Sir: The anterolateral thigh flap is qualified to be close to an ideal soft-tissue flap.1 The flap has the versatility of transferring different tissue components to fulfill the requirements of reconstruction. In particular, the muscle is invaluable for providing bulk, obliterating dead space, or neutralizing a hostile wound. Muscle viability is therefore of utmost importance.2 The myocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap is traditionally harvested en bloc without skin vessel dissection.3 This approach does not provide the opportunity to visualize the vascular connection between the muscle and skin to confirm the presence of reliable circulation in between, it does not address vascular variations of the anterolateral thigh flap, and it may result in skin vessel/muscular vessel injury during muscle cut, leading to skin paddle or even total flap loss, especially if the muscle segment is small.2–4 The authors propose using a perforator dissection technique for safe dissection of the anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap. A video for demonstration is also presented. Marking is performed in standard fashion and then ultrasound Doppler imaging is used to identify skin vessels. The anteromedial border is incised down to the deep fascia. Dissection proceeds laterally either suprafascially or subfascially. Skin vessels are identified, and then a suitable vein (or veins) is selected. After that, chosen skin vessels are unroofed by cutting the minimal amount of muscle fibers covering them. Vessel unroofing is complete when the entire course of the musculocutaneous perforator and its source artery are exposed. The vascularly robust muscle needed is then marked. The designed muscle is dissected with meticulous hemostasis. The posterior border of the skin paddle is cut once the defect is clear. The flap is then divided and transferred to the defect and the donor site is closed primarily. (SeeVideo, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which shows part 1 of stepwise harvest of the anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap with retrograde vessel unroofing, https://links.lww.com/PRS/B240; Video, Supplemental Digital Content 2, which shows part 2, https://links.lww.com/PRS/B241; and Video, Supplemental Digital Content 3, which shows part 3, https://links.lww.com/PRS/B242.)Video 1: Supplemental Digital Content 1 shows part 1 of stepwise harvest of the anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap with retrograde vessel unroofing, https://links.lww.com/PRS/B240.Video 2: Supplemental Digital Content 2 shows part 2 of stepwise harvest of the anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap with retrograde vessel unroofing, https://links.lww.com/PRS/B241.Video 3: Supplemental Digital Content 3 shows part 3 of stepwise harvest of the anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap with retrograde vessel unroofing, https://links.lww.com/PRS/B242.The indisputable advantages of the anterolateral thigh flap are as follows: two-team approach, composite reconstruction, long pedicle, and minimal donor-site morbidity.1 The flap’s vascular anatomy variations are its curse. Kimata et al. reported a 15.7 percent variability in the perforator’s vascular origin.4 Wong et al. reported a 14 percent rate of using the oblique branch as a reliable alternative pedicle.5 These findings imply that in the anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap, the skin and muscle could be nourished by different vessels, and failure to address this during flap dissection may jeopardize the flap’s skin or muscle viability.4 The anterolateral thigh myocutaneous flap is different from the vastus lateralis myocutaneous flap in that only a segment of the vastus lateralis muscle, not all of it, is harvested with the skin paddle.2 Therefore, (1) fewer skin vessels are captured in the flap’s territory, necessitating utmost protection to chosen perforator; and (2) there is an increased risk of perforator injury during muscle cut unless its path is clear. Thus, vessel unroofing increases the safety and reliability of the technique. The authors’ proposed technique could slightly increase flap harvest time compared with the classic method. However, the benefits as seen warrant the utmost emphasis. In conclusion, the proposed technique is easy to perform. It prevents accidental injury to skin/muscle nourishing vessel(s) and addresses possible anatomical variations. This technique is invaluable for young surgeons. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare. Nidal Farhan ALDeek, M.D., M.Sc. Chung-Kan Tsao, M.D. Huang-Kai Kao, M.D. Fu-Chan Wei, M.D. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chang Gung Medical College and Chang Gung University Taipei, Taiwan
Read full abstract