Non-nucleoside Analogue Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Research Articles

Surveillance of HIV antiretroviral drug resistance in treated individuals in England: 1998-2000.

To establish a surveillance programme for HIV drug resistance within the UK covering the years from 1998 to 2000, following the introduction of triple combination antiretroviral therapy. Sentinel sites included large, medium sized and small clinical centres. Data were analysed until December 2000. Of nearly 300 samples tested, results from 91, 92 and 92 patients, respectively in 1998, 1999 and 2000, who were receiving HIV therapy with a viral load >2000 copies/mL, the majority had viruses with some degree of drug resistance. Overall, the presence of any resistance increased between 1998 and 1999, and fell again in 2000 (69% versus 88% versus 55%). However, major differences were observed between drug classes, such that non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance rose dramatically over the period studied. We show that this correlated with increased NNRTI prescribing. Furthermore, an overall increase in prevalence of viruses with resistance to one or more drugs within all three available classes was observed. A higher prevalence of drug resistance was observed in patients from smaller clinical centres. This is the first such sentinel surveillance dataset from the UK, and is unique in correlating these data with national antiretroviral prescribing patterns. Our findings are relevant to the increased transmission of HIV drug resistance observed over this period.

Clinical efficacy of antiretroviral combination therapy based on protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors: indirect comparison of controlled trials

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of triple antiretroviral regimens based on protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in adults positive for antibodies to HIV-1.Design Systematic review...

Determinants of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in Chinese HIV/AIDS patients.

Drug adherence is crucial to the success of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the treatment of HIV disease. Adherence to HAART and its determinants may, however, differ across HIV/AIDS populations. We retrospectively studied drug adherence by self-report in HIV-1 infected Chinese patients who have been on HAART for at least 1 year as at the end of year 2000. HAART is defined as three or more antiretrovirals with at least one protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor. The last drug adherence level assessed by self-report in 161 Chinese patients were: grade A (100%) - 130, 80.7%; grade B (95-99%) - 25, 15.5%; grade C (90-94%) - three, 1.9% and grade D (< 90%) - three, 1.9%. Patients with full adherence were more likely to have undetectable (< 500 copies/mL) plasma virus level (adjusted OR, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.75-12.33). Patients' demographics, HIV disease status and antiretroviral regimen did not affect adherence. Partial drug adherence was, however, independently associated with the psychosocial factors of missing clinic appointments (adjusted OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.23-8.33), forgetfulness (adjusted OR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.64-12.5) and a busy work life (adjusted OR, 6.67; 95% CI, 1.75-25). There were similarities and differences in determinants affecting HAART adherence in Chinese compared with other patients. Psychosocial factors rather than HIV disease or treatment were more important factors in our Chinese patients. The relevance of patient populations and care setting for adherence to HAART shall be further studied.

Potent inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by template analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors derived by SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment).

RNA aptamers derived by SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment) and specific for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) bind at the template-primer cleft with high affinity and inhibit its activity. In order to determine the potential of such template analog RT inhibitors (TRTIs) to inhibit HIV-1 replication, 10 aptamers were expressed with flanking, self-cleaving ribozymes to generate aptamer RNA transcripts with minimal flanking sequences. From these, six aptamers (70.8,13, 70.15, 80.55,65, 70.28, 70.28t34, and 1.1) were selected based on binding constants (K(d)) and the degree of inhibition of RT in vitro (50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)]). These six aptamers were each stably expressed in 293T cells followed by transfection of a molecular clone of HIV(R3B). Analysis of the virion particles revealed that the aptamers were encapsidated into the virions released and that the packaging of the viral genomic RNA or the cognate primer, tRNA(Lys)(3), was apparently unaffected. Infectivity of virions produced from 293T cell lines expressing the aptamers, as measured by infecting LuSIV reporter cells, was reduced by 90 to 99.5% compared to virions released from cells not expressing any aptamers. PCR analysis of newly made viral DNA upon infection with virions containing any of the three aptamers with the strongest binding affinities (70.8,13, 70.15, and 80.55,65) showed that all three were able to form the minus-strand strong-stop DNA. However, virions with the aptamers 70.8 and 70.15 were defective for first-strand transfer, suggesting an early block in viral reverse transcription. Jurkat T cells expressing each of the three aptamers, when infected with HIV(R3B), completely blocked the spread of HIV in culture. We found that the replication of nucleoside analog RT inhibitor-, nonnucleoside analog RT inhibitor-, and protease inhibitor-resistant viruses was strongly suppressed by the three aptamers. In addition, some of the HIV subtypes were severely inhibited (subtypes A, B, D, E, and F), while others were either moderately inhibited (subtypes C and O) or were naturally resistant to inhibition (chimeric A/D subtype). As virion-encapsidated TRTIs can predispose virions for inhibition immediately upon entry, they should prove to be efficacious agents in gene therapy approaches for AIDS.

