Motor Cortex Excitability Research Articles

Assessing motor cortex excitability and it's relationship with cortical atrophy in Alzheimer's dementia

Assessing motor cortex excitability and it's relationship with cortical atrophy in Alzheimer's dementia

Upregulation of the parietal cortex improves freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is a key brain area for visuospatial processing and locomotion. It has been repetitively shown to be involved in the neural correlates of freezing of gait (FOG), a common symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, current neuroimaging modalities do not allow to precisely determine the role of the PPC during real FOG episodes. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to modulate the PPC cortical excitability using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to determine whether the PPC contributes to FOG or compensates for dysfunctional neural networks to reduce FOG. METHODS Fourteen participants with PD who experience freezing took part in a proof of principle study consisting of three experimental sessions targeting the PPC with inhibitory, excitatory, and sham rTMS. Objective FOG outcomes and cortical excitability measurements were acquired before and after each stimulation protocol. RESULTS Increasing PPC excitability resulted in significantly fewer freezing episodes and percent time frozen during a FOG-provoking task. This reduction in FOG most likely emerged from the trend in PPC inhibiting the lower leg motor cortex excitability. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the recruitment of the PPC is linked to less FOG, providing support for the beneficial role of the PPC upregulation in preventing FOG. This could potentially be linked to a reduction of the cortical input burden on the basal ganglia prior to FOG. Excitatory rTMS interventions targeting the PPC may have the potential to reduce FOG.

Pain control due to botulinum toxin therapy in cervical dystonia relates to the sensorimotor integration process

Background: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections have been found to improve pain symptoms of isolated cervical dystonia (CD). In addition to muscle relaxation at the peripheral level, few studies suggest that BoNT has effects on the central brain circuitries. The effects of BoNT on central circuitries that may be pain-related have not been examined. We probed these central effects with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) techniques in a CD cohort presenting with significant pain.Methods: TMS-based measures of sensorimotor integration that are mediated through central processes, such as the short and long latency afferent inhibition (SAI and LAI) and measures for motor cortical excitability including short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were recorded. These measures were recorded at specific interstimulus intervals (ISI) using paired-pulse paradigms before and after the peak effects of BoNT injections. Normative TMS data from age-matched healthy controls were collected for comparisons. Clinical pain symptoms were recorded with Toronto Western spasmodic rating scale (TWSTRS)-pain and a visual analog scale (VAS).Results: Eleven CD subjects (mean age ±SD, 53.1 ± 6.3 years) and 10 age-matched healthy controls were enrolled. SAI was found to be increased in CD patients at baseline, however at the time of peak BoNT effects, it revealed a significant change with normalization to healthy control data (SAI ISI 20 ms, p = 0.001; SAI ISI 30 ms, p = 0.03). The change in SAI correlated with improvements in pain levels assessed with TWSTRS-pain and VAS and the total dose of BoNT injected (corrected for multiple correlations). LAI, SICI, and ICF measures were similar to the healthy controls and remained unchanged with BoNT therapy.Conclusion: Pain control in CD from BoNT therapy relates to modulation of sensorimotor integration at the cortical level.

A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping.

Selective response inhibition may be required when stopping a part of a multicomponent action. A persistent response delay (stopping-interference effect) indicates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping. This study aimed to elucidate whether nonselective response inhibition is the consequence of a global pause process during attentional capture or specific to a nonselective cancel process during selective stopping. Twenty healthy human participants performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition paradigm with selective stop and ignore signals. Frontocentral and sensorimotor beta-bursts were recorded with electroencephalography. Corticomotor excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex were recorded with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Behaviorally, responses in the non-signaled hand were delayed during selective ignore and stop trials. The response delay was largest during selective stop trials and indicated that stopping-interference could not be attributed entirely to attentional capture. A stimulus-nonselective increase in frontocentral beta-bursts occurred during stop and ignore trials. Sensorimotor response inhibition was reflected in maintenance of beta-bursts and short-interval intracortical inhibition relative to disinhibition observed during go trials. Response inhibition signatures were not associated with the magnitude of stopping-interference. Therefore, nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping results primarily from a nonselective pause process but does not entirely account for the stopping-interference effect.

