Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results Research Articles

Unexpected Findings of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in Prenatal Screening of Chromosome Abnormality Based on Cell-Free Fetal DNA.

This study aims to assess the feasibility of detecting and diagnosing Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) during prenatal screening for chromosome abnormalities using cell-free fetal DNA extracted from peripheral blood samples of pregnant women. Two pregnant women identified as high risk through noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) underwent amniocentesis to obtain fetal cells. Subsequent fetal chromosomal karyotyping was conducted, and genomic DNA from fetal cells was extracted for copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq) analysis, complemented by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to detect deletions or duplications within the DMD gene. NIPT results for the two samples indicated potential abnormalities involving chromosomes 21 and 18. However, karyotype analysis of the fetuses revealed no abnormalities. CNV-Seq identified deletions of 0.28 and 0.18 Mb within chromosome Xp21.1, encompassing the DMD gene, in each fetus. In family 1, MLPA results indicated a maternal heterozygous deletion spanning exons 12 to 41 in the DMD gene, while the fetus exhibited deletions in exons 12 to 41. In family 2, MLPA results confirmed normal DMD gene status in the pregnant woman's peripheral blood genomic DNA but revealed a fetal deletion spanning exons 48 to 52. Both fetuses were diagnosed with DMD and subsequently underwent termination. Abnormalities identified through NIPT necessitate further invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures. For cases involving chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications, a combination of karyotyping and CNV-Seq testing is essential for comprehensive diagnosis. NIPT followed by CNV-Seq may offer insights into large exon deletions within the DMD gene in specific instances. · NIPT results can offer valuable insights into the deletion and duplication of DMD gene for the fetus.. · It's crucial to notice unexpected findings in NIPT.. · A combination of karyotyping and CNV-Seq testing is essential for comprehensive diagnosis..

Is intermediate risk really intermediate? Comparison of karyotype and non-invasive prenatal testing results of pregnancies at intermediate risk of trisomy 21 on maternal serum screening.

The purpose of this study was to assess the additional contribution of karyotyping compared with genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for pregnancies at intermediate risk for trisomy 21 (T21), calculated using the maternal serum screening without major structural anomalies detected through sonography. Karyotype results of all pregnancies undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing between January 2013 and March 2022 were obtained from a large hospital-based laboratory. Pregnancies with no major structural anomalies on ultrasound (including soft markers) and an intermediate risk for T21 on maternal serum screening were included in this study. The additional contribution of karyotyping for abnormal karyotype results was calculated after excluding results that could theoretically be identified with genome-wide NIPT. Among the 511 pregnancies analyzed, 13 (2.54%) were found to have abnormal karyotype results, 9 (1.76%) of which could theoretically have been detected with genome-wide NIPT. Within the cohort, 6/263 (2.28%) of women aged 35 years and older, and 3/248 (1.20%) of women younger than 35 years had results that could have been detected with genome-wide NIPT. After excluding results detectable using genome-wide NIPT, the additional contribution of karyotyping was found as 4/502 (0.79%) for the entire cohort, 2/257 (0.77%) for women aged 35 years and older, 2/245 (0.81%) for women younger than 35 years. Of the 511 examined pregnancies at intermediate risk for T21 by maternal serum screening, genome-wide NIPT would have failed to detect 4 of 13 abnormal karyotype results. The findings hold importance in guiding couples' informed decision-making processes regarding their choice of genetic screening and diagnostic testing in case of intermediate risk for T21.

Hierarchical Classification of Factors Associated With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Failures and Its Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes

Abstract Objective To conduct a hierarchical classification analysis of the nonreportable results of noninvasive prenatal testing in an attempt to reduce failure rates and provide pregnant women with accurate information to alleviate their anxiety. Methods In this study, 30,039 singleton pregnancies who underwent noninvasive prenatal testing in a single center from May 2019 to April 2022 were collected, and 811 samples with initial noninvasive prenatal testing failure were retrospectively analyzed. Grouping was based on the reasons for initial test failure; tracking the noninvasive prenatal testing results and prenatal diagnosis results (if any) of the “z-scores in the gray area” group and analyzing the possible influencing factors of the “low fetal fraction” group in the pre-experimental and experimental period by using one-way analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U test, and χ2 test; and tracking the pregnancy outcomes of the test failures samples to analyze the risk of perinatal complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes of the different types of test failures. Results None of the samples' initial inconclusive results because of z-scores in the gray area were found to have chromosomal aneuploidy. However, pregnancy complications (P = 0.018) and a high likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes (P = 0.048) may still occur. Maternal gestational age (P < 0.001), body mass index (P < 0.001), library concentration (P < 0.001), and fetal gender (P < 0.001) were considered to be the associated factors for the initial low fetal fraction results. This may be associated with pregnancy complications (P < 0.001) and a high likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes (P = 0.034). The body mass index (P = 0.015) and time between draws (P = 0.001) were associated with the second test’s success. The incidence of low fetal fraction samples was more frequent with blood collection tubes of the G type than with the K type (P < 0.001). Conclusion Initial inconclusive results because of z-scores in the gray area did not imply an increased risk of aneuploidy, but vigilance is needed for an increased risk of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Because of the low fetal fraction, the initial absence of results may be related to the assay method, as well as the effect of blood collection tubes and the need to be alert to the risk of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Accuracy of fetal fraction measurements in a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal test.

