Occurrence Of Target Lesion Revascularization Research Articles

Sirolimus-coated balloon in all-comer population of coronary artery disease patients: the EASTBOURNE DIABETES prospective registry

BackgroundThe outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients are still suboptimal, and it is unclear if diabetic patients might derive a benefit from the use of drug-coated balloons.AimsTo evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) MagicTouch (Concept Medical, India).MethodsWe conducted a subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated EASTBOURNE registry, evaluating the performance of MagicTouch SCB in patients with and without diabetes. The study primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up. Secondary clinical endpoints were major adverse clinical events (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and BARC 2–5 bleedings.ResultsAmong 2,083 enrolled patients, a total of 864 suffered from diabetes (41.5%). Patients with diabetes had a numerically higher occurrence of TLR (6.5% vs. 4.7% HR 1.38, 95%CI 0.91–2.08), all-cause death (3.8% vs. 2.6%, HR 1.81, 95%CI 0.95–3.46), and MACE (12.2% vs. 8.9%; HR 1.26 95%CI 0.92–1.74). The incidence of spontaneous MI was significantly higher among diabetic patients (3.4% vs. 1.5%, HR 2.15 95%CI 1.09–4.25); bleeding events did not significantly differ. The overall incidence of TLR was higher among in-stent restenosis (ISR) as compared to de-novo coronary lesions, irrespectively from diabetes status.ConclusionsIn the EASTBOURNE DIABETES registry, diabetic patients treated with the MagicTouch SCB did not have a significant increase in TLR when compared to non-diabetic patients; moreover, diabetic status did not affect the study device performance in terms of TLR, in both de-novo lesions and ISR.

Drug coated balloons-based approach versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents for left anterior descending revascularization

Abstract Introduction While representing the gold standard for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), drug eluting stents (DES) are associated with a progressively increasing risk of stent-related adverse events over time. (1) Left anterior descending (LAD) disease is a critical area for coronary stenting, due to the wide distribution with several side branches at risk of occlusion after stent implantation. Thus, the development of novel approaches for LAD PCI is warranted. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) used alone or in combination with DES as part of a hybrid procedure could allow to minimize stent burden and reduce the occurrence of stent-related events, but the evidence on their use for de novo lesions in large vessels is limited. (2-4) Methods Consecutive patients undergoing DCB implantation on the LAD in two Italian centers from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and compared to a historical cohort of LAD PCI with DES. Patients with in-stent restenosis were excluded. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR), while secondary endpoints included target vessel revascularization (TVR) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, TLR and TVR. Results 175 patients undergoing a DCB-based treatment on the LAD were included and compared to 1503 patients who received conventional PCI with DES. 83.9% of patients were male and 28.3% were diabetics, with no differences between the two groups. Total treated length was higher in the DCB group (54.9±20 for DES vs.66.2±35.2 mm for DCB, p<0.001); conversely, a greater mean DES length (54.9±20 vs.42.5±27.1 mm, p<0.001) was observed in the DES cohort. In the DCB group, mean DCB length was 36.8±20.2 mm; 32% of patients underwent DCB-only PCI and, in those who had hybrid PCI, DCB length was higher than stent length in 61.1% of cases. Large vessels (device diameter ≥3 mm) were treated in 81.6% and 77.1% of patients in the DES and DCB groups respectively, with no significant differences, while DCB with diameter ≥3 mm were used in 41.7% of patients in the DCB cohort. Mean follow-up duration was 2024 and 495 days in the DES and DCB groups respectively. At two years, the cumulative incidence of TLR was 9.1% (95% CI:7.6-10.9%) in the DES group vs. 4.8% (95% CI: 1.8-12.3%) in the DCB group (Log-rank p =0.225). After covariate adjustment through stepwise multivariable Cox regression analysis, DCB use was independently associated with lower TLR occurrence (HR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06-0.98), alongside with large vessels involvement, while diabetes, dyslipidemia, and prior CABG correlated with greater TLR risk. No differences between DES and DCB were detected for secondary endpoints. Conclusions A DCB-based treatment approach allowed a significantly reduced stent burden for LAD PCI and led to a lower risk of target lesion failure at two years. Future randomized studies are warranted to demonstrate the effect of DCB-based LAD PCI on long term outcomes.Major adverse cardiovascular eventsTLR predictors at Cox regression

