Non-critical COVID-19 Research Articles

Comparing Absolute Eosinophil and Monocyte Counts in Critical and Non-Critical COVID-19 Patients

Emerging evidence suggests that variations in immune cell counts, particularly absolute eosinophil and monocyte counts may be important in predicting the clinical course and severity of the disease in COVID-19 patients. Objective: To compare the absolute eosinophil and monocyte counts ‘between critical and non-critical COVID-19 patients to elucidate potential associations with disease severity and prognosis. Methods: Between March 19th and June 6th, 2021, peripheral blood samples were taken from 26 ‘critical COVID-19 patients and 26 non-critical COVID-19 patients. Standard laboratory procedures were used to determine the immunological and haematological parameters for every participant. Whole blood samples were taken in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes and processed per the manufacturer's instructions using an automated haematology analyser (XN-1000, Sysmex, Japan). Results: Critical patients of COVID-19 exhibited significantly reduced absolute eosinophil, absolute monocyte, and lymphocyte count compared to non-critical patients. Additionally, critical patients were significantly older. However, there is no significant differences in the two groups' basophil counts, neutrophil counts, WBC counts, RBC counts, HCT percentage, HGB levels, MCH levels, MCV, MCHC levels, and MPV or platelet counts. Conclusions: Critical patients exhibited significantly reduced absolute eosinophil and monocyte counts suggesting a potentially weaker immune response in these subgroups. The significance of immune cell counts in assessing the severity of COVID-19 is highlighted by these results which may aid in developing targeted therapeutic interventions and prognostic indicators. Validating these results and clarifying their therapeutic significance will require more investigation.

Co-infections and secondary infections amid COVID-19 outbreaks in Vietnam

BackgroundThe mortality risk of co-infections/secondary infections (CoI/ScI) is under-reported in patients with non-critical COVID-19, leading to the under-management of CoI/ScI and publication bias in the medical literature. We aimed to investigate the association between CoI/ScI and mortality in patients hospitalised with mild-to-severe COVID-19.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at a COVID-19 treatment hospital in Vietnam and collected all eligible medical records, with CoI/ScI status as the exposure (non-CoI/ScI and CoI/ScI, with the latter including nature of pathogen [bacterial, fungal, or bacterial + fungal] and multidrug-resistance pathogen [no MDRp or ≥ 1 MDRp]). The outcome was all-cause mortality, defined as in-hospital death by all causes or being discharged under critical illness. We used time-dependent analysis to report rates of mortality with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI, Poisson regression) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI (Cox proportional hazards regression with Holm’s method for multiplicity control).ResultsWe followed 1466 patients (median age 61, 56.4% being female) for a median of 9 days. We recorded 387 (26.4%) deaths (95/144 [66.0%] in the CoI/ScI group and 292/1322 [22.1%] in the non-CoI/ScI group). Adjusted mortality rates (per 100 person-days) of the CoI/ScI (6.4, 95% CI 5.3 to 7.8), including bacterial (8.0, 95% CI 7.2 to 8.9), no MDRp (5.9, 95% CI 4.8 to 7.4), and ≥ 1 MDRp (9.0, 95% CI 8.2 to 10.0) groups were higher than that of the non-CoI/ScI group (2.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.2). These corresponded to higher risks of mortality in the overall CoI/ScI (HR 3.27, 95% CI 2.58 to 4.13, adjusted p < 0.001), bacterial CoI/ScI (HR 3.79, 95% CI 2.97 to 4.83, adjusted p < 0.001), no MDRp CoI/ScI (HR 3.13, 95% CI 2.42 to 4.05, adjusted p < 0.001), and ≥ 1 MDRp CoI/ScI group (HR 3.89, 95% CI 2.44 to 6.21, adjusted p < 0.001). We could not attain reliable estimates for fungal and bacterial + fungal CoI/ScI.ConclusionCompared with the non-CoI/ScI group, patients with CoI/ScI had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality, regardless of resistance status. More evidence is needed to confirm the mortality risks in patients with fungal or bacterial + fungal CoI/ScI.