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidy relies on the analysis of fetoplacental cell-free DNA (cfDNA) found in maternal plasma. A minimum cfDNA fetal fraction (FF) is required for reliable test performance, but some methods may have suboptimal accuracy for FF measurement. This study investigated the accuracy of a single-nucleotide polymorphism- (SNP-) based NIPT method to assess FF. FF measurements using SNP-based NIPT in consecutive samples from singleton male pregnancies were compared with FF measured using a "gold standard" Y-chromosome method. In a cohort of 106,846 samples, the SNP-based FF method showed a standard deviation (SD) of 0.42%. Compared to the Y chromosome FF method, a correlation coefficient, r, of 0.995, and bias of 0.17% were observed. The SD was not substantially different across specific FF ranges or for samples with high-risk NIPT results. The SNP-based NIPT method estimates FF with good accuracy, with a SD three to eight times better than other NIPT methods (0.42% vs. 1.3%-3.4%). FF is an important quality control parameter and should be routinely reported as part of NIPT.

Correlation between types of ventricular septal defect and chromosomal abnormalities in low-risk non-invasive prenatal testing.

The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a correlation between different types of ventricular septal defects (VSD) and chromosomal abnormalities in the low-risk setting of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the prognosis of fetuses with varying types of VSD. Cases of pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis due to fetal VSD were collected by Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from May 2017 to May 2022. Exclusions were made for those without NIPT, with high-risk NIPT results, genetic disorders, and those lost to follow-up. Data collected included ultrasound classification of VSD, prenatal NIPT results, copy-number variations (CNVs) results, and neonatal outcomes. The prevalence of pathogenic CNVs was investigated in 74 cases of VSDs. Of these cases, 45 were isolated VSDs (9 muscular and 36 non-muscular) and 29 were non-isolated VSDs (10 with intracardiac and 19 with extra-cardiac structural anomalies). The results revealed that the incidence of pathogenic CNVs was lower in isolated VSDs compared to non-isolated VSDs in a low-risk NIPT condition (χ2 = 9.344, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of pathogenic CNVs between VSDs with intracardiac and extra-cardiac structural anomalies (P = 0.541). Moreover, VSDs associated with intracardiac structural anomalies had the highest rate of surgical intervention. When NIPT is low-risk and VSD is isolated, the likelihood of fetal chromosomal defects is not increased. However, if there are intra- or extra-cardiac structural abnormalities present alongside VSD, the possibility of pathogenic CNV is considerably greater, necessitating invasive prenatal diagnosis. Isolated muscular VSDs usually do not require surgery, which can be used as a basis for prenatal counseling regarding fetal VSD.

Investigational Management for a Positive NIPT Result - Case Report

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), since its introduction in 2011, has revolutionized prenatal screening, becoming widely used globally and replacing traditional screening methods in developed countries. The accuracy of NIPT in detecting aneuploidies is etremely high and there has been a recent trend towards improving NIPT for detecting microdeletion and microduplication syndromes, monogenic diseases, fetal se determination, and RH genotyping. Significant progress has been made in molecular analysis techniques of fetal DNA, including methods such as massively parallel sequencing, RNA-based testing, digital PCR, and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. We present the case of a 32-year-old patient who, at 12 weeks of gestation, had a non-invasive prenatal test result showing a maternal 22q11.2 deletion. Following genetic consultation, further investigations were conducted to stratify the fetal risk of inheriting the microdeletion syndrome. As a result, microarray CGH cytoarray from amniotic fluid was performed, and no 22q11.2 deletion was detected. In this case, complete elucidation of the origin of the deletion found in NIPT could not be achieved, as it would require arrayCGH testing for the mother, a test that was not performed due to financial reasons. Given the high rate of genetic syndromes with potential impact on fetal development and familial psychological impact, we wish to emphasize the necessity of financial support from the state to introduce non-invasive prenatal testing into the list of reimbursed analyses covered by health insurance. This would enable superior testing and, implicitly, genetic prevention of all pregnancies, facilitating appropriate risk stratification of pregnancies in our country.