Mechanisms of theta burst transcranial ultrasound induced plasticity in the human motor cortex

BackgroundTranscranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique with high depth penetrance and spatial resolution. Theta-burst TUS (tbTUS) is a plasticity-inducing protocol which increases motor cortical excitability for up to 30 min following 80s of sonication. While this protocol may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders, the mechanisms of action of TUS remain unclear. ObjectiveWe conducted the first pharmacological study to examine the mechanisms of TUS in human primary motor cortex. By administering brain-active drugs with known mechanisms of action, we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of tbTUS. MethodsFourteen healthy subjects participated in a within-subjects randomized, double-blind, cross-over study with five visits. At each visit, one of four study drugs (carbamazepine – Na+ channel blocker, nimodipine – L-type Ca2+ channel blocker, lorazepam – positive allosteric modulator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor, dextromethorphan – N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist) or placebo was administered in random order, followed by tbTUS. ResultsThe plasticity effects of tbTUS on motor cortex excitability measured by motor-evoked potential amplitudes elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation were reduced by all study drugs compared to placebo. ConclusiontbTUS may induce NMDA-dependent synaptic plasticity since the effects are blocked by increased GABAA receptor activities and voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+ channels blockers. These results are consistent with the hypotheses that tbTUS induced long-term potentiation-like mechanisms and that TUS involves activation of mechanosensitive Na+ and Ca2+ channels. Alternatively, non-specific pharmacologically induced changes in excitatory/inhibitory balance might have interfered with the effects of tbTUS.

Different effects of I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS on motor cortex interhemispheric interaction.

Activity of the neural circuits in the human motor cortex can be probed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Changing TMS-induced current direction recruits different cortical neural circuits. I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS (iTMS) substantially modulates motor cortex excitability through neural plasticity, yet its effect on interhemispheric interaction remains unclear. To explore the modulation of interhemispheric interaction by iTMS applied in different current directions. Twenty right-handed healthy young volunteers (aged 27.5 ± 5.0 years) participated in this study with three visits. On each visit, iTMS in posterior-anterior/anterior-posterior direction (PA-/AP-iTMS) or sham-iTMS was applied to the right hemisphere, with corticospinal excitability and intracortical facilitation of the non-stimulated left hemisphere evaluated at four timepoints. Ipsilateral silent period was also measured at each timepoint probing interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). PA- and AP-iTMS potentiated cortical excitability concurrently in the stimulated right hemisphere. Corticospinal excitability of the non-stimulated left hemisphere increased 10 min after both PA- and AP-iTMS intervention, with a decrease in short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) observed in AP-iTMS only. Immediately after the intervention, PA-iTMS tilted the IHI balance toward inhibiting the non-stimulated hemisphere, while AP-iTMS shifted the balance toward the opposite direction. Our findings provide systematic evidence on the plastic modulation of interhemispheric interaction by PA- and AP-iTMS. We show that iTMS induces an interhemispheric facilitatory effect, and that PA- and AP-iTMS differs in modulating interhemispheric inhibition.

Transcranial direct current stimulation to facilitate neurofunctional rehabilitation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a protocol for a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex and cerebellum is gaining prominence in the literature due to its potential to favor learning and motor performance. If administered during motor training, tDCS is capable of increasing the effect of training. Considering the motor impairment presented by children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), atDCS applied during motor training may contribute to the rehabilitation of these children. However, it is necessary to examine and compare the effects of atDCS over the motor cortex and the cerebellum on the motor skills of children with ASD. This information may benefit future clinical indications of tDCS for rehabilitation of children with ASD. The aim of the proposed study is to determine whether anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex and cerebellum can enhance the effects of gait training and postural control on motor skills, mobility, functional balance, cortical excitability, cognitive aspects and behavioral aspects in children with ASD. Our hypothesis is the active tDCS combined with motor training will enhance the performance of the participants in comparison to sham tDCS. A randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial will be conducted involving 30 children with ASD that will be recruited to receive ten sessions of sham or ten sessions of active anodal tDCS (1 mA, 20 min) over the primary motor cortex or cerebellun combined with motor training. The participants will be assessed before as well as one, four and eight weeks after the interventions. The primary outcome will be gross and fine motor skills. The secondary outcomes will be mobility, functional balance, motor cortical excitability, cognitive aspects and behavioral aspects. Although abnormalities in gait and balance are not primary characteristics of ASD, such abnormalities compromise independence and global functioning during the execution of routine activities of childhood. If demonstrated that anodal tDCS administered over areas of the brain involved in motor control, such as the primary motor cortex and cerebellum, can enhance the effects of gait and balance training in only ten sessions in two consecutive weeks, the clinical applicability of this stimulation modality will be expanded as well as more scientifically founded.Clinical trial registration February 16, 2023 (https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-3bskhwf).