Comparison of BARD®LIFESTREAM™ covered balloon-expandable stent versus GORE® VIABAHN™ covered self-expandable stent in treatment of aortoiliac obstructive disease: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial (NEONATAL trial)

BackgroundCovered stent has become one of the mainstream therapies for aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD), with a higher patency rate than bare metal stent. Covered balloon-expandable (CBE) stent can be placed more accurately with higher a radial support force, while covered self-expanding (CSE) stent has greater elasticity and higher trackability. However, there is no level I evidence regarding the comparison safety and efficacy between the CSE stent and CBE stent in AIOD to date. Therefore, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of CBE stent (BARD®LIFESTREAM™) and CSE stent (GORE® VIABAHN™) in AIOD.MethodsThis trial is a prospective, single-center, parallel, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. A total of 106 patients will be enrolled and these patients will be randomized to either the CBE stent group or the CSE stent group. The primary end point of the study is the occurrence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months after the intervention.DiscussionTo our knowledge, the ballooN sElf cOver steNt AorToiliAc occuLusive (NEONATAL) trial is the first RCT to compare CBE and CSE stent in AIOD patients. The main aim is to compare the TLR of the target lesion between CBE stent and CSE stent at 12 months post-procedure. The results of clinical trials may contribute to establishing a strategic guideline for choosing the optimal type of covered stent in the treatment of AIOD patients.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2100046734. Registered on 27 May 2021

Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in two different pathophysiologic scenarios. Background: There are different underlying pathological processes in coronary artery disease. Mid-term safety and efficacy of DCB approach is still limited. Methods: Medical records of all consecutive patients undergoing DCB were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 24 months. Results: Between January 2011 and December 2017, 442 patients were included, representing 4.4% of all PCIs in our institution. A total of 460 DCB lesions were treated, of which 328 (71.3%) were de novo and 132 (28.7%) were combined bare metal or drug-eluting stents with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The patients’ mean age was 66.2 ± 11.7 years with a diabetes prevalence of 45.3%. The TLR rate was lower in the de novo group (5.3%) compared to the ISR group (9.4%) (p = 0.04). No differences were observed in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between the de novo group (38.9%) and ISR group (42.5%) (p = 0.47). No significant differences were detected in the TLR occurrence in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion: Our extended experience demonstrates that the mid-term DCB approach in these two pathophysiologic settings represent a reasonable option, with low TLR rate.

Safety and Efficacy of Modern Stents in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

The impact of metabolic syndrome (MS) on stent performance and outcomes of patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including stent implantation, had not yet been fully established. The aim of the present study was to investigate long-term safety and efficacy of 2nd generation DES vs. other stent types in MS patients underwent successful PCI for an acute coronary event. Descriptive epidemiology, angiographic characteristics and one-year clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) procedures were evaluated according to the stent type inserted for 204 patients. The occurrence of TLR (6.62% vs. 9.43%, p = 0.50) and the composite outcomes (20.52% vs. 24.52%, p = 0.54) did not differ significantly between patients having 2nd generation drug eluting stents (DES) or other stent types implanted at the index procedure. It seems that the PCI in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is similarly efficient regardless of the stent type, suggesting that for the treatment of ACS in MS patients, all stent types show similar results, in terms of TLR or MACE.