Noninvasive Prenatal Test Results Indicative of Maternal Malignancies: A Nationwide Genetic and Clinical Follow-Up Study

The author describes the results and implications of a study on noninvasive prenatal test results that indicate maternal malignancies.

Prevalence threshold and positive predictive value of noninvasive prenatal testing.

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has increased the number of conditions that can be screened. However, the prevalence of conditions assessed by NIPT has remained stable. The "prevalence threshold," a novel epidemiological concept, uses a test's sensitivity and specificity to determine the prevalence below which a test's positive predictive value declines most sharply relative to disease prevalence. In this article, we calculated the prevalence threshold for common conditions assessed through NIPT and compared the value with the actual prevalence of each condition to best ascertain the reliability of NIPT results. Six databases and PubMed were searched from January 2010 to March 2023 for sensitivity and specificity parameters of common conditions tested through NIPT. Using an equation previously derived by the authors of the current paper, the prevalence threshold for each condition was calculated. The theoretical number of test iterations required to reach the prevalence threshold was also reported. None of the conditions tested through the NIPT had a prevalence rate that met or exceeded the calculated prevalence threshold. Trisomy 21 had the greatest concordance between the prevalence rate and the prevalence threshold. In contrast, Angelman, Cri-du-chat, and Prader-Willi syndromes had the most significant discordance. Apart from trisomy 21 and XXY, all remaining conditions required more than one test iteration to reach their respective prevalence threshold. We conclude that at the current prevalence levels, the positive predictive value of NIPT remains low, with the prevalence of disease levels significantly lower than the prevalence threshold for each condition tested.

Comparison of the performance of NIPT and NIPT-plus for fetal chromosomal aneuploidy and high Z-score increases the positive predictive value.

To evaluate non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT-plus) for detecting aneuploidies at different sequencing depths and assess Z-score accuracy in predicting trisomies 21, 18, 13, 45X, and 47XXX. Pregnancies with positive NIPT or NIPT-plus results detected at the prenatal diagnosis center of Nanfang Hospital were included in this retrospective study, between January 2017 and December 2022. Invasive prenatal diagnostic results were collected. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the relationship between Z-score and positive predictive value (PPV). Optimal cut-off values were obtained based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, and PPVs were calculated in different groups. We evaluated 1348 pregnant women with positive results, including 930 reported by NIPT and 418 reported by NIPT-plus. NIPT reported significantly more rare chromosomal aneuploidies (RCAs), and NIPT-plus had a significantly higher PPV for trisomy 21 (T21). Logistic regression analyses showed a significant association (P < 0.001) between Z-score and PPVs for T21 and trisomy 18 (T18). A linear relationship was observed between fetal fraction (FF) and Z-values in the true positive cases of T21 and T18.The high Z-score group had significantly higher PPVs than the low Z-score group for T21, T18, trisomy 13, and 47XXX, but not for 45X. The Z-score is helpful in assessing NIPT or NIPT-plus results. Therefore, we suggest including the Z-score and FF in the results. By combining the Z-score, FF, and maternal age, clinicians can interpret NIPT results more accurately and improve personal counsel to reduce patients' anxiety.

Noninvasive twin genotyping for recessive monogenic disorders by relative haplotype dosage.

To establish a haplotype-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) workflow for single-gene recessive disorders that adapt to dizygotic (DZ) twin pregnancies. Twin pregnancies at risk of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Becker muscular dystrophy, hemophilia B, spinal muscular atrophy, phenylketonuria, and nonsyndromic hearing loss were recruited. For subsequent analysis, capture sequencing targeting highly heterozygotic single nucleotide polymorphism sites was conducted. Paternal-specific alleles were used to calculate the total and individual fetal fractions and determine zygosity. A two-step Bayes Factor model was applied to clarify the complex genomic landscape in the maternal plasma: the first step involved determining whether the twins inherited the same haplotype, and the second step involved estimating their individual genotypes. NIPT results were subsequently confirmed by invasive diagnosis. Nine twin pregnancies were recruited, including five DZ and four monozygotic (MZ) twins. The earliest gestational age was 8+0 weeks, and the minimum fetal fraction was 4.6%. Three twin pregnancies were reported with one affected fetus, while the remaining six were reported without affected fetuses. Two dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies were confirmed to be MZ twins. The NIPT results were 100% consistent with those of invasive procedures or diagnostic genetic testing after birth. This study is the first to perform NIPT for single-gene disorders in twin pregnancies and preliminarily confirm its clinical feasibility. Acknowledging the twins' genotypes in the first trimester is valuable as it empowers obstetric care providers and parents to have adequate time for pregnancy management and decision-making.