Excitatory-inhibitory modulation of transcranial focus ultrasound stimulation on human motor cortex.

Transcranial focus ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) is a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technology. This study aimed to evaluate the modulatory effects of tFUS on human motor cortex (M1) excitability and explore the mechanism of neurotransmitter-related intracortical circuitry and plasticity. Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were used to assessed M1 excitability in 10 subjects. Paired-pulse TMS was used to measure the effects of tFUS on GABA- and glutamate-related intracortical excitability and 1 H-MRS was used to assess the effects of repetitive tFUS on GABA and Glx (glutamine + glutamate) neurometabolic concentrations in the targeting region in nine subjects. The etFUS significantly increased M1 excitability, decreased short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). The itFUS significantly suppressed M1 excitability, increased SICI, LICI, and decreased intracortical facilitation (ICF). Seven times of etFUS decreased the GABA concentration (6.32%), increased the Glx concentration (12.40%), and decreased the GABA/Glx ratio measured by MRS, while itFUS increased the GABA concentration (18.59%), decreased Glx concentration (0.35%), and significantly increased GABA/Glx ratio. The findings support that tFUS with different parameters can exert excitatory and inhibitory neuromodulatory effects on the human motor cortex. We provide novel insights that tFUS change cortical excitability and plasticity by regulating excitatory-inhibition balance related to the GABAergic and glutamatergic receptor function and neurotransmitter metabolic level.

Primary motor hand area corticospinal excitability indicates overall functional recovery after spinal cord injury.

After spinal cord injury (SCI), the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) lower extremity area decreases or disappears. A recent study reported that the M1 hand area of the SCI patient encodes the activity information of both the upper and lower extremities. However, the characteristics of the M1 hand area corticospinal excitability (CSE) changes after SCI and its correlation with extremities motor function are still unknown. A retrospective study was conducted on the data of 347 SCI patients and 80 healthy controls on motor evoked potentials (MEP, reflection of CSE), extremity motor function, and activities of daily living (ADL) ability. Correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were conducted to analyze the relationship between the degree of MEP hemispheric conversion and extremity motor function/ADL ability. The CSE of the dominant hemisphere M1 hand area decreased in SCI patients. In 0-6 m, AIS A grade, or non-cervical injury SCI patients, the degree of M1 hand area MEP hemispheric conversion was positively correlated with total motor score, lower extremity motor score (LEMS), and ADL ability. Multiple linear regression analysis further confirmed the contribution of MEP hemispheric conversion degree in ADL changes as an independent factor. The closer the degree of M1 hand area MEP hemispheric conversion is to that of healthy controls, the better the extremity motor function/ADL ability patients achieve. Based on the law of this phenomenon, targeted intervention to regulate the excitability of bilateral M1 hand areas might be a novel strategy for SCI overall functional recovery.

GR.4 Neurophysiological and clinical effects of low-intensity transcranial ultrasound of the motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease

Background: Low-intensity transcranial ultrasound (TUS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, which in theta burst mode (tbTUS) can increase cortical excitability. Parkinson’s disease (PD) has altered cortical excitability of motor cortex (M1). We evaluated the neurophysiological and clinical effects of M1 tbTUS in PD patients. Methods: Sixteen PD patients (4F, 59.5±9.7 years) in ON and OFF dopaminergic medication states, and 15 controls (5F, 61.9±8.7 years) were evaluated. tbTUS was applied for 80 seconds at M1 with 20W/cm2. Motor evoked potential (MEP) was recorded at baseline, at 5-minutes (T5), T30, and T60 after tbTUS. Motor (m)UPDRS was evaluated in PD at baseline and T60. Results: A linear mixed model on MEP amplitudes comparing PD-ON, PD-OFF and controls showed significant effect of time (F=4.83, p=0.003). Post-hoc analysis showed significant difference between baseline and T30 timepoints (p=0.0003). The MEP increase at T30 was higher in controls (66%), followed by PD-ON (41%) and PD-OFF (21%). PD-ON showed reduced mUPDRS at T60 when compared to PD-OFF, with significant effect of time (F=6.14, p=0.017) and group (F=5.39, p=0.025). Conclusions: tbTUS induced motor cortical plasticity is reduced in PD-OFF, that is partially restored by dopaminergic medications.Repeated sessions of tbTUS can be further investigated as a novel non-invasive treatment for PD.