Ultrathin Biodegradable-Polymer Orsiro Drug-Eluting Stent Performance in Real Practice Challenging Settings

BackgroundThe Orsiro cobalt-chromium stent platform (Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland) is one of the first devices in the era of ultrathin struts. However, data regarding the efficacy of Orsiro stent in patients with challenging anatomical conditions obtained from daily clinical practice are scant. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the long-term outcomes, defined as target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis (ST) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality over a six years period, in 1161 consecutive patients (mean age 64.3 ± 11.2 years old, 681 males) treated with 2327 Orsiro stents in our institution who presented with challenging anatomic/angiographic features. ResultsThe mean number of implanted stents was 1.7 ± 2.1 whereas the mean stent diameter and length were 3.6 ± 1.1 and 32.7 ± 15.6 mm, respectively. Mean follow-up duration was 35.6 ± 17 months (range 1–77 months); 923 patients (79.5%) reached the 3-year follow-up. The global rates of TLR, TVR, ST and CV mortality were 0.1%, 1.37%, 0.002%, and 1.9%, respectively with scarce statistically significant differences in multivessel disease, severe calcification, and lesion length > 41 mm. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that age, stent dislodgement, early stent thrombosis (p = 0.001) and lesion length ≥ 41 mm (p = 0.001) were independent predictors of TVR. Similarly, the occurrence of TLR was independently predicted by age, severe calcification, use of IVUS and Rotablator (p = 0.002), early stent thrombosis, LM bifurcation and length ≥ 41 mm (p = 0.001). ConclusionsThe Orsiro stent confirmed a very high efficacy profile in all anatomical scenarios with very low rates of clinically driven TLR and TVR, CV mortality and ST at 3-years.

Clinical performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon in coronary artery disease: EASTBOURNE registry.

The purpose of the EASTBOURNE registry is to evaluate the immediate and long-term clinical performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) in a real-world population of patients with coronary artery disease. We here present the prespecified interim analysis after the enrollment of the first 642 patients who obtained 1-year clinical follow-up. EASTBOURNE is a prospective, international, multicenter, all-comer investigator-driven clinical registry, which is enrolling consecutive patients treated with SCB at 42 European and Asiatic centers. Primary study endpoint is target-lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are procedural success and major adverse cardiac events through 36 months. Diabetes mellitus was present in 41% of patients. Acute coronary syndrome was present in 45% of patients and de novo lesions were 55%; 83% of the in-stent restenosis (ISR) patients had drug-eluting stents restenosis. Lesion predilatation was performed in 95% of the cases and bailout stenting occurred in 7.5%. So far, 642 patients have a complete 12-month follow-up. TLR occurred in 2.5%, myocardial infarction in 2.3%, total death in 1% and major adverse cardiac events in 5.8% of patients. A prespecified analysis of comparison between ISR and de-novo lesions showed a significantly higher occurrence of TLR in the ISR population (5.4 vs. 0.2%, P = 0.0008). The current interim analysis of 12-month follow-up of the EASTBOURNE registry shows good immediate performance and an adequate and encouraging safety profile through 12 months for this novel SCB.

The Effect of Drug-Eluting Stents on Target Lesion Revascularization in Native Coronary Arteries: Results from the NORSTENT Randomized Study

Background: The NORSTENT trial randomized 9,013 patients to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) or bare-metal stent (BMS) with 5-year follow-up. No difference was found in the composite primary outcome of death from any cause and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction after a median of 5 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included repeat revascularizations, which were reduced by DES. We report the occurrence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) in time and across demographic and clinical subgroups in patients with lesions in native coronary arteries (n = 8,782). Results: Clinically driven TLR was performed on 488 (5.6%) of the 8,782 patients during 5 years of follow-up. Male gender, older age, visible thrombus in the lesion, and larger stent diameter were associated with less TLR; multivessel disease and longer stents were associated with a higher risk of TLR. There was a substantial and highly significant reduction of the risk of any TLR after 5 years in the DES group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36–0.52], p < 0.001). The effect of DES on TLR was limited in time to the first 2 years in the study with no evidence of a later rebound effect. The reduction in TLR after DES insertion was consistent across subgroups defined by gender, age, diabetes status, renal function, and lesion and stent characteristics. The number needed to treat with DES (vs. BMS) to prevent 1 TLR ranged from 4 to 110 across clinically relevant subgroups. Conclusion: DES have a time-limited effect on the rate of TLR, but with a substantial and highly significant reduction in the first 2 years after the procedure. This effect was found to be consistent across all important clinical subgroups.

