Abstract Within comparative theology, the Hindu doctrine of avatāra has traditionally been compared to the Christian doctrine of the incarnation, both of which are expressions of divine embodiment in creaturely form. This article, however, contrasts the doctrine of avatāra with a reading of the incarnation that frames the latter within the broader context of kenoticism developed primarily in modern Christian theology. I argue that this approach (a) alleviates some of the difficulties encountered by the traditional comparison of avatāra with the incarnation and (b) highlights some noteworthy but easily missed dimensions present in the doctrines of both faith traditions. This is established through a comparison of two stories of young Kṛṣṇa and their display of divine play, līlā, with Hans Urs von Balthasar's kenotic reading of both the intratrinitarian relations and the metaphysical structure of finite beings. In this way, the article, on the one hand, alleviates the discrepancies about the number of divine descents and the link between these and the world's creation and metaphysical constitution, and, on the other hand, highlights how the Hindu notion of līlā and Christian kenotic readings intend to express the dialectic of divine sovereignty and accessibility in a philosophically and theologically responsible way.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
142 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Number Of Descents
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
144 Search results
Sort by Recency