Avascular necrosis of the bone in HIV-infected patients: incidence and associated factors.

All cases of avascular necrosis of the bone (AVN) diagnosed in HIV-infected patients from 1990 to 2000 in two Spanish provinces were examined. The frequency of AVN has increased since 1996, reaching a high of 1.19 cases per 1000 HIV-infected patients in the year 2000. AVN was predominantly seen in patients with advanced HIV disease and 86% had at least one risk factor previously associated with AVN. Ninety-one percent had had previous exposure to antiretroviral drugs and 70% had been given HAART before developing AVN.

Chronic hyperlactatemia in HIV-infected patients taking antiretroviral therapy.

To determine the prevalence, course and risk factors for hyperlactatemia in HIV-infected patients. A prospective, longitudinal study of venous lactate concentrations over an 18-month period in 349 participants of the Western Australian HIV Cohort Study. In 516 patient-years of observation, two patients experienced severe fulminant lactic acidosis (lactate > 5 mmol/l) and hepatic steatosis attributable to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). A further five patients with lesser elevations of lactate (2.8-4.1 mmol/l) but with symptoms of nausea or abdominal discomfort and evidence of hepatic steatosis had NRTI therapy revised, with relief of symptoms and a fall in lactate levels. Most remaining patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) had mild, chronic, asymptomatic hyperlactatemia, with mean lactate level between 1.5 mmol/l and 3.5 mmol/l most commonly. Longitudinal data was analysed in a non-linear mixed effects growth model which indicated that average lactate levels rose after the start of HAART but tended to stabilise at low-grade elevation, with an average 0.23 mmol/l greater long term level in stavudine users compared with zidovudine users (p < 0.01). A multiple linear regression model showed that the association between stavudine and higher lactate level was not confounded by longer duration of total NRTI exposure. Risk of hyperlactatemia was not significantly associated with use of other NRTIs, protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors or multiple immunological and virological factors in multivariate analyses. Chronic, compensated, asymptomatic hyperlactatemia is common in patients taking HAART. Decompensated, life-threatening lactic acidosis/hepatic steatosis is rare. Treatment with stavudine appears to be the predominant risk factor for development of chronic hyperlactatemia.

An Open-Label Randomized Trial to Evaluate Different Therapeutic Strategies of Combination Therapy in HIV-1 Infection: Design, Rationale, and Methods of the Initio Trial

This article discusses the design of an ongoing open-label, randomized trial comparing three strategies of initial and subsequent HIV therapy in terms of long-term immunological and virological effect. The three treatment arms are (1) didanosine (ddI) plus stavudine (d4T) plus efavirenz (EFV) followed by zidovudine (ZDV) plus lamivudine (3TC) plus abacavir (ABC) plus nelfinavir (NFV); (2) ddI plus d4T plus NFV followed by ZDV plus 3TC plus ABC plus EFV; (3) ddI plus d4T plus EFV plus NFV followed by ZDV plus 3TC plus ABC plus saquinavir plus ritonavir. The primary objective is to determine whether it is best to start with a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen, a non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimen, or with a regimen containing both a PI and an NNRTI. The aim is to recruit over 1000 patients followed for at least 3 years. The entry criteria are broad with no restriction on stage of disease, CD4 count, or HIV viral load. The criteria for therapeutic failure determining change of treatment are not defined and are left to the clinicians, but randomization is stratified by country and by the current criteria used for changing treatment. We describe the rationale behind various aspects of the design and discuss the complexities involved in undertaking such a large trial in HIV-infected patients from 180 clinical sites in 17 countries. Control Clin Trials 2001;22:160–175