Long-term comparison of everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in real world patients.

IntroductionElevated risk of adverse events in comparison to metallic stents resulted in withdrawal of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (eBVS), known as the most intensively studied BVS. There is a paucity of data comparing the two different BVS.AimTo evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of the novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (nBVS) compared with eBVS.Material and methodsConsecutive patients treated with nBVS or eBVS in our center were screened. The primary outcome was the 3-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and target-lesion revascularization (TLR).ResultsAfter matching, 98 patients treated with 135 eBVS were compared with 98 patients treated with 136 nBVS. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and lesion characteristics were comparable in both groups. The 3-year MACE rate was higher in the eBVS group (17.3% vs. 6.1%; p log-rank = 0.02). The occurrence of TLR (16.3% vs. 5.1%; p log-rank = 0.02) and TV-MI (8.2% vs. 0 %; p log-rank = 0.004) was also higher in the eBVS group except for cardiac deaths (1% vs. 2%; p log-rank = 0.98, eBVS vs. nBVS, respectively). Of note, definite device thrombosis rate was markedly increased in the eBVS group (5.1% vs. 0%; p log-rank = 0.03).ConclusionsThe present study revealed that the 3-year event risk was lower for nBVS compared to eBVS. More evidence is needed to evaluate long-term performance of novolimus-eluting biovascular platforms.

P6241Two-year clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stent implantation in hemodialysis patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) has been developed to improve clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients presenting coronary artery disease (CAD). Although BP-DES showed non-inferior safety and efficacy to durable polymer DES (DP-DES) in several randomized clinical trials, hemodialysis (HD) patients, who have been well known as high risk population for adverse events, were excluded in the most of trials. Therefore, there are limited data comparing the clinical outcomes between BP-DES and DP-DES in HD patients with CAD after PCI. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes in HD patients after BP-DES implantation compared with those after DP-DES implantation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 234 HD patients (male 74%, mean age 71±10 years) undergoing PCI for 404 lesions with 472 DESs (71 patients for 138 lesions with 170 BP-DESs [91 Ultimaster and 79 Synergy] and 163 HD patients for 266 lesions with 302 DP-DESs [219 Xience, 53 Promus and 30 Resolute]) from 2011 to 2017. Two-year clinical outcomes were compared between BP-DES group and DP-DES group. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR), while the secondary outcome measures were the occurrence of cardiac death (CD), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infraction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), non-TVR and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as a composite of CD, MI, and TVR. Outcome measures were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the differences between BP-DES group and DP-DES group were assessed by the log-rank test. We also conducted Cox's proportional hazard model to identify predictors for TLR occurrence. Results Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the two groups. The two-year incidence of TLR was not significantly different between BP-DES group and DP-DES group (14.1% vs. 22.2%, p=0.391). The two-year incidences of CD (17.3% vs. 17.5%, p=0.381), ST (0% vs. 3.9%, p=0.133), MI (4.2% vs. 5.8%, p=0.965), TVR (21.3% vs. 27.5%, p=0.586), non-TVR (26.1% vs. 31.3%, p=0.439) and MACE (41.1% vs. 42.6%, p=0.526) were also not different between the two groups. After multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.97; 95% confidence interval 1.03–3.78, p=0.004) was independently associated with TLR occurrence in HD patients. Two-year clinical outcomes of HD patient Conclusions At two-year follow-up after PCI, BP-DES had comparable safety and efficacy profiles to DP-DES in HD patients presenting CAD. Acknowledgement/Funding None

