You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized1 Apr 20111797 URETHRAL PRESERVATION AND ANASTOMOTIC TECHNIQUE DURING OPEN ANTEGRADE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: FUNCTIONAL AND ONCOLOGICAL RESULTS Federico Lanzi, Lorenzo Masieri, Nicola Tosi, Michele Lanciotti, Saverio Giancane, Claudia Giannessi, Marco Carini, and Sergio Serni Federico LanziFederico Lanzi Florence, Italy More articles by this author , Lorenzo MasieriLorenzo Masieri Florence, Italy More articles by this author , Nicola TosiNicola Tosi Florence, Italy More articles by this author , Michele LanciottiMichele Lanciotti Florence, Italy More articles by this author , Saverio GiancaneSaverio Giancane Florence, Italy More articles by this author , Claudia GiannessiClaudia Giannessi Florence, Italy More articles by this author , Marco CariniMarco Carini Florence, Italy More articles by this author , and Sergio SerniSergio Serni Florence, Italy More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2147AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The aim of the study is to present our technique of urethral preservation and vesicourethral anastomosis during open antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy (ARRP) in a series of 936 consecutive patients (pts) evaluating functional and oncological outcome. METHODS From Jan 2000 to Dec 2008, 936 pts underwent ARRP for clinically localized prostate cancer. Mean age (range) was 65.2 (42–78) years. The first step of our technique is the dissection of vesico-prostatic junction preserving completely the bladder neck. Once neurovascular bundles are dissected or resected, cranial traction of the completely mobilized prostate allows an excellent visualization of apex and urethral sphincter so urethra can be transected at its origin from prostatic boundaries. Vesicourethral anastomosis is created using four sutures of 3/0 Polysorb® around a Foley 18 Fr catheter after mucosal eversion of bladder neck. Catheter is usually removed on postoperative day 10. RESULTS Mean follow-up (SD, median, range) was 54.7 months (27.6; 51; 16 121). Of the 936 pts, 55 (5.9%) with pN+ were addressed to adjuvant therapy and excluded from survival analysis. Tumoral involvement of apex was found in 625/881 (70.9%) cases, while apical positive surgical margins were discovered in 42/625 (6.72%) pts. Of those, 15 (35.7%) developed BCR. Overall 892 (95.3%) pts completely fulfilled our continence criteria (no pads) at a minimum follow-up of 12 months; 16 (1.7%) pts developed mid stress incontinence (1 pad/die), while 22 (3.0%) pts used 2–3 pad/die. Continence rates obtained at catheter removal and at 1,3,6,12 months were 54.9% (514/936), 73.5% (688/936), 87.5% (819/936), 93.8% (878/936) and 95.3% (892/936) respectively. Overall 4 pts (0.4%) developed anastomotic contracture at mean 6.5 (5–9) months: of those, 2 pts were non nerve-sparing radical prostatectomized, 1 monolateral and 1 bilateral nerve-sparing (p=NS). All those pts were treated by endoscopic cold incision of anastomotic stricture: 1 pts developed mid urinary incontinence after endoscopic treatment; at a mean follow-up of 27.7 (15–47) months 3 patients were continent and without signs of obstruction at uroflowmetry. CONCLUSIONS Our technique allows an excellent definition of prostatic apex preserving the striated sphincter and saving the maximum of urethra with low risk of leaving prostatic tissue in situ. Contextual respect of anatomical boundaries of bladder neck and the mucosal eversion in creating anastomosis were found to be fundamental in prevention of anastomotic contracture. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e722 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Federico Lanzi Florence, Italy More articles by this author Lorenzo Masieri Florence, Italy More articles by this author Nicola Tosi Florence, Italy More articles by this author Michele Lanciotti Florence, Italy More articles by this author Saverio Giancane Florence, Italy More articles by this author Claudia Giannessi Florence, Italy More articles by this author Marco Carini Florence, Italy More articles by this author Sergio Serni Florence, Italy More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract