Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Resistance-associated Mutations Research Articles

High Prevalence of Doravirine Resistance in HIV-1-Infected Patients with Virological Failure to an NNRTI-Based Single-Tablet Regimen.

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the prevalence of resistance to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based single-tablet regimen (STR) in Taiwanese patients and clarify the clinical implications of using doravirine in patients who fail NNRTI treatment.Patients and MethodsTaiwanese patients infected with HIV-1 who failed NNRTI-based STR treatment were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2020. Mutations associated with drug resistance were identified using the 2019 International Antiviral Society-USA list of drug-resistant mutations in HIV, and drug susceptibility was assessed according to the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database version 9. Median values of continuous variables were compared between two groups using the Mann–Whitney U-test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.ResultsA total of 107 patients were included, of whom 29 were treatment failure to the initial STRs, and 78 failed treatment after switching to an STR. Seventy-four patients failed treatment with TDF/FTC/EFV (Atripla), 30 with TDF/FTC/RPV (Complera) and 3 with TAF/FTC/RPV (Odefsey). The prevalence rates of resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), NNRTIs, protease inhibitors (PIs) and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) were 76%, 86%, 3% and 2%, respectively. Among the 29 patients failure to the initial STRs, 62% developed doravirine resistance, compared to 64% of the 78 the patients who failed treatment after switching to an STR. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of specific NNRTI or doravirine resistance-associated mutations between these two groups. The patients with K65R mutations were more likely to have NNRTI resistance (p = 0.037) and doravirine resistance (p < 0.001).ConclusionOur findings showed a high rate of doravirine cross-resistance in patients with NNRTI-based STR treatment failure. Doravirine should be used cautiously as a salvage regimen in patients who fail NNRTI treatment.

Impact of HIV-1 Resistance-Associated Mutations on Susceptibility to Doravirine: Analysis of Real-World Clinical Isolates

ABSTRACTClinical management of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection may be negatively impacted by either acquired or transmitted drug resistance. Here, we aim to extend our understanding of the impact of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) on the susceptibility of clinical isolates to the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) doravirine. Clinical isolates from people living with HIV-1 undergoing routine testing for susceptibility to doravirine and other approved NNRTIs (etravirine, rilpivirine, efavirenz, and nevirapine) were collected from August 2018 to August 2019. Susceptibility in the presence/absence of NNRTI and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations was determined using cutoffs for relative fold change in inhibition (ratio of the 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] of patient virus compared with the IC50 of a wild-type reference strain). Biological cutoffs of 3- to 15-fold change were investigated for doravirine, with preestablished cutoffs used for the other NNRTIs. Of 4,070 clinical isolates, 42.9% had ≥1 NNRTI RAM. More isolates were susceptible to doravirine (92.5–96.7%) than to etravirine (91.5%), rilpivirine (89.5%), efavirenz (81.5%), or nevirapine (77.5%). Based on a 3-fold cutoff, doravirine susceptibility was retained in 44.7–65.8% of isolates resistant to another NNRTI and 28.5% of isolates resistant to all other tested NNRTIs. The presence of NRTI RAMs, including thymidine analog mutations, was associated with doravirine hypersusceptibility in some isolates, particularly in the absence of NNRTI RAMs. These results support the favorable resistance profile of doravirine and are of particular importance given the challenge posed by both acquired and transmitted resistance.

HIV-1 Drug Resistance and Third-Line Therapy Outcomes in Patients Failing Second-Line Therapy in Zimbabwe.