P2690Safety and effectiveness of thin-strut DES for bifurcated coronary lesions not involving left main: a RAIN (veRy thin stents for patients with left mAIn or bifurcatioN in real life) sub-analysis

Abstract Background Thinner stent struts of new DES (drug eluting stent) are associated with shorter time of reendothelialization, a reduction of shear stress and inflammation of coronary walls. Despite this great innovations their clinical safety and efficacy in challenging scenarios as non left main bifurcation coronary lesions has not been tested. Methods RAIN is a multicenter registry enrolling patients treated on bifurcated coronary lesions and left main with thin-strut DES. Baseline characteristics and procedural data were recorded. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was the primary endpoint, whereas major adverse clinical events (MACE; composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), TLR and stent thrombosis (ST)) along with its single components were the secondary endpoints. A multivariate analysis to identify predictors of TLR and sub-analysis according to stenting strategy (provisional vs 2-stent technique), use of final kissing balloon (FKB) and IVUS/OCT optimization were performed. Results Data from 1803 patients (59% ACS, 61% stable CAD) treated on bifurcations were retrospectively evaluated. Follow up was available for 1685 (94%) patients for a median of 12 months (IQR 7–18). TLR occurred globally in 2.5% of cases (2.2% in provisional stenting, 3.5% in 2-stent technique). The rate of MACE was 9.4%, whereas all-cause death and MI, occurred in 4.1% and 3.2% of cases respectively. TVR and definite ST incidence were 3.7% and 1.1%. At multivariate analysis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) negatively influenced the main endpoint (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.06–3.6, p=0.03), whereas post-dilatation (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.3–0.93, p=0.04) and provisional stenting resulted being protective factors. FKB reduced TLR occurrence at FU only in 2-stent technique (p=0.03), whereas intracoronary imaging (performed in 29% of patients) were uninfluential. Conclusion Very thin-strut DES represents a highly effective solution in bifurcation lesions. The risk of TLR is reduced by post-dilatation and provisional stenting. FKB is recommended in 2-stent technique, whereas further studies are required to address the impact of intracoronary imaging in this setting.

Everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Limited data exist on bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate novolimus-eluting BRS (DESolve) as interventional treatment for patients with ACS, and to compare its 12-month outcomes with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (Absorb). In this retrospective study, patients with ACS (including unstable angina pectoris, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) treated with either the Absorb or the DESolve BRS were evaluated in a1:1 matched-pair analysis. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, were evaluated as amajor endpoint. The occurrence of scaffold thrombosis was also assessed. Atotal of 102 patients were eligible for this analysis. The rate of MACE at 12months was comparable between the Absorb and the DESolve group (8.3% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.738). The occurrence of target lesion revascularization (6.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.700) and scaffold thrombosis (4.1% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.580) was comparable as well. All instances of scaffold thrombosis occurred within 30days of the index procedure. In this study, similar 12-month event rates were observed for both BRS types after implantation for the treatment of ACS.

Final 5-Year Results in Unselected Patients Implanted With a Thin-Strut, Platinum-Chromium, Everolimus-Eluting Stent (from the PROMUS Element Plus US Post-Approval Study)