Effect of degalactosylated bovine glycoprotein formulations MAF and M сapsules on lymphopenia and clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundTargeting mucosal immunity of the gut, which is known to provide antigen processing, while avoiding excessive or unnecessary inflammation, was tested as a way to modulate COVID-19 severity.MethodsRandomized open-label trial in 204 adults hospitalized with non-critical COVID-19 who received for 14 days in addition to standard of care (SOC) degalactosylated bovine glycoproteins formulations of either MAF capsules (MAF group) or M capsules (M group) or SOC only (control group).ResultsMedian recovery time when patients did not require supplemental oxygen was 6 days in both study groups compared to 9 days in the control (MAF vs. control; P = 0.020 and M vs. control; P = 0.004). A greater reduction in mortality was seen in the MAF group compared to the control by day 14 (8.3% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.121) and by day 29 (15.3% vs. 3.2%; P = 0.020), and similarly in the M group by day 14 (8.3% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.276) and by day 29 (15.3% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.017). The proportion of those who had baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) lower than 0.8 × 109/L was 13/63 (20.6%), 17/69 (24.6%), and 18/72 (25.0%) of patients in MAF, M, and control group respectively. Day 29 mortality among these lymphopenic patients was three times higher than for the intent-to-treat population (21% vs. 7%) and consisted in above subgroups: 2/13 (15%), 2/17 (12%), and 6/18 (33%) of patients. The decreased mortality in both study subgroups correlated with greater ALC restoration above 0.8 × 109/L level seen on day 14 in 91% (11/12) and 87.5% (14/16) of survivors in MAF and M subgroups respectively compared to 53.3% (8/15) of survivors in control subgroup. Incidences of any ALC decrease below the baseline level on day 14 occurred in 25.4% of patients in the MAF group and 29.0% of patients in the M group compared to 45.8% in control and ALC depletion by ≥ 50% from the baseline level consisted of 7.9%, 5.8%, and 15.3% of cases in these groups respectively.ConclusionThis study showed that both study agents prevented ALC depletion and accelerated its restoration, which is believed to be one of the mechanisms of improved crucial clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.Trial registrationThe trial was registered after the trial start in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04762628, registered 21/02/2021, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04762628.

The Onset of Intussusceptive Angiogenesis in COVID-19 Patients Might Come from the Mobilization of Stem Cell Sub-Populations Expressing the Hemangioblast Marker CD143.

COVID-19 and infectious diseases have been included in strategic development goals (SDG) of United Nations (UN). The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has unveiled complex pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning COVID-19, notably inducing a systemic acquired vascular hemopathy characterized by endothelial dysfunction and intussusceptive angiogenesis, a rapid vascular remodeling process identified as a hallmark in severe COVID-19 cases affecting pulmonary and cardiac tissues. Stem cell migration have been proposed as significant regulators of this neoangiogenic process. In a monocentric cross-sectional study, through spectral flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, we identified a distinct stem cell subpopulation mobilized in critical COVID-19. Indeed, by an unsupervised analysis generating a UMAP representation we highlighted eleven different clusters in critical and non-critical COVID-19 patients. Only one cluster was significantly associated to critical COVID-19 compared to non-critical patients. This cluster expressed the markers: CD45dim, CD34+, CD117+, CD147+, and CD143+, and were negative for CD133. Higher level of expression of hemangioblast markers CD143 were found in critical COVID-19 patients. This population, indicative of hemangioblast-like cells, suggests a key role in COVID-19-related neoangiogenesis, potentially driving the severe vascular complications observed. Our findings underscore the need for further investigation into the contributions of adult stem cells in COVID-19 pathology, offering new insights into therapeutic targets and interventions.

Lung Expansion Therapy for the Potential Populations: A Literature Review.

