Neoadjuvant Treatment Of Breast Cancer Research Articles

254P IHC and GEX biomarkers and their prognostic and treatment predictive role in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer

254P IHC and GEX biomarkers and their prognostic and treatment predictive role in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer

325P The clinical validity of histological grade in neoadjuvant treated breast cancer

325P The clinical validity of histological grade in neoadjuvant treated breast cancer

276P SHR-A1811 in combination with pyrotinib as neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC): Preliminary results from MUKDEN 07

276P SHR-A1811 in combination with pyrotinib as neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC): Preliminary results from MUKDEN 07

Predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in invasive breast cancer with different human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) subcategories.

Among human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients who receive anti-HER2 treatment, a noteworthy correlation between pathological complete response (pCR) and longer survival has been observed. The rate of pCR varies with the tumor's degree of HER2 protein expression. The aim of this study was to assess the correlations between clinicopathological characteristics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters, and pCR in breast cancer with different HER2 subcategories. A total of 281 invasive breast cancer patients diagnosed with HER2-positivity were included. HER2-positive translated to immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or IHC 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)(+). All enrolled patients underwent baseline MRI examination and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, dual anti-HER2 therapy, and subsequent therapeutic surgery from January 2021 to May 2022. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effects of covariates on pCR. Compared to the IHC 2+/FISH(+) group, patients with IHC 3+ tumors had a higher pCR rate (58.1% vs. 26.7%, P<0.001), clinical stage (58.6% vs. 40%, P=0.038), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value (0.96 vs. 0.88 mm2/s, P=0.004), and were more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER) negative (55.9% vs. 31.1%, P=0.002) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative (72.5% vs. 46.7%, P=0.001). In both groups, univariate analysis showed that the pCR group more often had ER-negative and PR-negative status than the non-pCR group (P<0.001). The final multivariable analysis showed that ER-negativity was associated with pCR in the IHC 2+/FISH(+) group (P=0.004). ER-negativity and the longest diameter were two independent predictors of pCR in the IHC 3+ group (P<0.001 for ER, P=0.026 for longest diameter). The IHC 3+ group had a higher pCR rate than the IHC 2+/FISH(+) group. Along with clinicopathological characteristics, MRI parameters were supplemental predictors of pCR, particularly in IHC 3+ patients.

283P Immune-mediated secondary adrenal insufficiency is more commonly found in younger patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer

283P Immune-mediated secondary adrenal insufficiency is more commonly found in younger patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Scoring in Neoadjuvant-Treated Breast Cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is now the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC). TIL scoring is prognostic and adds predictive value to the residual cancer burden evaluation after NAC. However, NAC induces changes in the tumor, and the reliability of TIL scoring in post-NAC samples has not yet been studied. H&E- and dual CD3/CD20 chromogenic IHC-stained tissues were scored for stromal and intra-tumoral TIL by two experienced pathologists on pre- and post-treatment BC tissues. Digital TIL scoring was performed using the HALO® image analysis software (version 2.2). In patients with residual disease, we show a good inter-pathologist correlation for stromal TIL on H&E-stained tissues (CCC value 0.73). A good correlation for scoring with both staining methods (CCC 0.81) and the digital TIL scoring (CCC 0.77) was also observed. Overall concordance for TIL scoring in patients with a complete response was however poor. This study reveals there is good reliability for TIL scoring in patients with detectable residual tumors after NAC treatment, which is comparable to the scoring of untreated breast cancer patients. Based on the good consistency observed with digital TIL scoring, the development of a validated algorithm in the future might be advantageous.

Comment on: Predictive value of pretreatment circulating inflammatory response markers in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer: meta-analysis.

Comment on: Predictive value of pretreatment circulating inflammatory response markers in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer: meta-analysis.

