Multidimensional Health Assessment Research Articles

Interrater reliability of RheuMetric checklist scales for Physician Global Assessment, inflammation, damage and patient distress

Abstract Objective To analyze interrater reliability of four RheuMetric checklist 0–10 visual numerical scales (VNS) of physician global assessment (DOCGL), inflammation or reversible findings (DOCINF), organ damage or irreversible findings (DOCDAM), and patient distress or findings explained by fibromyalgia and/or depression (DOCDIS). Methods A retrospective study was performed of data from a rheumatology fellows’ continuity clinic at Rush University. Each rheumatology patient with any diagnosis seen in routine care completed a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ). Both the rheumatology fellow and attending rheumatologist independently completed RheuMetric estimates at the same visit for DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, DOCDIS, and the proportion of DOCGL explained by each subglobal estimate (totaling 100%). Agreement between the two assessors was compared using paired t-tests, Spearman correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients (LCCC), and Bland-Altman plots. Results In 112 patients, mean levels of DOCINF were highest in inflammatory diseases, DOCDAM in osteoarthritis (OA), and DOCDIS in primary fibromyalgia (FM). However, mean DOCDAM was as high as DOCINF in inflammatory diseases. No statistically significant differences were seen between scores from attending rheumatologists and fellows. Agreement within 2/10 units ranged from 60% for DOCGL to 71% for DOICINF and DOCDAM. Spearman correlations were 0.49-0.65, ICCs were 0.46-0.63, LCCC were 0.46-0.62 between rheumatologist and fellow, indicating moderate agreement; reliability was slightly higher for each sub-global VNS than DOCGL. Conclusion RheuMetric 0–10DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS have moderate interrater reliability and are feasible in routine care to estimate patient status beyond DOCGL for improved management decisions.

The adoption of a place-based framework to inform municipal health strategies

Abstract Background Health is a place-based issue. Research shows that inequalities in health are significantly influenced by social, economic, and environmental factors, making local policies related to these domains critical determinants. Yet, place-based health planning remains underutilized by local practitioners, not receiving adequate attention from policy-makers. Departing from the Municipal Health Strategy of Coimbra, this presentation aims to showcase the framework used for guiding municipal health planning, addressing multidimensional factors, geographic analysis, intersectoral collaboration and participatory approaches. Methods The conceptual and methodological framework followed a population health approach with a geographic lens, looking at how the health outcomes and health determinants were geographically distributed across the municipality (data disaggregated at sub-municipal level), as well as the extent to which policies from multiple sectors can address them. The planning cycle followed an iterative seven-stage process based in five key actions: 1 - Assess (Health Profile), 2 - Prioritize (Priorities), 3 - Plan (Objectives and Strategies), 4 - Implement (Action Plan) and 5 - Monitor (Targets and Measures, Monitoring Plan). Participatory processes were conducted involving local stakeholders and citizens to identify needs, establish priorities and actions. Results The framework for action integrates 14 goals and 94 actions across six policy domains: Sustainable Mobility and Public Places, Safe and Adequate Housing, Accessible Healthcare, Social Cohesion and Participation, Education and Health Literacy and Intersectoral and Collaborative Leadership. Conclusions Adopting a place-based framework to health planning, involving a geographical and multidimensional health assessment as well as the participation of local stakeholders and citizens, was considered effective in turning evidence into practice. Key messages • Municipal health strategies should be developed with a place-based perspective, prioritizing health as the focal point across various intersectoral municipal policies. • The integrated framework shed light on the experience of co-creation to inform health-oriented planning, ensuring that actions address specific needs of localities.

Low Socioeconomic Status and Female Sex are Associated With Worse Functional Status in Axial Spondyloarthritis.