Modulation of dorsal premotor cortex differentially influences I-wave excitability in primary motor cortex of young and older adults.

Previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has demonstrated weakened connectivity between dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and motor cortex (M1) with age. While this alteration is probably mediated by changes in the communication between the two regions, the effect of age on the influence of PMd on specific indirect (I) wave circuits within M1 remains unclear. The present study therefore investigated the influence of PMd on early and late I-wave excitability in M1 of young and older adults. Twenty-two young (mean±SD, 22.9±2.9years) and 20 older (66.6±4.2years) adults participated in two experimental sessions involving either intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) or sham stimulation over PMd. Changes within M1 following the intervention were assessed with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. We applied posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) current single-pulse TMS to assess corticospinal excitability (PA1mV ; AP1mV ; PA0.5mV , early; AP0.5mV , late), and paired-pulse TMS short intracortical facilitation for I-wave excitability (PA SICF, early; AP SICF, late). Although PMd iTBS potentiated PA1mV and AP1mV MEPs in both age groups (both P<0.05), the time course of this effect was delayed for AP1mV in older adults (P=0.001). Furthermore, while AP0.5mV , PA SICF and AP SICF were potentiated in both groups (all P<0.05), potentiation of PA0.5mV was only apparent in young adults (P<0.0001). While PMd influences early and late I-wave excitability in young adults, direct PMd modulation of the early circuits is specifically reduced in older adults. KEY POINTS: Interneuronal circuits responsible for late I-waves within primary motor cortex (M1) mediate projections from dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), but this communication probably changes with advancing age. We investigated the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to PMd on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of M1 excitability in young and older adults. We found that PMd iTBS facilitated M1 excitability assessed with posterior-anterior (PA, early I-waves) and anterior-posterior (AP, late I-waves) current TMS in young adults, with a stronger effect for AP TMS. M1 excitability assessed with AP TMS also increased in older adults following PMd iTBS, but there was no facilitation for PA TMS responses. We conclude that changes in M1 excitability following PMd iTBS are specifically reduced for the early I-waves in older adults, which could be a potential target for interventions that enhance cortical excitability in older adults.

Replicability of motor cortex-excitability modulation by intermittent theta burst stimulation

ObjectiveTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) allows for cortical-excitability (CE) assessment and its modulation has been associated with neuroplasticity-like phenomena, thought to be impaired in neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the stability of these measures has been challenged, defying their potential as biomarkers. This study aimed to test the temporal stability of cortical-excitability modulation and study the impact of individual and methodological factors in determining within- and between-subject variability. MethodsWe recruited healthy-subjects to assess motor cortex (MC) excitability modulation, collecting motor evoked potentials (MEP) from both hemispheres, before and after left-sided intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), to obtain a measure of MEPs change (delta-MEPs). To assess stability across-time, the protocol was repeated after 6 weeks. Socio-demographic and psychological variables were collected to test association with delta-MEPs. ResultsWe found modulatory effects on left MC and not on right hemisphere following iTBS of left MC. Left delta-MEP was stable across-time when performed immediately after iTBS (ICC = 0.69), only when obtained first in left hemisphere. We discovered similar results in a replication cohort testing only left MC (ICC = 0.68). No meaningful associations were found between demographic and psychological factors and delta-MEPs. ConclusionsDelta-MEP is stable immediately after modulation and not impacted by different individual factors, including expectation about TMS-effect. SignificanceMotor cortex excitability modulation immediately after iTBS should be further explored as a potential biomarker for neuropsychiatric diseases.

