumor testing triage in identifying patients for olaparib, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $281,296 US dollars per progression-free life year gained. Assuming 10,000 eligible patients with ovarian cancer annually, Monte Carlo simulation yielded comparable numbers of patients with BRCA PV in the germline and tumor with the ASCO and tumor testing triage strategies (2,080 v 2,062, respectively), but substantially higher number of patients tested using the ASCO strategy (8,052 v 3,076). The ASCO strategy may identify more BRCA PVs but is not cost-effective. Tumor testing in epithelial ovarian cancer as triage for germline testing is the favored strategy in this health care system.

Maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade ovarian cancer: Main analysis of second progression-free survival in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

BackgroundPAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (NCT02477644) demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab in newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer. We report the prespecified main second progression-free survival (PFS2) analysis for PAOLA-1. MethodsThis randomised, double-blind, phase III trial was conducted in 11 countries. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed, advanced, high-grade ovarian cancer and were in response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Patients were randomised 2:1 to olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo for up to 24 months; all patients received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for up to 15 months. Primary PFS end-point was reported previously. Time from randomisation to second disease progression or death was a key secondary end-point included in the hierarchical-testing procedure. ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 35.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively, median PFS2 was 36.5 months (olaparib plus bevacizumab) and 32.6 months (placebo plus bevacizumab), hazard ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64–0.95; P = 0.0125. Median time to second subsequent therapy or death was 38.2 months (olaparib plus bevacizumab) and 31.5 months (placebo plus bevacizumab), hazard ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.64–0.95; P = 0.0115. Seventy-two (27%) patients in the placebo plus bevacizumab group received a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor as first subsequent therapy. No new safety signals were observed for olaparib plus bevacizumab. ConclusionIn newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab provided continued benefit beyond first progression, with a significant PFS2 improvement and a time to second subsequent therapy or death delay versus placebo plus bevacizumab.