Dose dense doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in a modified KEYNOTE522 regimen for triple negative breast cancer

The KEYNOTE-522 (KN522) regimen for neoadjuvant treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) utilized q3week dosing for doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC); however, dose-dense AC (ddAC) has demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) compared to q3week AC in anthracycline and taxane-based regimens. We performed a retrospective analysis assessing the use of ddAC in KN522 and the impact of sequencing ddAC before or after carboplatin/paclitaxel (CbT) plus pembrolizumab on multiple outcomes. 128 patients with TNBC were included. Overall pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 56%. Sequencing of ddAC vs CbT first showed no difference in pCR rate (ddAC 55% vs. CbT 58%, p = 0.77). However, ddAC first compared to CbT first correlated with a significant increase in the incidence of overall treatment delays (ddAC 70% vs. CbT 51%, p = 0.03), with cytopenias most frequent (ddAC 59% vs. CbT 31%, p = 0.001). ddAC in a modified KN522 regimen is safe, tolerable, and effective. Efficacy is comparable regardless of chemotherapy sequencing, but ddAC first is significantly associated with higher rates of treatment delays and cytopenias.

Trastuzumab, pertuzumab and nab-paclitaxel plus pyrotinib or not in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: A multi-center, randomized, open-label, phase II study.

e12634 Background: Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (TP) combined with chemotherapy is the standard neoadjuvant treatment regimen for HER2+ breast cancer. Anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, pyrotinib, shows great efficacy in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, but lacking efficacy data on the basis of TP and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TP plus nab-paclitaxel with or without pyrotinib as neoadjuvant treatment in HER2+ breast cancer. Methods: Stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer patients, stratified by disease stage (II vs. III) and hormone receptor (HR) status (positive vs. negative), were randomized 1:1 into the pyrotinib group or the control group. Both groups received a combination of 3-weekly TP and weekly nab-paclitaxel for 12 weeks. The pyrotinib group was concurrent given 320mg pyrotinib once daily. Primary endpoint was the total pathological complete remission (tpCR), defined as no invasive cancer in the breast and axillary lymph node. Results: From Nov 2020 to Apr 2023, a total of 109 patients were enrolled, with 108 receiving treatment: 55 in the pyrotinib group and 53 in the control group.The tpCR rate was 65.5% (95% CI: 51.4%, 77.8%) in the pyrotinib group, which shows no significant difference with the control group [60.4% (95% CI: 46.0%,73.5), P = 0.585). The breast pathological complete response (bpCR) rates were 70.9% (95% CI: 57.1%,82.4%) and 64.2%(95% CI: 49.8%,76.9%) in the pyrotinib and control group, respectively (P = 0.453). In the pyrotinib group, 52 (94.5%), 31 (56.4%), and 23 (41.8%) patients experienced dose-interruption, dose-reduction, and discontinuation of pyrotinib, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the pyrotinib and control groups were diarrhea (58.1% vs. 0%), decreased neutrophil count (23.6% vs. 15.1%), and decreased white blood cell count (16.4% vs. 7.5%). Conclusions: Our study showed pyrotinib didn’t significantly improve tpCR rate with pyrotinib on the basis of TP and nab-paclitaxel neoadjuvant therapy of HER2+ breast cancer. Concurrent pyrotinib treatment with TP was associated with a high rate of severe diarrhea. Further biomarker analyses are needed to identify which population would receive great benefit with neoadjuvant pyrotinib therapy in HER2+ breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04398914 .

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib and inetetamab in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoPICD study): A prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study.

e12627 Background: Inetetamab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, alters the Fc region amino acids, which induces ADCC stronger than trastuzumab. Pyrotinib is a small chemical inhibitor of pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase. The globally recommended first-line neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer is chemotherapy and two large-molecule monoclonal antibodies, which have unsatisfactory benefits for 50% of patients. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of targeted medicines, specifically inetetamab and pyrotinib, in conjunction with chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: The trial was structured as a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective study. 143 treatment-naive HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer patients were planned for the trial. Eligible patients will be administered six cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, including carboplatin (AUC=6mg/mL×min, ivgtt), doxorubicin (75mg/m2, ivgtt), inetetamab (initial loading dosage of 8mg/kg, maintenance dose of 6mg/kg), and pyrotinib (400mg/day, po). The surgery was conducted after the neoadjuvant phase, subsequent to a one-year course of targeted therapy with inetetamab and pyrotinib. The primary endpoint of the study is the total pathologic complete response (tpCR). The secondary endpoints include event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), neurologic disease-free survival (NDFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A cohort of 70 patients was enrolled between Nov. 27, 2021 and Feb. 1, 2024. Most patients completed the six-cycle neoadjuvant therapy with inetetamab, pyrotinib, and chemotherapy. The pathological findings of 49 patients who had radical surgery revealed that 65.3% (32/49, 95% CI, 0.515-0.791) of them achieved tpCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0). The initial subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with negative hormone receptors, the rate of tpCR was 80.0% (24/30, 95% CI, 64.8-95.2). Moreover, hormone receptor was statistically determined to be an independent factor influencing the effectiveness of the new treatment regimen ( p=0.032). The prevailing grade 3 or more severe adverse events included anemia (12.8%), diarrhea (10.0%), leukopenia (4.2%), liver dysfunction (4.2%) and renal dysfunction (4.2%). As of now, no treatment-related deaths have been documented. Conclusions: The ongoing study is actively enrolling participants. Preliminary findings from the study indicate that the combination of neoadjuvant inetetamab and pyrotinib with chemotherapy has demonstrated satisfactory effectiveness and manageable side effects. This offers a promising alternative for patients with locally advanced breast cancer that is HER2-positive. Clinical trial information: NCT06234137 .