Clinical and Physiological Effects of Single Day Accelerated Theta Burst Transcranial Focused Ultrasound in Parkinson’s Disease (P4-11.008)

<h3>Objective:</h3> To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of an accelerated schedule of theta burst focused ultrasound stimulation (tbTUS) delivered to the primary motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and United Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-Part III. <h3>Background:</h3> Low intensity transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is an emerging technology for non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) that can penetrate deeper in the brain with more focal stimulation compared to currently used forms of NIBS. TUS delivered in a theta burst pattern (tbTUS) for 80s induces sustained increases in motor cortex excitability lasting at least 30 minutes and is a promising NIBS protocol for treatment of neurological disorders. Accelerated stimulation schedules with several treatments per day can shorten treatment duration and improve accessibility. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> Three sets of tbTUS were delivered in consecutive order to the right and left primary motor cortices at 30-minute intervals. 10 PD patients attended one visit each for real and sham treatments in random order. Before and after interventions, TMS measures of motor-evoked potentials (MEP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), short-interval intracortical excitation (SICF), and UPDRS-Part III scores were collected. Patients and UPDRS raters were blinded to the stimulation condition. <h3>Results:</h3> Real but not sham tbTUS treatment led to increased MEP amplitude and SICF. While both conditions led to similar changes in UPDRS-III scores, rigidity subscores were reduced only with real treatment. There were no adverse effects. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> The study is ongoing, and more patients are being recruited. Preliminary findings show that accelerated tbTUS is a safe and tolerable treatment schedule for PD patients. Improvements in rigidity suggests that tbTUS could be further studied as a non-invasive treatment for PD. Future research may investigate the optimal time between sonications with a longer treatment duration and a larger number of patients. <b>Disclosure:</b> Yi Rong Ding has nothing to disclose. Dr. Samuel has nothing to disclose. Dr. Grippe has nothing to disclose. Dr. SARICA has nothing to disclose. Dr. Lozano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbott. Dr. Lozano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Insightec. Dr. Lozano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr. Lozano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Medtronic. Dr. Lozano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Functional Neuromodulation. Dr. Chen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbvie. Dr. Chen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Merz. Dr. Chen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Paladin Labs. Dr. Chen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Ipsen. Dr. Chen has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. Dr. Chen has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for Movement Disorders. The institution of Dr. Chen has received research support from Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The institution of Dr. Chen has received research support from NIH. The institution of Dr. Chen has received research support from Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Dr. Chen has received research support from Parkinson Foundation. The institution of Dr. Chen has received research support from National Organization for Rare Disease. The institution of Dr. Chen has received research support from Merz.

Classical conditioning of faciliatory paired-pulse TMS

In this proof-of-concept study, we questioned whether the influence of TMS on cortical excitability can be applied to classical conditioning. More specifically, we investigated whether the faciliatory influence of paired-pulse TMS on the excitability of the human motor cortex can be transferred to a simultaneously presented auditory stimulus through conditioning. During the conditioning phase, 75 healthy young participants received 170 faciliatory paired TMS pulses (1st pulse at 95% resting motor threshold, 2nd at 130%, interstimulus interval 12 ms), always presented simultaneously with one out of two acoustic stimuli. In the test phase, 20 min later, we pseudorandomly applied 100 single TMS pulses (at 130% MT), 50 paired with the conditioned tone—50 paired with a control tone. Using the Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test, we found significantly enhanced median amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) paired with the conditioned tone as compared to the control tone, suggesting successful conditioning (p = 0.031, responder rate 55%, small effect size of r = − 0.248). The same comparison in only those participants with a paired-pulse amplitude < 2 mV in the conditioning phase, increased the responder rate to 61% (n = 38) and effect size to moderate (r = − 0.389). If we considered only those participants with a median paired-pulse amplitude < 1 mV, responder rate increased further to 79% (n = 14) and effect size to r = − 0.727 (i.e., large effect). These findings suggest increasingly stronger conditioning effects for smaller MEP amplitudes during paired-pulse TMS conditioning. These proof-of-concept findings extend the scope of classical conditioning to faciliatory paired-pulse TMS.

Practice makes plasticity: 10-Hz rTMS enhances LTP-like plasticity in musicians and athletes.