We determined whether socioeconomic status (SES) and sex are associated with functional status (FS) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). We conducted a cohort study of patients with axSpA in the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry. We performed cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of FS through the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) using generalized estimating equation models. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used as an SES proxy. The cross-sectional analysis tested for a linear trend across ADI quintiles for MDHAQ. The longitudinal analysis' outcome was functional decline. We reported predictive margins and assessed for interaction with sex. In the longitudinal analysis, we reported odds of functional decline. In the cross-sectional analysis (N = 5,658), the mean ± SD age was 53.8 ± 15.2 years, 55.8% were female, and 71.4% were non-Hispanic White. The mean ± SD MDHAQ scores were 1.6 ± 2.0 in men versus 2.1 ± 2.2 in women. Predicted mean MDHAQ scores were 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-2.7) for the lowest ADI quintile and 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.1) for the highest. Women had lower FSs compared to men across quintiles. In the longitudinal analysis (n = 2,341), the proportion with FS decline was 14.3% (95% CI 7.6-25.5%) for the lowest SES quintile compared to 9.6% (95% CI 5.2-17.1%) for the highest. Women had 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.2) times higher odds of functional decline compared to men. There was no interaction with sex. In this large sample of patients with axSpA, those with lower SES had worse FS and functional decline. Women had worse FS than men, initially and over time.

Joint Damage and Low Lean Body Mass in a Cohort of Peruvian Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

To determine the association between radiologic joint damage (JD) and a lower lean body mass (LBM) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. A cross-sectional study from a single center established RA cohort. JD and appendicular LBM (arms and legs) were measured with the Sharp/van der Heijde (SvdH) score and dual x-ray absorptiometry expressed as kg/m 2 , respectively. A univariable analysis was used to determine the association between JD an LBM; then, a multivariable regression model was performed to evaluate the persistence of this association, adjusted by age, gender, disease duration, socioeconomic status (by the Graffar method), tobacco use, anticitrullinated protein antibody levels, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints for RA with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, glucocorticoid use (as prednisone equivalent), disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use, body mass index, and disability (by the multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire). Two hundred forty-seven patients were included; the average (SD) age was 63.0 (12.8) years, disease duration 20 (15.00) years, the total SvdH was 66 (86.75), and the aLBM was 13.6 (3.82) kg/m 2 . In the univariable analysis, a lower appendicular LBM was associated with higher SvdH score on the female population, in terms of the total ( B = -8.6, p < 0.01), bone erosion (-4.4, p < 0.01), and joint space narrowing (-4.2, p < 0.01) scores; this correlation remained in the multivariable analysis in terms of total SvdH ( B = -9.5, p < 0.01), bone erosion (-5.2, p < 0.01), and joint space narrowing (-4.3, p < 0.01). A lower LBM in female patients was associated with more severe JD independently of other variables examined. Strategies aimed at preserving LBM could have a favorable impact on the course of disease.

36-40% of Routine Care Patients With Osteoarthritis or Rheumatoid Arthritis Screen Positive for Anxiety, Depression, and/or Fibromyalgia on a Single MDHAQ.

Osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are associated with similar patient disease burdens and a high prevalence of comorbid anxiety (ANX), depression (DEP), and fibromyalgia (FM). Nonetheless, these comorbidities are infrequently assessed in routine care, in part because multiple questionnaires are not feasibly completed by patients. We analyzed the prevalence of ANX, DEP, and FM in patients with OA versus patients with RA seen in routine care using indices within a single Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and associations with \ Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) and its component function, pain, and patient global scores. A retrospective analysis of MDHAQ data in unselected patients with OA or RA receiving routine care at one setting included four indices within an MDHAQ: MDHAQ ANX screen, MDHAQ DEP screen, Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tool, and RAPID3. The prevalence of each comorbidity and associations with RAPID3 and components were analyzed in unadjusted and age-adjusted (Mantel-Haenszel) odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. Overall, 40.4% of 361 patients with OA and 36.3% of 488 patients with RA screened positive for ANX, DEP, and/or FM (8.1% and 7% for all three, respectively). RAPID3 and each component were elevated significantly in patients with any positive screen result for ANX, DEP, and/or FM in both diagnoses (ORs of 2.6-35.8). FM, DEP, and/or ANX rates were 40.4% in patients with OA and 36.3% in patients with RA, associated with significantly poorer patient status measures. Each of these three common comorbidities of patient distress may be feasibly screened for on a single MDHAQ in routine care.