ObjectivesTo analyze the patterns and risk factors of HIV drug resistance mutations among patients failing second-line treatment and to describe early treatment responses to recommended third-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in a national referral HIV clinic in Zimbabwe.MethodsPatients on boosted protease inhibitor (PI) regimens for more than 6 months with treatment failure confirmed by 2 viral load (VL) tests >1000 copies/mL were genotyped, and susceptibility to available antiretroviral drugs was estimated by the Stanford HIVdb program. Risk factors for major PI resistance were assessed by logistic regression. Third-line treatment was provided as Darunavir/r, Raltegravir, or Dolutegravir and Zidovudine, Abacavir Lamivudine, or Tenofovir.ResultsGenotypes were performed on 86 patients who had good adherence to treatment. The median duration of first- and second-line ART was 3.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 2.3–5.1) and 2.6 years (IQR, 1.6–4.9), respectively. The median HIV viral load and CD4 cell count were 65 210 copies/mL (IQR, 8728–208 920 copies/mL) and 201 cells/mm3 (IQR, 49–333 cells/mm3). Major PI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were demonstrated in 44 (51%) non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor RAMs in 72 patients (83%) and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors RAMs in 62 patients (72%). PI resistance was associated with age >24 years (P = .003) and CD4 cell count <200 cells/mm3 (P = .007). In multivariable analysis, only age >24 years was significantly associated (adjusted odds ratio, 4.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.69–13.38; P = .003) with major PI mutations. Third-line DRV/r- and InSTI-based therapy achieved virologic suppression in 29/36 patients (81%) after 6 months.ConclusionsThe prevelance of PI mutations was high. Adolescents and young adults had a lower risk of acquiring major PI resistance mutations, possibly due to poor adherence to ART. Third-line treatment with a regimen of Darunavir/r, Raltegravir/Dolutegravir, and optimized nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was effective.

Deep sequencing analysis of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase at baseline and time of failure in patients receiving rilpivirine in the phase III studies ECHO and THRIVE.

Minority variants (1.0-25.0%) were evaluated by deep sequencing (DS) at baseline and virological failure (VF) in a selection of antiretroviral treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected patients from the rilpivirine ECHO/THRIVE phase III studies. Linkage between frequently emerging resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) was determined. DS (llIumina®) and population sequencing (PS) results were available at baseline for 47 VFs and time of failure for 48 VFs; and at baseline for 49 responders matched for baseline characteristics. Minority mutations were accurately detected at frequencies down to 1.2% of the HIV-1 quasispecies. No baseline minority rilpivirine RAMs were detected in VFs; one responder carried 1.9% F227C. Baseline minority mutations associated with resistance to other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were detected in 8/47 VFs (17.0%) and 7/49 responders (14.3%). Baseline minority nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) RAMs M184V and L210W were each detected in one VF (none in responders). At failure, two patients without NNRTI RAMs by PS carried minority rilpivirine RAMs K101E and/or E138K; and five additional patients carried other minority NNRTI RAMs V90I, V106I, V179I, V189I, and Y188H. Overall at failure, minority NNRTI RAMs and NRTI RAMs were found in 29/48 (60.4%) and 16/48 VFs (33.3%), respectively. Linkage analysis showed that E138K and K101E were usually not observed on the same viral genome. In conclusion, baseline minority rilpivirine RAMs and other NNRTI/NRTI RAMs were uncommon in the rilpivirine arm of the ECHO and THRIVE studies. DS at failure showed emerging NNRTI resistant minority variants in seven rilpivirine VFs who had no detectable NNRTI RAMs by PS.

Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine-based regimens in treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients: a prospective cohort study.

IntroductionRilpivirine (RPV) is a new once-daily, non-nucleoside, reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). In treatment-naïve patients, RPV has shown non-inferior antiviral activity to efavirenz but data in treatment-experienced patients are more limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of RPV in treatment-experienced patients switching to a RPV-based regimen.MethodsBetween September 2012 and June 2013, all antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced HIV-1 infected patients with a plasma HIV-RNA level <50 cp/mL, and switching to a RPV-based regimen, were enrolled in this prospective monocentric cohort study. Clinical and laboratory data were collected every 3 months to assess safety and efficacy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with virologic success (HIV-RNA load <50 cp/mL) at 12 months using the FDA snapshot algorithm.ResultsA total of 281 patients (76% male, median age: 47 years, 56% MSM) were enrolled in this study. Median lymphocyte CD4 count at baseline was 640/mm3. Patients have received ART for a median of 7 years and viral replication was fully suppressed for a median of 3 years. Before the switch, 39% patients were treated with NNRTI, 52% with protease inhibitor and 7% with integrase inhibitor-based regimens. Reasons for switch were simplification (176 cases), adverse events (AEs) (93 cases) and others (12 cases). At month 12 (database frozen on June 2014) in the snapshot analysis, 56% of patients met virologic success, 5% experienced virologic failure (n=14) and 39% had no data in the window period. In the LOCF analysis (using data from the previous available visit before month 12), 89% patients were suppressed, 5% had virologic failure and 6% had no data. Genotypic resistance analysis was performed in 7/14 patients at the time of virologic failure (3 of whom had previous NRTI/NNRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs)), and new NNRTI and NRTI RAMs emerged in 4 patients. RPV-based regimen was generally well tolerated and only 6% of patients discontinued treatment for AEs. Grade 2–4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 39 patients: 6 had rashes, 13 neuropsychiatric symptoms, 10 GI symptoms, 10 biological abnormalities. At month 12, significant changes from baseline were seen for total and LDL cholesterol (−0.5 and −0.28 mmol/L, respectively, p<0.05 for both), and plasma creatinine (+5.8 µmol/L, p<10–4).ConclusionsIn patients fully suppressed on ART, switching to a RPV-based regimen in clinical practice was well tolerated and associated with few virologic failures.

