Multiple Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors Research Articles

Strengths and pitfalls of brigatinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients' management.

The treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has dramatically changed over the past 10 years, particularly thanks to the advent and development of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting oncogenic drivers. Among them, patients bearing anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations, which are causative of 3-5% of all advanced NSCLC, have seen dramatically improved their clinical outcomes moving life expectancy at 5 years from less than 5% to 50%. In fact, multiple ALK inhibitors (ALKi) entered in the therapeutic algorithm of ALK+ patients, multiplying their treatment opportunities. Remarkably, in the near future we could take advantage of up to different 6 molecules for the first-line approach (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, plus ensartinib and lorlatinib). Among available ALKi, brigatinib, a second-generation (2G) inhibitor, showed notable activity in this setting, also against central nervous system (CNS) disease, and a good safety profile, supporting its approval as upfront treatment based on the ALTA-1L trial results. With a peculiar profile of enzymatic targets, brigatinib represents a valuable opportunity in the ALK targeting journey, albeit having to balance its safety profile. The abundance of therapeutic options for these patients poses nontrivial questions; in absence of direct comparisons of efficacy is not easy to define the best approach and, more compelling, the correct administration sequence in order to give the best therapeutic chances to ALK+ lung cancer patients. In such wide variety of options, we reviewed the preclinical and clinical efficacy data of brigatinib, its pharmacological and safety profile, like also actual and potential future applications in the ALK+ NSCLC scenario. Through a spurious exercise of an indirect comparison with other available 2G ALKi, we tent to summarize the required knowledge to properly choose the best drug at the right time. Furthermore, we reviewed available data on molecular resistance mechanisms and putative therapeutic applications in other contexts, such as ROS1+ NSCLC patients or EGFR+ ones progressing to osimertinib.

Upfront Management of ALK-Rearranged Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: One Inhibitor Fits All?

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements represent a seldom event in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the oncogene alteration, ALK targeting represents the main therapeutic strategy. Here, we review evidence regarding ALK inhibitors (ALKi): clinical activity, safety profiles, financial costs, and biomarkers of efficacy. During the past 10years, multiple ALKi have been developed, and four different compounds are currently available as upfront options for ALK+ NSCLC patients: crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, and brigatinib. Second-generation (2G) ALKi demonstrated superior clinical activity in terms of median progression-free survival (mPFS), objective response rate (ORR), intracranial disease control, and duration of response (DOR) when compared with crizotinib. 2G ALKi represent the current gold-standard first-line treatment for ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC. Among all available options, in our opinion, alectinib has likely the best profile of clinical activity and safety, thus emerging as the best upfront therapy. More insights will come from ongoing trials and analysis of biomarkers.

Retrospective Observational Study of ALK-Inhibitor Therapy Sequencing and Outcomes in Patients with ALK-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BackgroundData are sparse concerning the sequential use of multiple anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors for ALK-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).ObjectiveThis study investigated sequencing and outcomes among patients receiving multiple ALK inhibitors.Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective observational cohort study of adult patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with available first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors from 1 September 2011 to 31 December 2017. Duration of therapy (DOT) and overall survival (OS) were assessed with the Kaplan–Meier method. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess if DOT with a preceding ALK inhibitor was predictive of DOT for subsequent ALK inhibitor treatments.ResultsA total of 410 patients were analyzed: 57% received 1 ALK inhibitor; 35%, 2 ALK inhibitors; and 8%, 3–4 ALK inhibitors. Among those receiving > 1 ALK inhibitor (n = 177), 60% received a crizotinib-led sequence and 39% an alectinib-led sequence. Nearly 60% of the overall population received chemotherapy prior to their first ALK inhibitor. Median OS for the study population was 28 months, 15 months in patients who received 1 ALK inhibitor, 42 months in patients who received 2 ALK inhibitors, and 56 months in patients who received 3–4 ALK inhibitors. Longer DOT of the first ALK inhibitor was associated with increased DOT of the second (p < 0.0001), and longer DOT of the second ALK inhibitor was associated with increased DOT of the third (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThis study provides initial information on real-world treatment patterns following the introduction of new ALK inhibitors, and supports the use of sequential ALK therapies.

Front-line treatment of ceritinib improves efficacy over crizotinib for Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion NSCLC: The role of systemic progression control.

BackgroundApproximately 3%–5% of lung adenocarcinoma is driven by anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene, whose activity can be suppressed by multiple ALK inhibitors. Crizotinib and ceritinib have demonstrated superior efficacy to platinum‐based chemotherapy as front‐line treatment for patients with ALK‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the direct comparison between them in the front‐line setting remains lacking.MethodsA total of 48 patients with ALK‐positive, previously untreated advanced NSCLC, who received crizotinib and ceritinib as front‐line treatment were retrospectively investigated. The efficacy and pattern of disease progression were analyzed.ResultsPatients receiving ceritinib treatment were significantly younger than those receiving crizotinib treatment (52.0 vs. 63.0, P = 0.016). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with ceritinib than with crizotinib treatment (32.3 vs. 12.9 months; log‐rank P = 0.020); the hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.08–0.90; P = 0.033). An objective response was noted in all patients in the ceritinib group and in 23 patients in the crizotinib group (74.2%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 88.5). The rate of systemic progression was significantly lower over time with ceritinib treatment compared to crizotinib treatment (cause‐specific hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI 0.06–0.73; P = 0.014). Serious adverse events were noted in one (2.9%) patient showing elevated liver function in the crizotinib group and three (23.1%) patients showing diarrhea in the ceritinib group. Dose reduction was needed in five out of 13 (38.5%) patients receiving ceritinib treatment.ConclusionCeritinib showed higher efficacy associated with a better control of systemic progression compared to crizotinib for the front‐line treatment of ALK‐positive advanced NSCLCs.