The Prevalence of Fibromyalgia in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using the Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tool (FAST 4) Based on the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ).

Introduction Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by widespread pain and fatigue, accompanied by symptoms such as decreased concentration, autonomic dysfunction, and abdominal pain. It can be either primary or secondary, notably to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tools (FAST 4), derived from the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), is a composite tool allowing for the rapid screening of FM. Our primary objective is to determine the prevalence of FM among RA patients using the FAST 4 index. Secondary objectives include comparing the FAST 4 index with the FiRST score and describing the correlation between FM and RA activity and different factors associated with FM in RA patients. Methods This was an observational cross-sectional study including patients diagnosed with RA according to the ACR/EULAR criteria. The FAST questionnaire comprises four sections assessing pain and fatigue on a visual analog scale, painful joints reported by the patient, and a list of 60 symptoms. A FAST 4 score of ≥ 3/4 indicates a positive screening for FM. Demographics and disease features were compared using descriptive statistics. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression models were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI. The sensitivity and specificity of the FAST 4 index were evaluated, and Fagan's nomograms were used to illustrate post-test probability. Statistically significant results were considered for p-values less than 0.05. Results The study enrolled 97 patients diagnosed with RA. The mean age of the patients was 56 ± 12.7 years, with a predominance of females (90.7%, N=88). The mean duration of RA was 13.5 ± 8.69 years. RA activity measured by DAS 28-ESR showed that 40.2% (N=39) had high disease activity, 38.1% (N=37) had moderate disease activity, 11.3% (N=11) had low disease activity, and 10.3% (N=10) were in remission. The prevalence of comorbid FM, according to the FAST 4 index, was 30.9% (N=30). Based on the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), depression was observed in 66.7% (N=20) patients with FM, while anxiety was reported in 60% (N=18). Moreover, 30.4% of patients screened positive for FM using the FiRST score. The FAST 4 index detected FM patients defined by FiRST with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 87.1%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 73.3%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 90%. Univariate analysis revealed that a positive FAST 4 index was associated with the number of painful and swollen joints (p<0.001 and 0.03, respectively). Additionally, patients with a positive FAST 4 index showed higher DAS 28 scores (p=0.002). No significant association was found with CRP levels (p=0.328), ESR (p=0.499), or the use of biological treatments (p=0.146) or corticosteroids (p=0.940). In multivariate analysis, only depression remained a risk factor, increasing the risk sixfold with an OR of 5.917, 95% CI (1.91-18.3), p=0.002. Conclusion Our study suggests a high prevalence of concomitant FM in our population, highlighting the importance of screening for FM, particularly using the FAST 4 index based solely on the MDHAQ questionnaire.

Impact of comorbidities on patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: a single centre cohort study

BackgroundComorbidities are frequent in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and may contribute to worse health-related outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used to evaluate the burden of the assessed disease. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of comorbidities on selected PROs in PsA.MethodsAdult patients, diagnosed with PsA, based on CASPAR criteria, were included in this cross-sectional, observational study. Collected data encompassed the comorbidities and PROs (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ], Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire [MDHAQ], 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]). Standard statistic methods were performed for data assessment.ResultsThere were 267 participants included in the study (54.7% females). The most prevalent comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (CVD) (29.2 %). Multimorbidity was observed in 50.2% cases and was associated with poorer results of SF-36 questionnaire, regarding bodily pain (34.7 [30.1, 39.3] vs. 47.5 [43.1, 52.0]; p<0.01), physical functioning (52.1 [47.3, 56.9] vs. 63.1 [58.9, 67.4]; p<0.01) and role physical (28.5 [21.2, 35.9] vs. 42.8 [35.2, 50.4]; p<0.01). CVD were associated with poorer MDHAQFn score (β=0.17, p<0.01), while mental disorders negatively influenced mental health (β= -0.35, p<0.01), vitality (β= -0.22, p<0.01), general health (β= -0.19, p<0.01), social functioning (β= -0.15, p=0.04) and role emotional (β= -0.30, p<0.01) dimensions of SF-36. ConclusionsMultimorbidity exerts significant impact on physical aspects of quality of life (QoL) in PsA. CVD and mental disorders adversely influence functional capacity as well as mental and social dimensions of QoL, respectively. The impact of comorbidities should be taken into account by clinicians and researchers assessing PROs.

