Urinary Neopterin Levels Research Articles

Urinary neopterin levels in hematologic malignancies.

We studied urinary excretion levels of neopterin in 30 cancer patients affected by non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, Hodgkin's disease and multiple myeloma compared to 30 healthy subjects. Mean value of neopterin excretion in cancer patients (576.01 +/- 620.37) appeared significantly increased (p less than 0.001) compared to normal controls (134.40 +/- 41.65). A neopterin excretion above the upper normal limit was observed in 23/28 (82%) patients with active disease. A trend to an increased urinary level of neopterin with more advanced stage was observed, namely in patients with bone marrow involvement and constitutional symptoms. We suggest that the evaluation of urinary neopterin levels may be of value in the diagnosis and follow-up of hematologic malignancies.

Neopterin as Tumour Marker Serum and Urinary Neopterin Concentrations in Malignant Diseases

Serum and urinary neopterin concentrations were measured in 142 patients suffering from various malignant diseases. Increased serum and urinary neopterin levels were found in 48% and 55% of patients respectively. Neopterin showed sufficient sensitivity in the detection of haematological disorders and hypernephroma, whereas the sensitivity of neopterin was rather poor in patients with other solid tumours. Comparison of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) concentrations and serum or urinary neopterin levels in testicular cancer patients showed that determination of neopterin provides no further information in the management of these patients. In testicular cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, a significant increase in serum (p less than 0.005) and urinary (p less than 0.0005) neopterin concentrations was measured after chemotherapy, reflecting the release of neopterin from macrophages during the damage by cytotoxic drugs. In the adjuvant testicular tumour patients, known to be tumour free, 1 out of 16 patients showed elevated serum and 3 out of 15 patients showed false positive urinary neopterin levels. False positive serum (24%) and urinary (37%) neopterin values were also obtained in 28 patients with various nonmalignant diseases, but no evidence for an inflammatory process. In 23 patients with inflammatory diseases pathological serum and urinary neopterin levels were measured in 55% and 59% respectively. When a RIA was compared with a HPLC method, higher urinary neopterin values were obtained with the RIA, indicating that non-oxidized pterines are also determined by the RIA method. In conclusion, neopterin might be a helpful biological marker in monitoring patients with malignant haematological disorders and renal cell carcinoma, but provides no additional information in other solid tumours studied.

Significance of urinary neopterin in patients with malignant tumors of the genitourinary tract.

The urinary neopterin excretion was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in 417 healthy subjects and in 76 patients with clinically and pathohistologically verified neoplasias of the urinary tract (bladder tumor, carcinoma of the prostate, and renal cell carcinoma). The patients with early tumor stages both with bladder tumor and carcinoma of the prostate had normal urinary neopterin levels, except one patient with bladder tumor who had a value at the upper confidence limit. Of 40 patients with higher stages of bladder tumor and carcinoma of the prostate, 35 had elevated urinary neopterin levels. Two of 10 patients with bladder tumor in stage T3, 1 of 4 patients with carcinoma of the prostate Stage C, and 2 of 15 patients with prostatic cancer Stage D showed normal neopterin levels. The patients with renal cell carcinoma did not demonstrate any definite correlation between tumor stage and urinary neopterin excretion. The current study suggests that the neopterin assay may supplement laboratory measurements in tumors of the urinary tract, providing helpful information regarding case selection for the most convenient therapeutic management and postoperative follow-up.

The value of urinary neopterin as an immunological parameter in patients with malignant tumors of the genitourinary tract.

In 153 patients with verified neoplasias of the genitourinary tract, urinary neopterin excretion was monitored under different conditions. As control, urinary neopterin values were taken from 208 male and 209 female volunteers. Neopterin excretion was measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Patients with early tumor stages, both with bladder tumor and carcinoma of the prostate, presented almost normal urinary neopterin levels. The difference of urinary neopterin excretion between low and high stages in bladder tumor (T0-1 versus T2-4) as well in carcinoma of the prostate (stage A-B versus stage C-D) is highly significant (p less than 0.001). In the group of patients with renal cell carcinoma we could not find any correlation between tumor stage and neopterin excretion. The basal urinary neopterin values in patients with testicle tumors were as follows: 1 of 6 patients stage-I seminomatous tumors and 2 of 4 patients with stage-I non-seminomatous tumors demonstrated elevated neopterin levels. In the higher stages all patients, in both groups, exhibited pathologically increased neopterin excretion. During therapy and follow-up: all 24 stage-I (seminomatous and non-seminomatous tumors) patients showed normal neopterin levels: 1 of 3 stage-II (non-seminomatous tumors) patients and all 5 stage-IV (seminomatous and non-seminomatous tumors) patients had elevated urinary neopterin excretion. Our experience suggests that neopterin measurements may supplement laboratory examinations in patients with malignant tumor diseases of the genitourinary tract, providing meaningful information in regard to early detection of tumor progression, tumor recurrence and follow-up.

Polarization fluoroimmunoassay of biopterin and neopterin in human urine

A polarization fluoroimmunoassay has been developed for the routine determination of biopterin and neopterin levels in human urine. The method employs fluorescein-labeled biopterin and neopterin. The assay is fast (incubation time: 2 min) and no separation step is required prior to measurement of fluorescence polarization. Linearity, recovery and precision were satisfactory. Estimations of biopterin and neopterin levels in human urine samples closely correlated with those obtained by radioimmunoassay.

Neopterin as a new biochemical marker for diagnosis of allograft rejection. Experience based upon evaluation of 100 consecutive cases.

The use of daily urinary neopterin evaluation to detect immunological complications has been tested in 96 consecutive cadaveric kidney recipients, three liver recipients, and one pancreas recipient. In 29 of these patients an immunologically uncomplicated posttransplant course was associated with stable or low neopterin levels, or both. In only 5% of daily determinations on these patients were increasing or high neopterin levels seen. On the other hand, major immunological complications, such as acute rejection episodes (38 cases), viral infections (17 cases), or both problems (8 cases), were preceded by increasing or high neopterin levels or both--on the average by one day. Withdrawal of cyclosporine was also found to be followed by increase of urinary neopterin levels. Neopterin evaluation enabled reliable and accurate prediction of immunological complications in 95% of patients with acute rejections and in 100% of patients with viral infections. It thus appears that daily assessment of urinary neopterin levels represents a useful tool for biochemical detection of immunological complications in allograft recipients.

Measurement of urinary neopterin in normal pregnant and non-pregnant women and in women with benign and malignant genital tract neoplasms

Urinary neopterin was measured in healthy women (n = 209) and men (n = 208), in patients with benign gynecological tumors (n = 53), in women with precancerous lesions of the cervix and the endometrium (n = 24) and in women with cancer of the genital tract (n = 108). In addition urinary neopterin measurements were made in 109 pregnant women and 20 women in the puerperium. No significant difference was found between mean neopterin values in patients with benign gynecological tumors, in women with precancerous lesions and in healthy women. Patients with cancer had significantly higher mean urinary neopterin levels than the control group. Raised neopterin levels were found in 56% of patients with genital tract cancer, the figures varying between 93% for ovarian cancer and 47% for cancer of the cervix. Some of the cancer patients had serial urinary neopterin measurements and in about 80% there was some relation between urinary neopterin values and clinical progress as judged clinically and radiologically, the best agreement existing in patients with ovarian cancer. Significantly higher mean neopterin values were found during normal pregnancy and in the early puerperium than in non-pregnant healthy controls. Raised urinary neopterin excretion may be due to enhanced cell proliferation and alloantigenic activation of T-lymphocytes.