96-Week Resistance Analyses of Rilpivirine in Treatment-Naive, HIV-1-Infected Adults from the Echo and Thrive Phase Iii Trials

In the ECHO/THRIVE 96-week efficacy analysis, the response rate was 78% with rilpivirine (RPV) and efavirenz (EFV) plus two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. For resistance analyses, virological failures (VFs) were genotyped and/or phenotyped at baseline and failure. In the overall 96-week resistance analyses, the proportion of VFs was higher with RPV (96/686, 14%) versus EFV (52/682, 8%), but similar within weeks 48-96 (22/686, 3% versus 16/682, 2%). In genotyped VFs, treatment-emergent non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were as common with RPV (46/86, 53%) versus EFV (20/42, 48%), but nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor RAMs were more common with RPV (48/86, 56%) than EFV (11/42, 26%). In RPV VFs, E138K+M184I remained the most frequent combination. Among RPV VFs with phenotypic RPV resistance, cross-resistance was observed with nevirapine (16/35, 46%), EFV (30/35, 86%) and etravirine (32/35, 91%). Among patients with baseline viral load (VL)≤100,000 copies/ml, there were fewer VFs (RPV: 28/368, 8%; EFV: 20/329, 6%), fewer VFs with treatment-emergent NNRTI RAMs (RPV: 10/27, 37%; EFV: 6/17, 35%), and less phenotypic resistance to RPV and other NNRTIs, than in patients with baseline VL>100,000 copies/ml (VFs: 68/318, 21% [RPV], 32/353, 9% [EFV]; NNRTI RAMs: 36/59, 61% [RPV], 14/32, 56% [EFV]). Among RPV VFs with baseline VL≤100,000 copies/ml observed within weeks 48-96, only 1/7 had phenotypic resistance to RPV. During the second year of treatment in ECHO/THRIVE, few VFs with emerging NNRTI RAMs (no new RPV RAMs) occurred.

Week 96 analysis of rilpivirine or efavirenz in HIV‐1‐infected patients with baseline viral load ≤ 100 000 copies/mL in the pooled ECHO and THRIVE phase 3, randomized, double‐blind trials

These 96-week, ECHO/THRIVE pooled analyses evaluated data for antiretroviral treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected adults with viral load (VL) ≤ 100 000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL receiving rilpivirine or efavirenz. ECHO and THRIVE were phase 3, randomized, double-blind trials. Patients received rilpivirine 25 mg once daily (qd) or efavirenz 600 mg qd, with a fixed (ECHO) or investigator-chosen (THRIVE) nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (N[t]RTI) background regimen. Response rate (the percentage of patients with VL < 50 copies/mL, using an intent-to-treat-population, time-to-loss-of-virological-response algorithm), virological failure (VF), resistance development, safety and tolerability were evaluated. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the rilpivirine (n = 368) and efavirenz (n = 329) groups. At week 96, response rates [84% for rilpivirine vs. 80% for efavirenz; difference 4.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.7% to 9.7%] and incidences of VF for the resistance analysis (VFres) (8% for rilpivirine vs. 6% for efavirenz; P = 0.46) were similar in the two groups. Among patients with VFres , a comparable proportion in each group developed nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). Among those with VFres , more patients in the rilpivirine group than in the efavirenz group developed N[t]RTI RAMs, mostly M184I/V. The mean (95% CI) CD4 cell count increased from baseline to week 96 by 224 (208-240) cells/μL in the rilpivirine group and by 206 (188-225) cells/μL in the efavirenz group. Treatment-related grade 2-4 overall adverse events, any rash and dizziness were less frequent for rilpivirine than for efavirenz (P < 0.0001). Rilpivirine demonstrated antiviral efficacy similar to that of efavirenz in antiretroviral treatment-naïve adults with baseline VL ≤ 100 000 copies/mL over 96 weeks. Frequencies of VFres and emergent NNRTI RAMs in each group were similar. More patients with VFres in the rilpivirine group than in the efavirenz group developed N[t]RTI RAMs (mostly M184I/V). Rilpivirine had a more favourable safety/tolerability profile than efavirenz.