Ramosetron as an add-on therapy for refractory fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous ramosetron for pain relief in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) unresponsive to conventional treatments. In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 80 FM patients were randomly allocated to receive either placebo (n = 40) or ramosetron (n = 40) at a dosage of 0.3 mg/day intravenously for five consecutive days. The primary outcome was the reduction in pain intensity at the end of the treatment period, evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included the FM Impact Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), EQ-5D and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory on days 5 (end of treatment), 7, 10 and 28. Safety was continuously monitored throughout the study. At the end of the treatment phase, the ramosetron group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in VAS pain scores compared with the placebo group (1.18 ± 1.60 vs 0.54 ± 1.59, P < 0.05). Additionally, the ramosetron group exhibited significant improvements in BDI (4.42 ± 5.18 vs 1.33 ± 4.87, P < 0.05) and MDHAQ pain scale (0.37 ± 0.74 vs 0.04 ± 0.52, P < 0.05) scores. However, these improvements in pain VAS and BDI scores were not sustained through day 28. The safety profile of ramosetron was favorable, with gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly constipation, being the most commonly reported adverse events. Intravenous administration of ramosetron provided safe and effective short-term relief of pain intensity in FM patients with inadequate response to standard treatments.

Physician estimate of inflammation vs global assessment in explaining variations in swollen joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

To analyse patients with RA for inflammatory activity by physician estimate of global assessment (DOCGL) vs an estimate of inflammatory activity (DOCINF) to explain variation in the swollen joint count (SJC). Patients with RA were studied at routine care visits. Patients completed a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and the physician completed a 28-joint count for swollen (SJC), tender (TJC) and deformed (DJC) joints and a RheuMetric checklist with a 0-10 DOCGL visual numeric scale (VNS) and 0-10 VNS estimates of inflammation (DOCINF), damage (DOCDAM) and patient distress (DOCSTR). The disease activity score in 28 joints with ESR (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) were calculated. Individual scores and RA indices were compared according to Spearman correlation coefficients and regression analyses. A total of 104 unselected patients were included, with a median age and disease duration of 54.5 and 5 years, respectively. The median DAS28-ESR was 2.9 (Q1-Q3: 2.0-3.7), indicating low activity. DOCINF was correlated significantly with DOCGL (ρ = 0.775). Both DOCGL and DOCINF were correlated significantly with most other measures; correlations with DOCGL were generally higher than with DOCINF other than for SJC. In regression analyses, DOCINF was more explanatory of variation in SJC than DOCGL and other DAS28-ESR components. Variation in SJC is explained more by a 0-10 DOCINF VNS than the traditional DOCGL or any other measure in RA patients seen in routine care. DOCINF on a RheuMetric checklist can provide informative quantitative scores concerning inflammatory activity in RA patients monitored over long periods.

Having More Tender Than Swollen Joints is Associated With Worse Function and Work Impairment in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may present with more tender than swollen joints, which can persist. Elevated tender-swollen joint difference (TSJD) is often challenging, because there may be multiple causes and it may contribute to overestimating disease activity. Little is known about the phenotype and impact of TSJDs on patient function. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of TSJD on functional outcomes in early RA and to see whether associations vary by joint size. Data were from patients with active, early RA (≤12 months) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort, who completed assessments of general function (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire [MDHAQ]), upper extremity (UE) function (Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders [Neuro-QoL] UE scale), and work/activity impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment RA) over their first year of follow-up. A total of 28 joint counts were performed. TSJDs were calculated. Adjusted associations between TSJDs and functional outcomes were estimated in separate multivariable linear mixed effects models. Separate analyses were performed for large- versus small-joint TSJD. Patients (N=547) were 70% female, mean age 56 (SD 15) years, mean disease duration 5.3 (SD 2.9) months. At baseline, 287 (52%) had TSJD >0 (43% involved large joints and 34% small joints), decreasing to 32% at 12 months. A one-point increase in TSJD was significantly associated with worse function (MDHAQ: adjusted mean change 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.13; Neuro-QoL UE function T score: adjusted mean change -0.59, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.43; and greater work impairment: adjusted mean change 1.95%, 95% CI 0.85%-3.05%). Higher large-joint TSJDs were associated with the worst functional outcomes. Having more tender than swollen joints is common in early RA and is associated with worse function, most notably when involving large joints. Early identification and targeted intervention strategies may be needed.