PROMUS Element (PE) Plus post-approval study was a large prospective, observational, all-comers study designed to evaluate the safety and performance of a thin-strut platinum chromium everolimus-eluting PE Plus stent in everyday clinical practice. A total of 2,683 "real-world" patients with limited clinical or anatomic exclusion criteria were enrolled at 52 clinical sites in the United States. The study met its primary end point of 12-month cardiac death or myocardial infarction (CD/MI) compared with a prespecified performance goal (p <0.0001). Five-year clinical outcomes were evaluated in overall PE Plus post-approval study patients and high-risk subgroups. During the 5-year follow-up period, CD/MI and stent thrombosis related to the PE Plus stent occurred in 9% and 2.2% overall patients, respectively. The reported all-cause mortality rate was 15%, with 7% classified as cardiac-related. A total of 18% patients underwent target vessel revascularization, and 11% were reported as target lesion revascularization. The rates of PE Plus stent-related CD/MI remained low in patients with medically treated diabetes (13%), small vessels (9%), and long stents (10%). PE Plus stent-related thrombosis through 5 years in patients with diabetes, small vessels and long stents was 4.2%, 2.2%, and 2.6%, respectively. The occurrence of target lesion revascularization was numerically higher in patients with diabetes (16%) and long lesions (18%) than the small vessels subgroup (11%). In conclusion, the final 5-year results establish the long-term safety and efficacy of the PE Plus stent in a broad, unselected patient population representative of "real-world" clinical practice.

Treatment of coronary artery disease with a new-generation drug-coated balloon: final results of the Italian Elutax SV rEgistry-DCB-RISE.

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are a recognized alternative to stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR), and there is some initial clinical evidence about their efficacy for the treatment of small coronary vessels. Newer-generation DCBs were developed to overcome the reduced deliverability of the previous generation, also warranting a more effective drug delivery to vessel wall. However, the vast majority of new-generation DCBs still lack of reliability due to paucity of clinical data. Between 2012 and 2015, all patients treated with Elutax SV DCB (Aachen Resonance, Germany) at nine Italian centers were enrolled in this retrospective registry. Primary outcome was the occurrence of target-lesion revascularization (TLR) at the longest available follow-up. Secondary endpoints were procedural success and occurrence of device-oriented adverse cardiovascular events including cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, stroke, and TLR. A minimum 6-month clinical follow-up was required. We enrolled 544 consecutive patients treated at 583 sites. Fifty-three per cent of the patients had ISR, and the rest native vessel coronary artery disease. Procedural success occurred in 97.5%. At the longest available clinical follow-up (average 13.3 ± 7.4 months), 5.9% of the patients suffered a TLR and 7.1% a device-oriented adverse cardiovascular event. We did not register cases of target-vessel abrupt occlusion. At multivariate analysis, severe calcification at the lesion site was the first determinant for the occurrence of TLR. This registry on the performance of a new-generation DCB shows an adequate profile of safety and efficacy at mid-term clinical follow-up.

Effect of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes after repeat drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis

BackgroundWhether diabetes mellitus (DM) is a predictor of long-term adverse clinical outcomes after repeat drug eluting stent (DES) implantation for DES in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the effect of DM on the long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing repeat DES implantation for DES-ISR lesions.MethodsIn the present study, 254 patients with DES-ISR were divided into DM or non-DM groups according to the presence or absence of DM. All patients received repeat 2nd generation DES implantation for DES-ISR. The occurrences of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) over a 2-year follow-up period were compared between the two groups. MACEs were defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). MACE free survival was investigated with Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with MACEs.ResultsBaseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups, except for the prevalence of early restenosis (lower) in the DM group. Differences in angiographic and procedural characteristics were not significant between groups. The rates of 2-year MACE (30.9 vs. 26.0%; P = 0.453) and TLR (24.7 vs. 19.7%; P = 0.411) were similar between groups. MACE-free survival and TLR-free survival were also similar between groups (P = 0.441 and P = 0.807). Subgroup analysis suggested a significant difference in the MACE (39.0 vs.15.3%, P < 0.001) and TLR occurrence (30.5 vs.8.2%, P < 0.001) and TLR-free survival (lower in early subgroup, P < 0.001) between early and late occurrence of ISR in the non-DM group of patients but not in the DM group. After adjustment for all significant clinical variables, Cox regression analysis indicated that DM was not associated with MACEs (hazard ratio [HR] 1.531, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.882-2.658, P =0.130). Non-focal type ISR and early ISR were predictors of MACEs (HR 2.671, 95% CI 1.468-4.858,P = 0.001; HR 4.703, 95% CI 2.725-8.117, P < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsPatients with DM have similar 2-year clinical outcomes to patients without DM when repeat 2nd generation DES was used for treatment of DES-ISR. DM is not the predictor of long-term prognosis in patients undergoing repeat 2nd generation DES for DES-ISR.

