On June 8, 1905, a group of researchers representing the elite of the French scientific community gathered in the offices of the Institut general psychologique (IGP) on the rue Conde in Paris with the celebrated Italian spiritualist medium, Eusapia Palladino, and the goal of ascertaining the reality of mediumistic phenomena. In the course of forty-three seances stretched over three years, the members of the group witnessed Eusapia producing a variety of unexplainable phenomena. With her hands and feet carefully controlled by the attending scientists, Eusapia shattered drinking glasses without touching them, caused curtains and strips of fabric to billow and bulge, produced luminescent wisps of light, materialized “spirit” hands and arms, and caused tables to lift from the floor and fly about the room. The observers reported being tapped on the shoulder, poked in the back, and pinched by an unseen agent. They felt their hair being pulled and chairs suddenly jerked from underneath them and overturned by an invisible force. The movement of a small side table floating over his head caused Pierre Curie to exclaim: “What is astonishing is the precision with which the gueridon moved without touching anyone. It made a nice curve and did not touch me at all.” The physicist Jacques-Arsene d’Arsonval, seizing another table as it was floating from the floor, cried, “It is absolutely the resistance of the magnetic field!” In spite of these experiences, three years, and thousands of francs spent, the research of the IGP culminated in a disappointing lack of consensus among the attending scientists about the meaning of the phenomena. While d’Arsonval admitted in the discussions following the presentation of the written account that he and his fellow scientists had “observed phenomena” and “believed that they were protected against fraud,” in the final analysis he maintained that they could not be “scientifically certain.” The obstacle in the end proved to be the one element that the scrupulous measurements of the seances could not fathom. Like the purloined letter hidden in plain sight, subjectivity—both that of the medium and of the observers—remained
Read full abstract