Secretion retention, atelectasis, and reduced lung compliance occur when endotracheal or tracheostomised patients cough ineffectively. There is a possibility of infection if the collapsed regions of the lungs are not reinflated. Therefore, to improve clinical outcomes, such as diaphragm mobility and thickness, lung volume, and thickness of the abdominal muscles, and decrease the length of hospitalizations, mechanical and manual techniques, such as balloon blowing exercises and incentive spirometer, are required. PubMed, Google Scholar, Pedro, Clinical Keys, Helinet, ProQuest, and Science Direct databases were used for the literature search considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The several manual and mechanical methods that were employed for lung expansion treatment for the potentialpopulations are highlighted in this overview of the literature. Ten studies were considered in this review: five on balloon-blowingexercises, four on tracheostomy with incentive spirometry exercises, and one on incentive spirometry with balloon-blowingexercises. The effects were examined on individual outcomes that included rate of perceived exertion (RPE), diaphragm mobility, pulmonary function, volume of breath, length of hospitalization, and postoperative day complications. The structured protocols proved to be effective in improving lung expansion and pulmonary function for the potential population that involved healthy adults, noncritical COVID-19 adults, smokers, thoracotomy patients, and tracheostomised patients. The road to recovery is yet unexplored and underachieved because of the lackof evidence.

Prevalence of Pneumocystis jirovecii Colonization in Non-Critical Immunocompetent COVID-19 Patients: A Single-Center Prospective Study (JiroCOVID Study).

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an invasive fungal infection (IFI) that occurs mainly in immunocompromised hosts. After observing a high prevalence of PJP as a complication of COVID-19 in immunocompetent patients, we conducted a study to evaluate the prevalence of P. jirovecii colonization with PCR on oral washing samples (OWS) among non-immunocompromised and non-critical patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia at our university hospital. All patients over 18 years of age admitted to the Infectious Diseases Unit for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia between July 2021 and December 2022 were included. Patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO, those with risk factors for developing PJP, and those receiving prophylaxis for P. jirovecii were excluded. Samples were collected by gargling with 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl on day 14 of the hospital stay or at discharge. Of 290 screened patients, 59 (20%) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Only 1 of 59 patients (1.7%) tested positive for P. jirovecii detection with PCR, and the same patient was the only one to develop PJP in the follow-up period. Our results are in line with the previous findings of other studies that confirmed a very low prevalence of P. jirovecii colonization on OWS in the immunocompetent population. Despite the limitations of the study, the fact that the only patient who tested positive for P. jirovecii was the only one in our cohort to develop PJP leads us to reflect on the role of this non-invasive sample in predicting the risk of PJP in patients with COVID-19.

Key patient demographics shape innate immune topography in noncritical hypoxic COVID-19 pneumonia.

Risk of severe disease and death due to COVID-19 is increased in certain patient demographic groups, including those of advanced age, male sex, and obese body mass index. Investigations of the biological variations that contribute to this risk have been hampered by heterogeneous severity, with immunologic features of critical disease potentially obscuring differences between risk groups. To examine immune heterogeneity related to demographic risk factors, we enrolled 38 patients hospitalized with clinically homogeneous COVID-19 pneumonia - defined as oxygen saturation less than 94% on room air without respiratory failure, septic shock, or multiple organ dysfunction - and performed single-cell RNA-Seq of leukocytes collected at admission. Examination of individual risk factors identified strong shifts within neutrophil and monocyte/dendritic cell (Mo/DC) compartments, revealing altered immune cell type-specific responses in higher risk COVID-19 patient subgroups. Specifically, we found transcriptional evidence of altered neutrophil maturation in aged versus young patients and enhanced cytokine responses in Mo/DCs of male versus female patients. Such innate immune cell alterations may contribute to outcome differences linked to these risk factors. They also highlight the importance of diverse patient cohorts in studies of therapies targeting the immune response in COVID-19.

In noncritical COVID-19, therapeutic vs. prophylactic anticoagulation did not reduce a composite adverse clinical outcome at 30 d.

Stone GW, Farkouh ME, Lala A, et al; FREEDOM COVID Anticoagulation Strategy Randomized Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of anticoagulation strategies for noncritically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:1747-1762. 36889611.

Cell and cytokine analyses from bronchoalveolar lavage in non-critical COVID-19 pneumonia.