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with excimer laser coronary angioplasty: benefits over scoring balloon angioplasty alone.

Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is associated with a high incidence of recurrence. This study evaluated the clinical safety and 6-month efficacy of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) before scoring balloon dilatation for the treatment of ISR. Twenty-three patients with ISR were included and treatment strategy of ISR was dependent on each operator. Twelve patients among those were treated with ELCA before scoring balloon dilatation (ELCA group) and 11 patients were treated with scoring balloon alone (non-ELCA group). Acute procedural results were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). Follow-up angiography was performed in all patients and the incidence of recurrent ISR and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was determined at 6months after initial ISR treatment. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. Maximum dilatation pressure of scoring balloon was significantly lower in the ELCA group than in the non-ELCA group (9.0 ± 3.1 vs. 14.9 ± 4.3atm, p = 0.001). In follow-up angiography, the occurrence of TLR was similar between groups (16.7 vs. 45.5%, p = 0.09), but the late luminal loss was significantly lower in the ELCA group (0.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7mm, p = 0.03). ELCA is a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of ISR and associated with a relatively low recurrent restenosis in comparison with scoring balloon dilatation alone.

Impact of bifurcation technique on long-term clinical outcomes in 976 patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents; Milan and new-Tokyo registry

Background: Unprotected distal left main (UDLM) bifurcation intervention still remains technically challenging despite improvement in device technology. Methods and results: Between April 2005 and August 2011, 976 consecutive patients with UDLM following PCI with DES implantation were evaluated: 633 were treated with 1 stent (1-S) and 343 with 2 stents (2-S). The end point of the study was the incidence of cardiac mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and TLR for main-branch (TLR-MB) including ULM itself and proximal left anterior descending artery. More complex lesions were observed in the 2-S group (3 vessel disease, 53.3% vs. 43.9%, p=0.01, true-bifurcation, 85.5% vs. 49.8%, p<0.001, calcification; 61.0% vs. 49.1%, p<0.001) despite similar comorbidities. Peri-procedural MI occurred more frequently in the 2-S group as compared to the 1-S (12.0% vs. 6.1%, p=0.01). During follow-up period (median 36.9 months), survival free from cardiac mortality was similar between the 2 groups (cardiac mortality at 3-years; 5.1% in 1-S vs. 2.9% in 2-S, HR 0.56, CI 0.28-1.14, p=0.11) despite higher occurrence of TLR and TLR-MB at 3-years (TLR; 11.7% vs. 23.5%, HR 2.19 CI 1.60-3.00, p<0.001 and TLR-MB; 5.1% vs. 9.9%, HR1.60 CI 0.94-2.75, p=0.09). When we assess the impact of 2-S, mini-crush (109 patients), culotte technique (69) and TAP (41) were similar clinical result at long term while old crush technique (54) was worse as compared to these new techniques. (cardiac mortality at 3-years; 7.4% in crush, 0.9% in mini-crush, 2.4% in TAP vs. 2.9% in culotte, TLR at 3-years; 31.5%, 21.1%, 24.4% vs. 23.2% and TLR-MB; 14.8%, 4.6%, 7.3% vs. 11.6%, respectively). Conclusions: Compared with the 2-stent technique, the 1-stent technique is associated with a better TLR-free survival. However, our registry demonstrated that new 2-stent technique such as mini-crush, culotte and TAP technique seems to be feasible except higher incidence of revascularization.