Noninvasive prenatal testing for the detection of fetal chromosome 17 microduplication: clinical implications and findings

Background Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used to screen for fetal aneuploidies. However, there are few reports of using NIPT for screening chromosomal microduplications and microdeletions. This study aimed to investigate the application efficiency of NIPT for detecting chromosomal microduplications.MethodsFour cases of copy number gains on the long arm of chromosome 17 (17q12) were detected using NIPT and further confirmed using copy number variation (CNV) analysis based on chromosome microarray analysis (CMA).ResultsThe prenatal diagnosis CMA results of the three cases showed that the microduplications in 17q12 (ranging from 1.5 to 1.9 Mb) were consistent with the NIPT results. The karyotypic analysis excluded other possible unbalanced rearrangements. The positive predictive value of NIPT for detecting chromosomal 17q12 microduplication was 75.0%.Conclusions NIPT has a good screening effect on 17q12 syndrome through prenatal diagnosis, therefore it could be considered for screening fetal CNV during the second trimester. With the clinical application of NIPT, invasive prenatal diagnoses could be effectively reduced while also improving the detection rate of fetal CNV.

Comprehensive Recommendations for the Clinical Management of Pregnant Women With Noninvasive Prenatal Test Results Suspicious of a Maternal Malignancy.

In this article, we defined comprehensive recommendations for the clinical follow-up of pregnant women with a malignancy-suspicious NIPT result, on the basis of the vast experience with population-based NIPT screening programs in two European countries complemented with published large data sets. These recommendations provide a tool for classifying NIPT results as malignancy-suspicious, and guide health care professionals in structured clinical decision making for the diagnostic process of pregnant women who receive such a malignancy-suspicious NIPT result.

From Conception to Revelation: Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Explored

Prenatal testing plays a crucial role in addressing the inherent unpredictability of genetic disorders that can affect unborn children. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) has emerged as a groundbreaking tool in the realm of prenatal care, enabling the early detection of chromosomal abnormalities. By examining fetal DNA present in the mother's bloodstream, NIPT has achieved remarkable accuracy rates, surpassing invasive techniques that carry inherent risks. However, with these advancements come ethical considerations. The results of NIPT can significantly influence a mother's decision regarding the continuation or termination of pregnancy. This decision can be further complicated by religious beliefs, which often play a pivotal role in guiding choices related to pregnancy. Moreover, receiving a positive result from NIPT can subject expectant mothers to profound emotional stress, highlighting the need for comprehensive counseling and support services. In addition to these ethical concerns, practical limitations persist. The cost of NIPT remains a substantial barrier for many families, potentially limiting its accessibility. Furthermore, NIPT's accuracy can be influenced by factors such as gestational age, with tests often yielding inconclusive results when fetal fractions are low. Despite these challenges, technological innovations, including microarrays and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), have bolstered the capabilities of NIPT. These advancements enable a more comprehensive assessment of fetal DNA, enhancing the overall quality of prenatal care. As NIPT continues to evolve and integrate with broader genomic technologies, society must engage in thoughtful reflection on its implications. The potential normalization of pregnancy terminations based on genetic information underscores the importance of ethical and societal discussions surrounding the use of NIPT, with a focus on preserving informed patient choices and ensuring comprehensive support for expectant parents facing difficult decisions.

Association between fetal fraction of cell-free DNA and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