Use of an AI-powered visualization platform to support precision clinical decision-making in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

e12618 Background: Chemotherapy to reduce cancer burden and tumor size ("downstaging") is widely used in neoadjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) and can have a dramatic impact on selection of further treatment courses, including surgery. The resulting decision-making process between physicians and cancer patients requires detailed and effective communication of the patient's disease status, and clear presentation of this information in Tumor Board settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) -powered visualization platforms offer the potential to aid in evaluating breast tumor location and morphology, and accordingly optimize treatment. Additionally, these tools offer enhanced communication with patients regarding future treatment options, particularly serving as clinical decision support (CDS) tools. Methods: We assessed the performance of an AI platform that employs dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to render three-dimensional (3D) visualizations of breast tumors and 5 additional chest tissues on an independent validation dataset comprise of 100 ESBC cases with ground-truth tumor labels vetted by 2 breast-specialized radiologists. The platform provides 3D depictions of the tumor and its multi-tissue context, as well as functionalities for quantifying tumor morphology, tumor-to-landmark structure distances, excision volumes, and approximate surgical margins. We subsequently evaluated the tool's utility in a real-world setting to understand how the tool impacts clinical decision-making and patient communication, specifically around surgical planning in the context of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Results: The platform generated accurate 3D tumor maps, as evidenced by a median Dice score of 75.6% and a median Hausdorff distances of 15.1 mm relative to the radiologist validation set. The automatic longest tumor dimension calculations were linearly correlated with radiologist direct measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.78) and had a median absolute difference of 6.3 mm. We found strong overlap between the platform’s ground-truth convex hulls, as shown by a median Dice score of 81.5%. When used by a skilled breast-specialized surgeon, the tool enabled rapid and intuitive patient-physician communication of the location and extent of disease, and potential degrees of downstaging to breast-conserving surgery. Conclusions: Detailed 3D tumor and surrounding multi-tissue depictions offer both qualitative and quantitative comprehension of cancer topology and may aid in formulating an optimal treatment approach for breast cancer treatment. We show that detailed depictions enhance communication between physicians and patients and may aid in streamlining decision-making.

Efficacy and safety of recombinant humanized anti-HER2 antibody-MMAE conjugate (RC48) in neoadjuvant for HER2-positive breast cancer: A single-arm phase II study.

