PrefaceUntil recently, mathematical studies of Lorentzian causality theory assumed, explicitly or implicitly, smoothness of the metric. This changed a few years ago, after independent work by Fathi and Siconolfi, and by Chruściel and Grant. Since then many papers began to explore causality under weaker conditions such as C1,1 metrics, Lipschitz metrics, continuous metrics (and cone structures), or even topological settings. Indeed, new insights are needed when the metric is not twice-differentiable. Hence, manifolds for which the metric is not C2 might be called non-regular, though closer inspection reveals that there are not so many differences between the C2 and the C1,1 theories, so one can also refer to the non-regular theories as those whose metric has regularity below C1,1.In Riemannian signature geometers studied non-regular manifolds using comparison geometry and other approaches. Many of these techniques have yet to be exported to the Lorentzian signature since, of course, a number of difficulties have to be addressed. In spite of this, mathematical physicists study non-regular spaces with a strong motivation that stems from the desire of understanding the ultimate nature of spacetime. The idea is that at the quantum level and hence whenever the physical conditions become extreme (say gravitational collapse, or origin of the universe) the spacetime manifold should perhaps not be approximated by a smooth manifold. If this expectation is correct then an understanding of the role of differentiability conditions in general relativity might give hints to the very nature of gravity and spacetime at the quantum scale.
Read full abstract