Motor skill learning has been linked to functional and structural changes in the brain. Musicians and athletes undergo intensive motor training through the practice of an instrument or sport and have demonstrated use-dependent plasticity that may be subserved by long-term potentiation (LTP) processes. We know less, however, about whether the brains of musicians and athletes respond to plasticity-inducing interventions, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), differently than those without extensive motor training. In a pharmaco-rTMS study, we evaluated motor cortex excitability before and after an rTMS protocol in combination with oral administration of D-cycloserine (DCS) or placebo. In a secondary covariate analysis, we compared results between self-identified musicians and athletes (M&As) and non-musicians and athletes (non-M&As). Three TMS measures of cortical physiology were used to evaluate plasticity. We found that M&As did not have higher baseline corticomotor excitability. However, a plasticity-inducing protocol (10-Hz rTMS in combination with DCS) strongly facilitated motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in M&As, but only weakly in non-M&As. Placebo and rTMS produced modest facilitation in both groups. Our findings suggest that motor practice and learning create a neuronal environment more responsive to plasticity-inducing events, including rTMS. These findings may explain one factor contributing to the high inter-individual variability found with MEP data. Greater capacity for plasticity holds implications for learning paradigms, such as psychotherapy and rehabilitation, by facilitating LTP-like activation of key networks, including recovery from neurological/mental disorders.

Modulating motor cortical oscillation with coordinated reset multifocal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

According to the theory of coordinated reset (CR) stimulation, multifocal bursts of stimuli delivered in a random order with a specific interval may reduce the resonance power of the oscillatory generator in the epicenter. We develop a noninvasive coordinated multifocal burst stimulation (COMBS) with three repetitive transcranial stimulation machines based on CR theory to modulate the target frequency in the primary motor cortex and to assess its effect on motor cortical excitability in separate experiments. Electroencephalography and electromyography were recorded in 16 healthy participants during a finger-tapping task, both before and after the intervention. The resting oscillatory power at the targeted frequency was not changed by COMBS. α-Band power was increased in both preparation and movement stages and the low β-band power was increased in the movement stage of the finger tapping task. The extent of low β-band event-related desynchronization was reduced by COMBS. There were no changes in reaction time, but there was a trend for a reduced error rate after COMBS. In another 14 healthy participants, there were no significant changes in cortical excitability before and after COMBS measured by rest motor threshold, short interval intracortical inhibition, short interval intracortical facilitation, and cortical silent period. The result indicates that COMBS may modify the cortical oscillatory power and its perturbation within specific movement stage.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study, to our knowledge, to apply coordinated reset (CR) neuromodulation to the motor cortex with three repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) stimulators to assess its effect on cortical oscillation. The results revealed enhancement of α-band power specifically in preparation and movement stages and low β-band power in the movement stage of a motor task. It postulated that CR stimulation may modify the motor cortical oscillation in the specific movement stages.

Cortical inhibition and facilitation are mediated by distinct physiological processes

A complex interaction of inhibitory and facilitatory interneuronal processes may underlie development of cortical excitability in the human motor cortex. To determine whether distinct interneuronal processes mediated cortical excitability, threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation was utilised to assess cortical excitability, with figure-of-eight coil oriented in posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) and latero-medial (LM) directions. Motor evoked potential (MEP) responses were recorded over the contralateral abductor pollicis brevis. Resting motor threshold (RMT), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and intracortical facilitation were recorded. Significant effects of coil orientation were evident on SICI (F = 8.560, P = 0.002) and SICF (F = 7.132, P = 0.003). SICI was greater when recorded with PA (9.7 ± 10.9%, P = 0.029) and AP (13.1 ± 7.0%, P = 0.003) compared to LM (5.2 ± 7.3%) directed currents. SICF was significantly greater with PA (-14.7 ± 8.1%, P = 0.016) and LM (-14.7 ± 8.8%, P = 0.005) compared to AP (-9.1 ± 7.2%) coil orientations. SICI recorded with LM and PA coil orientations were correlated (R = 0.7, P = 0.002), as was SICF recorded with AP vs LM (R = 0.60, P = 0.019) and LM vs PA (R = 0.69, P = 0.002) coil orientations. RMT was significantly smaller with PA compared to AP (P < 0.001) and LM (P = 0.018) stimulation. Recruitment of distinct interneuronal processes with variable cortical orientation and thresholds underlies short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation.