Clinical and Procedural Predictors of Suboptimal Outcome After the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis in the Unprotected Distal Left Main Stem

Few data are available regarding the optimal revascularization strategy for unprotected distal left main coronary artery (UDLM) in-stent restenosis (ISR). Between April 2002 and December 2008, UDLM-ISR following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation occurred in 92 of 474 patients (19.4%). Of these, 8 (8.7%) who underwent a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were excluded, and the remaining 84 (91.3%) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (43 plain old balloon angioplasty [POBA] and 41 DES) were analyzed to assess the feasibility of PCI for UDLM-ISR. The overall cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse cardiac events during the follow-up period (median, 24 months) occurred in 4, 2, and 31 patients, respectively. Repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR) occurred in 28 patients. The incidence of repeat TLR was higher following PCI with POBA than with DES (hazard ratio [HR], 2.79; 95% CI, 1.23-6.34; P=0.014). On Cox regression analysis, the independent predictors of repeat TLR were treatment with POBA (HR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.41-7.69; P=0.006) and EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) >6 (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.02-6.28; P=0.045). More complex lesions requiring a 2-stent strategy were associated with a higher occurrence of TLR for restenosis of the left circumflex coronary artery ostium (LCX-ISR) (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.59-3.97; P=0.001) as well as repeat TLR for recurrent LCX-ISR (HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 0.97-19.20; P=0.05) compared to a 1-stent strategy. No cardiac death at 2 years occurred in patients with LCX-ISR. UDLM restenosis is better treated with DES than with POBA. The rate of recurrent ISR following repeat PCI was high, whereas the rates of MI and death were relatively low. Complex lesions requiring a 2-stent strategy had a higher recurrence rate at the ostial LCX but without an associated increased risk of MI and death.

Adverse cardiovascular outcomes associated with concurrent use of clopidogrel or ticlopidine and proton-pump inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Recent clinical studies reported the drug interaction between proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and clopidogrel, which remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether the concurrent use of PPI with clopidogrel or ticlopidine is associated with increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the cardiovascular outcomes associated with the concurrent use of PPI and clopidogrel or ticlopidine in the well-characterized 1286 patients with CAD undergoing PCI in the University of Tokyo Hospital. In the Japanese patients with CAD undergoing PCI, the concurrent use of PPI was significantly associated with increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events in the ticlopidine users (hazard ratio 2.63; 95 % confidence interval 1.65-4.18; P < 0.001), but not in the clopidogrel users. In the clopidogrel users as well as the ticlopidine users, PPI use did not affect the occurrence of target lesion revascularization, but significantly increased the risk for new lesion formation in the coronary arteries, which required subsequent revascularization. The adverse cardiovascular effects of the concurrent use of PPI and ticlopidine were identified in the patients with CAD undergoing PCI. Also, new lesion formation in the coronary arteries was shown to be increased when PPI was coprescribed for the thienopyridine users.

Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary bifurcations

The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of sirolimus-eluting (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting (PES) stent implantation in coronary bifurcations treated with either a 1-stent or 2-stent strategy. The study used a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive de novo bifurcations, excluding left main, treated with SES or PES between April 2003 and June 2005. We identified 170 bifurcations in 161 patients treated with SES and 119 bifurcations in 112 patients treated with PES. During a median follow-up of 1,061 days (interquartile range 814-1,314), 43 patients (26.7%) in the SES group and 28 (25.0%) in the PES group had a major adverse cardiac event (P = .78). The angiographic restenosis rate per bifurcation was 20.9% and 25.9%, respectively (P = .41). There was no difference overall in the occurrence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) per bifurcation, 22 with SES (12.9%) and 18 with PES (15.1%), P = .61. The TLR rate was similar for SES and PES in bifurcations treated with 1 stent (6.7% vs 11.4%, P = .40) and in bifurcations treated with both branch stenting (20.0% vs 20.4%, P =1.0). In this cohort, the long-term clinical outcomes appear similar overall between SES and PES in the treatment of coronary bifurcations irrespective of whether a 1-stent or 2-stent strategy was used.