e12636 Background: Breast cancer patients who achieve pCR after neoadjuvant therapy have a relatively good prognosis. Whether antibody‐drug conjugates (ADCs) can replace traditional chemotherapy combined with dual-target therapy in neoadjuvant therapy still needs to be explored. RC48 is a novel recombinant human anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody conjugated with a microtubule inhibitor (MMAE) via a cleavable linker, which can effectively kill HER2-positive tumors as well as tumors with low or heterogeneous HER2 expression through the bystander effect. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RC48 in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (size&gt;20mm) or confirmed axillary lymph node metastasis were eligible and received RC48 at a dose of 2.5mg/kg alone every 2 weeks for 6 cycles followed by surgery. EC was administered postoperatively every 21 days for 4 cycles. Trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab was administered for 1 year in the adjuvant setting. The primary endpoints were ORR and pCR rates. Results: 23 patients had been enrolled, and all of them had completed surgical treatment. The median age was 45(38-70) years. The current results showed that 13.0% (3/23) achieved pCR, 78.3% (18/23) achieved PR, and 8.7% (2/23) experienced PD. The ORR was 91.3%. 42% (5/12) of patients with initially positive axillary lymph nodes turned negative after surgery. 11.8% (2/17) HR-/HER2+ patients achieved pCR. According to the proportion of target lesion reduction, patients were divided into mild response (0-50%) and moderate-to-severe response (51%-100%). In the HR-/HER2+ subtype group, 23.5% (4/17) had a mild response, and 76.5% (13/17) had a moderate-to-severe response. 6 patients with HR+ have been enrolled, and 16.7% (1/6) of them achieved pCR. All of HR+ subtypes had a moderate-to-severe response. No relevant serious (grade 3/4) toxicity has been reported. Conclusions: The present data showed an acceptable pCR rate with RC48 in HER2-positive breast cancer. Although the pCR rate was lower than the traditional chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy, the effect of rapid reduction of tumor volume was better (the moderate-severe remission rate was 82.6%). For HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, the ORR in this study reached 100%, indicating that the novel ADC had a significant inhibitory effect on the crosstalk between ER and HER2. And it was expected that the Destiny Breast 11 study would show similar results. This scheme had a good negative conversion rate for patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. Finally, RC48 provided a neoadjuvant treatment option with low toxicity and high patient compliance for HER2-positive breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT05134519 .

Systemic inflammatory markers in neoadjuvant pembrolizumab therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: Prognostic insights and nomogram construction.

e12649 Background: Systemic inflammatory markers derived from peripheral blood cells, such as the neutrophils and lymphocytes ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR), have shown promise as prognostic markers. Currently, neoadjuvant treatment (NACT) for early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) involves the addition of an immune therapy, and little is known about the variation of these markers in this specific context. Methods: This study evaluated two groups who received NACT for eTNBC in a single third-level cancer center. The first received NACT with EC X4 and a weekly paclitaxel regimen, the second pembrolizumab and NACT. A total of 70 patients were included, 37 patients in the pembrolizumab group. NLR was defined as the absolute blood neutrophil count (N) divided by the absolute lymphocyte count (L), dNLR was defined as the N divided by the derived L (absolute leukocyte count — N), PLR was defined as the absolute platelet count divided by the L, LMR was defined as the L divided by the absolute monocyte count. Association between systemic inflammatory markers and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed using statistical tests. Inflammatory markers were evaluated at the time of diagnosis, at the time of chemotherapy regimen change, and 1 week before surgery. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used for correlation and Student’s t-test to compare different groups. Results: The pCR rates were 60,6% in the standard therapy and 77,8% in the pembrolizumab. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups. NLR, dNLR, PLR and LMR at 6 months showed significant differences compared to baseline levels. dNLR in the immunotherapy group, at the end of therapy, showed statistical significance with the Welch Two Sample t-test with p-value = 0.001. Variables were weighted with respect to the type of treatment and the outcome was assessed as pCR. On the basis of these data, a nomogram was constructed to predict the likelihood of achieving pCR in patients undergoing neoadjuvant pembrolizumab therapy. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of systemic inflammatory markers as prognostic indicators in patients with eTNBC undergoing NACT. dNLR is a novel biomarker associated with clinical outcome in solid tumors. In this study, for the first time, a correlation was found between the use of pembrolizumab and the change in dNLR and consequently its impact on pCR. A nomogram was constructed to predict the outcome of pCR. [Table: see text]

