291 Reviews with cataloging Indigenous cultures on the other, compartmentalized the inherent flaws in the very program she carried out. She understood, for example, that Nez Perce allotments were not well suited for productive agriculture and would not provide the income for the allottees to pay taxes on their lands. Loyal to the system she helped envision, she advocated for minor changes and believed that “if it failed, the Indians themselves, still mired in the commitments to traditional ways of living and thinking, would bear the blame” (p. 305). The strength of Dividing the Reservation is the level of detail Tonkovich provides on Fletcher’s ideas and actions on allotment. The letters present Fletcher’s (mis)understanding of indigenous people’s viewpoints in striking and revealing ways. In Tonkovich’s 2012 work, Allotment Plot: Alice C. Fletcher, E. Jane Gay, and Nez Perce Survivance, she convincingly argues that the Nez Perce maintained their sovereignty through an adept understanding of allotment policy and cunning negotiation. Thus, combining her works together shows the individual agency of Indigenous and government actors during this period. Dividing the Reservation will interest researchers of the allotment period generally and Nez Perce reservation specifically. An accessible sourcebook, it will also serve teachers introducing their students to primary sources and the revelatory qualities found in analyzing personal correspondence. DAVID-PAUL B. HEDBERG Portland, Oregon INDIAN BASKETS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND OREGON by Ralph Shanks and Lisa Woo Shanks, editors University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, 2015. Illustrations, maps, bibliography, index. 152 pages. $39.95, cloth. Indian Baskets of Northern California and Oregon is volume three in a series that includes Indian Baskets of Central California (2006) and California Indian Baskets (2010), the latter of which is a description of Native basketry traditions in the Golden State’s southern half. Like the previous titles, Indian Baskets of Northern California and Oregon presents an in-depth analysis of regional Native basketry. The text provides exhaustive commentary about the materials, techniques, and basket forms related to the creative expressions of a wide range of Indigenous people groups. The book is a boon for an array of audiences: basket artists, collectors and students of Native and craft arts, and regional historians among them. It is also a useful reference tool for libraries and museums. The degree of textual density, however, may prove off-putting for casual readers. In his introduction, Ralph Shanks pays homage to his mentor, the late Lawrence Dawson of the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley. Dawson’s work is cited throughout the text, and he was undoubtedly a diligent and thoughtful researcher. Shanks cites the elder scholar’s study of regional twined basketry and his finding that the technique was shared by West Coast tribes, Bering Sea and Asian groups, and Japan’s Ainu people. Readers are told that Dawson “believed that the first baskets brought into North America were just two types of twined baskets,” and he concludes that “after its humble beginnings in Asia, twined basketry flowered in California and Oregon” (p. 6). Throughout the text, Shanks returns to that theory, and suggests that diverse Native weavers learned basket-making techniques as they migrated south through Oregon and into California. His assertions about the origins of Native North American peoples — consistently stated as facts — are surprising and unsettling in a text that often acknowledges cooperationandcollaborationwithNativebasket makers. If one embraces Shanks’s ideology, no credence can be given to Native peoples’ perspectives on their own origins. Readers whose interest may be limited to Oregon-made baskets will be disappointed in the treatment this text gives to the state’s Native basketry. Although it provides exhaustive discussion of baskets made by diverse Northern Cali- 292 OHQ vol. 118, no. 2 fornia people groups, Oregon basketry traditions — apart from those in the southwestern corner of the state and the Klamath and Modoc — are treated only in passing. Given the extended discussion of basket traditions that appeared elsewhere , the twining traditions of Wasco/Wishxam weavers, and the work of Native basket makers from the Willamette Valley and the central and northern Oregon Coast are all given short shrift. The Nez Perce and...
Read full abstract