The article is devoted to the issues of implementation of administrative liability for driving a vehicle while intoxicated. The author makes a thesis that there is a high level of road traffic injuries as a result of road accidents in Ukraine and a low level of road safety. One of the reasons for this state of road accidents is the commission of road traffic accidents while intoxicated, which is a consequence of the low culture of domestic drivers and a sense of impunity, as such offences are becoming the norm and have become commonplace. It is argued that an important aspect of successful implementation of the State policy in the field of road safety is the ability of the national judicial system to fulfil its tasks of ensuring the inevitability of liability for committed road traffic offences. However, there are a number of factors (determinants) which prevent the courts from successfully performing their functions. Attention is drawn to the annual increase in the workload of the judicial system of Ukraine. The increase in vacant positions due to the dismissal of judges has a negative impact on the quality and quantity of cases considered, as well as on the overall duration of the process in the direction of its delay. The author provides statistical data showing an increase in the number of cases submitted to judges, which confirms the first thesis. The author emphasises the obsolescence of the current legislation on administrative liability and the existence of a significant number of shortcomings and gaps which require immediate response. The author supports the position that the latter significantly contributes to corruption among representatives of the judiciary. The author emphasises the typical mistakes made by police officers in the preparation of administrative offence case files, which significantly affect the final court decision, and as a result, the allegedly guilty person in drunk driving escapes liability altogether. The author provides an example of a common violation committed by police officers in the course of the procedure for bringing a driver to administrative responsibility. The author makes a conclusion about the organisational, regulatory and managerial determinants which lead to impunity of motor vehicle drivers.
Read full abstract