Cell and cytokine analyses from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are poorly described. This study focused on patients hospitalized in the non-intensive care unit for either suspected COVID-19 pneumonia or persistent respiratory symptoms following proven COVID-19 pneumonia. Overall, 54 patients who underwent BAL between April 2020 and February 2021 for suspected or follow-up of proven COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Based on SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test results and clinical follow-up, three pulmonary disease groups were defined: non-COVID-19 (n = 20), acute COVID-19 (n = 13), and post-COVID-19 (n = 24) pneumonia patients. Cytological and cytokine analyses were performed on BAL fluid (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, HGF, and TGF-β), with investigators blinded to the patient groups. Lymphocytic alveolitis with plasmocytes was observed in acute COVID-19 pneumonia, returning to normal post-COVID-19. The highest cytokine levels were observed in COVID-19 patients, with significantly increased IFN-γ, IL-10, and HGF levels compared to non-COVID-19 patients, while significantly decreased IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and HGF levels were noted in post-COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients, correlations between IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ concentrations were found. Lymphocytic alveolitis with plasmacytosis was found in non-critical COVID-19 pneumonia This alveolitis is associated with the presence of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ and HGF. Alveolitis and cytokines levels decreased in post-COVID-19 pneumonia.

Assessing Convalescent Plasma Efficacy in Moderate COVID-19 Hospitalizations: A Bicentric Retrospective Study

COVID-19 claimed millions of lives, mainly in the pre-vaccine era. Preliminary studies showed promising efficacy of convalescent plasma against SARS-CoV-2 (CP). To evaluate the efficacy of CP in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with moderate severity. Retrospective, bicentric study including adults hospitalized for moderate (non-critical) COVID-19 who required oxygen therapy. CP donated by survivors of mild cases (600 cc) were searched for IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2. Its impact on mortality, hospital stay (days), and need for mechanical ventilation (IMV) was evaluated. Of the 119 patients included, 58% were men (median age 60 years), 88% had comorbidity, and 43% had a high-risk CALL score. Forty-three patients (36%) received CP, only 15 (12.6%) early (< 7 days). Twenty-two patients had to be transferred to the intensive care unit; 18 received IMV, and 15 died (12.6%). The use of CP was not associated with changes in mortality (p = 0.16), need for IMV (p = 0.79), or hospital stay (p = 0.24). Its early administration (< 7 days of symptoms) did not show a significant association either. The presence of heart disease and subsequently requiring IMV were independent factors of mortality. The use of CP in patients hospitalized for moderately severe COVID-19 was not associated with lower mortality, hospital stay, or the need for IMV.

Leveraging T-cell receptor - epitope recognition models to disentangle unique and cross-reactive T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 during COVID-19 progression/resolution.

Despite the general agreement on the significance of T cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection, the clinical impact of specific and cross-reactive T-cell responses remains uncertain. Understanding this aspect could provide insights for adjusting vaccines and maintaining robust long-term protection against continuously emerging variants. To characterize CD8+ T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 epitopes unique to the virus (SC2-unique) or shared with other coronaviruses (CoV-common), we trained a large number of T-cell receptor (TCR) - epitope recognition models for MHC-I-presented SARS-CoV-2 epitopes from publicly available data. These models were then applied to longitudinal CD8+ TCR repertoires from critical and non-critical COVID-19 patients. In spite of comparable initial CoV-common TCR repertoire depth and CD8+ T-cell depletion, the temporal dynamics of SC2-unique TCRs differed depending on the disease severity. Specifically, while non-critical patients demonstrated a large and diverse SC2-unique TCR repertoire by the second week of the disease, critical patients did not. Furthermore, only non-critical patients exhibited redundancy in the CD8+ T-cell response to both groups of epitopes, SC2-unique and CoV-common. These findings indicate a valuable contribution of the SC2-unique CD8+ TCR repertoires. Therefore, a combination of specific and cross-reactive CD8+ T-cell responses may offer a stronger clinical advantage. Besides tracking the specific and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 CD8+ T cells in any TCR repertoire, our analytical framework can be expanded to more epitopes and assist in the assessment and monitoring of CD8+ T-cell response to other infections.