To determine the association between fetal fraction (FF) levels in cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes. This retrospective cohort study, conducted at a single center, involved 2063 pregnant women with normal 1st and 2nd trimester non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) results between 2016 and 2021. Pregnancy outcomes were examined by determining the < 4% and < 5th percentile (3.6%) cut-off values for low fetal fraction (LFF). Pregnancy outcomes were also examined by dividing the FF into population-based quartiles. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were pregnancy-induced hypertensive diseases (PIHD), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), spontaneous preterm birth (PTB), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), low birth weight (LBW), macrosomia, and 1st and 5th minutes low APGAR scores (< 7). PIHD was significantly higher in LFF (< 4% and < 5th percentile) cases (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, in population-based quartiles of FF, PIHD did not differ significantly between groups. Composite adverse maternal outcomes were significantly higher in the FF < 4% group (p = 0.042). When analyzes were adjusted for maternal age, BMI, and gestational age at NIPT, significance was maintained at < 4%, < 5th percentile LFF for PIHD, and < 4% LFF for composite adverse maternal outcomes. However, there was no significant relationship between LFF with GDM, ICP and PTB. Additionally, there was no significant association between low APGAR scores, SGA, LGA, LBW, macrosomia, and LFF concerning neonatal outcomes. Our study showed that LFF in pregnant women with normal NIPT results may be a predictor of subsequent PIHD.

Performance Evaluation of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Screening Chromosome Disorders: A Single-Center Observational Study of 15,304 Consecutive Cases in China.

This study was to evaluate the performance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting fetal chromosome disorders in pregnant women. From October 1st, 2017, to December 31th, 2022, a total of 15,304 plasma cell free DNA-NIPT samples were collected for fetal chromosome disorders screening. The results of NIPT were validated by confirmatory invasive testing or clinical outcome follow-up. Further, NIPT performance between low-risk and high-risk groups, as well as singleton pregnancy and twin pregnancy groups was compared. Besides, analysis of 111 false-positive cases was performed. Totally, NIPT was performed on 15,086 eligible venous blood samples, of which 179 (1.19%) showed positive NIPT results and 68 were further validated to be true positive samples via confirmatory invasive testing or follow-up of clinical outcomes. For common chromosome aneuploidies, sex chromosome abnormalities (SCA) and other chromosomal aneuploidies, the detection sensitivities of NIPT were all 100%, the specificities were 99.87%, 99.70%, and 99.68% and the positive predictive values (PPVs) were 65.45%, 31.82%, and 10.91%, respectively. No statistically significant variance in detection performance was observed among 2987 high-risk and 12,099 low-risk subjects, as well as singleton and twin pregnancy subjects. The concentration of cell-free fetal DNA of 111 false-positive cases ranged from 5.5% to 33.7%, which was higher than the minimum requirement of NIPT. With stringent protocol, NIPT shows high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fetal chromosome disorders in a large-scale clinical service, helping improving overall pregnancy management.

Clinical evaluation of noninvasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidies in 9,176 Korean pregnant women: a single-center retrospective study

BackgroundTo evaluate the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in Korean pregnant women.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed NIPT data from 9,176 women with singleton pregnancies referred to the CHA Biotech genome diagnostics center. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood, and high-throughput massively parallel sequencing was conducted. Subsequently, the positive NIPT results for SCA were validated via karyotype and chromosomal microarray analyses.ResultsOverall, 46 cases were SCA positive after NIPT, including 20, 12, 8, and 6 for Turner, triple X, Klinefelter, and Jacob syndromes, respectively. Among 37 women with invasive prenatal diagnosis, 19 had true positive NIPT results. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for detecting SCAs was 51.35%. The PPV was 18.75% for Turner, 88.89% for triple X, 71.43% for Klinefelter, and 60.00% for Jacob’s syndromes. NIPT accuracy for detecting sex chromosome trisomies was higher than that for sex chromosome monosomy (P = 0.002). No significant correlation was observed between fetal SCA incidence and maternal age (P = 0.914), except for the borderline significance of Jacob’s syndrome (P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed when comparing NIPT and karyotyping validation for fetal SCA according to pregnancy characteristics.ConclusionOur data suggest that NIPT can reliably screen for SCAs, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies compared with monosomy X. No correlation was observed between maternal age and fetal SCA incidence, and no association was observed between different pregnancy characteristics. The accuracy of these findings requires improvements; however, our study provides an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further management. Larger scale studies, considering confounding factors, are required for accurate evaluation.

Limited ability of increased sequencing depth in detecting cases missed by noninvasive prenatal testing: a comparative analysis of 3 clinical cases

Increased sequencing depth can improve the detection rate of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for chromosome aneuploidies and copy number variations (CNVs). However, due to the technical limitations of NIPT, false-positives and false-negatives are inevitable. False-positives for aneuploidy and CNVs have been widely reported, but few missed cases have been reported. In this study, we report 3 patients missed by NIPT, which were still missed after increasing the sequencing depth. To verify the detection efficiency of the platform, the results of NIPT in 32,796 patients treated in Yulin Women and Children Health Care Hospital from 2020 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on false-negative cases found by postnatal follow-up or amniocentesis were collected, and the sequencing data, pregnancy examination data, and postnatal follow-up results of these missed patients were summarized. Five patients missed by NIPT were found, and they were missed again by retesting or increasing the sequencing depth. Except for hypospadias found in 1 patient, ultrasonography of the other 4 patients showed no obvious abnormalities during the whole pregnancy. Our results suggest that pregnant women should be fully informed of the benefits and limitations of NIPT before undergoing the examination to avoid unnecessary medical disputes.