The main non-invasive neuromodulatory techniques: an infographic

INTRODUCTION: This infographic aims to present the main non-invasive neuromodulatory techniques that can be used to assess and/or modulate central nervous system excitability. Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to assess brain excitability through the delivery of magnetic pulses over the cerebral cortex. The motor evoked potential is an indirect measure of motor cortex excitability and is the most used cortical measure of excitability. RESULTS: Neuromodulation may be achieved through several techniques, which may be used to promote top-down or bottom-up effects. Among the top-down techniques is direct current stimulation (DCS) which can change its nomenclature according to the stimulation target, for example, transcranial (tDCS), or cerebellar (ctDCS). In addition, also can be included in top-down techniques the transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), transcranial alternate current stimulation (tACS), and repetitive TMS (rTMS). On other hand, the bottom-up techniques include the peripheral electrical stimulation (PES), transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS). CONCLUSION: The neuromodulatory effects are dependent on several parameters that can be specific to physical principles (electrical or magnetic). For example, in repetitive P/TMS the frequency, type and angular orientation of coil, distance between the coil and the brain, pulse waveform, and pattern of stimulation are presented as important parameters able to interfere with the quality of stimulation. The same can be observed in tDCS, ctDCS, and tsDCS with the polarity and shape and montage of electrode, intensity, site and duration of stimulation, and current density.

Effects of Paired Associative Stimulation on Cortical Plasticity in Agonist–Antagonist Muscle Representations

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) increases and decreases cortical excitability in primary motor cortex (M1) neurons, depending on the spike timing-dependent plasticity, i.e., long-term potentiation (LTP)- and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity, respectively. However, how PAS affects the cortical circuits for the agonist and antagonist muscles of M1 is unclear. Here, we investigated the changes in the LTP- and LTD-like plasticity for agonist and antagonist muscles during PAS: 200 pairs of 0.25-Hz peripheral electric stimulation of the right median nerve at the wrist, followed by a transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left M1 with an interstimulus interval of 25 ms (PAS-25 ms) and 10 ms (PAS-10 ms). The unconditioned motor evoked potential amplitudes of the agonist muscles were larger after PAS-25 ms than after PAS-10 ms, while those of the antagonist muscles were smaller after PAS-25 ms than after PAS-10 ms. The γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA)- and GABAB-mediated cortical inhibition for the agonist and antagonist muscles were higher after PAS-25 ms than after PAS-10 ms. The cortical excitability for the agonist and antagonist muscles reciprocally and topographically increased and decreased after PAS, respectively; however, GABAA and GABAB-mediated cortical inhibitory functions for the agonist and antagonist muscles were less topographically decreased after PAS-10 ms. Thus, PAS-25 ms and PAS-10 ms differentially affect the LTP- and LTD-like plasticity in agonist and antagonist muscles.

Motor Function and Physiology in Youth With Neurofibromatosis Type 1

BackgroundNeurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic neurocutaneous disorder commonly associated with motor and cognitive symptoms that greatly impact quality of life. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can quantify motor cortex physiology, reflecting the basis for impaired motor function as well as, possibly, clues for mechanisms of effective treatment. We hypothesized that children with NF1 have impaired motor function and altered motor cortex physiology compared to typically developing (TD) control children and children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). MethodsChildren aged 8-17 years with NF1 (n = 21) were compared to children aged 8-12 years with ADHD (n = 59) and TD controls (n = 88). Motor development was assessed using the Physical and Neurological Examination for Subtle Signs (PANESS) scale. The balance of inhibition and excitation in motor cortex was assessed using the TMS measures short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Measures were compared by diagnosis and tested using bivariate correlations and regression for association with clinical characteristics. ResultsIn NF1, ADHD severity scores were intermediate between the ADHD and TD cohorts, but total PANESS scores were markedly elevated (worse) compared to both (P < 0.001). Motor cortex ICF (excitatory) was significantly lower in NF1 than in TD and ADHD (P < 0.001), but SICI (inhibitory) did not differ. However, in NF1, better PANESS scores correlated with lower SICI ratios (more inhibition; ρ = 0.62, P = 0.003) and lower ICF ratios (less excitation; ρ = 0.38, P = 0.06). ConclusionsTMS-evoked SICI and ICF may reflect processes underlying abnormal motor function in children with NF1.