Validation and Cultural Adaptation of Persian Version of Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multidimensional disease. In addition to quantitative factors, qualitative factors play an important role in the progress and outcome of the diseases. One of the most effective methods of collecting qualitative information is questionnaires reported by patients. The data obtained from the questionnaires are as important as the clinical criteria. Multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) is one of the latest questionnaires that provide useful information in a short time. To investigate the reliability and validity of the Persian form of MDAHAQ for the use of Iranian patients. Two groups of participants were selected for this study. The validity test group included 110 patients, and the reliability test group included 140 patients. Translation and adaption of MDHAQ were performed by using Guillemin guidelines. The reliability was tested by using test-retest and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Persian version of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was used for assessing the criterion validity. The correlation between the MDHAQ score and Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and the Persian version of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) was evaluated using the Spearman coefficient. Discriminant validity was tested in groups of patients based on two varied disease activities based on CDAI and DAS28. Test-retest with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) gave a coefficient of 0.865(95% CI: 0.809, 0.904) for physical function and 0.786(95% CI: 0.698, 0.848) for psychological items. Cronbach's alpha was 0.885 and 0.705 for physical function and psychological dimensions respectively. The Persian version of the MDHAQ had a good to strong correlation with the Persian version of the HAQ (ranging from 0.604 to 0.962) and also with CDAI (ranging from 0.616 to 0.838) and a moderate correlation with DAS28 (ranging from 0.415 to 0.439). The Persian form of MDHAQ is a reliable and valid instrument for the routine evaluation of RA patients in rheumatology clinics in Iranian RA patients.

Development of the American College of Rheumatology Patient-Reported Outcome Quality Measures for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

As part of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded American College of Rheumatology (ACR) initiative, we sought to develop quality measures related to Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) use for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical care. An expert workgroup composed of physician, patient, and researcher representatives convened to identify patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains of greatest importance to people with SLE. A patient advisory panel separately ranked domains. PROMs assessing priority domains were identified through structured literature review, and detailed psychometric reviews were conducted for each PROM. In a Delphi process, the expert workgroup rated PROMs on content validity, psychometric quality, feasibility of implementation, and importance for guiding patient self-management. The patient advisory panel reviewed PROMs in parallel and contributed to the final recommendations. Among relevant PRO domains, the workgroup and patient partners ranked depression, physical function, pain, cognition, and fatigue as high-priority domains. The workgroup recommended at least once yearly measurement for (1) assessment of depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire or Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression scales; (2) assessment of physical function using PROMIS physical function scales or the Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire; and (3) optional assessments of fatigue and cognition. Pain scales evaluated were not found to be sufficiently superior to what is already assessed in most SLE clinic visits. Expert workgroup members and patient partners recommend that clinicians assess depression and physical function at least once yearly in all people with SLE. Additional PROMs addressing cognition and fatigue can also be assessed. Next steps are to incorporate PROM-based quality measures into the ACR The Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry.