USE OF SGLT2–INHIBITORS IN THE TREATMENT OF ANTHRACICLINE CARDIOTOXICITY

Abstract The survival rate of cancer patients has significantly increased in the last 25 years thanks to the extraordinary advances in anti-tumor therapies. However, many chemotherapeutic agents are potentially cardiotoxic. In particular, anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is a clinical condition caused by chemotherapy drugs that lead to morpho-functional alterations and cell death of cardiomyocytes; the most typical clinical manifestation of this cardiotoxicity is the development of left ventricular dysfunction, which over time can evolve towards full-blown heart failure. It is therefore characterized by a reversible asymptomatic stage that progresses to an irreversible stage, often difficult to treat. For an early individualization of this toxicity, a dedicated clinic has been established in our center for the monitoring of patients undergoing treatment with cardiotoxic chemotherapy. We describe the case of a 53-year-old patient with preserved biventricular systolic function undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer, who at the end of the second infusion of anthracyclines presented with mild exertional dyspnoea associated with radiological signs of pulmonary congestion and an increase in the indices of myocardionecrosis and BNP. The echocardiogram revealed a sudden worsening of the left ventricular systolic function which was 48%. It was therefore decided to hospitalize the patient and initiate infusional diuretic therapy with a rapid clinical and instrumental response. An SGLT2 inhibitor with indication for the treatment of heart failure with moderately reduced ejection fraction was also added to the therapy. At the one-month check-up, there was an almost complete recovery of left ventricular function and a clear symptomatic benefit with associated normalization of laboratory markers of myocardial damage and heart failure, with the possibility for the patient to undergo surgery to remove the left ventricle. tumor mass. This clinical case could represent a starting point to start considering therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention and early treatment of cardiac toxicities from some chemotherapeutics, in order to avoid the process of irreversibility of myocardial damage with subsequent poor response to anti-inflammatory therapies. – conventional compensation.

Comparison of anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free regimens in neoadjuvant HER-2 positive breast cancer treatment

While some clinics have adopted abbreviated neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, there remains a shortage of comprehensive clinical data to support this practice. This is a retrospective, multicenter study. A total of 142 patients were included in the study who are HER2-positive breast cancer, aged ≤ 65 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery at 10 different oncology centers in Türkiye between October 2016 and December 2022. The treatment arms were divided into 4–6 cycles of docetaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab for arm A, 4 cycles of adriamycin/cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of taxane/TP for arm B. There were 50 patients (35.2%) in arm A and 92 patients (64.8%) in arm B. The median follow-up of all of the patients was 19.9 months (95% CI 17.5–22.3). The 3-year DFS rates for treatment arms A and B were 90.0% and 83.8%, respectively, and the survival outcomes between the groups were similar (p = 0.34). Furthermore, the pathologic complete response rates were similar in both treatment arms, at 50.0% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.90). This study supports shortened neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, a common practice in some clinics.

Predictive value of pretreatment circulating inflammatory response markers in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer: meta-analysis.

Systemic inflammatory response markers have been found to have a prognostic role in several cancers, but their value in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was carried out to investigate this. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies that explored the predictive value of circulating systemic inflammatory response markers in patients with breast cancer before commencing neoadjuvant therapy. A meta-analysis was undertaken for each inflammatory marker where three or more studies reported pCR rates in relation to the inflammatory marker. Outcome data are reported as ORs and 95% confidence intervals. A total of 49 studies were included, of which 42 were suitable for meta-analysis. A lower pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was associated with an increased pCR rate (pooled OR 1.66 (95% c.i. 1.32 to 2.09); P < 0.001). A lower white cell count (OR 1.96 (95% c.i. 1.29 to 2.97); P = 0.002) and a lower monocyte count (OR 3.20 (95% c.i. 1.71 to 5.97); P < 0.001) were also associated with a pCR. A higher lymphocyte count was associated with an increased pCR rate (OR 0.44 (95% c.i. 0.30 to 0.64); P < 0.001). The present study found the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, white cell count, lymphocyte count, and monocyte count of value in the prediction of a pCR in the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Further research is required to determine their value in specific breast cancer subtypes and to establish optimal cut-off values, before their adoption in clinical practice.

Abstract PO1-27-07: Is HER2-low a biologically distinct breast cancer (BC) subtype? Prognosis and pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in early breast cancer (BC) HER2 negative

