Several reptile species have been described as hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease, and therefore, they have become vertebrates of epidemiological interest. In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in animal welfare, especially in populations with small numbers where lethal sampling could have catastrophic consequences, and non-lethal methodologies have been developed for detecting zoonotic parasites. In this study, we compared three non-lethal sampling methodologies for detecting T. cruzi DNA in 21 captured specimens of the native lizard Liolaemus monticola, collected from the semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem of Chile. Specimens were subjected to xenodiagnosis (XD), tail clipping, and living syringe sampling procedures to evaluate whether lizards could serve as sentinel species for T. cruzi in endemic regions. To detect the protozoan, real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on the DNA extracted from the samples (intestinal contents, tail tissues, and blood from living syringes). Trypanosoma cruzi DNA was detected in 12 of 21 lizards, considering all three methodologies. By XD, 12 specimens showed infection (57.1 %), and both living syringe and tail sampling methodologies detected only one infected lizard (4.8 %). Therefore, T. cruzi can be detected in lizards by qPCR using the three methodologies but XD is by far the most effective non-lethal detection methodology. The use of tail and living syringe methodologies showed a large underestimation; however, they might be options for monitoring the presence of T. cruzi in lizard populations when large sample sizes are available.
Read full abstract