Development and preliminary evaluation of the Comprehensive Health Self-Assessment Questionnaire (CHSAQ) for individuals in the Chinese People Liberation Army

ObjectiveThere is currently no widely accepted multidimensional health assessment questionnaire for individuals in the Chinese People Liberation Army (PLA). This study developed a multidimensional health survey questionnaire (Comprehensive Health Self-Assessment Questionnaire, CHSAQ) suitable for personnel in the PLA and conducted a preliminary examination of its reliability, validity, and discriminative ability.MethodsAfter 183 items from 32 dimensions were selected to form the initial version of the CHSAQ, three groups of soldiers were selected from May 2022 to April 2023 and completed three survey rounds (with 183, 131, and 55 valid items). The items were screened based on classic test theory. After screening, the final questionnaire entries were formed, the structure of the questionnaire was explored through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, and its reliability, structural validity, and discriminative ability were evaluated.ResultsThe final questionnaire consisted of 8 dimensions and 55 items on job satisfaction, anxiety and depression, daily activities, physical function, the otolaryngology system, the integumentary system, sleep disorders, and the visual system. The total cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.648% according to exploratory factor analysis. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, the normed fit index (NFI) was 0.880, and the comparison fit index (CFI) was 0.893 (close to 0.90). The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.970, the split half reliability coefficient was 0.937, and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.902. The results are presented as different pairwise comparisons.ConclusionOur study developed a self-report questionnaire for evaluating the comprehensive health status of personnel in the PLA in accordance with the standard procedure for questionnaire development. Our findings also showed that the CHSAQ for individuals in the PLA has good reliability and structural validity.

PROMIS-29 in rheumatoid arthritis patients who screen positive or negative for fibromyalgia on MDHAQ FAST4 (fibromyalgia assessment screening tool) or 2011 fibromyalgia criteria

BackgroundPROMIS-29 T-scores query health-related quality of life (HRQL) in 7 domains, physical function, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, and social participation, to establish population norms. An MDHAQ (multidimensional health assessment questionnaire) scores these 7 domains and includes medical information such as a FAST4 (fibromyalgia assessment screening tool) index. We analyzed PROMIS-29 T-scores in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients vs population norms and for positive vs negative fibromyalgia (FM) screens, and compared PROMIS-29 T-scores to MDHAQ scores to assess HRQL. MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed at one routine visit of 213 RA patients, who completed MDHAQ, PROMIS-29, and reference 2011 FM Criteria. PROMIS-29 T-scores were compared in RA vs population norms and in FM+ vs FM- RA patients, based on MDHAQ/FAST4 and reference criteria. Possible associations between PROMIS-29 T-scores and corresponding MDHAQ scores were analyzed using Spearman correlations and multiple regressions. ResultsMedian PROMIS-29 T-scores indicated clinically and statistically significantly poorer status in 25-27% FM+ vs FM- RA patients, with larger differences than in RA patients vs population norms for 6/7 domains. MDHAQ scores were correlated significantly with each of 7 corresponding PROMIS-29 domains (|rho|≥0.62, p<0.001). Linear regressions explained 55-73% of PROMIS-29 T-score variation by MDHAQ scores and 56%-71% of MDHAQ score variation by PROMIS-29 T-scores. ConclusionsScores for 7 PROMIS-29 domains and MDHAQ were highly correlated. The MDHAQ is effective to assess HRQL and offers incremental medical information, including FAST4 screening. The results indicate the importance of assessing comorbidities such as fibromyalgia screening in interpreting PROMIS-29 T-scores.

Oral Health Assessment Tools for Elderly Adults: A Scoping Review.

The aim of this study was to synthesize the Oral Health Assessment Tool for elderly adults and determine its psychosocial properties. We conducted a scoping review. The Arkey and O'Malley methodology was employed to conduct scoping reviews involving the exploration of both national and international databases, as well as a manual search of the reference lists of the selected studies. We focused on oral health assessment tools for elderly adults (>60 years). The review report adhered to the standards outlined in the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The study protocol was officially filed with the Open Science Framework. A total of 19 documents were included. The literature search included a time frame ranging from 1995 to 2023 and covered a diverse range of 13 countries. Of the 19 assessment tools examined, it was found that only the Oral Assessment Sheet had multidimensional characteristics, while the remaining tools were unidimensional in nature. The evaluation of oral health assessment tools was conducted across several contexts, including nursing homes, geriatric facilities, communities, and hospitals. A total of eleven studies underwent reliability testing, whereas two studies were alone validated for validity and did not undergo reliability testing. Additionally, seven studies were exclusively validated for reliability and did not undergo validity testing. Multidimensional oral health assessment tools for elderly adults that integrate social and psychological aspects need to be developed and validated. It is necessary to develop oral health assessment tools based on hospitalized elderly patients to meet the oral and dental health needs of elderly patients.