Abstract Background: Overexpression of HER2 is a significant prognostic and predictive factor in early breast cancer. HER2 positive tumors are those scored by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or 2+ with amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). These tumors may benefit from HER2-targeted treatment and additionally, in early HER2-positive BC, achieving a complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment improves patient survival. In recent years, new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates have proven effective for HER2 low BC (defined as IHC score 1+ or 2+ not amplified) in the metastatic disease setting; however, in HER2-low early BC, studies testing novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates as neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are ongoing. Currently, we don´t know exactly whether HER2 expression can influence the pathological response rate after NAT or disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients compared to HER2-zero (IHC 0). The aim of our study is to determine the impact on response rate to NAT and survival outcomes in early HER2-negative BC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in two hospitals in Andalucia, Spain. Patients with early HER2 negative BC treated with NAT from January 2015 to June 2022 were included. Patients were divided into HER2 low patients (IHC 1+ or 2+ not amplified) and HER2 0 (IHC 0). We collected clinical and pathological characteristics, pathological response rate using the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) system where a complete pathological response (pCR) was defined as ypT0/ypTis and ypN0, and survival outcomes. The primary objective of the study was to analyze the pCR rate after NAT according to HER2 score, and secondary objectives were to assess disease-free survival and overall survival (DFS and OS rates). Results: 574 patients were included (100% women). 397 patients had hormone receptors (luminal BC) on these tumors, and 177 did not have them, i.e., triple-negative BC (TNBC). 225 patients were HER2-zero, and 312 patients were HER2-low (253/312 patients had luminal BC and 59/312 patients were TNBC). The pCR in HER2-low patients was 17.3% and 23.1% in HER2-zero patients (p=0.047). For luminal BC patients, the pCR was 16.7% in HER2-low tumors and 13.7% in HER2-zero tumors (p=0.29). Similarly, there was no difference in pCR rates in TNBC patients (45.8% in HER2-low and 53.8% in HER2-zero tumors, respectively, (p=0.958). The overall survival (OS) at 96 months was 88.7% (95% CI 85.6%-92%). Regarding survival outcomes, neither HER2 expression level was associated with higher 8-year DFS: 81.1% in HER2-low patients (95% CI 75.7%-86.8%) and 74.9% in HER2-zero patients (95% CI 62.3%-90.1%) p=0.64. There was no difference between histological subtypes at 8-years regarding DFS rate: 80.5% (95% CI 74.3%-87.2%) in luminal HER2-low patients and 76.3% (95% CI 60.8%-95.7%) in luminal HER2-zero patients, p=0.22; 83.8% in TNBC HER2-low (95% CI 74.5%-94.2%) and 77.5% in TNBC HER2-zero patients (95% CI 69.4%-86.6%) p=0.26. We also didn´t find significant differences in terms of OS. For HER2-low patients, the 8-year OS was 90.9% (95% CI 87%-94.9%) and for HER2-zero patients, it was 86.4% (95% CI 80.8%- 92.5%) p=0.46. There were also no differences in OS for different histological subgroups with an 8-year OS in luminal HER2-low breast cancer patients of 92.5% (95% CI 88%-96.7%) and 87% in HER2-zero (95% CI 78.9%-96.1%) p=0.91. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer phenotype, the OS was 84.2% for HER2-low (95% CI 74.5%-95.2%) and 85.3% for HER2-zero (95% CI 77.9%-93.4%) p=1. Conclusions: We found no difference in survival outcomes and response rate to conventional NAT between HER2-low and HER2-zero expression levels. Therefore, our data do not support the hypothesis of HER2-low as a biologically specific breast cancer subtype. Further research on this approach with HER2 antibody-drug conjugate schemes as an alternative to traditional NAT schemes is warranted. Citation Format: Ana Gil-Torralvo, Yeray Rodriguez, Alejandro Falcon, David Morales, Mónica Cejuela, Isabel Miras, Marta Amérigo, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Juan Bayo, Francisco Javier Salvador Bofill. Is HER2-low a biologically distinct breast cancer (BC) subtype? Prognosis and pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in early breast cancer (BC) HER2 negative [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-27-07.

Abstract PO2-01-07: Real-world efficacy of dual HER2-blockade in combination with anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free neoadjuvant treatment in early breast cancer (BC)