Chinese perspectives on clinical efficacy and safety of alectinib in patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The incidence of lung cancer is increasing in China, in contrast to trends in Western countries, due to the increasing numbers of smokers and high levels of air pollution. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of lung cancer, accounting for approximately 85% of lung cancers. Better understanding of the pathogenesis of NSCLC has led to the identification of multiple genetic mutations and chromosomal translocations such as those in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. To facilitate the identification of treatment targets, multiple guidelines (European Society for Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Society of Clinical Oncology) now recommend screening for genetic factors to help guide treatment decisions. In recent years, multiple ALK inhibitors have been developed to treat NSCLC, including the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib; second-generation TKIs such as ceritinib, ensartinib, brigatinib, and alectinib; the third-generation TKI lorlatinib; and the fourth-generation TKI repotrectinib. These agents differ in structure, potency, and activity, both systemically and their effects on central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Recently, alectinib was approved in China to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC that were ALK+. Alectinib has demonstrated activity against NSCLC, including metastases within the CNS, with better tolerability than crizotinib. These ALK inhibitors represent significant advances in the treatment of NSCLC and yet patients will likely still exhibit disease progression. Alectinib offers greater potency with greater specificity as well as a better toxicity profile than many other TKIs that are currently available. Here, we review the role of ALK as a therapeutic target in NSCLC, the testing methods for identifying ALK-rearranged NSCLC, and the various TKIs currently being used or explored for treatment in this setting, with a focus on alectinib from a Chinese perspective.

Drug resistance in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged lung cancer.

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, and many kinds of ALK fusion genes have been found in a variety of carcinomas. There is almost no detectable expression of ALK in adults. However, through ALK gene rearrangement, the resultant ALK fusion protein is aberrantly overexpressed and dimerized through the oligomerization domains, such as the coiled‐coil domain, in the fusion partner that induces abnormal constitutive activation of ALK tyrosine kinase. This results in dysregulated cell proliferation. ALK gene rearrangement has been observed in 3%‐5% of non‐small‐cell lung cancers, and multiple ALK inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of ALK‐positive lung cancer. Among those inhibitors, in Japan, 3 (4 in the USA) ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved and are currently used in clinics. All of the currently approved ALK‐TKIs have been shown to induce marked tumor regression in ALK‐rearranged non‐small‐cell lung cancer; however, tumors inevitably relapse because of acquired resistance within a few years. This review focuses on ALK‐TKIs, their resistance mechanisms, and the potential therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance.

Sequential Use of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors in Japanese Patients With ALK-Rearranged Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

BackgroundSecond-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, such as alectinib and ceritinib, have recently been approved for treatment of ALK-rearranged non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An optimal strategy for using 2 or more ALK inhibitors has not been established. We sought to investigate the clinical impact of sequential use of ALK inhibitors on these tumors in clinical practice. Patients and MethodsPatients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated from May 2010 to January 2016 at the National Cancer Center Hospital were identified, and their outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. ResultsFifty-nine patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC had been treated and 37 cases were assessable. Twenty-six received crizotinib, 21 received alectinib, and 13 (35.1%) received crizotinib followed by alectinib. Response rates and median progression-free survival (PFS) on crizotinib and alectinib (after crizotinib failure) were 53.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.7%-80.9%) and 38.4% (95% CI, 12.0%-64.9%), and 10.7 (95% CI, 5.3-14.7) months and 16.6 (95% CI, 2.9-not calculable), respectively. The median PFS of patients on sequential therapy was 35.2 months (95% CI, 12.7 months-not calculable). The 5-year survival rate of ALK-rearranged patients who received 2 sequential ALK inhibitors from diagnosis was 77.8% (95% CI, 36.5%-94.0%). ConclusionThe combined PFS and 5-year survival rates in patients who received sequential ALK inhibitors were encouraging. Making full use of multiple ALK inhibitors might be important to prolonging survival in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK): A potential oncogenic driver in triple-negative breast cancer?

1067 Background: TNBC, a molecularly heterogeneous subset of breast cancer, has an aggressive clinical course and no established targets for therapy. Wild-type ALK gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was noted in 6/9 inflammatory TNBC specimens (Robertson et al. SABCS, P3-01-18). The status of ALK, full-length or fused, in non-inflammatory TNBC has not been described. Identification of a biomarker such as ALK in TNBC would be clinically significant, given the ongoing development of multiple ALK inhibitors. We screened for ALK expression in TNBC specimens with a novel patented qRT-PCR assay (Insight ALK Screen). Methods: We tested archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks of TNBC tissue. Evaluable specimens had sufficient tumor material for 10 slides with 5-micron sections. Insight ALK Screen was performed using previously described methodology (Hout, et al. AACR 2011, Abstract 2220). We subjected ALK Screen positive specimens to ALK break-apart FISH (Vysis) and direct sequencing analysis. Results: See clinical characteristics (Table). Insufficient RNA: 8/40 (20%). Insight ALK Screen-positive: 8/32 (25%). Break-apart FISH performed on these 8 specimens suggested 3/8 to be positive for ALK translocation and 2/8 to contain amplification of ALK without a translocation. The ALK-amplified specimens were subsequently confirmed with sequencing of RNA-PCR products to express full-length ALK. One additional ALK Screen-positive, FISH-negative specimen had full-length ALK expression confirmed on sequencing. Further analysis of the other 2 ALK Screen-positive cases is pending. Conclusions: ALK expression was seen in ~25% of TNBC specimens screened by Insight ALK Screen. We observed both ALK translocations and amplification/overexpression of full-length ALK. We are testing additional specimens by FISH and immunohistochemistry to evaluate the full spectrum of ALK alterations in TNBC. Updated data will be presented. [Table: see text]