In vitro and in vivo activities of AIC292, a novel HIV-1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor.

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are important and frequently used elements of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. However, the development of drug resistance, as well as the side effects of existing drugs, defines a medical need for novel NNRTIs with excellent tolerability, improved activity against NNRTI-resistant viruses, and a low barrier to resistance. Within the chemical class of diarylpyrazole-[imidazolidinone]-carboxamides, AIC292 was identified as a promising novel HIV-1 NNRTI and has successfully completed single-dose clinical phase I studies. Here, we report on the antiviral activity of AIC292, evaluated in vitro against wild-type and NNRTI-resistant HIV-1 isolates and in vivo using an engineered mouse xenograft model. AIC292 inhibited wild-type HIV-1 laboratory strains at low nanomolar concentrations, was well tolerated in different cell lines, and showed excellent selectivity in a lead profiling screen. In addition, activity of AIC292 could be demonstrated against a broad panel of wild-type HIV-1 group M and group O clinical isolates. AIC292 also retained activity against viruses harboring NNRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), including the most prevalent variants, K103N, Y181C, and G190A. Interestingly, viruses bearing the L100I RAM were hypersusceptible to AIC292. Two-drug combination assays showed no antagonistic interactions between AIC292 and representative marketed HIV drugs with regard to antiviral activity. Furthermore, AIC292 displayed potent antiviral in vivo efficacy in a mouse xenograft model when applied once daily. Taken together, these data show that AIC292 represents a molecule with the antiviral properties of a novel NNRTI for the treatment of HIV-1 infection.

National sentinel surveillance of transmitted drug resistance in antiretroviral-naive chronically HIV-infected patients in France over a decade: 2001-2011

As recommended by the French ANRS programme for the surveillance of HIV-1 resistance, we estimated the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in antiretroviral-naive, chronically HIV-1-infected patients. RAMs were sought in samples from 661 newly diagnosed HIV-1-infected patients in 2010/11 at 36 HIV clinical care centres. Weighted analyses were used to derive representative estimates of the percentage of patients with RAMs. At patient inclusion, the prevalence of virus with protease (PR) or reverse transcriptase (RT) RAMs was 9.0% (95% CI 6.8%-11.2%). No integrase RAMs were observed. The prevalences of protease inhibitor, nucleoside RT inhibitor and non-nucleoside RT inhibitor RAMs were 1.8%, 6.2% and 2.4%, respectively. Resistance to one, two and three classes of antiretroviral agent was observed in 7.9%, 0.9% and 0.2% of patients, respectively. The frequency of RAMs was higher in patients infected with B compared with non-B subtype virus (11.9% versus 5.1%, P = 0.003). Baseline characteristics (gender, age, country of transmission, CD4 cell count and viral load) were not associated with the prevalence of transmitted RAMs. However, men having sex with men (MSM) were more frequently infected with resistant virus than were other transmission groups (12.5% versus 5.8%, P = 0.003). Compared with the 2006/07 survey, the overall prevalence of resistance remained stable. However, a significant decrease in the frequency of virus with PR RAMs was observed in 2010/11 compared with the 2006/07 survey (1.8% versus 5.0%, P = 0.003). In France in 2010/11, the global prevalence of transmitted drug-resistant variants was 9.0%, and the prevalence was stable compared with the 2006/07 survey. MSM and B subtype-infected patients are the groups with a higher prevalence of drug resistance.