Abstract BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy with antiHER-2 blockade is the standard of care for HER-2 positive early BC. The objective of this treatment is tumor downstaging to increase resectability and pathological complete response (pCR), a reliable surrogate endpoint for survival. Adding Trastuzumab (T) to chemotherapy resulted in an improvement in pCR, however, resistance to this agent is common and the incorporation of Pertuzumab (P) to the neoadjuvant scene demonstrated an increase in pCR in the Peony (39.3% vs 21.8%) and Neosphere trials (45.8% vs 29%). Across all studies, pCR is even higher in patients (pts) with negative hormonal receptor (HR) status (50%-63%) (3, 4). Tryphaena and Berenice found low rates of cardiotoxicity with T-P combination. Recently, TRAIN-2 data showed that anthracyclines and platinum have a similar pCR (67% vs 68%), but febrile neutropenia and cardiotoxicity is higher in the anthracycline group, concluding that omitting this therapy might be a preferred approach in the presence of dual HER2 blockade. Our study investigated the pCR benefit of dual HER2 blockade with anthracyclines and platinum in HER2 positive early BC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, unicenter, observational study of pts, treated with neoadjuvant T-P plus chemotherapy, in HER-2 positive early BC, between April 2015 and December 2022 at University Hospital A Coruña (Spain). The primary endpoint was total pCR in breast and axila (tpCR: ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary endpoints were: association between clinicopatological characteristics and pCR; and between cardiotoxicity and treatment pattern. Statistical analyses were conducted with Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS). RESULTS: During the study period, from April 2015 to May 2022, 154 pts were enrrolled. The median age was 51,3 years [range 26 – 799 years], all patients were female. Infiltrating ductal carcinoma was present in 92.2% pts, and 5.8% were inflammatory BC. At diagnosis, 11.7%, 61.7% and 26.6% had stages I, II and III, respectively, and 51.3% revealed axillary node involvement. Among observed cases, 94 (61%) were positive HR; 68 (45%) had histological grade 2 and 83 (53.9%) histological grade 3 tumors; and 151 pts (99.3%) presented a ki-67 level &amp;gt;20%. HER2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) resulted in 3+ for 133 pts (86.9%) and in 2+ for 20 pts (13.1%), all of them with positive result by in situ hybridation (ISH). P-T were mostly combined with anthracyclines (64.9%). tpCR rate was 50.6%, and it was not significantly different according chemotherapy approach. tpCR was significantly higher among HR negative tumours (73.3%) compared with HR positive (36.2%) (p= 0.001), and in HER2 positive 3+ (55.6%) compared with HER2 positive 2+ (15%) tumours (p= 0.001). Achievement of tpCR was not significantly associated with tumor size, stage, histological grade and ki-67 level. Breast pCR was higher than tpCR (54.2%). 13 pts (8.4%) presented recurrence disease, in 76.9% of cases was a metastatic relapse. Cardiotoxicity was low during all stages of treatment and was not significantly associated with chemotherapy pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant T-P plus chemotherapy with either anthracyclines or platinum therapy, demonstrated same efficacy and cardiac safety in our real-world study. pCR rates are lower in positive HR and HER2 positive 2+, needing more investigation with combination strategies including hormonotherapy, Our results are similar to data from randomized trials and other real-world efficacy studies, but we need more follow-up to identify late cardiotoxicity by anthracyclines and recurrences in positive HR tumors. Citation Format: Beatriz Alonso de Castro, Cristina Reboredo, Lourdes Calvo, Maria-Eva Perez-Lopez, Martin Igor Gomez Randulfe Rodriguez, Sofia silva diaz, Iria Parajo Vazquez, Silvia Antolin Novoa. Real-world efficacy of dual HER2-blockade in combination with anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free neoadjuvant treatment in early breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-01-07.

Abstract PO5-01-03: Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted regimens with or without anthracyclines for HER2-positive inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): a multicenter retrospective study