Multimorbidity Patterns and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Outcomes: Findings From a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort.

To determine whether unique multimorbidity patterns are associated with long-term rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease severity. We conducted a cohort study within the Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis registry. We applied previously derived multimorbidity patterns based on the presence of diagnostic codes for relevant conditions prior to enrollment using linked administrative data. Disease activity and functional status were assessed longitudinally up to 5 years after enrollment. The association of multimorbidity patterns with disease activity and functional status were assessed using generalized estimating equations models adjusting for relevant confounders. We studied 2,956 participants, of which 88.2% were male, 76.9% reported white race, and 79.3% had a smoking history. Mental health and substance abuse (β 0.12 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.00, 0.23]), cardiovascular (β 0.25 [95% CI 0.12, 0.38]), and chronic pain (β 0.21 [95% CI 0.11, 0.31]) multimorbidity were associated with higher Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) scores. Mental health and substance abuse (β 0.09 [0.03, 0.15]), cardiovascular (β 0.11 [95% CI 0.04, 0.17]), and chronic pain multimorbidity (β 0.15 [95% CI 0.10, 0.20]) were also associated with higher Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) scores. The metabolic pattern of multimorbidity was not associated with DAS28 or MDHAQ. The number of multimorbidity patterns present was highly associated with DAS28 and MDHAQ (P trend < 0.001), and patients with all four multimorbidity patterns had the highest DAS28 (β 0.59 [95% CI 0.36, 0.83]) and MDHAQ (β 0.27 [95% CI 0.16, 0.39]) scores. Mental health and substance abuse, chronic pain, and cardiovascular multimorbidity patterns are associated with increased RA disease activity and poorer functional status. Identifying and addressing these multimorbidity patterns may facilitate achieving RA treatment targets.

Correlation of Disease Activity Scores and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Saudi Experience.

Introduction This study aimed to analyze the correlation between Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) and disease activity scores using the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)/C-reactive protein (CRP)), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) attending a single rheumatology center in Jeddah. Methods A cross-sectional study of patients with RA who fulfilled the 2010 American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of RAbetween June 2018 and November 2019 was conducted. The validated Arabic version of the multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) was used. The data collected included demographic information, comorbid illnesses, concomitant medications, laboratory results, and disease activity measured using the DAS 28 ESR/CRP, CDAI, SDAI, and RAPID3. Results A total of 137 patients with RA were included in the analysis; the mean age was 53.1 (± 12) years, there were 122 (89%) females, and the mean disease duration was 8 (± 4) years. Forty-nine (44.5%) patients were treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), 53 (48.2%) with non-anti-TNF, 8 (7.3%) with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and 27 (20%) with synthetic disease-modifying drugs (sDMARD). The mean RAPID3 (0-10) score was 3.6 (± 2) for low disease activity. The mean DAS28 ESR was 4.16 (± 4) for moderate disease activity. The mean DAS CRP was 3.39 (± 1.2) for moderate disease activity. The mean CDAI was 13.4 (± 10.7) for moderate disease activity. The mean SDAI was 15.34 (± 11.8) for moderate disease activity. Pearson's correlations showed a strong correlation with DAS28 CRP (r=0.773, p < 0.001), SDAI (r=0.764,p < 0.001), CDAI (r=0.710, p < 0.001), and DAS28 ESR (r=0.283, p < 0.002). Conclusion RAPID3significantly correlated with DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI scores in our patients. It isa simple, inexpensive, and patient-centered practical tool for assessing disease activity that can reflect the health-related quality of life and be easily implemented inclinical practice.

RheuMetric Quantitative 0 to 10 Physician Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Distress in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Validation Against Reference Measures.