Patterns of Resistance Mutations to Antiretroviral Drugs in Extensively Treated HIV-1–Infected Patients With Failure of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

Summary: Resistance-mutation patterns in the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease genes of HIV-1 were analyzed in 22 patients who had been extensively pretreated and who failed to respond to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The number of mutations ranged from 8 to 19 (median, 13): 4 to 12 (median, 6) mutations in the RT gene, and 4 to 8 (median, 7) mutations in the protease gene. In the RT gene, the most frequent resistance mutations were found at codons 215 (100%), 41 (95%), 67 (91%), and 210 (77%). Multidrug-resistant mutation patterns including Q151M and insertion mutations at codon 69, which confer cross-resistance to the different nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors were detected in 1 and 3 patients, respectively; 1 patient with insertion mutation displayed a NGQCV sequence at codons 67 to 70. In the protease gene, the most frequent mutations were found at codons 63 (95%), 10 (86%), 90(86%), 71(77%), 46 (50%), 36 (45%), and 84 (45%). Genotypic resistance to zidovudine, saquinavir, and indinavir was found in 100% of the patients. All patients showed also resistance or possible resistance to stavudine, abacavir, ritonavir, and nelfinavir. Mutations conferring genotypic resistance to nonnucleoside analogue RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) were found in 12 (80%) of the NNRTI-experienced patients and 1 of 7 NNRTI-naive patients. Our results indicate that failure of HAART in the patients extensively pretreated results from the multiplicity of RT and protease mutations that confer genotypic resistance to almost all available antiretroviral drugs. In these patients, genotypic resistance tests confirm the lack of alternative salvage therapy strategies based on the currently available antiretroviral drugs.

Patterns of resistance mutations to antiretroviral drugs in extensively treated HIV-1-infected patients with failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Resistance-mutation patterns in the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease genes of HIV-1 were analyzed in 22 patients who had been extensively pretreated and who failed to respond to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The number of mutations ranged from 8 to 19 (median, 13): 4 to 12 (median, 6) mutations in the RT gene, and 4 to 8 (median, 7) mutations in the protease gene. In the RT gene, the most frequent resistance mutations were found at codons 215 (100%), 41 (95%), 67 (91%), and 210 (77%). Multidrug-resistant mutation patterns including Q151M and insertion mutations at codon 69, which confer cross-resistance to the different nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors were detected in 1 and 3 patients, respectively; 1 patient with insertion mutation displayed a NGQGV [corrected] sequence at codons 67 to 70. In the protease gene, the most frequent mutations were found at codons 63 (95%), 10 (86%), 90(86%), 71(77%), 46 (50%), 36 (45%), and 84 (45%). Genotypic resistance to zidovudine, saquinavir, and indinavir was found in 100% of the patients. All patients showed also resistance or possible resistance to stavudine, abacavir, ritonavir, and nelfinavir. Mutations conferring genotypic resistance to nonnucleoside analogue RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) were found in 12 (80%) of the NNRTI-experienced patients and 1 of 7 NNRTI-naive patients. Our results indicate that failure of HAART in the patients extensively pretreated results from the multiplicity of RT and protease mutations that confer genotypic resistance to almost all available antiretroviral drugs. In these patients, genotypic resistance tests confirm the lack of alternative salvage therapy strategies based on the currently available antiretroviral drugs.