Different effects of vaccine on VST in critical and non-critical COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study of 363 cases

AimTo explore the risk factors of prolonged viral shedding time (VST) in critical/non-critical COVID-19 patients during hospitalization. MethodsIn this retrospective study, we enrolled 363 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted in a designated hospital during the COVID-19 outbreak in Nanjing Lukou International Airport. Patients were divided into critical (n = 54) and non-critical (n = 309) groups. We analyzed the relationship between the VST and demographics, clinical characteristics, medications, and vaccination histories, respectively. ResultsThe median duration of VST was 24 d (IQR, 20–29) of all patients. The VST of critical cases was longer than non-critical cases (27 d, IQR, 22.0–30.0 vs. 23 d, IQR 20–28, P < 0.05). Cox proportional hazards model showed that ALT (HR = 1.610, 95%CI 1.186–2.184, P = 0.002) and EO% (HR = 1.276, 95%CI 1.042–1.563, P = 0.018) were independent factors of prolonged VST in total cases; HGB (HR = 0.343, 95%CI 0.162–0.728, P = 0.005) and ALP (HR = 0.358, 95%CI 0.133–0.968, P = 0.043) were independent factors of prolonged VST in critical cases, while EO% (HR = 1.251, 95%CI 1.015–1.541, P = 0.036) was the independent factor of prolonged VST in non-critical cases. Vaccinated critical cases showed higher levels of SARS-CoV-2-IgG (1.725 S/CO, IQR 0.3975–28.7925 vs 0.07 S/CO, IQR 0.05–0.16, P < 0.001) and longer VSTs (32.5 d, IQR 20.0–35.25 vs 23 d, IQR 18.0–30.0, P = 0.011) compared with unvaccinated critical patients. Fully vaccinated non-critical cases, however, presented higher levels of SARS-CoV-2-IgG (8.09 S/CO, IQR 1.6975–55.7825 vs 0.13 S/CO IQR 0.06–0.41, P < 0.001) and shorter VSTs (21 d, IQR 19.0–28.0 vs 24 d, IQR 21.0–28.5, P = 0.013) compared with unvaccinated non-critical patients. ConclusionsOur results suggested that risk factors of prolonged VST were different between critical and non-critical COVID-19 patients. Increased level of SARS-CoV-2-IgG and vaccination did not shorten the VST and hospital stay in critical COVID-19 patients.

Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Critical and Non-Critical Elderly COVID-19 Patients in Udayana University Academic Hospital: A Retrospective Study

Elderly COVID-19 patients have been associated with worse outcomes and have been presented with the highest mortality rate. However, studies on the clinical features and the differences between critical and non-critical elderly COVID-19 patients in Indonesia and even other countries are still lacking and rare. In this retrospective study, the epidemiological and clinical features of critical and non-critical elderly COVID-19 patients admitted to Udayana University Academic Hospital between April 2020 and March 2021 were analyzed and then compared. Of the 280 medical records analyzed, 60.7% were male and the median age was 65.0 years old. Based on the medical records, 18.2% of elderly patients met our criteria of critical patients. The most common symptoms presented in both category upon admission included fever and coughing. The most common comorbidity found in critical patients was heart disease and hypertension in non-critical patients. Laboratory results differences included leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, platelets, SGOT, SGPT, and urea. Only 9.9% of critical patients and 6.1% of non-critical patients were given antiviral therapy. In contrast, 68.6% of critical patients and 76% of non-critical patients were given antibiotics. The mortality rate in critical patients was 70.6% and 0.4% in non-critical patients. Based on the results, a multimodal approach in the treatment of elderly COVID-19 patients is very essential. The higher mortality rate in elderly patients should be able to be reduced by giving early and timely antiviral therapy with the addition of effective choice of drugs.

Clinical risk score for early prediction of recurring SARS-CoV-2 positivity in non-critical patients.