To analyze a RheuMetric checklist, which includes four feasible physician 0 to 10 scores for DOCGL, inflammation (DOCINF), damage (DOCDAM), and distress (DOCSTR) for criterion and discriminant validity against standard reference measures. A prospective, cross-sectional assessment was performed at one routine care visit at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Rheumatologists recorded DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, DOCSTR, and 28 joint counts for swelling (SJC), tenderness (TJC), and limited motion/deformity (DJC). Patients completed a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), which includes routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3), fibromyalgia assessment screening tool (FAST4), and MDHAQ depression screen (MDS2). Laboratory tests and radiographic scores were recorded. RheuMetric estimates of inflammation, damage, and distress were compared with reference and other measures using correlations and linear regressions. In 173 patients with RA, variation in RheuMetric DOCINF was explained significantly by SJC and inversely by disease duration; variation in DOCDAM was explained significantly by DJC, radiographic scores, and physical function; and variation in DOCSTR was explained significantly by fibromyalgia and depression. RheuMetric DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCSTR estimates were correlated significantly and specifically with reference measures of inflammation, damage, and distress, documenting criterion and discriminant validity.

Screening for Anxiety in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis Using the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire.

To analyze the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) in screening for anxiety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), compared to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as the reference standard. Patients with a physician diagnosis of RA or PsA were invited to complete the MDHAQ and HADS at their routine rheumatology clinic visit. Sensitivity, specificity, percent agreement, and [Formula: see text] statistics were used to evaluate agreement between 2 MDHAQ items for anxiety and HADS subscale for Anxiety (HADS-A) score of ≥ 8. The first item is a question asked on a 4-point scale (0-3.3), and the second is a yes or no (blank) question asked within a 60-item review of symptoms (ROS) checklist. The study included 183 participants, of whom 126 (68.9%) had RA and 57 (31.1%) had PsA. The mean age was 57.3 years and 66.7% were female. Positive screening for anxiety according to a HADS-A score of ≥ 8 was seen in 39.3% of patients. Compared to those with a HADS-A score of ≥ 8, patients with an MDHAQ score of ≥ 2.2 or a positive on ROS had a sensitivity of 69.9%, specificity of 73.6% and substantial agreement (agreement 80.9%, [Formula: see text] 0.59). The MDHAQ provides information similar to the HADS in screening for anxiety in patients with RA and PsA. The use of this single questionnaire, which can also be used to monitor clinical status and to screen for fibromyalgia and depression without requiring multiple questionnaires, may prove a valuable tool in routine clinical practice.

Comparison of Disability Indices by Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and Short Form 36 in Patients of Rheumatoid Arthritis With or Without Fibromyalgia

Background: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic disabling and deforming autoimmune disease which presents frequently with articular and extra articular features.Fibromyalgia (FM) has been reported in significant number with RA cases. FM has negative impact on health status, functional capacity, and quality of life. Aim of this study is to assess disability indices Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MD HAQ) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) in patient of RA with FM in comparison to RA without FM.&#x0D; Materials and methods: Total 50 patients of RA were enrolled from the Medicine and Physical Medicine Department of Chittagong Medical College Hospital. After clinical evaluation, MDHAQ and SF-36 questionnaires were applied to every patient. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and C-reactive Protein (CRP) Rheumatoid Factor (RF) were measured to assess disease activity of RA. FM and RA were diagnosed by American College of Rheumatology Joint count criteria.&#x0D; Results: Meanage was 51.20 (±8.44) years with male to female ratio 1:1.6.Out of 50 RA patients, 11(22%) were classified having FM predominantly in female.Mean (±SD) Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) were significantly higher in patients with RA and FM (5.74±1.09) than in patients with RA only (4.51±1.41). Median MDHAQ scores were significantly higher in patients with RA and FM than the RA patients without FM. SF-36 scores for quality of life in all aspects is significantly worse in RA patients with FM compared to RAwithout FM.&#x0D; Conclusions: RA with FMPatients are found to have worse scores on the MDHAQ and SF-36 than RA alone.&#x0D; JCMCTA 2019 ; 31 (1) : 4-8