Pre-Existing Mutations in the Rilpivirine Phase Iii Trials Echo and Thrive: Prevalence and Impact on Virological Response

Rilpivirine (RPV), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), was approved for HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults based on data from two Phase III trials. In the screening population, the prevalence of 49 NNRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) and the impact of allowed NNRTI RAMs on virological response to an RPV- or efavirenz (EFV)-containing regimen were analysed. ECHO and THRIVE were global, Phase III, doubleblind, double-dummy, randomized trials in antiretroviral treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults to determine whether RPV 25 mg once daily had non-inferior efficacy versus EFV 600 mg once daily, both given with tenofovir/emtricitabine (ECHO) or tenofovir/emtricitabine, zidovudine/lamivudine or abacavir/lamivudine (THRIVE). The prevalence of 49 NNRTI RAMs, including the predefined list of 39 NNRTI RAMs used to exclude patients with potential resistance to RPV or EFV, was investigated at screening by population sequencing (including mixtures) using the virco(®)TYPE HIV-1 genotyping assay. Of the 1,796 screened patients in whom genotypic resistance results were available, 372 (21%) had NNRTI RAMs. Of 527 screening failures, 148 (28%) were due to the presence of NNRTI RAMs. The presence of allowed NNRTI RAMs was associated with comparable response rates to the overall population (RPV 84.3% versus EFV 82.3%, intent-to-treat time-to-loss-of-virological-response): V90I (82.4% and 100% for RPV and EFV, respectively), V106I (85.7% and 93.3%), V179I (87.7% and 94.0%) and V189I (100.0% and 88.9%). Analysis of the ECHO and THRIVE screened population suggests that transmitted NNRTI resistance is prevalent in treatment-naive patients but prevalence of the 15 RPV RAMs remains low. The four allowed NNRTI RAMs present at baseline did not affect RPV response at week 48.

Genotypic and Phenotypic Characterization of HIV-1 Isolates Obtained From Patients on Rilpivirine Therapy Experiencing Virologic Failure in the Phase 3 ECHO and THRIVE Studies

Genotypic and phenotypic characterization was performed of HIV-1 isolates from treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients experiencing virologic failure (VF) during treatment with the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTIs) rilpivirine or efavirenz in the pooled phase 3 studies ECHO and THRIVE. Among 686 patients receiving rilpivirine, 72 (10%) experienced VF versus 39 of 682 (6%) receiving efavirenz. In patients with low baseline viral load (VL) ≤100,000 copies per milliliter, the proportions of rilpivirine VFs (19 of 368) and efavirenz VFs (16 of 330) were the same (5%). In patients with high baseline VL >100,000 copies per milliliter, the proportion of VFs was higher with rilpivirine (53 of 318; 17%) than efavirenz (23 of 352; 7%). The rate of rilpivirine VF was comparable between HIV-1 subtype B-infected (11%) and nonsubtype B-infected (8%) patients. The absolute number of VFs with treatment-emergent NNRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) was higher for rilpivirine (most commonly E138K or K101E) than efavirenz (most commonly K103N), but relative proportions were similar [63% (39 of 62) vs. 54% (15 of 28), respectively]. More rilpivirine VFs had treatment-emergent nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor RAMs than efavirenz VFs [68% (42 of 62) versus 32% (9 of 28), respectively], most commonly M184I and M184V. The proportion of rilpivirine VFs with RAMs in patients with low baseline VL was lower than in those with high baseline VL [38% (6 of 16) versus 72% (33 of 46) for NNRTI RAMs and 44% (7 of 16) versus 76% (35 of 46) for nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor RAMs, respectively]. In summary, VF and treatment-emergent reverse transcriptase RAMs were similar at low baseline VL but more frequent at high baseline VL in rilpivirine-treated than in efavirenz-treated patients. The frequent emergence of E138K, especially in combination with M184I, in rilpivirine VFs is a unique finding of these trials.