Recurrent positive results in quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (qRT-PCR) tests have been commonly observed in COVID-19 patients. We aimed to construct and validate a reliable risk stratification tool for early predictions of non-critical COVID-19 survivors' risk of getting tested re-positive within 30 days. We enrolled and retrospectively analyzed the demographic data and clinical characters of 23,145 laboratory-confirmed cases with non-critical COVID-19. Participants were followed for 30 days and randomly allocated to either a training (60%) or a validation (40%) cohort. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to identify possible risk factors with the SARS-CoV-2 recurrent positivity and then incorporated into the nomogram. The study showed that the overall proportion of re-positive cases within 30 days of the last negative test was 24.1%. In the training cohort, significantly contributing variables associated with the 30-day re-positivity were clinical type, COVID-19 vaccination status, myalgia, headache, admission time, and first negative conversion, which were integrated to build a nomogram and subsequently translate these scores into an online publicly available risk calculator (https://anananan1.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp2/). The AUC in the training cohort was 0.719 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.712-0.727] with a sensitivity of 66.52% (95% CI, 65.73-67.30) and a specificity of 67.74% (95% CI, 66.97-68.52). A significant AUC of 0.716 (95% CI, 0.706-0.725) was obtained for the validation cohort with a sensitivity of 62.29% (95% CI, 61.30-63.28) and a specificity of 71.26% (95% CI, 70.34-72.18). The calibration curve exhibited a good coherence between the actual observation and predicted outcomes. The risk model can help identify and take proper management in high-risk individuals toward the containment of the pandemic in the community.

Serum Catestatin Level as a Stratification Assessment Tool in Non-Critical COVID-19 Patients.

Catestatin (CST) is a peptide with immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anti-microbial activities. There are only a few studies that have investigated plasma CST levels in COVID-19 patients (mostly in ICU patients). In our work, the aim was to demonstrate serum CST levels and their correlation with clinical outcomes in a group of severe COVID-19 patients admitted to the non-ICU department. The subjects were 32 patients (25 females, 7 males) admitted to the non-ICU unit for COVID-19 patients. CST levels in our cohort were higher (8.91 ± 7.00) than previously reported CST levels in control subjects. We found a significant positive correlation between serum CST levels and C-reactive protein (r = 0.423, p = 0.008), D-dimers (r = 0.395, p = 0.013), hsTNT (high-sensitivity troponin T) (r = 0.603, p &lt; 0.001), proBNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) (r = 0.569, p &lt; 0.001), and hospitalization days (r = 0.388, p = 0.014). There was a difference between groups of participants with SOFA &lt;3 (n = 18) and SOFA &gt;=3 (n = 14) in catestatin serum levels (7.25 ± 3.66 vs. 11.05 ± 9.52 ng/mL), but the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.065). We considered plasma CST level at hospital admission as a possible tool for early risk assessment in non-critical COVID-19 patients. This study is an attempt to clarify the complex pathophysiological mechanisms present in the development of severe forms of SARS-CoV2 infection.

Descriptive characteristics of continuous oximetry measurement in moderate to severe covid-19 patients

Non-invasive oxygen saturation (SpO2) is a central vital sign used to shape the management of COVID-19 patients. Yet, there have been no report quantitatively describing SpO2 dynamics and patterns in COVID-19 patients using continuous SpO2 recordings. We performed a retrospective observational analysis of the clinical information and 27 K hours of continuous SpO2 high-resolution (1 Hz) recordings of 367 critical and non-critical COVID-19 patients hospitalised at the Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. An absolute SpO2 threshold of 93% most efficiently discriminated between critical and non-critical patients, regardless of oxygen support. Oximetry-derived digital biomarker (OBMs) computed per 1 h monitoring window showed significant differences between groups, notably the cumulative time below 93% SpO2 (CT93). Patients with CT93 above 60% during the first hour of monitoring, were more likely to require oxygen support. Mechanical ventilation exhibited a strong effect on SpO2 dynamics by significantly reducing the frequency and depth of desaturations. OBMs related to periodicity and hypoxic burden were markedly affected, up to several hours before the initiation of the mechanical ventilation. In summary, OBMs, traditionally used in the field of sleep medicine research, are informative for continuous assessment of disease severity and response to respiratory support of hospitalised COVID-19 patients. In conclusion, OBMs may improve risk stratification and therapy management of critical care patients with respiratory impairment.