Salvage therapy with abacavir plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and a protease inhibitor in heavily pre-treated HIV-1 infected patients

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) may fail, especially in pre-treated patients. To examine retrospectively whether heavily pre-treated patients not responding to HAART at least once respond to a salvage therapy with abacavir, a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) plus a non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and one or two protease inhibitors (PI). We retrospectively identified and analysed patients followed in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study with > 1000 HIV RNA copies/ml on HAART, naive to abacavir who were switched to abacavir plus one NNRTI (efavirenz or nevirapine) and one or two PI which had not been used in the previous HAART. Of 23 identified HIV-infected patients with four (median) therapy changes before salvage, 10 patients (43%) achieved a decrease of plasma HIV RNA > 0.5 log10 at 6 months of therapy. After 6 months only two patients had an HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml, one of them < 50 copies/ml. Seven patients increased their CD4 cell counts by > 30% above baseline. Three patients, all with CD4 cell counts < 100 x 10(6)/l before salvage therapy had a > 30% decline in CD4 cell count. An extended number of resistance-associated mutations was found in almost all patients at baseline. One patient had two new AIDS-defining events. Five patients (22%) discontinued treatment because of side-effects, mainly occurrence of a rash. Salvage therapy in intensively pre-treated patients has a low virological success rate despite usage of abacavir and NNRTI. Nevertheless, this did not correlate with immunological and clinical course. This study emphasizes the difficulty of second-line treatment in HIV-1 infection and stresses the need for new compounds.

A Novel Genotype Encoding a Single Amino Acid Insertion and Five Other Substitutions Between Residues 64 and 74 of the HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Confers High-Level Cross-Resistance to Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Summary: We investigated HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) polymorphisms of plasma isolates from 98 HIV-1-infected study subjects with >2 years of antiretroviral therapy who were failing their current protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen. In 1 patient, we detected a virus with a heavily mutated β3-β4 connecting loop of the HIV-1 RT fingers subdomain, consisting of a single aspartate codon insertion between positions 69 and 70 and five additional variations: 64N, K65, K66, 67G, 68Y, T69, Ins D, 70R, W71, R72, K73, 74I. Mutants with the recently described 2-aa insertions between codons 68 and 70 of RT were detected in another 3 patients. Among the four isolates with the 1- or 2-aa insertions, the novel genotype was the most refractory to therapy and displayed the highest level of phenotypic resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Follow-up samples demonstrated that the novel mutant represents a stable genetic rearrangement and that the amino acid insertions can coexist with nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) mutations resulting in phenotypic resistance to both NRTIs and NNRTIs. An increasing number of HIV-1 isolates containing various insertions in the β3-β4 hairpin of the HIV-1 RT fingers subdomain appear to emerge after prolonged therapy with different NRTIs, and these polymorphisms can confer multiple drug resistance against NRTIs.

A novel genotype encoding a single amino acid insertion and five other substitutions between residues 64 and 74 of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase confers high-level cross-resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Abacavir CNA2007 International Study Group.

We investigated HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) polymorphisms of plasma isolates from 98 HIV-1-infected study subjects with >2 years of antiretroviral therapy who were failing their current protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen. In 1 patient, we detected a virus with a heavily mutated beta3-beta4 connecting loop of the HIV-1 RT fingers subdomain, consisting of a single aspartate codon insertion between positions 69 and 70 and five additional variations: 64N, K65, K66, 67G, 68Y, T69, Ins D, 70R, W71, R72, K73, 74I. Mutants with the recently described 2-aa insertions between codons 68 and 70 of RT were detected in another 3 patients. Among the four isolates with the 1- or 2-aa insertions, the novel genotype was the most refractory to therapy and displayed the highest level of phenotypic resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Follow-up samples demonstrated that the novel mutant represents a stable genetic rearrangement and that the amino acid insertions can coexist with nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) mutations resulting in phenotypic resistance to both NRTIs and NNRTIs. An increasing number of HIV-1 isolates containing various insertions in the beta3-beta4 hairpin of the HIV-1 RT fingers subdomain appear to emerge after prolonged therapy with different NRTIs, and these polymorphisms can confer multiple drug resistance against NRTIs.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (Haart) for the treatment of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) refers to a broad category of treatment regimens usually comprised of three or more antiretroviral drugs that, in previously untreated HIV-1-infected patients, are expected to reduce plasma virus levels below the limits of detection. Most HAART regimens include drugs from at least two of the three classes of antiretroviral therapy (nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, non-nucleoside analog RT inhibitors, and protease inhibitors). In deciding when to initiate antiretroviral therapy, physicians and their patients must balance the virological and immunological benefits of early treatment with the costs of drug therapy, the risk of drug side effects, and the risk of drug resistance if adherence is suboptimal. In previously untreated patients, HIV-1 replication can be suppressed indefinitely with certain HAART regimens. In previously treated patients, the benefits of HAART are often significantly diminished.