Characterization of Genotypic and Phenotypic Changes in HIV-1-Infected Patients with Virologic Failure on an Etravirine-Containing Regimen in the DUET-1 and DUET-2 Clinical Studies

The randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III DUET studies enrolled treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients. We examined the genotypic and phenotypic changes at endpoint relative to baseline, including the emergence of individual reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations, in patients who received the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) etravirine and experienced virologic failure by rebound by the time of the Week 96 analysis. Patients received etravirine 200 mg twice-daily in combination with a background regimen containing darunavir/ritonavir, investigator-selected nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and optional enfuvirtide. Virologic failure by rebound occurred in 93 (15.5%) etravirine-treated patients (compared with 170 [28.1%] placebo-treated patients). Patients experiencing virologic failure had more baseline antiretroviral resistance and lower activity of the background regimen relative to those not experiencing failure. Emergence of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations was observed in 55 of 93 patients. The most frequently emerging RT mutations were V179F, V179I, and Y181C, with positions K101 and E138 also showing frequent changes. Mutations usually emerged in a background of multiple other NNRTI mutations and were, in most cases, associated with a decrease in phenotypic sensitivity to etravirine at endpoint. Further analysis is needed to clarify the role of mutations at position 138 as determinants of etravirine resistance.

Resistance-Associated Mutations to Etravirine (TMC-125) in Antiretroviral-Naïve Patients Infected with Non-B HIV-1 Subtypes

Susceptibility to etravirine (ETR), an expanded-spectrum nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is dependent on the type and number of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). Studies have shown that some HIV-1 subtypes may have natural polymorphisms described as ETR RAMs. This study addresses the prevalence of ETR RAMs in treatment-naïve patients infected with HIV-1 non-B subtypes and its potential impact on ETR susceptibility. The prevalence of ETR RAMs in 726 antiretroviral-naïve patients infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes was studied. ETR genotypic resistance was interpreted according to Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA and Stanford algorithms. NNRTI phenotypic susceptibilities of samples with at least one ETR RAM were measured. Overall, 75 (10.3%) of 726 sequences harbored at least one ETR RAM: sequences from 72 patients (10%) each had one ETR RAM, and sequences from 3 patients (0.4%) each had two ETR RAMs (V90I and Y181C in one case and V90I and A98G in two cases). None of the viruses had three or more ETR RAMs, and none were consequently classified as resistant to ETR. All sequences with two ETR RAMs belonged to subtype CRF02_AG. The presence of one ETR RAM was statistically more frequent in subtype CRF02_AG than in other non-B subtypes (P=0.004). Three new mutation profiles (E138A and V179I, Y181C and H221Y, and V90I and Y181C) showing decreased ETR phenotypic susceptibility were identified. In conclusion, although the prevalence of ETR RAMs in treatment-naïve patients infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes was 10%, in most cases this had no significant impact on ETR susceptibility. However, the transmission of drug-resistant viruses with Y181C in a non-B genetic background has a potential for impact on ETR susceptibility.

Compilation and prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are an important component of antiretroviral therapy for HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected patients. Development of NNRTI resistance can lead to treatment failure and is conferred by the presence of specific resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in the reverse transcriptase. In addition to the widely used list of NNRTI RAMs provided by the International AIDS Society-USA HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutation Group, which were identified on the basis of clinical experience with the approved NNRTIs, a more comprehensive list of NNRTI RAMs is needed to guide the study of baseline and emerging resistance to new NNRTIs. We conducted an extensive review of the existing literature on NNRTI resistance, together with several in vitro and in vivo studies on the mechanism of HIV-1 resistance to approved NNRTIs and to NNRTIs formerly or currently in clinical development. In total, 44 NNRTI RAMs were identified. These included V90I, A98G, L100I, K1O1E/P/Q, K103H/N/S/T, V106A/I/M, V108I, E138G/K/Q, V179D/E/F/G/I, Y181C/I/V, Y188C/H/L, V189I, G190A/C/E/Q/S, H221Y, P225H, F227C/L, M230I/L, P236L, K238N/T and Y318F. These NNRTI RAMs were observed, either alone or in combination with others, ranging in frequency from 0.02% to 56.96% in a panel of 101,679 NNRTI-resistant isolates submitted to Virco BVBA (Mechelen, Belgium) for routine clinical resistance testing. Phenotypical data from site-directed mutants helped to establish the contribution of each mutation to NNRTI resistance. The list of 44 NNRTI RAMs compiled in this study provides a comprehensive overview of mutations that play a role in HIV-1 NNRTI resistance and can be used to guide further in vitro and in vivo research on the mechanisms of HIV-1 NNRTI resistance.