A unique cytotoxic CD4+ T cell-signature defines critical COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 infection causes a spectrum of clinical disease presentation, ranging from asymptomatic to fatal. While neutralising antibody (NAb) responses correlate with protection against symptomatic and severe infection, the contribution of the T-cell response to disease resolution or progression is still unclear. As newly emerging variants of concern have the capacity to partially escape NAb responses, defining the contribution of individual T-cell subsets to disease outcome is imperative to inform the development of next-generation COVID-19 vaccines. Immunophenotyping of T-cell responses in unvaccinated individuals was performed, representing the full spectrum of COVID-19 clinical presentation. Computational and manual analyses were used to identify T-cell populations associated with distinct disease states. Critical SARS-CoV-2 infection was characterised by an increase in activated and cytotoxic CD4+ lymphocytes (CTL). These CD4+ CTLs were largely absent in asymptomatic to severe disease states. In contrast, non-critical COVID-19 was associated with high frequencies of naïve T cells and lack of activation marker expression. Highly activated and cytotoxic CD4+ T-cell responses may contribute to cell-mediated host tissue damage and progression of COVID-19. Induction of these potentially detrimental T-cell responses should be considered when developing and implementing effective COVID-19 control strategies.

Study on prescription medication mode and mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of noncritical COVID-19 based on data mining

Study on prescription medication mode and mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of noncritical COVID-19 based on data mining

Use of convalescent plasma therapy in hospitalised adult patients with non-critical COVID-19: a focus on the elderly from Hungary

Convalescent plasma therapy might be a feasible option for treatment of novel infections. During the early phases of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, several promising results were published with convalescent plasma therapy, followed by more disappointing findings of randomised controlled trials. In our single-centre, open-label, prospective, cohort study, we assessed the findings of 180 patients treated with convalescent plasma during the first four waves of the pandemic in Hungary. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were clinical improvement and need for intensive care unit admission by day 28. Subgroup analysis comparing elderly and non-elderly (less than 65 years of age) was performed. Twenty (11.4%) patients died by day 28, at significantly higher rates in the elderly subgroup (3 vs. 17, p < 0.01). One hundred twenty-eight (72.7%) patients showed clinical improvement, and 15 (8.5%) were transferred to the intensive care unit until day 28. Non-elderly patients showed clinical improvement by day 28 in significantly higher rates (improvement 74 vs. 54, no improvement 15 vs. 11, worsening or death 4 vs. 18 patients, p < 0.01). In conclusion, we found similar clinical outcome results as randomised controlled trials, and the impact of risk factors for unfavourable clinical outcomes among patients in the elderly population.

The First Italian Telemedicine Program for Non-Critical COVID-19 Patients: Experience from Lodi (Italy).

Italy was the first Western country to face a massive SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. The limited information initially available on the natural course of the disease required caution in the discharge of patients accessing health facilities. This resulted in overcrowded health facilities and emergency services. In this context, improvements of other forms of hospital care assistance were needed. This study shows the results of the first Italian remote monitoring program for COVID-19 patients. The program was implemented by the Azienda Socio Sanitaria (ASST) Lodi (Italy) by using the innovative Zcare software®. Data generated during patient recruitment, monitoring, and discharge were extracted from the Zcare software and statistically analysed. Data refer to a sample of 1196 patients enrolled in the remote monitoring program in 2020. Patients reported symptoms mainly during the first week. The most frequently reported symptoms were general fatigue, cough, and loss of taste and smell (dysosmia). More than 80% of patients reported a saturation level below 96% at least once, and more than 70% had a temperature above 37 °C. Active monitoring of reported symptoms provided valuable insights into the disease’s natural history during its less severe acute phase. Only 109 individuals visited the emergency department at least once in the first 100 days of monitoring. Of these, 101 had COVID-19 infection, 69 of whom were hospitalized following a first clinical assessment at the emergency department. The ASST Lodi’s telemedicine strategy for COVID patients appears to be a viable alternative to hospitalization. This strategy enables the provision of proper care while making resources available for more critically ill patients, and enhances the availability of resources available for more critically ill patients.