Contribution of uniparental disomy to fetal growth restriction: a whole-exome sequencing series in a prenatal setting

Fetal growth restriction (FGR), a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality, is caused by fetal, maternal, and placental factors. Uniparental disomy (UPD) is a rare condition that leads to imprinting effects, low-level mosaic aneuploidies and homozygosity for pathogenic variants. In the present study, UPD events were detected in 5 women with FGR by trio exome sequencing (trio-WES) of a cohort of 150 FGR cases. Furthermore, noninvasive prenatal testing results of the 5 patients revealed a high risk of rare autosomal trisomy. Trio-WES showed no copy-number variations (CNVs) or nondisease-causing mutations associated with FGR. Among the 5 women with FGR, two showed gene imprinting, and two exhibited confined placental mosaicism (CPM) by copy number variant sequencing (CNV-seq). The present study showed that in FGR patients with UPD, the detection of imprinted genes and CPM could enhance the genetic diagnosis of FGR.

Clinical value of positive CNVs results by NIPT without fetal ultrasonography-identified structural anomalies.

To evaluate the clinical value of positive copy number variations (CNVs) results by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) without fetal ultrasonography-identified structural anomalies, especially with several known CNVs results. A total of 135,981 results of NIPT performed between April 1, 2017, and March 31, 2020, enrolled in the free NIPT service program implemented by the local government were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 87 cases with positive NIPT screens for CNVs and no fetal ultrasonography-identified anomalies were recalled and provided genetic counseling. After obtaining full informed consent, these cases were provided invasive prenatal diagnosis by karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)/copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) with follow-up. One case was lost, while 86 cases were successfully followed up. A total of 44 (50.6%) cases underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis, of which six cases were detected with abnormal karyotype. CMA/CNV-Seq revealed 11 fetuses with positive results for CNVs, among whom eight were consistent with NIPT results, two were partially consistent, one was inconsistent, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 22.7% (10/44). For known CNVs, PPVs were 20% (15q11.2-q13 microdeletion) and 33.3% (5p end deletions). Among 11 pregnant women with positive prenatal diagnosis, seven were confirmed to have pathogenic CNVs in their fetuses; four had CNVs of unknown clinical significance. Even in pregnancies without ultrasonography-identified anomalies, a positive NIPT screen for CNVs must be interpreted with caution and validated by additional diagnostic study.

Limited additional value of karyotyping cultured amniotic fluid cell colonies in addition to microarray on uncultured cells for confirmation of abnormal non-invasive prenatal testing results.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) allows the detection of placental chromosome aberrations. To verify whether the fetus also has the chromosome aberration, diagnostic follow-up testing is required. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the added value of analyzing amniotic fluid (AF) cell cultures in addition to uncultured AF cells for the detection of fetal mosaicism. NIPT was performed as part of the Dutch TRIDENT study. Cytogenetic studies in uncultured AF were performed using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-array. Cultured AF cell colonies (in situ method) were investigated with fluorescent in situ hybridization and/or karyotyping. Clinical outcome data were collected in cases with discordant results. Between April 2014 and December 2021, 368 amniocenteses were performed after a chromosomal aberration was detected with NIPT. Excluding 134 cases of common aneuploidies (confirmed by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction), 29 cases with investigation of uncultured cells only and 1 case without informed consent, 204 cases were eligible for this study. In 196 (96%) cases, the results in uncultured and cultured cells were concordant normal, abnormal or mosaic. Five cases (2%) showed mosaicism in cultured AF cells, whereas uncultured AF cells were normal. Two (1%) of these, one mosaic trisomy 13 and one mosaic trisomy 16, were considered true fetal mosaics. The added value of investigating AF cell cultures in addition to uncultured cells is limited to two of 204 (1%) cases in which true fetal mosaicsm would otherwise be missed. The clinical relevance of one (trisomy 13) remained unknown and the other case also showed ultrasound anomalies, which determined pregnancy management. This seems to justify limiting prenatal cytogenetic confirmatory testing to SNP arrays on uncultured AF cells, considerably shortening the reporting time.