Polymorphism and drug selected mutations of reverse transcriptase gene in 102 HIV‐1 infected patients living in China

Few data are available for genotypic patterns within human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) in drug-naive patients and RT inhibitor (RTI) treated patients in China. This study aimed at characterizing the polymorphism of RT HIV-1 in the absence of drug treatment and to identify known and unknown mutations emerging under RTI selective pressure. The HIV-1 RT gene from 21 drug-naive patients and 81 RTI treated patients from three provinces in China was analyzed. Most patients (>80%) received a triple regimen including stavudine (d4T) plus didanosine (ddI) and nevirapine (NVP), or d4T plus lamivudine (3TC) and efavirenz (EFV), or zidovudine (AZT) +ddI + NVP. In untreated patients, four highly polymorphic positions were found (122, 200, 207, and 211). In treated patients, two patterns of resistance associated mutations (RAMs) were observed: (1) K65R (9.8%), L74V (7.4%), M184V (7.4%), Q151M (5%), and thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) (9.3%) including T215Y (5.5%), in patients who underwent ddI + d4T + NVP. (2) T215Y (23%), M184V (20%), and TAMs (15.4%) in patients receiving d4T + 3TC + EFV. In all cases, a high prevalence of non-nucleoside RTIs (NNRTI) RAMs (41.9%) was found. Four RTI suspected new RAMs were described at position 142, 221, 224, and 228. An association between H221Y and L228H/R with Y181C was noted. These data highlight the predominant spread of NNRTI RAM in China, depict the specific genotypic pattern of RTI selected mutations in China, and suggest the association of newly described mutations with RTI therapy.

Dawn of non-nucleoside inhibitor-based anti-HIV microbicides

The emergence of HIV/AIDS as a disease spread through sexual intercourse has prompted the search for safe and effective vaginal and rectal microbicides for curbing mucosal viral transmission via semen. Since endogenous reverse transcription is implicated in augmenting the sexual transmission of HIV-1 infection, potential microbicides should have the inherent ability to optimally inhibit both wild-type and drug-escape mutants. The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), which bind to an allosteric site on RT, are an important arsenal of drugs against HIV-1. The clinical success of NNRTI-based HIV/AIDS therapies has led to extensive structural and molecular modelling studies of enzyme complexes and chemical synthesis of second- and third-generation NNRTIs. Rationally designed NNRTIs deduced from changes in binding pocket size, shape and residue character that result from clinically observed NNRTI resistance-associated mutations exhibit high binding affinity for HIV-1 RT and robust anti-HIV activity against the wild-type and drug-escape mutants without cytotoxicity. Notably, membrane permeable tight binding NNRTIs have the ability to inactivate cell-free as well as cell-associated HIV-1 in semen without metabolic activation. Consequently, NNRTIs currently under development as experimental microbicides include thiourea-PETT (where PETT stands for phenethylthiazolylthiourea) derivatives (PHI-236, PHI-346 and PHI-443), urea-PETT derivatives (MIV-150), oxypyrimidines (S-DABOs), thiocarboxanilides (UC-781) and diarylpyrimidines (TMC-120). Mucoadhesive formulations of these NNRTIs have been studied for safety and efficacy in animal models and some have entered Phase I safety testing in humans. This review focuses on the structural, biological and preclinical studies relevant to the clinical development of these NNRTIs as molecular virucides intended to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV-1.