Management of HIV Infection

HIV disease is a serious global health problem and a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It has recently been estimated that more than 30 million adults and 1.1 million children are infected with HIV; it is expected that 40 million people will have acquired the virus by the year 2000. The high costs of treating patients with HIV infection place a heavy burden on healthcare resources. Primary aims of management of patients with HIV infection are decreased morbidity and improved survival via sustained suppression of HIV replication and the prevention of emergence of drug-resistant virus. Triple therapy with combinations of antiretroviral drugs is now regarded as optimal treatment and is the standard of care in most developed countries. Two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, such as lamivudine and zidovudine, plus a protease inhibitor or a non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor are among the combinations of drugs recommended for initial or second-line treatment. A combination formulation of lamivudine and zidovudine has recently become available; it can be taken as a single tablet twice daily rather than as 8 tablets per day when the 2 drugs are given separately. Combination therapy with lamivudine and zidovudine (as dual therapy or in combination with another nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor) decreases the rate of HIV disease progression in antiretroviral therapy-naive or -experienced patients. Dual therapy with lamivudine and zidovudine or triple therapy with lamivudine and zidovudine-containing regimens produces reductions in HIV RNA levels and improvements in CD4+ cell counts. Lamivudine plus zidovudine therapy, alone or in combination with other drugs, is generally well tolerated. Gastrointestinal symptoms are the most common events reported during dual therapy with the 2 drugs. Neutropenia and anaemia may also occur during combination therapy with lamivudine and zidovudine and blood counts must be monitored regularly for signs of haematological toxicity. Thus, the combination formulation of lamivudine and zidovudine has a potentially useful role as a component of initial or second-line treatment regimens for patients with HIV infection. Reducing the number of tablets that have to be taken each day simplifies the administration of lamivudine and zidovudine. The combination formulation is likely to be particularly beneficial in the management of patients who find it difficult to adhere to more complex treatment regimens.

The combination of tat and NF-κB inhibitor is more effective to suppress the HIV reactivation than either alone: Toshihiko Kira 1)2) Koh-ichi Hashimoto 2) Takashi Okamoto 3) Masanori Baba 4) Shiro Shigeta 2)1Dept. Pharmacology, Medical School, Yale Univ. 2)Dept. Microbiology, Fukushima Medical College 3)Dept. Molecular Genetics, Medical School, Nagoya City Univ. 4) Center for Chronic Infections Diseases, Medical School, Kagoshima

This article discusses the design of an ongoing open-label, randomized trial comparing three strategies of initial and subsequent HIV therapy in terms of long-term immunological and virological effect. The three treatment arms are (1) didanosine (ddI) plus stavudine (d4T) plus efavirenz (EFV) followed by zidovudine (ZDV) plus lamivudine (3TC) plus abacavir (ABC) plus nelfinavir (NFV); (2) ddI plus d4T plus NFV followed by ZDV plus 3TC plus ABC plus EFV; (3) ddI plus d4T plus EFV plus NFV followed by ZDV plus 3TC plus ABC plus saquinavir plus ritonavir. The primary objective is to determine whether it is best to start with a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen, a non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimen, or with a regimen containing both a PI and an NNRTI. The aim is to recruit over 1000 patients followed for at least 3 years. The entry criteria are broad with no restriction on stage of disease, CD4 count, or HIV viral load. The criteria for therapeutic failure determining change of treatment are not defined and are left to the clinicians, but randomization is stratified by country and by the current criteria used for changing treatment. We describe the rationale behind various aspects of the design and discuss the complexities involved in undertaking such a large trial in HIV-infected patients from 180 clinical sites in 17 countries. Control Clin Trials 2001;22:160–175