In present analysis, we investigate the flow behavior of SiO2/H2O/C2H6O2 nanofluid along with magnetic field and heat generation influence on permeable channel having squeezing/dilating walls. The modeled partial differential system including mass balance, momentum and temperature equations are transformed into ordinary differential system by using similarity transformations and achieved the coupled of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The numerical solution of coupled system of equations is interpreted for velocity and temperature by using Bvp4c method. The graphical behavior of different parameters such as deforming rate L (for velocity we have taken L=±0.1,±0.7 and ±1.2, wheres for temperature L=−0.1,−0.7 and −0.9 has been taken), permeating Reynolds number H (for velocity H=0.1,0.4 and 0.7 and for temperature H=−0.6,−0.7 and −0.8 has been taken), Hartman number M (for velocity M=0.1,1.3 and 2.5 is taken), heat generation β (for temperature β=0.1,0.5 and 0.9 is taken) and solid fraction volume R (for velocity R=0.1,0.9 and 1.2 is taken, for temperature R=0.7,0.8 and 0.9 is assumed) for temperature and velocity have been plotted using Matlab software. The observation of case I; L>0,H>0, shows the velocity of both base (H2O and C2H6O2) fluids increases at middle portion of channel due to increase in L and M. On the other hands the velocity profiles show increasing behavior for H and decreasing behavior for R at the edges of channel. Temperature distribution observation of case I; L>0,H>0, it is cleared that the temperature of SiO2/H2O/C2H6O2 nanofluid increases due to increase of β. The temperature profile of SiO2/H2O nanofluid decreases by increase of R, on other hands the temperature profile of SiO2/C2H6O2 nanofluid decreases on interval (−1<h<0) and increases on interval (0<h<1) with increase of R. The observation of case II; L<0,H<0, deduces that the temperature of SiO2/H2O/C2H6O2 nanofluid increases by increase of H. The graphical results show that temperature profile reveals batter performance for base fluid H2O as compared to base fluid C2H6O2. We compared the present results with previous results and found that present results are similar to previous results.