Mutations other than 103N in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase (RT) emerge from K103R polymorphism under non-nucleoside RT inhibitor pressure

K103N mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) confers high-level resistance against non-nucleoside RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) and it easily occurs partly because it arises by a single nucleotide substitution from wild-type K103. There are polymorphisms at codon 103 of HIV-1 RT. We found K103R polymorphic mutation in 3.3% of treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients. R103N does not seem to occur as easily as K103N because R103N requires two nucleotide substitutions. To induce NNRTI resistance-associated mutations, HIV-1 K103R was propagated in the presence of increasing concentrations of efavirez (EFV) or nevirapine (NVP). V179D emerged in all three EFV cultures and in two of four NVP cultures. R103G emerged by a single nucleotide substitution in one of three EFV cultures. R103N did not emerge in any of 7 NNRTI cultures. Analysis of recombinant HIV-1s showed that HIV-1 K103R/V179D was significantly resistant and HIV-1 K103G was moderately resistant against EFV and NVP.

Nevirapine-selected mutations Y181I/C of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase confer cross-resistance to stavudine.

Stavudine administration did not increase the frequency of Y181I/C reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-treated patients. However, recombinant Y181C HIV-1 showed reduced stavudine susceptibility with respect to both recombinant wild-type and K103N HIV-1 strains. In addition, recombinant Y181I RT enzyme showed reduced susceptibility to stavudine with respect to both wild-type and K103N RT. A previously unnoticed role of Y181I/C RT changes selected by nevirapine or other NNRTI in determining stavudine resistance is documented.

Prevalence of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations and polymorphisms in NNRTI-naïve HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of treatment containing nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) could be compromised in NNRTI-naÏve patients already harboring a virus resistant to NNRTIs. On the contrary, hypersusceptibility to NNRTIs in patients having failed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-containing regimens has been described and has been associated with improved outcome. METHOD: We assessed the prevalence of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations or polymorphisms in 146 antiretroviral-naÏve patients and in 181 HIV-infected patients who were given an NNRTI-based regimen. We phenotypically evaluated the NNRTI susceptibility of 41 strains presenting with amino acid substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance. RESULTS: In the 268 genotypically analyzable samples, the overall prevalence of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations was 2% (6/268 patients). The prevalence of strains with amino acid substitutions at reverse transcriptase (RT) gene positions (A98, K101, K103, V106, V108, V179) involved in NNRTI resistance was 15%. Hypersusceptibility to NNRTI was rare (2%, 1/41) in those samples. RT substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance were not associated with a significantly worse virologic outcome in NNRTI-treated patients. Our understanding of small shifts in IC50 values (higher or lower) toward NNRTI is very limited. The significance of many RT mutations on NNRTI susceptibility is not clear. CONCLUSION: In contrast to resistance mutations, RT substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance are frequent. They are not associated with a worse virologic outcome or with decreased phenotypic susceptibility to NNRTIs. It may be prudent not to rule out the use of NNRTIs in patients with small shifts in IC50 values or poorly understood mutations.

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance among patients failing a nevirapine plus protease inhibitor-containing regimen

To determine the rate of nevirapine resistance in patients failing a nevirapine plus protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen, and whether these isolates remain susceptible to other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI). A retrospective cohort study in two tertiary university hospitals. Eighty-eight HIV-infected, NNRTI-naive patients receiving nevirapine plus PI as a rescue regimen after PI treatment failure. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance data at inclusion (73 and 60 plasma samples, respectively) and after 24 weeks (53 and 42 samples). Baseline phenotypic susceptibility to nevirapine was found in 70% of patients, and similar data were observed for efavirenz (91%) and delavirdine (71%). NNRTI resistance-associated mutations were found in 11 patients (12.5%). At 24 weeks, resistant isolates to nevirapine were found in 92% of patients, and correlated with similar resistance to efavirenz (68%) and delavirdine (73%). In the genotypic analysis, the Y181 C mutation was observed in 76% of mutants, and the most common changes were a combination of mutations at positions Y181C/K103N (23%) and the single mutation Y181C (15%). The development of nevirapine resistance was associated with baseline resistance to PI included in the regimen (P= 0.01). For isolates containing the single amino acid substitution Y181C, 29% remained fully susceptible to efavirenz, whereas 14% showed intermediate resistance to efavirenz and delavirdine. The failure of a nevirapine plus PI-containing regimen is associated with nevirapine resistance in most patients, with the most common mutation occurring at amino acid residue 181. Although there is a high degree of cross-resistance among NNRTI, nearly one third of resistant isolates carrying the single Y181C mutation remain susceptible to efavirenz.