Abstract Background Previous randomized clinical trials have shown no significant benefit with the addition of anthracyclines to neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer. However, these studies did not focus on inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), or a small minority of patients on these trials. The study aims to compare pathologic complete response rates with and without anthracyclines in HER2-positive IBC. Methods We reviewed patients diagnosed with Stage III HER2-positive IBC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and modified radical mastectomy at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2014 and 2021. Patients received either docetaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab-doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (THP-AC) or docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TCHP). The primary outcome was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, defined as ypTisT0/N0. Secondary outcomes included 2-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed with adjustments for clinically relevant covariates. Results Ninety-nine patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-nine patients received TCHP and 60 received THP-AC. The median follow-up time was 3.02 years. Three patients had disease progression during neoadjuvant therapy. pCR rates did not differ between the two regimens (48.7% TCHP vs. 51.7% THP-AC; p = 0.774). Patient’s baseline characteristics did not significantly affect the pCR rate, except for age. A multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age and estrogen receptor (ER) status did not show a significant association between pCR and regimen (odds ratio 1.232, 95% CI 0.537–2.829 for THP-AC vs. TCHP, p = 0.623). The 2-year EFS rates for TCHP and THP-AC were 57% and 74%, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients who received THP-AC had better EFS than patients who received TCHP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.423, 95% CI 0.214–0.835, p = 0.013). The EFS benefit of THP-AC remained statistically significant after adjusting for age and type of adjuvant therapy in the final reduced multivariable Cox model (HR 0.441, 95% CI 0.220–0.882, p = 0.021). Univariate analysis did not show a significant association between EFS and other baseline covariates (body mass index, race, N and M category, nuclear grade, ER status, and HER2-targeted therapy). OS did not differ between the THP-AC and TCHP groups (HR 0.419, 95% CI 0.122–1.440, p = 0.167). Conclusions The present analysis revealed that a non–anthracycline-containing regimen in HER2-positive IBC patients had no significant difference in pCR rates but was associated with lower 2-year EFS when compared to an anthracycline-containing regimen. However, OS was similar. Limitations of the study include a small sample size, lack of temporal analysis, and retrospective design with its possible selection bias. Further investigation of the optimal neoadjuvant regimen for patients with HER2-positive IBC is warranted. Citation Format: Toshiaki Iwase, Sridhar Nithya, Megumi Kai, Jie Willey, Wenli Dong, Yu Shen, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Anthony Lucci, H. T. Carisa Le-Petross, Azadeh Nasrazadani, Sadia Saleem, Rachel Layman, Vicente Valero, Debu Tripathy, Wendy Woodward, Yee Chung Cheng, Faina Nakhlis, Jennifer Bellon, Filipa Lynce, Naoto Ueno. Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted regimens with or without anthracyclines for HER2-positive inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): a multicenter retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-01-03.

Abstract PO3-27-01: Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in loco-regional advancedbreast cancer by using advanced PET/CT metabolic parameters

Abstract Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in loco-regional advanced breast cancer by using advanced PET/CT metabolic parameters. Abstract: Background: The standard treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by surgery. The usefulness of FDG PET/CT for evaluating the treatment efficacy in breast cancer is well established; however, the role of quantitative functional PET/CT parameters, such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between quantitative functional parameters derived from PET/CT in LABC patients at staging and the response to neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients (aged 25-82 y) with confirmed LABC (stages II-III) who underwent PET/CT as a part of their staging assessment and received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery were retrospectively included in this study. All patients underwent an FDG PET/CT at staging; and values of SUV max, SUV mean, MTV, and TLG were determined from the PET/CT studies. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the completeness of histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy, both in the primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes. Clinical, imaging and demographic data were collected from patient’s medical record. Results: A complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 33/78 (42%) patients. Among patients with ER/PR positive, Her2-neu negative tumors, in 23/27 (85%) patients only partial pathologic response was reached; 91% of patients with ER/PR negative, Her2-neu positive and 43% of Triple-negative patients had complete pathological? response. For the primary breast tumor response, a higher SUV max, 10.7±5.34 for pCR vs. 7.24±4.62 for non-pCR group was measured, p-value=0.003; threshold value of 6.625. A higher SUV mean in the primary tumor resulted in a significantly higher rate of pCR, 5.95±2.36 vs 4,4±2.16, p=0.004, with a threshold value of 5.795. Neither MTV, not TLG were predictive parameters of the primary tumor response. For lymph nodes response, SUV max and SUV mean had no role in the prediction of pCR. Statistically significant difference however, was found between pCR and non-pCR in MTV values in the involved lymph nodes, with a median =2.13 cm³ [0-7.85] in pCR group vs 5.43 cm³ [3.11-15.3] in non-pCR, p=0.01 (threshold value 2.375) as well as in TLG measurements, with a median of 4.64 [0-19.8] vs. 12.7 [3.21-23.1], p=0.047, (25-75 IQR). Conclusion: Primary breast tumor SUV max/mean values have a significant correlation with the treatment response and threshold values were found. Low MTV and TLG measurements in lymph nodes may predict pCR. Neither MTV nor TLG had were found to have a significant role in the prediction of the primary tumor response. Citation Format: Maisun Shamya, Olga Kagna, Zohar Keidar, Tala Palchan-Hazan, Salem Billan, Roxolyana Abdah-Bortnyak. Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in loco-regional advancedbreast cancer by using advanced PET/CT metabolic parameters [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-27-01.